| 1 |
♠KJ8643
♥Q5
♦8532
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 5♣ E -2 ♦A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 10-Winham-Murdock
50 3.70 1.30 2♠ N -1 ♦7 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ W +1 ♠3 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
150 1.30 3.70 3♣ E +2 ♠9 8-Foy-Erickson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
300 0.10 4.90 2♠* N -2 ♦7 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 2 |
♠Q87
♥AQ8
♦T642
♣AQ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: -/1♠ ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6/7 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.30 0.70 1♠ W ♦T 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 10-Winham-Murdock
80 4.30 0.70 1♠ W ♦T 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
110 1.30 3.70 2♠ W ♦2 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
110 1.30 3.70 1♠ W +1 ♦6 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
110 1.30 3.70 1♠ W +1 ♣3 8-Foy-Erickson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
|
| 3 |
♠A5
♥KQ52
♦JT2
♣T632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 4♠ E -3 ♣A 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
200 3.70 1.30 3♥ N +2 ♠K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
180 2.50 2.50 2N N +2 ♠Q 8-Foy-Erickson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
130 1.30 3.70 3♣ S +1 ♠4 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 10-Winham-Murdock
100 0.10 4.90 2♠ E -1 ♦7 5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
|
| 4 |
♠AKT85
♥843
♦64
♣AK8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.90 0.10 1N S +2 ♦2 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
140 3.10 1.90 3♠ N ♥A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
140 3.10 1.90 2♠ N +1 ♦T 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.30 3.70 2♠ N ♥7 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 0.10 4.90 4♠ N -1 ♦T 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
|
| 5 |
♠AKJ42
♥J8
♦Q98432
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 4♠ ♣1 ♦6 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.30 0.70 5♣ W -1 ♠A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
50 4.30 0.70 5♣ W -1 ♥J 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
130 2.50 2.50 4♣ W ♥J 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Harken
150 1.30 3.70 4♣ W +1 ♠A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
200 0.10 4.90 4♠ N -2 ♦K 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 6 |
♠K65
♥KQ75
♦AT94
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ -/1♦ 5NT ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.90 0.10 3♠ W -3 ♣A 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
210 3.70 1.30 2N N +3 ♥2 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
200 2.50 2.50 3♠ W -2 ♥K 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.30 3.70 5♣ S -1 ♣5 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
500 0.10 4.90 5♣* N -3 ♦K 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 7 |
♠6
♥T83
♦AK97
♣AJ752
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.90 0.10 4♥ S +1 ♠3 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
200 3.70 1.30 3♥ S +2 ♠Q 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Harken-Harken
100 1.30 3.70 4♠* E -2 ♥A 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
100 1.30 3.70 3♠ E -1 ♥A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Foy-Erickson
100 1.30 3.70 3♠ E -1 ♥A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 8 |
♠AK5
♥T
♦T8652
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥5/4 NT3 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣2/1 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♠A 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ W -2 ♠A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Harken-Harken
50 1.00 4.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Foy-Erickson
50 1.00 4.00 3♥ W -1 ♠A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠Q943
♥64
♦A76
♣A765
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3/4 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♦3 10-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Foy-Erickson
100 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♦2 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
170 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♦2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.00 4.00 2♥ E +2 ♣2 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 10 |
♠753
♥7
♦8654
♣JT732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.90 0.10 4♥ W -1 ♣J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
620 3.10 1.90 4♥ E ♠Q 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
620 3.10 1.90 4♥ E ♠Q 10-Winham-Murdock vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
630 1.30 3.70 3N W +1 ♣3 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
660 0.10 4.90 3N E +2 ♥J 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 11 |
♠T62
♥K75
♦AKQJ3
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
280 4.90 0.10 2♦* N +1 ♠K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
50 3.10 1.90 4♠ W -1 ♦A 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
50 3.10 1.90 4♠ E -1 ♦4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
140 1.30 3.70 3♠ W ♦A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
420 0.10 4.90 4♠ W ♦A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 12 |
♠J7
♥K75
♦AT2
♣KT872
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4/3♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.90 0.10 3N N +1 ♣3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
150 3.70 1.30 2♠ W -3 ♥K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
140 1.90 3.10 3♥ S ♣9 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 1.90 3.10 2♥ S +1 ♣9 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
110 0.10 4.90 2♥ S ♠4 10-Winham-Murdock vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 13 |
♠K42
♥Q9764
♦A42
♣AT
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.70 1.30 2♠ S +1 ♣8 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
140 3.70 1.30 1♠ S +2 ♥2 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 3.70 1.30 2♥ N +1 ♦J 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Harken
90 1.30 3.70 1N N ♥T 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Foy-Erickson
100 0.10 4.90 2♥ N -1 ♦5 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 14 |
♠K63
♥A765
♦J3
♣AT84
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.90 0.10 4♥ N +3 ♦K 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
460 3.70 1.30 3N S +2 ♠Q 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Harken
440 2.50 2.50 5♣ S +2 ♦8 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
420 1.30 3.70 5♣ S +1 ♦T 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Foy-Erickson
100 0.10 4.90 7♥* N -1 ♦5 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 15 |
♠T53
♥A
♦AKJT7
♣K976
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4/5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.90 0.10 2N W -4 ♦A 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
50 3.70 1.30 1N W -1 ♦A 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 2.50 2.50 2♣ W ♥A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Foy-Erickson
110 1.30 3.70 3♣ W ♦A 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
200 0.10 4.90 2♣ N -2 ♦Q 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Harken
|
| 16 |
♠KQ3
♥KT43
♦J95
♣974
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 2♣ W +2 ♥3 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 4.00 1.00 2♦ W +3 ♥3 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
180 3.00 2.00 1N W +3 ♥3 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
660 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠3 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
660 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♥3 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
660 1.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♥7 8-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
|
| 17 |
♠73
♥J53
♦KT64
♣AJ97
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 6♥ 5♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♦4 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♥3 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ W +2 ♥3 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♠7 8-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥3 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
450 1.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♦4 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 18 |
♠Q972
♥K3
♦KQ743
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 3NT ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♥9 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣K 8-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣2 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
620 3.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ W -2 ♥K 1-Kobland-Davidson vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
100 0.50 4.50 4♠ W -2 ♥K 5-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 19 |
♠T4
♥JT9875
♦Q743
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦2/3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣5 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 1.00 5♠ W -1 ♣2 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
100 4.00 1.00 5♠ W -1 ♣2 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
100 4.00 1.00 5♠ W -1 ♣2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
100 2.00 3.00 5♣ S -2 ♠K 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
300 1.00 4.00 5♣* S -2 ♠K 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♣2 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 20 |
♠Q943
♥T8742
♦A75
♣A
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣5/6 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♠ -/2NT ♦4 ♥5 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 5♠ W -2 ♣A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
200 4.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣A 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
100 3.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♥4 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
PASS 2.00 3.00 Pass Out 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♥5 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♣A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
|
| 21 |
♠4
♥AJ93
♦A65
♣K9864
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠4 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 1N W +1 ♣6 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 8-Foy-Erickson
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♣6 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
200 3.00 2.00 3♠ W +2 ♣4 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Gelfand-Johnson
300 1.50 3.50 1N N -3 ♥6 5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
300 1.50 3.50 4♦ S -3 ♠A 10-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.00 5.00 5♠ W ♣9 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Spinazze-Gamble
|
| 22 |
♠Q532
♥T964
♦T92
♣93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠9 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦K 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
420 3.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦K 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Harken-Harken
170 2.00 3.00 3♠ N +1 ♦K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 8-Foy-Erickson
110 1.00 4.00 2♠ N ♦K 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
50 0.00 5.00 4♥ N -1 ♦K 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 23 |
♠62
♥954
♦AKJ72
♣732
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♥A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
140 4.00 1.00 3♠ S ♣4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
140 4.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♥A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
100 2.00 3.00 5♣ E -1 ♠Q 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 4.00 4♣ E ♠Q 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 8-Foy-Erickson
620 0.00 5.00 4♥ W ♦A 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
|
| 24 |
♠A854
♥-
♦J
♣KT985432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠5 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 5.00 0.00 6♣ N ♦A 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 10-Winham-Murdock
510 4.00 1.00 4♥ S +3 ♣7 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Nathanson-Nelson
420 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♦A 11-Sterling-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
420 2.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♦5 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 5-Harken-Harken
230 1.00 4.00 2♥ S +4 ♦5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
190 0.00 5.00 4♣ N +3 ♠7 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 8-Foy-Erickson
|
| 25 |
♠Q54
♥K92
♦AT
♣AQ987
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.30 0.70 3N N +1 ♠3 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
430 4.30 0.70 3N N +1 ♦3 8-Foy-Erickson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 2.50 2.50 2N N +1 ♠K 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.30 3.70 3N N -1 ♦3 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
100 0.10 4.90 3N N -2 ♦6 5-Harken-Harken vs 10-Winham-Murdock
|
| 26 |
♠J4
♥AJ83
♦Q953
♣AK2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.90 0.10 4N S ♣9 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
100 3.10 1.90 3N S -1 ♠2 8-Foy-Erickson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 3.10 1.90 3N S ♣3 5-Harken-Harken vs 10-Winham-Murdock
200 0.70 4.30 4♥ S -2 ♠5 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
200 0.70 4.30 4♥ N -2 ♣5 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 27 |
♠Q75
♥KQJ965
♦A
♣742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.90 0.10 2♥ N +1 ♦5 2-Nathanson-Nelson vs 11-Sterling-Henderson
100 3.70 1.30 3♦ W -2 ♥K 8-Foy-Erickson vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 2.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♠4 4-Gelfand-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Davidson
50 0.70 4.30 2♠ S -1 ♣8 7-Spinazze-Gamble vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.70 4.30 3♥ N -1 ♠9 5-Harken-Harken vs 10-Winham-Murdock
|