? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Deb Dotters - Vern Katz 63.73 1st A 0.90
John Walker - Lester Loops 63.06 2nd A 0.63
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano 62.48 3rd A 0.45
Nancy Pringle - Nandor Vadas 53.54 4th A 0.32
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 11, 2026  |CLUB NO.>137059    | 02/11/2026 21:01
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 70% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   31.5 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/500/200   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=4                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lester Loops           John Walker              A    2     .     .     39.73  63.06  0.63(A) 
 2 Bette Harken           David Harken             A    .     .     .     30.20  47.94          
 3 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B    3     2     .     39.36  62.48  0.45(A) 
 4 Richard Hamlin         Barbara Rodrigues        C    .     .     .     26.83  42.59          
 5 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               A    .     .     .     26.16  41.52          
 7 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            C    4     .     2     33.73  53.54  0.32(A) 
 8 Richard Pearce         Susan Pearce             C    .     .     .     27.04  42.92          
 9 Matthew Nathanson      Shamim Formoso           B    .     .     .     28.55  45.32          
10 Vern Katz              Deb Dotters              C    1     1     1     40.15  63.73  0.90(A) 
                                          Totals                         291.75       

1 ♠QT9632
J74
94
♣54
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J85
KT65
T3
♣AJ83
♠A4
Q983
AKQ82
♣T7
♠K7
A2
J765
♣KQ962
3
915
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT3
EW: 3♣ 3 4 4NT  ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    1.95   1.65  4 E      ♣K  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
        430    1.65   1.95  3N W +1   ♣5  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
2 ♠AQ87
965
AT64
♣Q7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠-
AQ32
875
♣J96532
♠J92
J8
KQJ93
♣AK8
♠KT6543
KT74
2
♣T4
12
715
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠  ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 NT5
EW: 5♣ 5 1  ♠4 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -400 5-EW/5♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          1.95   1.65  2♠ S      3  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
  100          1.65   1.95  2N E -2   ♠4  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
3 ♠KJ84
73
Q7642
♣J7
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A3
AQJ84
T8
♣9632
♠T952
KT652
J5
♣Q8
♠Q76
9
AK93
♣AKT54
7
116
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 5 3♠ 1NT  ♥5
EW: 2  ♣3 ♦1 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +400 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          1.95   1.65  4♠ N      2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
        100    1.65   1.95  4♠ S -2   A  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Harken-Harken
4 ♠J5
942
62
♣AK9874
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K
QJ73
KT854
♣JT2
♠AQT64
KT
Q973
♣65
♠98732
A865
AJ
♣Q3
8
1011
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2NT  ♦4 ♥5 ♠5
EW: 3 1 1♠  ♣5 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -110 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         90    2.17   0.83  2 W      ♣A  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
         90    2.17   0.83  2 W      ♣A  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
        600    0.17   2.83  3N W      ♣A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
5 ♠8
T73
KQ94
♣Q7652
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠QJ3
KQJ8
JT
♣KT94
♠A765
6
A763
♣AJ83
♠KT942
A9542
852
♣-
7
1313
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1  ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT4
EW: 4/3♣ 2/- 2♠ 3NT
       ♦8/6 ♥6/5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -400 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  4♠ E -3   A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
        400    1.50   1.50  3N W      ♣5  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
        430    0.17   2.83  3N E +1   ♠9  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
6 ♠JT643
943
2
♣QT52
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQ8
AK82
J8764
♣6
♠97
J765
AK5
♣J743
♠A52
QT
QT93
♣AK98
3
139
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2♠  ♦4 ♥3 NT5
EW: 3 3 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3♠*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.83   0.17  2♠ S      A  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
         50    1.50   1.50  3♠ N -1   A  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
        150    0.17   2.83  1 S -3   A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Harken-Harken
7 ♠AT3
AJ6
KQ32
♣AK8
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠752
KT8754
J7
♣T9
♠KJ98
Q92
T
♣Q7543
♠Q64
3
A98654
♣J62
21
48
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 1 3♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          1.95   1.65  2N N +2   ♣4  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        100    1.65   1.95  6 S -1   ♣T  10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
8 ♠65
5
T9532
♣QJ852
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠983
KQ987
4
♣AK94
♠AQ7
JT632
QJ87
♣3
♠KJT42
A4
AK6
♣T76
3
1210
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1/2♣ 2 1♠  ♥3 NT5
EW: 4 2/1NT  ♣5/4 ♦5 ♠5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -420 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    1.80   1.80  4 W      ♠6  10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
        420    1.80   1.80  4 W      ♣Q  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
9 ♠KT84
A765
QT4
♣K9
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠J9
QJ983
AK5
♣872
♠7653
K2
J96
♣A653
♠AQ2
T4
8732
♣QJT4
12
118
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 2 2♠  ♥6 NT6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    1.80   1.80  1N S -1   8  10-Katz-Dotters vs 1-Loops-Walker
         50    1.80   1.80  3 N -1   ♠7  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 5-Davidson-Winham
10 ♠K
AJ97
A74
♣K9853
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AQT98
Q43
QJ6
♣J7
♠2
K85
KT532
♣AQT2
♠J76543
T62
98
♣64
15
1212
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3
EW: 3♣ 4 2 2/3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -630 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.83   0.17  3N E -3   6  10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
        600    0.83   2.17  3N E      T  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
        600    0.83   2.17  3N E      ♣6  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
11 ♠9875
J6
AK53
♣KQ3
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T432
Q7532
86
♣A8
♠QJ6
84
JT2
♣J9652
♠AK
AKT9
Q974
♣T74
13
65
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 6 3 4♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠3 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +920 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  490          2.17   0.83  3N S +3   3  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
  490          2.17   0.83  3N S +3   3  10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
  460          0.17   2.83  3N S +2   ♠4  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
12 ♠6
AQ85
AJ5
♣KQJ96
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠AK2
KJT9
KQT6
♣74
♠QJT54
76
972
♣A82
♠9873
432
843
♣T53
17
167
0
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1  ♦5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 2 2/3♠  ♣5/6 ♥6 NT6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.17   0.83  2♠ W      ♣K  10-Katz-Dotters vs 2-Harken-Harken
        110    2.17   0.83  2♠ W      ♣6  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
        120    0.17   2.83  2N W      ♣K  9-Nathanson-Formoso vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
13 ♠JT76
AT
T32
♣K982
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠93
J4
K987
♣AJ654
♠AKQ84
Q532
AJ
♣Q3
♠52
K9876
Q654
♣T7
8
918
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3/4 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠3/4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2 2 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   ♣T  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  100          1.00   2.00  3N W -1   3  10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
  100          1.00   2.00  3N W -1   2  2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          1.00   2.00  4♠ E -1   ♣T  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
14 ♠AKJ
9743
Q965
♣AQ
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠T9643
52
KJ4
♣J73
♠Q875
QJT
T83
♣T86
♠2
AK86
A72
♣K9542
16
55
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6 6/5 3♠ 6NT
EW:  ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +990 6NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  990          3.00   0.00  6N N      Q  10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
  450          2.00   1.00  4 N +1   T  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
  400          1.00   2.00  5♣ S      ♠T  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
         50    0.00   3.00  6 N -1   ♠5  2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
15 ♠AT9753
K95
3
♣T52
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠K6
74
AT9742
♣Q74
♠QJ8
AQT82
KQ
♣A93
♠42
J63
J865
♣KJ86
7
918
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3
EW: 2♣ 5 4 1♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  3N E -1   ♣6  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
        170    1.50   1.50  3 E +1   ♠4  2-Harken-Harken vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        170    1.50   1.50  3 E +1   ♠4  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        400    0.00   3.00  3N E      ♣6  10-Katz-Dotters vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
16 ♠AT93
KQ942
Q43
♣9
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠4
73
AT76
♣K76542
♠QJ762
AJ
985
♣QT8
♠K85
T865
KJ2
♣AJ3
11
710
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1 4 2♠  ♣5 NT6
EW: 2♣  ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +420 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          3.00   0.00  4 N +1   ♠Q  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
  420          2.00   1.00  4 N      ♠Q  10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
  170          1.00   2.00  3 N +1   ♠Q  2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
  140          0.00   3.00  2♠ S +1   A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
17 ♠KQ8
AQT5
AKT
♣K73
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠942
K732
J63
♣JT2
♠T6
J98
Q7542
♣A86
♠AJ753
64
98
♣Q954
21
57
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 3 3/4 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: +460 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          2.50   0.50  4♠ N +2   4  5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  480          2.50   0.50  4♠ N +2   ♣A  10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
  450          1.00   2.00  4♠ N +1   5  2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
  230          0.00   3.00  3♠ N +3   ♣A  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
18 ♠AK4
QT864
T
♣AQT8
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠87
753
J87632
♣65
♠QJ9632
9
54
♣KJ92
♠T5
AKJ2
AKQ9
♣743
15
17
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 4 6 2/3♠ 5/6NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠4 NT1
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +1440 6NT-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1430          3.00   0.00  6 N      ♠Q  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
  680          1.50   1.50  4 N +2   ♠Q  2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Loops-Walker
  680          1.50   1.50  4 N +2   5  10-Katz-Dotters vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
  650          0.00   3.00  4 N +1   ♠Q  5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
19 ♠92
KQ3
75432
♣A87
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠A764
954
A9
♣Q642
♠8
AJT872
Q86
♣JT5
♠KQJT53
6
KJT
♣K93
9
108
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3♠  ♣6 ♥4 NT6
EW: 3  ♣6 ♦5/4 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.00   0.00  4♠ S      9  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
  170          1.50   1.50  2♠ S +2   5  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  170          1.50   1.50  2♠ S +2   ♣2  10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  100          0.00   3.00  3 E -1   ♠T  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
20 ♠AT73
J543
98
♣K65
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J94
Q82
Q5
♣AQJ98
♠Q52
AKT7
KT42
♣73
♠K86
96
AJ763
♣T42
8
1212
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3♣ 1/- 3/2 1♠ 2NT
       ♦7/6
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -140 3-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.50   0.50  3N W -2   ♠4  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
  200          2.50   0.50  3N W -2   ♠3  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          1.00   2.00  3N E -1   ♠6  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
        120    0.00   3.00  2N W      ♠3  10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
21 ♠K87
A
QJ832
♣Q982
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠T54
4
K764
♣J7653
♠Q96
KQT98652
-
♣AT
♠AJ32
J73
AT95
♣K4
12
411
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 5 4♠  ♥5 NT6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♦2 ♠2 NT2
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  5* E -3  A  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
  300          2.00   1.00  4* E -2  3  10-Katz-Dotters vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  100          1.00   2.00  5 E -2   3  3-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Harken-Harken
   50          0.00   3.00  4 E -1   A  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
22 ♠64
72
KJ86
♣KQ973
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KJ83
KQ6
A975
♣T2
♠AQT52
J54
QT42
♣6
♠97
AT983
3
♣AJ854
9
139
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 1  ♦4 ♠3 NT6
EW: 3 4♠  ♣4 ♥5 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -300 5♣*-NS-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          2.83   0.17  3N W -3   ♣3  2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
        140    1.50   1.50  3♠ E      3  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
        620    0.17   2.83  4♠ E      3  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
23 ♠7
Q92
J75
♣KT7432
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠K
AT874
AQT84
♣A9
♠AQ9842
KJ53
K2
♣6
♠JT653
6
963
♣QJ85
6
1713
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦0 ♥0 ♠2 NT0
EW: 7 7 5♠ 7NT  ♣6
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: -2220 7NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        680    2.83   0.17  4 E +2   3  2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
        710    1.50   1.50  4 W +3   ♣2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
       1430    0.17   2.83  6 W      ♠7  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
24 ♠KT2
AQT6
-
♣T98764
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠9763
J9
K875
♣KJ3
♠AQJ
8432
QJT62
♣A
♠854
K75
A943
♣Q52
9
814
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
EW: 4 1 2/3♠ 2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.83   0.17  3 E      ♠4  2-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
        150    1.50   1.50  1N E +2   5  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Nathanson-Formoso
        200    0.17   2.83  2N S -4   5  4-Hamlin-Rodrigues vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
25 ♠K53
AT
AT3
♣AKJ94
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠Q9
KQJ7
KJ84
♣632
♠A876
8543
Q62
♣QT
♠JT42
962
975
♣875
19
128
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT  ♦6 ♥5
EW: 1 2  ♣5 ♠5 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          2.83   0.17  2N N +2   ♠6  10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        110    1.50   1.50  2 E      ♣5  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
        150    0.17   2.83  2N N -3   2  5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
26 ♠JT84
A732
KJ4
♣A6
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠K97653
QJ
A86
♣K9
♠AQ
K864
7532
♣Q74
♠2
T95
QT9
♣JT8532
13
1311
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT5
EW: 2 1 2♠ 1/2NT  ♣5
LoTT: 15 - 16 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.83   0.17  2♠ W      ♣A  10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        140    0.83   2.17  2♠ W +1   ♣A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
        140    0.83   2.17  2♠ W +1   ♣A  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
27 ♠AQ54
-
QT76
♣KQT42
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠87
A4
AK52
♣98765
♠KJ92
JT986
J9
♣AJ
♠T63
KQ7532
843
♣3
13
1111
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5/6 NT5
EW: 1♣ 1 2NT  ♦6 ♠6
LoTT: 13 - 14 = -1
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  3 W -3   ♣K  10-Katz-Dotters vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  120          1.50   1.50  2N S      3  5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Hamlin-Rodrigues
        150    0.17   2.83  3♣ N -3   ♠9  8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker