| 1 |
♠KQ986
♥K82
♦A62
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.75 0.25 2♠ W -2 ♦2 5-Harken-Murdock vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.25 1.75 3♠ N -1 ♦8 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Walker
100 1.75 3.25 3♠ N -2 ♣6 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 0.25 4.75 2N N -3 ♦5 8-Cowen-Ray vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 2 |
♠A843
♥QJ42
♦82
♣JT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.75 0.25 2♣ E +3 ♠2 5-Harken-Murdock vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠2 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
460 2.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♦3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Walker
520 0.25 4.75 3N E +4 ♣2 8-Cowen-Ray vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 3 |
♠T
♥AK83
♦T864
♣T972
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 1.75 4♥ W -1 ♠T 5-Harken-Murdock vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.25 1.75 4♥ W -1 ♠T 8-Cowen-Ray vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
100 3.25 1.75 4♥ W -1 ♠T 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
620 0.25 4.75 4♥ W ♠T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 4 |
♠K42
♥KQ42
♦JT
♣JT52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.75 0.25 3N E -3 ♠3 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 3-Hamlin-Black
100 3.25 1.75 3N W -1 ♠4 1-Loops-Walker vs 8-Cowen-Ray
120 1.75 3.25 1N E +1 ♠3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
800 0.25 4.75 2♠* S -3 ♥J 11-Graves-Kobland vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 5 |
♠AK4
♥J72
♦J9872
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.75 0.25 3N N +2 ♥8 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 3-Hamlin-Black
180 2.50 2.50 1N N +3 ♠9 11-Graves-Kobland vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
180 2.50 2.50 1N N +3 ♥3 1-Loops-Walker vs 8-Cowen-Ray
140 0.25 4.75 2♠ S +1 ♣T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 6 |
♠JT842
♥3
♦Q74
♣KQ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♠A 1-Loops-Walker vs 8-Cowen-Ray
200 4.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♠A 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 1.75 3.25 2♦ S -1 ♥T 11-Graves-Kobland vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
200 0.25 4.75 4♠ N -4 ♦5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 7 |
♠A963
♥A8
♦T9873
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5/4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.75 0.25 4♥ S +2 ♣2 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Cowen-Ray
650 3.25 1.75 4♥ S +1 ♠8 11-Graves-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Murdock
620 1.75 3.25 4♥ S ♦K 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hamlin-Black
170 0.25 4.75 3♥ S +1 ♦K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
|
| 8 |
♠75
♥J7
♦KT654
♣KJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.75 0.25 4♠ E -1 ♦7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Cowen-Ray
90 3.25 1.75 1N E ♠4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
140 1.75 3.25 2♠ E +1 ♣2 11-Graves-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Murdock
150 0.25 4.75 2N E +1 ♠4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hamlin-Black
|
| 9 |
♠AKQ96
♥J2
♦T942
♣K5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.75 0.25 2N* E -2 ♠A 11-Graves-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Murdock
200 3.25 1.75 3N E -2 ♠8 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Cowen-Ray
100 1.00 4.00 2N W -1 ♠A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Hamlin-Black
100 1.00 4.00 3♦ E -1 ♠2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
|
| 10 |
♠T952
♥9
♦J5432
♣KT7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1/2♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.75 0.25 3♥ E +2 ♥A 11-Graves-Kobland vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
300 3.25 1.75 4♠ S -3 ♥5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠Q 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
650 1.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 11 |
♠KQ764
♥954
♦KT75
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.75 0.25 1N N ♥2 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
100 3.25 1.75 2♣ S -2 ♠5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
150 1.75 3.25 2N S -3 ♥2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
250 0.25 4.75 3♦ N -5 ♥3 11-Graves-Kobland vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
|
| 12 |
♠KJ3
♥QJ5
♦KQT9
♣T95
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.75 0.25 2♣ S ♠T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 3.25 1.75 3♦ N -1 ♥A 11-Graves-Kobland vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
110 1.75 3.25 2♥ W ♣5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
200 0.25 4.75 2N N -2 ♠7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
|
| 13 |
♠8
♥A542
♦9852
♣AQ64
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/3♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.75 0.25 3♠ W -1 ♦2 1-Loops-Walker vs 10-Davidson-Winham
150 2.50 2.50 1N W +2 ♦5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Murdock
150 2.50 2.50 1N W +2 ♣4 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
600 0.25 4.75 3N W ♣6 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Cowen-Ray
|
| 14 |
♠A96
♥632
♦42
♣A9875
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♠ 3/1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠2/3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.90 0.10 4♠ S +2 ♣2 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 11-Graves-Kobland
450 3.70 1.30 4♠ S +1 ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Murdock
420 2.50 2.50 4♠ S ♥A 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Cowen-Ray
170 1.30 3.70 3♠ S +1 ♦8 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
140 0.10 4.90 2♠ N +1 ♦8 1-Loops-Walker vs 10-Davidson-Winham
|
| 15 |
♠AK96
♥753
♦QJ8
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.90 0.10 3N N +2 ♦T 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 11-Graves-Kobland
630 3.70 1.30 3N S +1 ♦3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Harken-Murdock
600 2.50 2.50 3N N ♠2 9-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
180 1.30 3.70 2N S +2 ♠2 1-Loops-Walker vs 10-Davidson-Winham
150 0.10 4.90 1N S +2 ♦3 3-Hamlin-Black vs 8-Cowen-Ray
|
| 16 |
♠6
♥J53
♦K952
♣A9754
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2/3♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 1.00 3N S -1 ♦2 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 4.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♣T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
50 4.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♣T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
100 1.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♥2 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
100 1.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♥4 5-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Hamlin-Black
100 1.00 4.00 2♠ S -2 ♥2 8-Cowen-Ray vs 11-Graves-Kobland
|
| 17 |
♠Q63
♥K83
♦AKT
♣AT72
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♥4 5-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 3.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥4 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
50 3.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥4 8-Cowen-Ray vs 11-Graves-Kobland
50 3.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♣2 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 ♥4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
100 0.50 4.50 3N N -2 ♥4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
|
| 18 |
♠-
♥AQ9752
♦Q942
♣QJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ -/2♥ -/3NT ♦6 ♥6/8 ♠5/4 NT5/9 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♣A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
620 4.30 0.70 4♠ S ♣A 5-Harken-Murdock vs 3-Hamlin-Black
200 1.30 3.70 4♠ S -2 ♣A 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
200 1.30 3.70 4♠ S -2 ♣A 8-Cowen-Ray vs 11-Graves-Kobland
200 1.30 3.70 4♠ S -2 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
|
| 19 |
♠AQ732
♥54
♦52
♣A952
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 5.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦K 11-Graves-Kobland vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
200 4.00 1.00 4♦ W -2 ♦5 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Hamlin-Black
140 3.00 2.00 3♠ N ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Cowen-Ray
90 1.50 3.50 2♦ W ♥5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 1.50 3.50 2♦ W ♦5 5-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Loops-Walker
110 0.00 5.00 3♦ W ♥5 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 20 |
♠KJ
♥KQJ93
♦AKJ7
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦2/3 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦8 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Hamlin-Black
630 4.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♣J 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♦8 5-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Loops-Walker
620 2.50 2.50 4♥ N ♦8 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
600 1.00 4.00 3N N ♠4 11-Graves-Kobland vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
200 0.00 5.00 3N N -2 ♠4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Cowen-Ray
|
| 21 |
♠T7
♥AK4
♦AKQ4
♣AKT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠Q 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
660 4.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♠8 10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Hamlin-Black
630 3.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♣5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Cowen-Ray
600 1.50 3.50 3N N ♠4 5-Harken-Murdock vs 1-Loops-Walker
600 1.50 3.50 3N N ♠4 11-Graves-Kobland vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
100 0.00 5.00 5♦ S -1 ♣6 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 22 |
♠A92
♥A96
♦T753
♣853
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.10 1.90 2N S ♠5 11-Graves-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
120 3.10 1.90 2N S ♦4 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
120 3.10 1.90 1N S +1 ♦8 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
120 3.10 1.90 1N S +1 ♦4 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Murdock
50 0.10 4.90 3N S -1 ♦4 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 23 |
♠A72
♥KJ4
♦7653
♣Q43
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.90 0.10 2N N +1 ♥2 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
120 3.70 1.30 1N N +1 ♠9 11-Graves-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
110 1.90 3.10 3♦ S ♠Q 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.90 3.10 3♦ S ♠Q 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Murdock
170 0.10 4.90 2♠ W +2 ♦5 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
|
| 24 |
♠KQJT54
♥K653
♦KT
♣7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6♠ 5/4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.90 0.10 4♠ N +1 ♥9 6-Nelson-Nathanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 3.10 1.90 4♠ N ♥9 3-Hamlin-Black vs 9-Hullman-Formoso
420 3.10 1.90 4♠ N ♥9 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Friedberg-Gelfand
200 1.30 3.70 2♠ N +3 ♥9 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Murdock
170 0.10 4.90 3♠ N +1 ♥9 11-Graves-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 25 |
♠9863
♥8754
♦62
♣Q87
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.75 0.25 4♠ E -3 ♥A 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
200 3.25 1.75 3♠ E -2 ♥A 5-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Davidson-Winham
100 1.75 3.25 4♠ E -1 ♥A 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 1-Loops-Walker
110 0.25 4.75 2♠ E ♥A 8-Cowen-Ray vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
|
| 26 |
♠AKT643
♥AJT
♦54
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.75 0.25 2♠ N +3 ♥9 5-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Davidson-Winham
170 3.25 1.75 3♠ N +1 ♥5 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 1-Loops-Walker
140 1.00 4.00 2♠ N +1 ♣5 8-Cowen-Ray vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
140 1.00 4.00 1♠ N +2 ♣5 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
|
| 27 |
♠AJT95
♥T3
♦K9
♣AKJ7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♣ 4♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.75 0.25 4♣ S +1 ♥A 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 3-Hamlin-Black
50 3.25 1.75 2♠ N -1 ♦4 5-Harken-Murdock vs 10-Davidson-Winham
100 1.75 3.25 3N N -2 ♦8 4-Friedberg-Gelfand vs 1-Loops-Walker
150 0.25 4.75 3N S -3 ♦5 8-Cowen-Ray vs 6-Nelson-Nathanson
|