| 1 |
♠A63
♥KJT
♦J6
♣AQT53
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 2/4♦ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♥ S -2 ♦A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ W ♠A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
150 0.17 2.83 2♦ W +3 ♠A 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 2 |
♠KJ9865
♥Q7
♦T6
♣K82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5/4 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ ♦7/6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 1N S +2 ♣J 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
100 0.17 2.83 3♠ N -1 ♦4 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 3 |
♠T8
♥AQJ432
♦KJ6
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.17 0.83 3♠ E +1 ♥K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
170 2.17 0.83 3♠ E +1 ♥K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
650 0.17 2.83 4♠ E +1 ♥K 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 4 |
♠Q
♥J42
♦AK52
♣Q9763
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4/3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 1N S +1 ♠5 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.83 2.17 4♠ E -1 ♣J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
100 0.83 2.17 3♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 5 |
♠T62
♥A986
♦Q5
♣Q943
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 1/-NT ♥6 ♠6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 1N W +1 ♥2 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 1.50 1.50 1N W +2 ♥6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
200 0.17 2.83 2♠ S -2 ♦9 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 6 |
♠Q854
♥J92
♦852
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♠ N -1 ♦A 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 1.50 1.50 2♥ S -2 ♣6 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
110 0.17 2.83 3♣ E ♦K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 7 |
♠KJ95
♥JT9
♦A
♣KQJT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: -/1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 1N S +1 ♥3 10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♥4 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 0.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♥4 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠T763
♥-
♦9762
♣KT843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 5/6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 6♥ W -2 ♦7 10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
450 1.50 1.50 5♥ W ♣3 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
990 0.17 2.83 6N E ♥7 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 9 |
♠A86
♥85
♦854
♣AT862
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 2N W ♣6 10-Winham-Murdock vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
150 0.83 2.17 1N W +2 ♣8 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.83 2.17 2♦ W +3 ♦4 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 10 |
♠Q82
♥A82
♦AK62
♣AKJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣6 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠T 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♦3 10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 11 |
♠985
♥J72
♦KQ85
♣K98
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4/6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 2.83 0.17 1♠ E ♣Q 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
110 0.83 2.17 1♠ E +1 ♥A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 0.83 2.17 1♠ E +1 ♦9 10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 12 |
♠K
♥JT53
♦A97643
♣Q5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♠ E -2 ♥K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
400 1.50 1.50 3♦ N -4 ♠A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
1100 0.17 2.83 4♦* N -4 ♠A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 13 |
♠T863
♥42
♦A95
♣KQ87
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♥ W -1 ♠T 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
90 1.50 1.50 1N E ♣5 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.50 1.50 2♦ W ♣K 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
120 0.00 3.00 2N W ♣7 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 14 |
♠873
♥A9
♦94
♣J98765
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♣5 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣6 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ W ♦9 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
430 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♦5 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
|
| 15 |
♠AJT
♥T9
♦JT98
♣KQ73
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠3 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N E ♥K 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♥K 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ E +2 ♥K 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
200 0.00 3.00 4♦* N -1 ♠2 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 16 |
♠Q52
♥T94
♦T97
♣QT74
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2/1♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N E +1 ♦5 10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ W ♦7 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ W +1 ♥T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +2 ♥T 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 17 |
♠72
♥AJT
♦KJ52
♣9543
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5/2 ♦2 ♠2/1 NT3/2 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 1N E ♥7 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
110 2.00 1.00 2♠ W ♠2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♦2 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
200 0.00 3.00 2♠ W +3 ♦2 10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 18 |
♠AT542
♥642
♦T
♣Q754
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣T 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣T 10-Winham-Murdock vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 19 |
♠K96
♥A943
♦5
♣QT973
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N ♣4 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦5 10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ E +1 ♠Q 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♣5 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 20 |
♠Q
♥KJ86
♦KJ762
♣AT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 2/3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♠2 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
200 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -2 ♦Q 10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦Q 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♠4 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
|
| 21 |
♠A2
♥AT932
♦AT72
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♥ N ♣A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♣8 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Nelson
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -2 ♣A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 22 |
♠A6
♥6
♦K542
♣QT9632
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/4♣ 4♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♠ 1/-NT ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♠7 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ S +1 ♠K 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♦T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♥J 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 23 |
♠T5
♥A8
♦T9652
♣Q542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♠T 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
110 1.50 1.50 3♣ W ♠T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
110 1.50 1.50 2♣ W +1 ♠T 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
400 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -4 ♣7 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 24 |
♠Q754
♥53
♦J74
♣KT63
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5/6 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠J 4-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hullman-Kobland
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦K 2-Gelfand-Nelson vs 8-Spinazze-Gamble
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 25 |
♠K98
♥982
♦K4
♣AQ764
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 3.00 0.00 6♣ S ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
460 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥6 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
460 1.50 1.50 1N S +4 ♦5 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
420 0.00 3.00 5♣ N +1 ♥A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 26 |
♠96
♥JT72
♦AQ86
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3/4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♥9 10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♣4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 1.00 2.00 2N E +1 ♠6 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
660 0.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♦5 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 27 |
♠KJ3
♥K83
♦K854
♣Q93
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠3 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -3 ♣4 10-Winham-Murdock vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
150 2.00 1.00 3♥ S -3 ♣4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 2.00 1.00 3♣ N -3 ♦2 3-Hullman-Kobland vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -4 ♣4 8-Spinazze-Gamble vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|