? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Peter Gelfand - Tony Nelson 60.64 1st A 0.90
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano 56.08 2nd A 0.63
Richard Pearce - Susan Pearce 53.18 3rd A 0.45
Jan Winham - Judith Murdock 50.25 4th A 0.32
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>May 13, 2026       |CLUB NO.>137059    | 05/13/2026 21:23
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/500  |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=5                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lesley Xu              Matthew Nathanson        C    .     .     .     35.44  49.22          
 2 Peter Gelfand          Tony Nelson              A    1     .     .     43.66  60.64  0.90(A) 
 3 John Hullman           Christina Kobland        A    .     .     .     32.95  45.76          
 4 Francesco Ruggeri      Kenneth Girouard         C    .     .     .     30.11  41.82          
 5 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          C    2     1     1     40.38  56.08  0.63(A) 
 7 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            C    .     .     .     30.29  42.07          
 8 Georgianna Spinazze    Ken Gamble               A    .     .     .     35.61  49.46          
 9 Susan Pearce           Richard Pearce           C    3     2     2     38.29  53.18  0.45(A) 
10 Jan Winham             Judith Murdock           B    4     .     .     36.18  50.25  0.32(A) 
                                          Totals                         322.91       

1 ♠A63
KJT
J6
♣AQT53
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠74
63
AK9842
♣KJ7
♠KJ2
AQ85
T53
♣984
♠QT985
9742
Q7
♣62
15
1110
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4
EW: 2/4 3NT  ♣6 ♥6 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.83   0.17  3 S -2   A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        110    1.50   1.50  3 W      ♠A  10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        150    0.17   2.83  2 W +3   ♠A  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
2 ♠KJ9865
Q7
T6
♣K82
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠3
6532
A53
♣AJT94
♠Q42
AK8
J8742
♣63
♠AT7
JT94
KQ9
♣Q75
9
910
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥6
EW: 1♣ 1/- 1  ♦7/6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  1N S +2   ♣J  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
  110          1.50   1.50  2♠ N      A  10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        100    0.17   2.83  3♠ N -1   4  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
3 ♠T8
AQJ432
KJ6
♣K6
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠Q964
65
T9
♣AQ873
♠AK532
T
A832
♣JT5
♠J7
K987
Q754
♣942
14
812
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3  ♣3 ♠3 NT6
EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -300 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    2.17   0.83  3♠ E +1   K  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        170    2.17   0.83  3♠ E +1   K  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
        650    0.17   2.83  4♠ E +1   K  10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
4 ♠Q
J42
AK52
♣Q9763
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠9876
Q98753
Q83
♣-
♠KJ432
KT
T
♣AK852
♠AT5
A6
J9764
♣JT4
12
414
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 4/3 2NT  ♥5 ♠4
EW: 2 3♠  ♣4 ♦3 NT4/3
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +130 4-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.83   0.17  1N S +1   ♠5  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
  100          0.83   2.17  4♠ E -1   ♣J  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
  100          0.83   2.17  3♠ E -1   A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
5 ♠T62
A986
Q5
♣Q943
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J
K54
962
♣AJ8752
♠K754
QJT
AKJ74
♣6
♠AQ983
732
T83
♣KT
8
914
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 3 1/-NT
       ♥6 ♠6 NT7/6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 3-EW/3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    2.83   0.17  1N W +1   2  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        150    1.50   1.50  1N W +2   6  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
        200    0.17   2.83  2♠ S -2   9  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
6 ♠Q854
J92
852
♣AJ8
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠3
Q53
9643
♣76432
♠AT62
AT6
AJ
♣KT95
♠KJ97
K874
KQT7
♣Q
8
216
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6
EW: 3♣  ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.83   0.17  3♠ N -1   A  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        100    1.50   1.50  2 S -2   ♣6  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        110    0.17   2.83  3♣ E      K  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
7 ♠KJ95
JT9
A
♣KQJT9
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠Q73
K83
KJ862
♣85
♠AT82
Q6542
9
♣762
♠64
A7
QT7543
♣A43
15
96
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 1♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW: -/1  ♣3 ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          2.83   0.17  1N S +1   3  10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        100    1.50   1.50  3N N -1   4  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        200    0.17   2.83  3N N -2   4  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
8 ♠T763
-
9762
♣KT843
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AKJ52
JT83
K5
♣65
♠84
AQ42
AQJ3
♣AQ2
♠Q9
K9765
T84
♣J97
3
1219
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1
EW: 3♣ 5/6 6 5♠ 6NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  6 W -2   7  10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        450    1.50   1.50  5 W      ♣3  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        990    0.17   2.83  6N E      7  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
