? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Jan Winham - Leslie Davidson 61.11 1st A 1.00
John Walker - Lester Loops 55.21 2nd A 0.70
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano 53.81 1st B 0.56
Nancy Pringle - Nandor Vadas 51.54 2nd B 0.39
Bette Harken - David Harken 49.00 3rd B 0.28
Francesco Ruggeri - Kenneth Girouard 46.27 2nd C 0.22
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>March 11, 2026     |CLUB NO.>137059    | 03/11/2026 21:27
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   48.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=7/C=4                      ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lester Loops           John Walker              A    2     .     .     53.00  55.21  0.70(A) 
 2 Peter Gelfand          Ken Gamble               A    .     .     .     47.93  49.93          
 3 Richard Pearce         Susan Pearce             C    .     .     .     42.43  44.20          
 4 Jan Winham             Leslie Davidson          A    1     .     .     58.67  61.11  1.00(A) 
 5 Bette Harken           David Harken             B    .     3     .     47.04  49.00  0.28(B) 
 6 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B    3     1     .     51.66  53.81  0.56(B) 
 7 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            C    4     2     1     49.48  51.54  0.39(B) 
 8 Francesco Ruggeri      Kenneth Girouard         C    .     .     2     44.42  46.27  0.22(C) 
 9 Matthew Nathanson      Lesley Xu                C    .     .     .     41.43  43.16          
10 Michael Modest         Christina Kobland        B    .     .     .     44.67  46.53          
                                          Totals                         480.73       

1 ♠K942
AKT7
AQJT2
♣-
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠AT63
842
65
♣AQJ8
♠J
Q9653
43
♣K7653
♠Q875
J
K987
♣T942
17
116
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 4♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♥6
EW: 2♣ 1  ♦1 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.88   0.13  3 W -1   ♠2  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
         50    2.63   1.38  3♠ S -1   5  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        100    0.75   3.25  4♠ S -2   6  10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
        100    0.75   3.25  4♠ S -2   ♣Q  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
2 ♠Q842
8653
63
♣964
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠6
AJ92
KJT874
♣QJ
♠AKT93
QT7
Q9
♣A32
♠J75
K4
A52
♣KT875
2
1215
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1
EW: 2♣ 6 6/5 4/3♠ 6/5NT
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -990 6NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        460    3.88   0.13  3N E +2   ♣5  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        490    1.38   2.63  3N E +3   ♣7  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
        490    1.38   2.63  3N E +3   ♣7  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
        490    1.38   2.63  3N E +3   ♣7  10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
3 ♠Q74
AQ5
974
♣AJ96
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KT2
J76
KT
♣KT842
♠A8653
842
AJ86
♣Q
♠J9
KT93
Q532
♣753
13
1011
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6
EW: 1♣ 1 2♠  ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.25   0.75  1N W -1   ♣6  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Harken-Harken
  100          3.25   0.75  2♠ E -1   ♣5  10-Modest-Kobland vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
        110    1.38   2.63  2♠ E      3  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        140    0.13   3.88  2♠ E +1   3  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
4 ♠KJ87
Q42
J63
♣Q42
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T64
J73
K742
♣965
♠AQ95
A95
T9
♣A873
♠32
KT86
AQ85
♣KJT
9
414
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 1/2 1 -/1NT
       ♣6/7 ♠6 NT6/7
EW: 1♠  ♣6 ♦5 ♥5/6 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +90 1NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.88   0.13  1N S +1   ♣5  5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
  100          2.63   1.38  1N W -1   ♠7  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
        100    1.38   2.63  1♠ N -1   2  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        200    0.13   3.88  2 S -2   ♣9  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
5 ♠QT3
J65
J974
♣Q87
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠A74
Q2
Q532
♣T954
♠865
A87
AT8
♣AJ62
♠KJ92
KT943
K6
♣K3
6
813
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1♠  ♣5/4 ♦6/5 NT6
EW: 2♣ 1 1NT  ♥5 ♠6/5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 2NT*-EW/2*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.88   0.13  1 S +1   ♣4  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
        110    2.00   2.00  3♣ E      T  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        110    2.00   2.00  3♣ E      9  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
        200    0.13   3.88  3 S -2   ♣5  5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
6 ♠AK86
632
AJ
♣AK73
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠7
AKJT5
T8
♣J6542
♠J943
74
K73
♣QT98
♠QT52
Q98
Q96542
♣-
19
96
