? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Len Vishnevsky - Peter Gelfand 68.01 1st A 1.10
Charles Pender - Christina Kobland 57.76 2nd A 0.77
John Hullman - Shamim Formoso 53.76 3rd A 0.55
Richard Pearce - Susan Pearce 52.67 1st B 0.56
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano 48.73 2nd B 0.39
Bette Harken - Judith Murdock 47.10 3rd B 0.28
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>April 1, 2026      |CLUB NO.>137059    | 04/01/2026 21:20
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/1000/300  |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=11/B=7/C=3                      ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lesley Xu              Matthew Nathanson        C    .     .     .     36.81  43.82          
 2 Susan Pearce           Richard Pearce           C    4     1     1     44.24  52.67  0.56(B) 
 4 Len Vishnevsky         Peter Gelfand            A    1     .     .     57.13  68.01  1.10(A) 
 5 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B    .     2     .     40.93  48.73  0.39(B) 
 6 Francesco Ruggeri      Kenneth Girouard         C    .     .     .     38.38  45.69          
 7 Lester Loops           John Walker              A    .     .     .     36.66  43.64          
 8 Barbara Tidmore        Kathy O'Neil Traback     B    .     .     .     33.90  40.36          
 9 Bette Harken           Judith Murdock           B    .     3     .     39.56  47.10  0.28(B) 
10 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               B    .     .     .     37.99  45.23          
11 Charles Pender         Christina Kobland        A    2     .     .     48.52  57.76  0.77(A) 
12 John Hullman           Shamim Formoso           A    3     .     .     45.16  53.76  0.55(A) 
                                          Totals                         459.28       

1 ♠AT872
2
QT982
♣A6
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KQ4
J85
K54
♣Q932
♠963
73
A763
♣J754
♠J5
AKQT964
J
♣KT8
10
115
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 5 4♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          3.88   0.13  4 N +1   ♣4  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
  430          2.63   1.38  4N N      A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
  420          1.38   2.63  4 S      ♠K  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  170          0.13   3.88  3 S +1   4  9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
2 ♠KT52
KT97
A93
♣T2
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AQ97
-
KQJ8752
♣K7
♠J8
AQJ5432
6
♣J86
♠643
86
T4
♣AQ9543
10
159
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 3 2 2♠ 1NT  ♣5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -110 2♠-EW/2-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.88   0.13  4 E -2   ♠6  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
   50          2.63   1.38  3 E -1   ♣A  9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
        140    1.38   2.63  3 E      ♠3  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        170    0.13   3.88  3 E +1   ♠6  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
3 ♠Q964
4
KT8
♣AQ752
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠K5
T8732
Q975
♣KT
♠T7
KQJ965
3
♣9864
♠AJ832
A
AJ642
♣J3
11
86
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 6 6♠ 1NT  ♥5
EW: 2  ♣3 ♦1 ♠1 NT1
LoTT: 20 - 20 = 0
Par: +980 6♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          3.88   0.13  4♠ S +2   6  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  450          1.38   2.63  5♠ S      2  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
  450          1.38   2.63  4♠ S +1   8  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
  450          1.38   2.63  4♠ S +1   2  9-Harken-Murdock vs 7-Loops-Walker
4 ♠A843
QJT
Q7432
♣J
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠QJ
A864
KJ65
♣T86
♠K965
K95
T9
♣K532
♠T72
732
A8
♣AQ974
10
119
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♥6 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -80 1-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.67   0.33  2N W -2   ♣J  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  100          2.00   2.00  1N W -1   Q  11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
    PASS       0.33   3.67  Pass Out      12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
5 ♠QT
JT42
KQ84
♣T97
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AKJ852
3
A
♣KJ543
♠97643
KQ875
2
♣A2
♠-
A96
JT97653
♣Q86
8
169
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1
EW: 6/5♣ 3 6♠ 6NT  ♦5
LoTT: 20 - 22 = -2
Par: -990 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        480    3.67   0.33  5♠ W +1   5  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        980    1.17   2.83  6♠ W      J  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
        980    1.17   2.83  6♠ W      K  11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
6 ♠832
K83
J873
♣962
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AT54
976
AQ5
♣K85
♠KQ9
JT4
642
♣J743
♠J76
AQ52
KT9
♣AQT
4
137
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 1NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.67   0.33  2♣ E -1   T  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
   90          2.00   2.00  1N S      9  11-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
        100    0.33   3.67  1N S -2   9  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
7 ♠Q95
Q972
83
♣KJT2
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AK82
AJ85
J54
♣53
♠J6
63
AQT76
♣Q876
♠T743
KT4
K92
♣A94
8
139
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠  ♦5 NT6
EW: 2/1  ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -90 2-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    3.67   0.33  2N W      7  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
        600    2.00   2.00  3N W      ♣T  10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        630    0.33   3.67  3N W +1   2  11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
8 ♠973
QJ953
KQ3
♣A4
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠T65
2
986542
♣K52
♠AKQ82
T74
AJT
♣QJ
♠J4
AK86
7
♣T98763
12
317
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3  ♦3 ♠4 NT6
EW: 4 3♠  ♣5 ♥4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.83   1.17  3 N      ♠A  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
  140          2.83   1.17  3 N      ♠A  11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
   50          0.33   3.67  3♠ E -1   A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
9 ♠T2
AQT6
T73
♣Q532
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KQ9873
85
A5
♣KT9
♠A64
J73
98
♣J8764
♠J5
K942
KQJ642
♣A
8
126
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4  ♣5 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦3 ♥3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.67   0.33  4 S      ♠K  11-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  130          2.00   2.00  4 S      ♠K  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Harken-Murdock
  100          0.33   3.67  3♠ W -1   7  10-Davidson-Winham vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
10 ♠KJ3
6
T96
♣AJ6543
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠Q8
J
KQ8732
♣KQ87
♠976542
KQ432
-
♣T9
♠AT
AT9875
AJ54
♣2
9
135
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3 1♠ 2/3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          3.88   0.13  4* W -3  6  11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
  500          2.63   1.38  3 W -5   6  10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
  200          1.38   2.63  3♠ E -2   ♣2  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
        100    0.13   3.88  3N N -1   ♠5  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
11 ♠AQJ8
AQT
QJT75
♣J
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T653
K
AK864
♣AK3
♠K974
J98765
-
♣854
♠2
432
932
♣QT9762
17
174
2
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1NT  ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1♠  ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.88   0.13  2N N +1   6  11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
   50          2.63   1.38  2N W -1   ♣J  10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
        140    1.38   2.63  2 W +1   Q  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
        300    0.13   3.88  3* N -2  8  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
12 ♠T962
86
A53
♣7532
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠854
T7
K64
♣AKJT9
♠AKQ73
A943
T72
♣8
♠J
KQJ52
QJ98
♣Q64
4
1113
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 1 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.88   0.13  3♠ E -1   K  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Loops-Walker
        140    2.00   2.00  3♠ E      K  10-Davidson-Winham vs 9-Harken-Murdock
        140    2.00   2.00  3♠ E      K  11-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        200    0.13   3.88  2* S -1  ♣A  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
13 ♠KT64
QT7
QJ72
♣74
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠Q3
K2
K983
♣AKJT2
♠AJ982
9865
A5
♣85
♠75
AJ43
T64
♣Q963
8
169
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT3/2
EW: 5♣ 4 3 5♠ 4NT
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.88   0.13  3N W -1   2  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        180    2.00   2.00  2N W +2   ♠4  7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
        180    2.00   2.00  2N W +2   ♠4  9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        630    0.13   3.88  3N W +1   2  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
14 ♠K643
KT9832
A8
♣J
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠QT52
74
J764
♣985
♠AJ98
AQ
QT5
♣KQ63
♠7
J65
K932
♣AT742
11
318
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/4
       ♣6 ♦5/6 ♠5/6 NT5/6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣6 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +420 4-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.25   0.75  3 N +1   ♣K  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  170          3.25   0.75  2 N +2   ♣3  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
  140          1.38   2.63  2 S +1   ♣9  7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
  110          0.13   3.88  2 N      ♣K  9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
15 ♠J85
AQ984
75
♣Q54
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠62
K5
KT9843
♣K86
♠KQ943
3
AJ62
♣972
♠AT7
JT762
Q
♣AJT3
9
910
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1NT  ♦3 ♠5
EW: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♥3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +300 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.25   0.75  5 W -1   A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 10-Davidson-Winham
   50          3.25   0.75  5 E -1   A  7-Loops-Walker vs 11-Pender-Kobland
        130    1.38   2.63  4 W      A  9-Harken-Murdock vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        140    0.13   3.88  3♠ E      J  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
16 ♠654
J9
JT43
♣AK85
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠A982
AT8
8752
♣94
♠QJ73
Q63
AK6
♣J32
♠KT
K7542
Q9
♣QT76
9
813
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 -/1 3♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♥6/7
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    4.00   0.00  3♣ N -1   A  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
        110    3.00   1.00  2♠ E      ♣6  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
        140    1.50   2.50  2♠ W +1   J  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        140    1.50   2.50  2♠ W +1   ♣A  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
        170    0.00   4.00  2♠ E +2   4  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
17 ♠A9
JT9876
K82
♣AQ
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠KQ4
A2
J95
♣KJT92
♠652
Q3
AQT764
♣73
♠JT873
K54
3
♣8654
14
148
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 2♠  ♣6 ♦4 NT5
EW: 3 1NT  ♣6 ♥3/4 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +100 4*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  590          4.00   0.00  4* N     A  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
  170          3.00   1.00  3♠ N +1   ♣6  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
  110          2.00   2.00  2 N      ♣7  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
  100          1.00   3.00  4 E -2   5  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
         50    0.00   4.00  4 N -1   ♣7  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
18 ♠AQ87
8
KJ942
♣J82
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠643
QJT3
A
♣KT764
♠T95
A542
QT863
♣3
♠KJ2
K976
75
♣AQ95
11
106
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 3/2 3/2♠ 2NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-N
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          4.00   0.00  2N S      Q  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Loops-Walker