9 ♠A86
85
854
♣AT862
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠4
KT2
AKQT9
♣J953
♠Q9753
AJ73
732
♣Q
♠KJT2
Q964
J6
♣K74
8
139
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3 2  ♣4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    2.83   0.17  2N W      ♣6  10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        150    0.83   2.17  1N W +2   ♣8  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        150    0.83   2.17  2 W +3   4  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
10 ♠Q82
A82
AK62
♣AKJ
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J965
K6
74
♣Q9865
♠T43
QT3
QT853
♣T7
♠AK7
J9754
J9
♣432
21
64
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 5 3♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          1.50   1.50  4 S +1   ♣6  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
  650          1.50   1.50  4 N +1   ♠T  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
  650          1.50   1.50  4 N +1   3  10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
11 ♠985
J72
KQ85
♣K98
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠6
T85
JT32
♣T7543
♠KQJT4
KQ96
A6
♣A6
♠A732
A43
974
♣QJ2
9
119
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4/6
EW: 1♣ 1 3 1♠  NT6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         80    2.83   0.17  1♠ E      ♣Q  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        110    0.83   2.17  1♠ E +1   A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        110    0.83   2.17  1♠ E +1   9  10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
12 ♠K
JT53
A97643
♣Q5
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J9875
K7
Q8
♣T732
♠AT
AQ942
KJ52
♣98
♠Q6432
86
T
♣AKJ64
10
614
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1 1  ♣5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  3♠ E -2   K  9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        400    1.50   1.50  3 N -4   ♠A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
       1100    0.17   2.83  4* N -4  ♠A  10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
13 ♠T863
42
A95
♣KQ87
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠KJ54
AJ
KQJT2
♣T4
♠Q2
Q8763
743
♣A32
♠A97
KT95
86
♣J965
9
158
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3 1 2♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  2 W -1   ♠T  10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
         90    1.50   1.50  1N E      ♣5  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
         90    1.50   1.50  2 W      ♣K  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        120    0.00   3.00  2N W      ♣7  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
14 ♠873
A9
94
♣J98765
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠AKJ92
J4
QJ82
♣Q4
♠Q64
QT875
A6
♣K32
♠T5
K632
KT753
♣AT
5
1411
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1 2 3♠ 3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  4♠ W -1   ♣5  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
   50          2.50   0.50  3♠ W -1   ♣6  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        140    1.00   2.00  3♠ W      9  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        430    0.00   3.00  3N E +1   5  10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
15 ♠AJT
T9
JT98
♣KQ73
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠Q9754
76432
5
♣84
♠K862
A5
AKQ
♣JT95
♠3
KQJ8
76432
♣A62
11
217
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1NT  ♥5 ♠3
EW: 2♠  ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    3.00   0.00  1N E      K  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        170    1.50   1.50  3♠ E +1   K  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        170    1.50   1.50  2♠ E +2   K  10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        200    0.00   3.00  4* N -1  ♠2  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
16 ♠Q52
T94
T97
♣QT74
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJT63
K82
Q32
♣65
♠K87
J5
AK4
♣K9832
♠94
AQ763
J865
♣AJ
4
1014
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2/1 4♠ 3NT  ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    3.00   0.00  1N E +1   5  10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        140    1.50   1.50  3♠ W      7  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        140    1.50   1.50  2♠ W +1   T  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        170    0.00   3.00  2♠ W +2   T  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
17 ♠72
AJT
KJ52
♣9543
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AQ9643
9
QT97
♣AJ
♠T5
6543
A63
♣KQ87
♠KJ8
KQ872
84
♣T62
9
139
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5/2 ♦2 ♠2/1 NT3/2
EW: 2♣ 4 5♠ 2NT  ♥6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -450 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    3.00   0.00  1N E      7  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        110    2.00   1.00  2♠ W      ♠2  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        140    1.00   2.00  2♠ W +1   2  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        200    0.00   3.00  2♠ W +3   2  10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
18 ♠AT542
642
T
♣Q754
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠3
QJ853
Q98532
♣T
♠Q96
T9
76
♣AJ9863
♠KJ87
AK7
AKJ4
♣K2
6
57
22
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1 3 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   3  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  650          2.50   0.50  4♠ S +1   ♣T  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  620          1.00   2.00  4♠ S      ♣T  10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        100    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   ♣A  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
