| 1 |
♠AT872
♥2
♦QT982
♣A6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♥ N +1 ♣4 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
430 2.63 1.38 4N N ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.38 2.63 4♥ S ♠K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
170 0.13 3.88 3♥ S +1 ♦4 9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
|
| 2 |
♠KT52
♥KT97
♦A93
♣T2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♥ E -2 ♠6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.63 1.38 3♥ E -1 ♣A 9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ E ♠3 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
170 0.13 3.88 3♥ E +1 ♠6 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 3 |
♠Q964
♥4
♦KT8
♣AQ752
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +2 ♦6 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
450 1.38 2.63 5♠ S ♥2 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ S +1 ♥8 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
450 1.38 2.63 4♠ S +1 ♥2 9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
|
| 4 |
♠A843
♥QJT
♦Q7432
♣J
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 2N W -2 ♣J 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
100 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♥Q 11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
PASS 0.33 3.67 Pass Out 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 5 |
♠QT
♥JT42
♦KQ84
♣T97
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 6/5♣ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.67 0.33 5♠ W +1 ♥5 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
980 1.17 2.83 6♠ W ♥J 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
980 1.17 2.83 6♠ W ♦K 11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 6 |
♠832
♥K83
♦J873
♣962
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2♣ E -1 ♦T 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♥9 11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
100 0.33 3.67 1N S -2 ♥9 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 7 |
♠Q95
♥Q972
♦83
♣KJT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 2/1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.67 0.33 2N W ♥7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣T 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
630 0.33 3.67 3N W +1 ♥2 11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠973
♥QJ953
♦KQ3
♣A4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 4♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 1.17 3♥ N ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
140 2.83 1.17 3♥ N ♠A 11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.33 3.67 3♠ E -1 ♥A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 9 |
♠T2
♥AQT6
♦T73
♣Q532
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♥ S ♠K 11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 2.00 4♦ S ♠K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
100 0.33 3.67 3♠ W -1 ♦7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 10 |
♠KJ3
♥6
♦T96
♣AJ6543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 4♦* W -3 ♥6 11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
500 2.63 1.38 3♦ W -5 ♥6 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
200 1.38 2.63 3♠ E -2 ♣2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♠5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
|
| 11 |
♠AQJ8
♥AQT
♦QJT75
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N N +1 ♥6 11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 2.63 1.38 2N W -1 ♣J 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ W +1 ♦Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
300 0.13 3.88 3♦* N -2 ♥8 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 12 |
♠T962
♥86
♦A53
♣7532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3♠ E -1 ♥K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥K 10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♥K 11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 0.13 3.88 2♥* S -1 ♣A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 13 |
♠KT64
♥QT7
♦QJ72
♣74
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT3/2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -1 ♦2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
180 2.00 2.00 2N W +2 ♠4 7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
180 2.00 2.00 2N W +2 ♠4 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
630 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♦2 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
|
| 14 |
♠K643
♥KT9832
♦A8
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♥ ♣6 ♦5/6 ♠5/6 NT5/6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 3♥ N +1 ♣K 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.25 0.75 2♥ N +2 ♣3 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ S +1 ♣9 7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ N ♣K 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 15 |
♠J85
♥AQ984
♦75
♣Q54
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 5♦ W -1 ♥A 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
50 3.25 0.75 5♦ E -1 ♥A 7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
130 1.38 2.63 4♦ W ♥A 9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ E ♥J 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 16 |
♠654
♥J9
♦JT43
♣AK85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ -/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♣ N -1 ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
110 3.00 1.00 2♠ E ♣6 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♥J 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +1 ♣A 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♥4 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
|
| 17 |
♠A9
♥JT9876
♦K82
♣AQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥3/4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 4.00 0.00 4♥* N ♦A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♣6 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♣7 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
100 1.00 3.00 4♦ E -2 ♥5 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
|
| 18 |
♠AQ87
♥8
♦KJ942
♣J82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♣ 3/2♦ 3/2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N S ♥Q 1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
90 3.00 1.00 1N S ♥3 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥Q 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
100 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♦6 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
200 0.00 4.00 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
|
| 19 |
♠AT2
♥Q97632
♦7
♣632
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦2/1 ♥4 ♠5 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 5♣ S +1 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♥A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ S ♥A 11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 ♥A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +2 ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
|
| 20 |
♠7
♥AQT7
♦AK
♣AKT953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣0/1 ♦4/5 ♥0/1 ♠4 NT0/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 4.00 0.00 6♥ N ♠A 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
600 2.00 2.00 5♣ N ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
230 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +4 ♣8 11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ N ♠A 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 21 |
♠63
♥KJ2
♦J4
♣AQ9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W ♠6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W ♠6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W ♥2 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
110 2.50 1.50 2♦ W +1 ♥2 12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -2 ♠9 11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
|
| 22 |
♠KJ642
♥863
♦T43
♣Q6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ W ♠7 11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
620 3.25 0.75 4♥ W ♠4 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.75 3.25 4♥ W +1 ♣Q 7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.75 3.25 4♥ W +1 ♣6 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 23 |
♠JT72
♥-
♦983
♣AT9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 6♥ 4♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 6♥ E -1 ♦J 11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
650 2.63 1.38 5♥ E ♣9 7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
680 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♣7 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
1430 0.13 3.88 6♥ E ♣8 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 24 |
♠T87
♥Q97
♦K86
♣Q642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.25 0.75 1N E -2 ♣K 6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.25 0.75 3♥ W -2 ♣2 11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
50 1.38 2.63 1N W -1 ♣2 7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 0.13 3.88 2♠ E ♣A 10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
|
| 25 |
♠K2
♥J92
♦QJ982
♣J65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ -/1♦ 1NT ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 1♦* E -1 ♦2 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♣5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham
50 0.33 3.67 3♣ N -1 ♦3 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 26 |
♠J432
♥AK
♦32
♣A7654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2♠ E -1 ♥K 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
100 1.17 2.83 1N N -1 ♥T 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham
100 1.17 2.83 2♣ N -1 ♥3 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 27 |
♠K5
♥T6
♦92
♣KQJ9653
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.67 0.33 3♣ N +1 ♥3 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -2 ♦K 8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
170 0.33 3.67 3♥ W +1 ♦9 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham
|