| 1 |
♠AKQ4
♥A98
♦T74
♣T63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♣9 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
460 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♣4 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
430 0.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♣8 2-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
430 0.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♣8 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 2 |
♠JT632
♥732
♦54
♣Q92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 4/3♣ 4/3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♠5 2-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♥8 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦A 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦3 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 3 |
♠AJ75
♥T43
♦T84
♣K95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: -/1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 3/4NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠5 2-Modest-Kobland vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
630 2.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠5 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
630 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♥3 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
660 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♠5 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
|
| 4 |
♠A4
♥KJ82
♦T65
♣AKQ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠1 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 2.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♥9 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
720 2.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♥6 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 2-Modest-Kobland
720 2.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♥5 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
200 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -2 ♠5 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
|
| 5 |
♠92
♥Q832
♦Q84
♣J762
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 ♠9 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
100 2.50 0.50 2♥ W -2 ♠9 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
110 1.00 2.00 3♣ E ♠A 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 2-Modest-Kobland
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ W +1 ♠9 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
|
| 6 |
♠JT52
♥QT76
♦T9
♣K65
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♦7 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦7 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
100 1.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♦A 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
90 0.00 3.00 1N S ♦7 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 2-Modest-Kobland
|
| 7 |
♠AT32
♥42
♦AT62
♣AT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ W +2 ♥2 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
170 2.50 0.50 2♥ W +2 ♦5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 2-Modest-Kobland
200 1.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♥T 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ W ♦A 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
|
| 8 |
♠QJT9
♥AK4
♦Q8
♣AT93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♣Q 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣Q 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
170 1.00 2.00 4♦ N +2 ♥5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 2-Modest-Kobland
50 0.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 ♣Q 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
|
| 9 |
♠J
♥97643
♦K7
♣AJT54
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♥4 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♣8 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
630 1.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♣J 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 2-Modest-Kobland
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥2 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 10 |
♠K
♥QJ9642
♦AK4
♣K32
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1♦ 4/5♥ 4/5♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 5♥ N ♦T 2-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
650 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♦T 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♦T 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
600 0.00 3.00 3N N ♣7 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
|
| 11 |
♠KT3
♥53
♦AJT9
♣KJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4/5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♥5 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♣J 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
50 2.00 1.00 2♥ E -1 ♦2 2-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦2 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 12 |
♠AQJ9
♥AJT942
♦T
♣KQ
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 6♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠3 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♦2 2-Modest-Kobland vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
680 2.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♠8 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ S +1 ♠7 9-Henderson-Ducey vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 13 |
♠AK2
♥K97543
♦-
♣A987
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 7♥ 6♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥0 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 2.50 0.50 6♥ N +1 ♠J 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
1460 2.50 0.50 6♥ N +1 ♦9 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 2-Modest-Kobland
1430 1.00 2.00 6♥ N ♣5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
680 0.00 3.00 4♥ N +2 ♠J 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 14 |
♠J9
♥5
♦AQ963
♣K9765
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♥ -/1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♠6/7 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♠T 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 2-Modest-Kobland
150 2.00 1.00 4♦ S +1 ♠T 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
50 0.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥J 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
50 0.50 2.50 5♦ N -1 ♣4 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
|
| 15 |
♠KJT965
♥T4
♦Q94
♣J9
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥2 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
100 2.00 1.00 4♥* W -1 ♦4 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 2-Modest-Kobland
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥2 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠J 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
|
| 16 |
♠J
♥AQ9832
♦JT64
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠3 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♦K 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ N +1 ♦K 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
170 2.00 1.00 2♥ N +2 ♦K 2-Modest-Kobland vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
50 0.00 3.00 5♥ N -1 ♠7 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
|
| 17 |
♠A8
♥T6
♦AJ532
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♣5 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
90 2.00 1.00 2♦ N ♥3 2-Modest-Kobland vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♠6 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ N -2 ♥3 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
|
| 18 |
♠KT
♥AK62
♦Q752
♣QT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♥7 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 6-Millslagle-Graves
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♠5 7-Boggs-Gelfand vs 1-Davidson-Gamble
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♣5 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
200 0.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♥4 2-Modest-Kobland vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
|
| 19 |
♠Q72
♥J7
♦AJT4
♣7432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♠2 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 2-Modest-Kobland
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦6 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
600 2.00 1.00 3N E ♥5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
660 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♦J 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
|
| 20 |
♠JT87
♥A8
♦85
♣AKQ84
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 5♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♣5 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
200 2.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♦5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♣A 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
650 0.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♣5 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 2-Modest-Kobland
|
| 21 |
♠AT7
♥62
♦J9642
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♣K 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 4-Wesolowski-Sedey
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W ♣K 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
110 1.50 1.50 1♥ W +1 ♣K 3-Shoemaker-Loops vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣K 8-Ruggeri-Schilling vs 2-Modest-Kobland
|
| 22 |
♠QT97
♥K876
♦Q62
♣87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N S +3 ♦7 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦A 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♦5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
|
| 23 |
♠KQ
♥AJT9752
♦J
♣JT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 1.50 1.50 5♥ N +1 ♠6 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♠T 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♠8 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +2 ♦5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
|
| 24 |
♠94
♥976
♦Q654
♣9762
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ W +1 ♠9 10-Llacera-Formoso vs 8-Ruggeri-Schilling
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠9 4-Wesolowski-Sedey vs 9-Henderson-Ducey
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠9 6-Millslagle-Graves vs 7-Boggs-Gelfand
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦5 1-Davidson-Gamble vs 3-Shoemaker-Loops
|