| 1 |
♠AT96
♥KQ3
♦QT743
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ S +1 ♣T 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Walker
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ S ♣T 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ W -2 ♣Q 9-Modest-Cottel vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
150 0.13 3.88 2N E +1 ♦5 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 3-Kobland-Pender
|
| 2 |
♠A52
♥8753
♦2
♣T9865
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ N -1 ♥T 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Walker
150 2.63 1.38 3♦ E +2 ♠3 9-Modest-Cottel vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
180 1.38 2.63 1N W +3 ♣6 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
430 0.13 3.88 3N E +1 ♥6 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 3-Kobland-Pender
|
| 3 |
♠-
♥A9743
♦T86
♣JT743
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 3/4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.25 0.75 2N W +2 ♦6 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Walker
180 3.25 0.75 1N W +3 ♥4 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 3-Kobland-Pender
600 1.38 2.63 3N E ♠A 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
660 0.13 3.88 3N W +2 ♥4 9-Modest-Cottel vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 4 |
♠AKT7
♥95
♦JT4
♣A765
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ W ♥9 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 1-Simon-Sterling vs 3-Kobland-Pender
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♠A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Johnson-Loops
990 0.13 3.88 4♥* W +1 ♠A 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
|
| 5 |
♠A43
♥QT6
♦KT7
♣A653
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ 5NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.88 0.13 4♥* E -5 ♣4 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
800 2.63 1.38 5♥* W -4 ♣A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
300 1.38 2.63 4♥* E -2 ♠A 1-Simon-Sterling vs 3-Kobland-Pender
100 0.13 3.88 4♥* W -1 ♦7 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Johnson-Loops
|
| 6 |
♠Q3
♥KQT853
♦QJ
♣J63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 3N S +2 ♣5 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
450 2.63 1.38 5♥ N ♠A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Johnson-Loops
200 0.75 3.25 3♥ N +2 ♠A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
200 0.75 3.25 3♥ N +2 ♦9 1-Simon-Sterling vs 3-Kobland-Pender
|
| 7 |
♠AQ85
♥T82
♦J43
♣T52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2/3 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 6♣ E -2 ♥A 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 3-Kobland-Pender
300 2.63 1.38 4♥ S -3 ♠5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Simon-Sterling
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ E ♦2 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 4-Johnson-Loops
630 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♥2 9-Modest-Cottel vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
|
| 8 |
♠K97
♥AQ86
♦KQ3
♣Q97
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 1N N ♠Q 9-Modest-Cottel vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.38 2.63 1N N -1 ♠Q 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 4-Johnson-Loops
50 1.38 2.63 1N N -1 ♠Q 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 3-Kobland-Pender
50 1.38 2.63 1N N -1 ♠Q 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Simon-Sterling
|
| 9 |
♠J75
♥A64
♦A943
♣KJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠3 |
| EW: 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♠* W -1 ♠5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Simon-Sterling
50 2.63 1.38 3♦ N -1 ♠3 9-Modest-Cottel vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
170 0.75 3.25 2♠ W +2 ♥A 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 3-Kobland-Pender
170 0.75 3.25 2♠ W +2 ♣J 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 4-Johnson-Loops
|
| 10 |
♠KT76
♥QJ62
♦K7
♣642
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2/3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♥ W -1 ♠6 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Loops
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♠6 9-Modest-Cottel vs 8-Loops-Walker
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♥2 1-Simon-Sterling vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
120 0.13 3.88 1N W +1 ♣8 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 11 |
♠K7643
♥76
♦8
♣AQT62
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5/4♣ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT ♦6/5 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 4♦ E -3 ♥A 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
130 2.63 1.38 4♣ N ♠9 1-Simon-Sterling vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ N ♦4 9-Modest-Cottel vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 0.13 3.88 3♦ W -2 ♥7 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Loops
|
| 12 |
♠A8
♥T7642
♦A65
♣KT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ E -2 ♥K 1-Simon-Sterling vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♠5 9-Modest-Cottel vs 8-Loops-Walker
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥K 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Loops
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ E ♥K 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 13 |
♠J2
♥QJ
♦AJ62
♣J5432
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥4 4-Johnson-Loops vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ S +2 ♠2 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♦5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Kobland-Pender
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S ♥4 8-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ E -1 ♣K 1-Simon-Sterling vs 9-Modest-Cottel
|
| 14 |
♠QT543
♥J85
♦A6
♣AK8
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 1♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6/3NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♦2 4-Johnson-Loops vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♠2 8-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥T 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ S ♠8 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Kobland-Pender
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♦2 1-Simon-Sterling vs 9-Modest-Cottel
|
| 15 |
♠5
♥JT98652
♦AK