19 ♠K96
A943
5
♣QT973
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A53
QJ62
98
♣AK86
♠T42
KT75
KQJT3
♣4
♠QJ87
8
A7642
♣J52
9
149
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT4
EW: 2 2 2NT  ♣4 ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  3♠ N      ♣4  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          2.00   1.00  4 W -1   5  10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        140    1.00   2.00  2 E +1   ♠Q  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
        620    0.00   3.00  4 E      ♣5  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
20 ♠Q
KJ86
KJ762
♣AT5
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AJ965
AQ2
53
♣J83
♠K
T9753
AT94
♣KQ2
♠T87432
4
Q8
♣9764
14
1212
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5
EW: 1/2♣ 1 2/3 2♠ 2NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -140 3-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.50   0.50  3N E -2   ♠2  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
  200          2.50   0.50  4 E -2   Q  10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        110    1.00   2.00  2 E      Q  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        600    0.00   3.00  3N E      ♠4  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
21 ♠A2
AT932
AT72
♣82
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KJ873
KJ5
Q6
♣543
♠T54
4
9543
♣AKQ96
♠Q96
Q876
KJ8
♣JT7
12
109
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3  ♣5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2 N      ♣A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
   50          2.00   1.00  3♠ W -1   ♣8  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        100    1.00   2.00  4 N -1   ♣A  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
        200    0.00   3.00  3 N -2   ♣A  10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
22 ♠A6
6
K542
♣QT9632
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K953
87542
87
♣85
♠QJ842
KQ
AJ3
♣AJ7
♠T7
AJT93
QT96
♣K4
9
318
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/4♣ 4 1  ♠5 NT6
EW: 2♠ 1/-NT
       ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT7/6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS/4♣-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   ♠7  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
  130          2.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♠K  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
  100          1.00   2.00  3♠ E -1   T  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        140    0.00   3.00  2♠ E +1   J  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
23 ♠T5
A8
T9652
♣Q542
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ32
J
73
♣AKJT96
♠J6
QT972
KQJ8
♣73
♠A9874
K6543
A4
♣8
6
149
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1 1 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3♣ W -1   ♠T  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        110    1.50   1.50  3♣ W      ♠T  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        110    1.50   1.50  2♣ W +1   ♠T  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        400    0.00   3.00  3 N -4   ♣7  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
24 ♠Q754
53
J74
♣KT63
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠863
AK
86
♣AQ8754
♠A92
QJT972
AT53
♣-
♠KJT
864
KQ92
♣J92
6
1311
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4
EW: 2♣ 1 3 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  4 E -1   2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        420    1.00   2.00  4 E      ♠J  4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
        420    1.00   2.00  4 E      K  2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
        420    1.00   2.00  4 E      K  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
25 ♠K98
982
K4
♣AQ764
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠J742
J54
972
♣532
♠653
AQT63
QT8
♣J8
♠AQT
K7
AJ653
♣KT9
12
29
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 3 5♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT0
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  920          3.00   0.00  6♣ S      A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
  460          1.50   1.50  3N N +2   6  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
  460          1.50   1.50  1N S +4   5  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  420          0.00   3.00  5♣ N +1   A  10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
26 ♠96
JT72
AQ86
♣KQ6
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠J53
AQ864
T
♣A985
♠AKQ
K5
KJ932
♣T32
♠T8742
93
754
♣J74
12
1116
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 3 2♠ 3NT
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  4♠ E -1   9  10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          2.50   0.50  4 E -1   ♣4  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        150    1.00   2.00  2N E +1   ♠6  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        660    0.00   3.00  3N E +2   5  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
27 ♠KJ3
K83
K854
♣Q93
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠AT9762
J4
A973
♣4
♠854
QT5
2
♣AJ8765
♠Q
A9762
QJT6
♣KT2
12
97
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1NT  ♣6 ♥5 ♠3
EW: 1♣ 3♠  ♦5 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        150    2.00   1.00  4 S -3   ♣4  10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        150    2.00   1.00  3 S -3   ♣4  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
        150    2.00   1.00  3♣ N -3   2  3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
        200    0.00   3.00  4 S -4   ♣4  8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson