| 1 |
♠AT632
♥J854
♦A6
♣85
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.88 0.13 5♥* E -5 ♠K 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♥6 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 1.38 2.63 3♠ S +2 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Harken-Harken
50 0.13 3.88 5♠ S -1 ♣A 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 2 |
♠AQ52
♥987
♦T9874
♣J
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4/5 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -1 ♣J 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♠2 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ W ♣J 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
420 0.75 3.25 4♥ W ♣J 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
| 3 |
♠2
♥J54
♦A843
♣KQJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ W -1 ♣K 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♠9 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 2.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♠3 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
150 0.13 3.88 4♣ N -3 ♠9 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
| 4 |
♠42
♥92
♦86
♣AQT9872
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 |
| EW: 1/-♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦7/6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 4♥ W -2 ♦8 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦5 1-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
620 0.33 3.67 4♥ E ♦A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 5 |
♠KJT98763
♥A
♦AK
♣J8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♥4 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3♠ N -1 ♣A 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
200 1.17 2.83 4♠ N -2 ♦J 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
200 1.17 2.83 4♠ N -2 ♦5 1-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
| 6 |
♠54
♥K6
♦A965
♣K9843
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦5 1-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦3 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 7 |
♠T943
♥KQ92
♦K7
♣A43
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♥ S ♦4 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
110 2.00 2.00 1♥ S +1 ♦4 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Ray-Dau
100 0.33 3.67 4♥ S -1 ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
|
| 8 |
♠95
♥AJT432
♦AT5
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.67 0.33 3N S +1 ♦9 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
50 2.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦J 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 0.33 3.67 4♥ N -2 ♦J 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
| 9 |
♠KQT72
♥K98
♦A
♣KQT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT6 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥3 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 1♠ N +3 ♠8 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ W +1 ♠K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
130 0.33 3.67 3♦ W +1 ♠K 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
| 10 |
♠Q94
♥AQ8654
♦83
♣J8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣5 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ S +2 ♦6 10-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +2 ♠2 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Walker
620 0.75 3.25 4♥ S ♦6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
620 0.75 3.25 4♥ S ♦2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 11 |
♠K3
♥T9743
♦K9852
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 2/3♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♣K 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Walker
50 2.63 1.38 3♠ E -1 ♥4 10-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ W +1 ♣6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ E +1 ♣K 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 12 |
♠AKJ2
♥Q85
♦J832
♣82
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3♦ E -1 ♥4 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Walker
100 2.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♣6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 0.33 3.67 3♦ E ♥3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 13 |
♠JT87642
♥K5
♦943
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 2/3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 3N W -3 ♠J 1-Harken-Harken vs 10-Pender-Kobland
100 2.00 2.00 2N W -1 ♠J 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠Q 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
140 0.13 3.88 2♥ W +1 ♠7 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
| 14 |
♠K2
♥JT942
♦K5
♣J974
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ -/1NT ♠3 NT6/7 |
| EW: 4♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♦ S -2 ♠Q 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♥J 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Loops-Walker
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +2 ♥J 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ W ♦K 1-Harken-Harken vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
| 15 |
♠T53
♥AT654
♦T94
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 3N W -1 ♥5 9-Nathanson-Xu vs 6-Loops-Walker
50 3.25 0.75 3♠ E -1 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
130 1.38 2.63 4♣ W ♦4 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.13 3.88 4♣ W +1 ♦T 1-Harken-Harken vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
| 16 |
♠QJ4
♥T8
♦J853
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠6 1-Harken-Harken vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠6 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ W +1 ♥8 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣Q 8-Ray-Dau vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♣2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
| 17 |
♠A63
♥JT94
♦AK
♣JT43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4/3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +2 ♦J 1-Harken-Harken vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♠5 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
460 2.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♥5 8-Ray-Dau vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♦J 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ S ♦J 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
| 18 |
♠QT32
♥A4
♦A53
♣K932
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥5 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
50 2.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
50 2.00 2.00 1♥ E -1 ♣6 1-Harken-Harken vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ W -1 ♠2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Walker
90 0.00 4.00 1N W ♠2 8-Ray-Dau vs 11-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠AQ4
♥653
♦K86
♣A963
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥7 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
430 3.50 0.50 3N N +1 ♥3 6-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
180 2.00 2.00 2N N +2 ♥K 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Harken-Harken
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♥T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 0.00 4.00 5♣ S -1 ♥T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
| 20 |
♠KJ2
♥T6
♦K7
♣T96432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ ♦7/6 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♥T 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ W ♥T 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♣7 6-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W +1 ♥T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 21 |
♠T8542
♥73
♦JT3
♣KT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3/2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♠T 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Harken-Harken
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ W ♣5 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Nathanson-Xu
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ E +2 ♥5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠T 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ruggeri-Girouard
170 0.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♠2 6-Loops-Walker vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
|
| 22 |
♠KJ3
♥A865
♦T5
♣J963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.25 0.75 5♣ N +1 ♦A 6-Loops-Walker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
420 3.25 0.75 5♣ N +1 ♣7 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
150 1.38 2.63 3♣ S +2 ♥Q 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -2 ♥4 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
| 23 |
♠AKJ432
♥J6
♦AK
♣763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.25 0.75 4♠ N ♥A 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Harken
620 3.25 0.75 4♠ N ♥K 6-Loops-Walker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.75 3.25 5♥ E -1 ♠Q 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
100 0.75 3.25 5♥ E -1 ♠T 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 24 |
♠AJT52
♥KJ82
♦5
♣A86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.25 0.75 3♠ N +1 ♦K 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Gelfand-Gamble
170 3.25 0.75 2♠ N +2 ♦K 6-Loops-Walker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.38 2.63 2♠ N +1 ♦K 7-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 5-Davidson-Winham
50 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -1 ♣5 11-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Harken-Harken
|
| 25 |
♠J
♥QJT542
♦94
♣Q754
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3/2♥ ♣5 ♦4/3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1/-♠ 2/-NT ♥4 ♠7/6 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♥ N ♣J 8-Ray-Dau vs 6-Loops-Walker
50 1.17 2.83 4♥ N -1 ♣J 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Harken-Harken
50 1.17 2.83 3♥ N -1 ♦8 5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
| 26 |
♠A862
♥J8
♦974
♣KQ74
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.67 0.33 6♥ E -3 ♥6 5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♦5 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Harken-Harken
650 0.33 3.67 4♥ E +1 ♠5 8-Ray-Dau vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
| 27 |
♠T9
♥AT9
♦AK2
♣KQ762
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.67 0.33 3N N +1 ♠5 4-Gelfand-Gamble vs 1-Harken-Harken
400 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠4 5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
100 0.33 3.67 3♦ N -2 ♣J 8-Ray-Dau vs 6-Loops-Walker
|