| 1 |
♠QT9632
♥J74
♦94
♣54
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.95 1.65 4♥ E ♣K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.65 1.95 3N W +1 ♣5 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
| 2 |
♠AQ87
♥965
♦AT64
♣Q7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 1.95 1.65 2♠ S ♥3 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
100 1.65 1.95 2N E -2 ♠4 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 3 |
♠KJ84
♥73
♦Q7642
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦1 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.95 1.65 4♠ N ♥2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.65 1.95 4♠ S -2 ♥A 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
| 4 |
♠J5
♥942
♦62
♣AK9874
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.17 0.83 2♦ W ♣A 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
90 2.17 0.83 2♦ W ♣A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
600 0.17 2.83 3N W ♣A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
| 5 |
♠8
♥T73
♦KQ94
♣Q7652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4/3♣ 2/-♦ 2♠ 3NT ♦8/6 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 4♠ E -3 ♥A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
400 1.50 1.50 3N W ♣5 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
430 0.17 2.83 3N E +1 ♠9 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
|
| 6 |
♠JT643
♥943
♦2
♣QT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ S ♥A 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
150 0.17 2.83 1♦ S -3 ♥A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
|
| 7 |
♠AT3
♥AJ6
♦KQ32
♣AK8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 1.95 1.65 2N N +2 ♣4 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 1.65 1.95 6♦ S -1 ♣T 10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 8 |
♠65
♥5
♦T9532
♣QJ852
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♥ 2/1NT ♣5/4 ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.80 1.80 4♥ W ♠6 10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
420 1.80 1.80 4♥ W ♣Q 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 9 |
♠KT84
♥A765
♦QT4
♣K9
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.80 1.80 1N S -1 ♥8 10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
50 1.80 1.80 3♦ N -1 ♠7 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 10 |
♠K
♥AJ97
♦A74
♣K9853
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3N E -3 ♥6 10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
600 0.83 2.17 3N E ♥T 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.83 2.17 3N E ♣6 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
|
| 11 |
♠9875
♥J6
♦AK53
♣KQ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.17 0.83 3N S +3 ♥3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
490 2.17 0.83 3N S +3 ♥3 10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
460 0.17 2.83 3N S +2 ♠4 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 12 |
♠6
♥AQ85
♦AJ5
♣KQJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2/3♠ ♣5/6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.17 0.83 2♠ W ♣K 10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
110 2.17 0.83 2♠ W ♣6 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
120 0.17 2.83 2N W ♣K 9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 13 |
♠JT76
♥AT
♦T32
♣K982
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3/4 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣T 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 1.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦3 10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 2.00 3N W -1 ♦2 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♣T 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 14 |
♠AKJ
♥9743
♦Q965
♣AQ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 6/5♥ 3♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 3.00 0.00 6N N ♥Q 10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦T 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
400 1.00 2.00 5♣ S ♠T 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
50 0.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 ♠5 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 15 |
♠AT9753
♥K95
♦3
♣T52
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3N E -1 ♣6 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♠4 2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ E +1 ♠4 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
400 0.00 3.00 3N E ♣6 10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 16 |
♠AT93
♥KQ942
♦Q43
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.00 1.00 4♥ N ♠Q 10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
140 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 17 |
♠KQ8
♥AQT5
♦AKT
♣K73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♦4 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
480 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +2 ♣A 10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♦5 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
230 0.00 3.00 3♠ N +3 ♣A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 18 |
♠AK4
♥QT864
♦T
♣AQT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 6♥ 2/3♠ 5/6NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 3.00 0.00 6♥ N ♠Q 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♠Q 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +2 ♦5 10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ N +1 ♠Q 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 19 |
♠92
♥KQ3
♦75432
♣A87
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦5/4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥9 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♥5 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♣2 10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 0.00 3.00 3♥ E -1 ♠T 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 20 |
♠AT73
♥J543
♦98
♣K65
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 3/2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♠4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
200 2.50 0.50 3N W -2 ♠3 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♠6 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
120 0.00 3.00 2N W ♠3 10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 21 |
♠K87
♥A
♦QJ832
♣Q982
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 5♥* E -3 ♦A 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
300 2.00 1.00 4♥* E -2 ♥3 10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 1.00 2.00 5♥ E -2 ♥3 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ E -1 ♦A 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 22 |
♠64
♥72
♦KJ86
♣KQ973
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3N W -3 ♣3 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.50 1.50 3♠ E ♦3 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
620 0.17 2.83 4♠ E ♦3 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 23 |
♠7
♥Q92
♦J75
♣KT7432
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0 |
| EW: 7♦ 7♥ 5♠ 7NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.83 0.17 4♥ E +2 ♦3 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
710 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +3 ♣2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
1430 0.17 2.83 6♥ W ♠7 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 24 |
♠KT2
♥AQT6
♦-
♣T98764
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 3♦ E ♠4 2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.50 1.50 1N E +2 ♥5 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
200 0.17 2.83 2N S -4 ♦5 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 25 |
♠K53
♥AT
♦AT3
♣AKJ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.83 0.17 2N N +2 ♠6 10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
110 1.50 1.50 2♥ E ♣5 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
150 0.17 2.83 2N N -3 ♦2 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
|
| 26 |
♠JT84
♥A732
♦KJ4
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1/2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ W ♣A 10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
140 0.83 2.17 2♠ W +1 ♣A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
140 0.83 2.17 2♠ W +1 ♣A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 27 |
♠AQ54
♥-
♦QT76
♣KQT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♦ W -3 ♣K 10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
120 1.50 1.50 2N S ♥3 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
150 0.17 2.83 3♣ N -3 ♠9 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
|