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♥ N +2 ♦5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 3-Kobland-Pender
200 3.50 0.50 2♥ S +3 ♥K 8-Loops-Walker vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦6 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N ♠3 4-Johnson-Loops vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Simon-Sterling vs 9-Modest-Cottel
|
| 16 |
♠KJ952
♥T7543
♦75
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -1 ♠A 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Loops
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♣K 3-Kobland-Pender vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ E -1 ♠A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ E -1 ♦T 9-Modest-Cottel vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -1 ♥9 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Simon-Sterling
|
| 17 |
♠A983
♥T74
♦J6
♣AJ75
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 6♦ 3♥ 7♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥4 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 4.00 0.00 6♠ S +1 ♥5 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Simon-Sterling
510 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +3 ♥5 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
510 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +3 ♣6 9-Modest-Cottel vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♠5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Loops
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +2 ♦6 3-Kobland-Pender vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
| 18 |
♠95
♥A8432
♦QJ854
♣6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2/3♣ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♦Q 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
170 2.50 1.50 3♠ W +1 ♣6 9-Modest-Cottel vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ W +2 ♣6 3-Kobland-Pender vs 8-Loops-Walker
200 1.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♣K 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Simon-Sterling
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ W ♦Q 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Loops
|
| 19 |
♠Q2
♥AJ964
♦AKT52
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦8 3-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ E ♦8 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +2 ♦3 1-Simon-Sterling vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
300 1.00 3.00 5♦* N -2 ♥T 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 8-Loops-Walker
500 0.00 4.00 5♦* N -3 ♥T 4-Johnson-Loops vs 9-Modest-Cottel
|
| 20 |
♠Q964
♥K765
♦9
♣AQ54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 3♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠3 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 8-Loops-Walker
600 2.50 1.50 3N S ♠3 4-Johnson-Loops vs 9-Modest-Cottel
600 2.50 1.50 3N N ♦2 1-Simon-Sterling vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠3 3-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 21 |
♠KJT8652
♥6
♦QT
♣842
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 1♦ 4♥ 3NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 6♥ W -1 ♠J 3-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Boggs-Gelfand
50 3.50 0.50 5♥ W -1 ♠2 4-Johnson-Loops vs 9-Modest-Cottel
200 2.00 2.00 4♠* N -1 ♥A 1-Simon-Sterling vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♣2 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 5-Llacera-Llacera
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
| 22 |
♠KJ952
♥7
♦AQ4
♣T942
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥5 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Simon-Sterling
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦2 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♣3 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Loops-Walker
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ N ♦8 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 9-Modest-Cottel
420 0.50 3.50 4♠ N ♦2 4-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Kobland-Pender
|
| 23 |
♠A974
♥982
♦KJ4
♣862
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♥ S +2 ♣5 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Loops-Walker
170 2.50 1.50 2♠ N +2 ♣A 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Simon-Sterling
170 2.50 1.50 2♥ S +2 ♠J 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 9-Modest-Cottel
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ S ♠J 4-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Kobland-Pender
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ S ♠5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
|
| 24 |
♠94
♥Q85
♦AT75
♣J632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3/2 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♠5 7-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 9-Modest-Cottel
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥4 2-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Loops-Walker
430 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 6-Shoemaker-Wesolowski
400 1.00 3.00 3N S ♥T 4-Johnson-Loops vs 3-Kobland-Pender
50 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥4 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Simon-Sterling
|
| 25 |
♠AKJ5
♥82
♦92
♣97543
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 5♦ E -2 ♥A 3-Kobland-Pender vs 9-Modest-Cottel
100 2.63 1.38 4♦ E -1 ♠4 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Loops
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E ♣J 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
130 0.13 3.88 3♦ E +1 ♣J 8-Loops-Walker vs 1-Simon-Sterling
|
| 26 |
♠T542
♥J83
♦2
♣A8643
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1/-NT ♣5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 1N E -2 ♥6 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Loops
120 2.63 1.38 2N E ♦J 8-Loops-Walker vs 1-Simon-Sterling
150 1.38 2.63 2N E +1 ♦J 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
300 0.13 3.88 3♦ S -3 ♠3 3-Kobland-Pender vs 9-Modest-Cottel
|
| 27 |
♠AQ3
♥A876
♦J64
♣AQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♦ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -1 ♦5 8-Loops-Walker vs 1-Simon-Sterling
50 3.25 0.75 2♠ E -1 ♦5 10-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Wainer-Ruggeri
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ E ♦6 3-Kobland-Pender vs 9-Modest-Cottel
110 0.75 3.25 2♠ E ♦5 5-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Loops
|