   90          3.00   1.00  1N S      3  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        100    1.50   2.50  3N S -1   Q  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Davidson-Winham
        100    1.50   2.50  3N N -1   6  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 9-Harken-Murdock
        200    0.00   4.00                8-Tidmore-Traback vs 11-Pender-Kobland
19 ♠AT2
Q97632
7
♣632
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J7643
AKJ8
53
♣85
♠985
T54
K642
♣KT7
♠KQ
-
AQJT98
♣AQJ94
6
96
19
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 4 3 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦2/1 ♥4 ♠5 NT4/3
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +920 6♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          4.00   0.00  5♣ S +1   A  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  150          3.00   1.00  3 S +2   A  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
  130          1.00   3.00  4 S      A  11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
  130          1.00   3.00  3 S +1   A  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
  130          1.00   3.00  2♣ S +2   A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
20 ♠7
AQT7
AK
♣AKT953
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠953
J6
J9763
♣QJ7
♠AKJT
9543
T54
♣82
♠Q8642
K82
Q82
♣64
20
58
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 5 3♠ 4NT
EW:
       ♣0/1 ♦4/5 ♥0/1 ♠4 NT0/2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +650 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1430          4.00   0.00  6 N      ♠A  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
  630          3.00   1.00  3N N +1   ♠A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  600          2.00   2.00  5♣ N      ♠A  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  230          1.00   3.00  2 N +4   ♣8  11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
  140          0.00   4.00  3 N      ♠A  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
21 ♠63
KJ2
J4
♣AQ9732
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠9
T954
AK8732
♣T5
♠AKJ54
763
Q65
♣K8
♠QT872
AQ8
T9
♣J64
11
713
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3 2 3NT  ♣5 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.50   1.50  3 W      ♠6  2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        110    2.50   1.50  3 W      ♠6  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        110    2.50   1.50  3 W      2  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
        110    2.50   1.50  2 W +1   2  12-Hullman-Formoso vs 7-Loops-Walker
        200    0.00   4.00  2 S -2   ♠9  11-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Harken-Murdock
22 ♠KJ642
863
T43
♣Q6
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠T83
AQJT972
8
♣AK
♠A97
K5
QJ76
♣JT42
♠Q5
4
AK952
♣98753
6
1411
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣6 ♥1 ♠5 NT1
EW: 1♣ 4 2♠ 5NT  ♦6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -660 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    3.25   0.75  4 W      ♠7  11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        620    3.25   0.75  4 W      ♠4  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
        650    0.75   3.25  4 W +1   ♣Q  7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        650    0.75   3.25  4 W +1   ♣6  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
23 ♠JT72
-
983
♣AT9843
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AQ854
A87
74
♣K62
♠3
KJT6432
AKQ
♣QJ
♠K96
Q95
JT652
♣75
5
1316
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦4 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
EW: 1♣ 2/3 6 4♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.88   0.13  6 E -1   J  11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        650    2.63   1.38  5 E      ♣9  7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        680    1.38   2.63  4 E +2   ♣7  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
       1430    0.13   3.88  6 E      ♣8  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
24 ♠T87
Q97
K86
♣Q642
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQ4
AKT83
95
♣T98
♠KJ52
J4
JT73
♣J73
♠963
652
AQ42
♣AK5
7
137
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣5 ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -100 2NT*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.25   0.75  1N E -2   ♣K  6-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
  100          3.25   0.75  3 W -2   ♣2  11-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
   50          1.38   2.63  1N W -1   ♣2  7-Loops-Walker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        110    0.13   3.88  2♠ E      ♣A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand
25 ♠K2
J92
QJ982
♣J65
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q73
T643
T3
♣K943
♠AJ98
K87
AK764
♣7
♠T654
AQ5
5
♣AQT82
8
515
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ -/1 1NT  ♦6/7 ♥6 ♠6
EW: 1 1♠  ♣5 ♦6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 1NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.67   0.33  1* E -1  2  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  100          2.00   2.00  2 W -1   ♣5  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham
         50    0.33   3.67  3♣ N -1   3  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
26 ♠J432
AK
32
♣A7654
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T976
QJ84
AK6
♣82
♠AQ85
T93
QT8
♣KT9
♠K
7652
J9754
♣QJ3
12
1011
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5
EW: 1 2 4♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -620 4♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.67   0.33  2♠ E -1   K  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        100    1.17   2.83  1N N -1   T  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham
        100    1.17   2.83  2♣ N -1   3  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
27 ♠K5
T6
92
♣KQJ9653
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠J42
AQJ542
J53
♣4
♠AT87
873
KQ84
♣T8
♠Q963
K9
AT76
♣A72
9
99
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2 4 2/1♠  ♣4 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -300 5♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          3.67   0.33  3♣ N +1   3  4-Vishnevsky-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        100    2.00   2.00  5♣ N -2   K  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 6-Ruggeri-Girouard
        170    0.33   3.67  3 W +1   9  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Davidson-Winham