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 3♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♥6/5
EW: 3♣ 1  ♦2 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.88   0.13  3 S      A  5-Harken-Harken vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
         50    2.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   A  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
         50    2.00   2.00  4♠ S -1   A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
        100    0.13   3.88  2N N -2   7  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 4-Winham-Davidson
7 ♠Q7642
K63
K93
♣K3
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠8
AT74
AJT75
♣QT9
♠J
Q985
Q64
♣AJ854
♠AKT953
J2
82
♣762
11
1110
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 NT6
EW: 4♣ 4 4 1NT  ♠4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -200 4♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    2.63   1.38  4♠ S -1   ♠8  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
        100    2.63   1.38  4♠ S -1   A  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        100    2.63   1.38  4♠ S -1   ♣9  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
        620    0.13   3.88  4 E      ♠A  10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
8 ♠Q85
AKQ653
J3
♣K7
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠763
9
AK92
♣QJ643
♠JT42
J8
Q74
♣T952
♠AK9
T742
T865
♣A8
15
104
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 5 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥2 ♠5 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          3.88   0.13  4 N +2   ♠J  10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
  450          1.38   2.63  4 S +1   ♠J  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
  450          1.38   2.63  4 N +1   ♠J  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
  450          1.38   2.63  4 N +1   ♣T  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
9 ♠J842
AT5
AKJ985
♣-
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠A9
9732
T762
♣AJT
♠QT73
Q4
4
♣KQ9863
♠K65
KJ86
Q3
♣7542
13
99
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3 3♠  ♣4 NT6
EW: 3♣  ♦2 ♥3 ♠4 NT3
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +140 3♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          3.88   0.13  3 N +1   ♣K  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
  110          2.00   2.00  2♠ N      5  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 4-Winham-Davidson
  110          2.00   2.00  3 N      4  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Harken-Harken
        200    0.13   3.88  3 S -4   2  10-Modest-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
10 ♠J9843
5
K983
♣754
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠Q752
KQ62
2
♣T632
♠KT
98
AQT76
♣AQ98
♠A6
AJT743
J54
♣KJ
4
715
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥5/6 ♠5/6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1 1 1♠ 1NT
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -110 3♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.25   0.75  3 E -2   A  1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
  200          3.25   0.75  4♣ E -2   A  10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
        130    1.38   2.63  3♣ E +1   4  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
        300    0.13   3.88  2 S -3   2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
11 ♠AK6
Q7
A8753
♣KQ7
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠732
KJ52
J9
♣J932
♠984
9643
KQT6
♣54
♠QJT5
AT8
42
♣AT86
18
65
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4/3 2 5♠ 4NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +450 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          2.63   1.38  3N S +2   2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
  460          2.63   1.38  3N N +2   6  10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
  460          2.63   1.38  3N N +2   3  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  430          0.13   3.88  3N N +1   4  1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
12 ♠9
AT532
JT95
♣A73
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJ852
64
43
♣QT65
♠AT76
Q9
AK6
♣J982
♠K43
KJ87
Q872
♣K4
9
514
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3 2NT  ♣6 ♠6
EW: 1♣ 1♠  ♦3 ♥3 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  790          3.88   0.13  4* N     A  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  100          2.63   1.38  4♠ E -2   A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Winham-Davidson
   50          1.38   2.63  3♠ W -1   J  1-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
        110    0.13   3.88  2♠ E      7  10-Modest-Kobland vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
13 ♠A6
KT8
AK3
♣76432
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠842
76
QT8652
♣Q5
♠KQJ95
952
J9
♣AJ9
♠T73
AQJ43
74
♣KT8
14
412
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 1♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW:  ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          4.00   0.00  4 S      ♠8  4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
  170          3.00   1.00  3 S +1   ♠2  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
  140          2.00   2.00  3 S      ♠2  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
        100    0.50   3.50  3N N -1   ♠K  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        100    0.50   3.50  4 S -1   ♠8  10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
14 ♠T742
KT86532
8
♣T
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠9
QJ
AKT953
♣A984
♠AQJ3
-
QJ742
♣K752
♠K865
A974
6
♣QJ63
3
1413
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 1♠  ♣2 ♦1 NT4
EW: 5♣ 6  ♥4 ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 22 = -3
Par: -920 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    4.00   0.00  5 N -2   ♣2  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
        200    3.00   1.00  5 N -4   Q  10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        420    1.50   2.50  5 E +1   6  4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
        420    1.50   2.50  5 E +1   ♣6  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
        650    0.00   4.00  5* E +1  A  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
15 ♠A42
K652
KQ98
♣J5
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠T93
Q874
A6
♣K874
♠K76
JT9
542
♣A632
♠QJ85
A3
JT73
♣QT9
13
98
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1 2♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠5/4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.00   0.00  3♠ S      6  10-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
  120          3.00   1.00  1N S +1   A  4-Winham-Davidson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
  110          2.00   2.00  2♠ S      4  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
   90          0.50   3.50  1N N      ♣5  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
   90          0.50   3.50  2 N      J  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Harken-Harken
16 ♠AJ765
9632
A85
♣9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠K84
854
JT432
♣52
♠T2
KQ7
K96
♣AQT74
♠Q93
AJT
Q7
♣KJ863
9
414
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2/3♣ 1 4 4♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6/5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +420 4♠-NS/4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          4.00   0.00  2 W -4   ♣9  5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  200          2.50   1.50  1N E -2   ♣6  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
  200          2.50   1.50  2♠ N +3   6  10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
  170          1.00   3.00  1♠ N +3   K  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  140          0.00   4.00  2♠ N +1   K  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
17 ♠AQT53
AJT52
J
♣93
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠92
84
Q52
♣AKQ854
♠KJ
K973
AT97
♣T62
♠8764
Q6
K8643
♣J7
12
1111
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 2♠  ♣3 ♦4 NT3
EW: 4♣ 1 2NT  ♥5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.00   0.00  3♠ N      ♣2  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
  110          3.00   1.00  2♠ N      ♣T  10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
   50          2.00   2.00  5♣ W -1   ♠A  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
         50    0.50   3.50  4♠ S -1   ♣A  5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
         50    0.50   3.50  3♠ N -1   ♣5  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
18 ♠942
AQT
AT96
♣AQ6
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J
J3
K853
♣KT9854
♠AQ763
K52
J42
♣J7
♠KT85
98764
Q7
♣32
16
811
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 3 2♠ 3NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +500 4♣*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          4.00   0.00  2 S +2   ♣5  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Loops-Walker
  110          3.00   1.00  2 S      ♠J  5-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          2.00   2.00  2♠ E -2   Q  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
   50          1.00   3.00  3♣ W -1   A  9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
         90    0.00   4.00  1N W      6  10-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Winham-Davidson
19 ♠A3
Q9
J6532
♣Q542
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠J8542
T654
AT9
♣K
♠76
KJ8732
Q
♣9873
♠KQT9
A
K874
♣AJT6
9
86
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 2/1♠ 3NT  ♥4
EW: 3  ♣3 ♦2 ♠5 NT3
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +400 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          4.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♠2  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  400          3.00   1.00  3N S      ♠5  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
         50    1.50   2.50  3N S -1   ♠3  4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
         50    1.50   2.50  4 N -1   ♠7  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
        200    0.00   4.00  3N S -4   4  10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
20 ♠Q9542
AJ972
J7
♣5
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠A63
T63
AKQ2
♣QJ2
♠KJT87
K
9643
♣K97
♠-
Q854
T85
♣AT8643
8
1610
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♦2 ♠4 NT5
EW: 3♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦6 ♥3
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   A  10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
  200          3.50   0.50  4♠ W -2   ♣5  4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
  100          1.00   3.00  3N W -1   ♠4  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
  100          1.00   3.00  4♠ W -1   ♣5  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  100          1.00   3.00  2♠ E -1   4  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
21 ♠A9762
A
KQT4
♣JT9
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠J83
KQJT5
97
♣A65
♠KQ54
986
863
♣KQ4
♠T
7432
AJ52
♣8732
14
1110
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1♠  ♥6 NT6
EW: 1 1NT  ♣5 ♦3 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.25   0.75  3 W -2   ♠A  4-Winham-Davidson vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
  100          3.25   0.75  3 W -2   K  6-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
   50          1.38   2.63  3 W -1   ♣J  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Gelfand-Gamble
        110    0.13   3.88  2 W      ♣J  10-Modest-Kobland vs 5-Harken-Harken
22 ♠AT7
K87
QJ973
♣K2
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠QJ986
AT6
A2
♣985
♠532
Q4
K864
♣AJ43
♠K4
J9532
T5
♣QT76
13
1110
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 1  ♣6 ♠5 NT6/5
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT  ♦5 ♥5
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +90 2-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   1.00  2N E -1   T  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  100          3.00   1.00  3♠ W -1   7  10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
  100          3.00   1.00  2♠ W -1   Q  4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
         50    1.00   3.00  3 S -1   ♠Q  5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
        140    0.00   4.00  3♠ W      ♣K  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
23 ♠Q53
72
7542
♣AT95
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ86
54
AKT86
♣J3
♠KT2
AT8
J3
♣Q8642
♠974
KQJ963
Q9
♣K7
6
1310
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 4 4♠ 4NT  ♥6
LoTT: 17 - 15 = +2
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          4.00   0.00  2 S      A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
        100    2.50   1.50  2 S -1   K  4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
        100    2.50   1.50  2 N -1   A  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
        120    1.00   3.00  1N E +1   K  5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
        600    0.00   4.00  3N W      7  10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
24 ♠6
AT8632
83
♣Q987
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AQ42
J54
AT64
♣JT
♠J873
KQ7
K95
♣K54
♠KT95
9
QJ72
♣A632
6
1212
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5
EW: 2/1 -/1 2♠ 2NT
       ♣5 ♥6/7
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.50   0.50  4♠* W -2  A  2-Gelfand-Gamble vs 8-Ruggeri-Girouard
  300          3.50   0.50  4♠* E -2  A  10-Modest-Kobland vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
   50          1.50   2.50  3N E -1   ♠5  4-Winham-Davidson vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
   50          1.50   2.50  3♠ E -1   9  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
        140    0.00   4.00  3♠ W      A  5-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
25 ♠AJT742
A2
763
♣K7
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K
Q974
AJ82
♣JT83
♠Q9863
KT53
QT
♣54
♠5
J86
K954
♣AQ962
12
117
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 1♠  ♥5 NT6
EW: 2 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -100 2♠*-NS/2*-NS/2♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.63   1.38  3♠ N -1   ♣5  10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
         50    2.63   1.38  2♠ N -1   ♠5  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
         50    2.63   1.38  2♠ N -1   3  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
        100    0.13   3.88  3N N -2   5  5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
26 ♠J9
AK976432
54
♣J
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T65
-
AT632
♣AK732
♠A32
Q5
K98
♣T9854
♠KQ874
JT8
QJ7
♣Q6
9
119
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3  ♣1 ♦3 ♠6 NT5
EW: 5♣ 4 1♠  ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 20 - 21 = -1
Par: -500 5*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          3.88   0.13  4 N +2   ♠A  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
  620          2.63   1.38  4 N      ♣T  10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  140          0.75   3.25  3 N      8  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
  140          0.75   3.25  3 N      ♣T  5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
27 ♠984
A4
K97
♣A8743
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠62
QJT93
JT54
♣95
♠AJ53
75
Q32
♣KQT6
♠KQT7
K862
A86
♣J2
11
412
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 1 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          3.88   0.13  3N N      ♠3  8-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 1-Loops-Walker
  150          2.63   1.38  2N S +1   Q  3-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
         50    0.75   3.25  3N S -1   Q  5-Harken-Harken vs 4-Winham-Davidson
         50    0.75   3.25  3N N -1   ♠3  10-Modest-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle