? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Lesley Xu - Matthew Nathanson 70.56 1st A 1.00
John Walker - Peter Gelfand 67.05 2nd A 0.70
Charles Pender - Christina Kobland 57.61 3rd A 0.50
Bette Harken - David Harken 54.44 4th A 0.35
Richard Pearce - Susan Pearce 43.23 2nd B 0.20
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>February 4, 2026   |CLUB NO.>137059    | 02/04/2026 21:04
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 70%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   42.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/200/50    |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=10/B=4/C=1                      ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lesley Xu              Matthew Nathanson        B    1     1     .     59.27  70.56  1.00(A) 
 2 John Walker            Peter Gelfand            A    2     .     .     56.32  67.05  0.70(A) 
 3 Gregory Brennecke      Richard Hamlin           C    .     .     .     32.92  39.19          
 4 Bette Harken           David Harken             A    4     .     .     45.73  54.44  0.35(A) 
 5 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          A    .     .     .     36.18  43.07          
 6 Richard Pearce         Susan Pearce             B    .     2     .     36.31  43.23  0.20(B) 
 7 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            B    .     .     .     30.27  36.04          
 8 Barbara Tidmore        Kathy O'Neil Traback     A    .     .     .     36.19  43.08          
 9 Charles Pender         Christina Kobland        A    3     .     .     48.39  57.61  0.50(A) 
10 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               A    .     .     .     38.62  45.98          
                                          Totals                         420.20       

1 ♠Q2
762
J643
♣K983
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠J76
QJ43
K85
♣AQ2
♠A954
AT95
A97
♣JT
♠KT83
K8
QT2
♣7654
6
1313
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5
EW: 1 3 2♠ 2NT  ♣6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.67   0.33  4 W -1   2  9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
        120    2.00   2.00  2N W      ♣8  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        140    0.33   3.67  3 W      ♠Q  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
2 ♠J82
K5
A973
♣KT93
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠AT965
AJ984
54
♣A
♠KQ74
Q762
Q8
♣QJ5
♠3
T3
KJT62
♣87642
11
1312
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3  ♥3 ♠3 NT6
EW: 4 4♠ 1NT  ♣4 ♦4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    3.67   0.33  2 W +3   ♣3  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        420    2.00   2.00  4♠ W      A  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        450    0.33   3.67  4♠ W +1   ♠2  9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
3 ♠9
JT64
76543
♣AT2
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠T53
AQ875
KT
♣653
♠KQ862
932
AQ
♣QJ8
♠AJ74
K
J982
♣K974
5
914
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3  ♥5 ♠5 NT6
EW: 2 2♠  ♣5 ♦4 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.83   1.17  2♠ E      J  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        110    2.83   1.17  2♠ E      ♣4  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        300    0.33   3.67  5* S -2  ♠2  9-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
4 ♠K4
Q73
A964
♣K973
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠T96
A9854
Q3
♣T52
♠75
J6
KJT852
♣AQ6
♠AQJ832
KT2
7
♣J84
12
611
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 4♠ 1NT  ♦5
EW: 2  ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +620 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.00   2.00  4♠ S      A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
  620          2.00   2.00  4♠ S      5  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
  620          2.00   2.00  4♠ S      ♣2  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
5 ♠K97
Q874
J65
♣K42
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠AJ5
J952
A4
♣9763
♠QT84
AKT3
K98
♣AJ
♠632
6
QT732
♣QT85
9
1017
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠3 NT3
EW: 2♣ 1 4 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        180    3.67   0.33  1N E +3   3  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        420    1.17   2.83  4 E      7  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
        420    1.17   2.83  4 E      5  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
6 ♠AJ6
A2
AQ762
♣AQ3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠KQ975
KQT83
K
♣K2
♠42
J954
T98
♣JT85
♠T83
76
J543
♣9764
21
162
1
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 4 1♠ 3NT  ♥5
EW: 2  ♣3/4 ♦3 ♠5/6 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.67   0.33  3* W -1  A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
  150          2.00   2.00  2N N +1   J  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 4-Harken-Harken
        100    0.33   3.67  3N N -2   4  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
7 ♠Q875
7
AKQ76
♣Q64
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠A9
9852
T52
♣KT52
♠JT432
QJT6
98
♣A7
♠K6
AK43
J43
♣J983
13
78
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 3 1♠ 2NT  ♥6/5
EW: 1  ♣4 ♦3 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  630          2.00   2.00  3N S +1   ♣2  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
  630          2.00   2.00  3N S +1   ♣2  9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  630          2.00   2.00  3N S +1   ♣2  10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
8 ♠K542
J54
J42
♣987
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A7
AK2
KT753
♣KQ4
♠T9863
73
A86
♣AT5
♠QJ
QT986
Q9
♣J632
5
198
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣3 ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT3
EW: 3♣ 5 2 4♠ 4NT
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    2.83   1.17  4♠ W      ♣9  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        420    2.83   1.17  4♠ E      T  9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        430    0.33   3.67  3N W +1   ♣9  10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
9 ♠92
KQ72
AQ42
♣J87
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QT3
J643
9876
♣KT
♠AJ854
T9
KT3
♣Q94
♠K76
A85
J5
♣A6532
12
610
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 3 2NT  ♠6
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥4 NT4
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.67   0.33  2♣ S +1   ♠3  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
         50    2.00   2.00  2N S -1   ♠3  10-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        150    0.33   3.67  3N S -3   ♠Q  9-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
10 ♠A83
K65
T5
♣AKJT6
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠T64
J843
Q9873
♣7
♠Q92
AQ972
J
♣Q954
♠KJ75
T
AK642
♣832
15
311
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4/5♣ 3 3/4♠ 2/3NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦4 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +620 4♠-S
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.25   0.75  3N N      7  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
  600          3.25   0.75  3N N      ♣4  9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        100    1.38   2.63  3N N -1   7  10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
        200    0.13   3.88  5♣ N -2   A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
11 ♠86
AQ74
Q976
♣T76
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠T52
KT5
J83
♣QJ92
♠AKQJ9
J83
K42
♣K4
♠743
962
AT5
♣A853
8
717
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT  ♦6 ♥6
LoTT: 14 - 15 = -1
Par: -110 2♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.88   0.13  4♠ E -2   ♣A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
        140    2.63   1.38  3♠ E      6  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
        150    1.38   2.63  1N E +2   ♣3  9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        420    0.13   3.88  4♠ E      9  10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
12 ♠AJT7643
83
-
♣AJT6
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠982
T
98432
♣KQ52
♠K
AQ976
AT6
♣9843
♠Q5
KJ542
KQJ75
♣7
10
513
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4♠ 4NT  ♣6 ♦6
EW:  ♣5/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠2 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +630 4NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          3.88   0.13  4♠ N +2   A  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
  650          2.63   1.38  4♠ N +1   ♣9  9-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  140          1.38   2.63  3♠ N      A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
  110          0.13   3.88  2♠ S      ♣4  10-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
13 ♠J95
32
KQJ32
♣AT9
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠A832
T985
A64
♣J3
♠QT7
AKJ764
97
♣76
♠K64
Q
T85
♣KQ8542
11
910
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3  ♥3 ♠3 NT5
EW: 3 2♠ 1NT  ♣3 ♦3
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -140 3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  710          4.00   0.00  4♣* S     T  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
  100          3.00   1.00  3 E -1   ♣K  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        140    1.00   3.00  3 E      5  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        140    1.00   3.00  3 E      ♣K  10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        140    1.00   3.00  2 E +1   5  4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
14 ♠A32
T9743
T653
♣7
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K86
KQJ62
72
♣642
♠Q97
A85
QJ984
♣QJ
♠JT54
-
AK
♣AKT9853
4
912
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 3♠ 3NT  ♦6 ♥6
EW: 1  ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +400 3NT-NS/5♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          4.00   0.00  4* W -3  ♣7  4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
  150          1.50   2.50  4 W -3   ♣7  10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
  150          1.50   2.50  4♣ S +1   K  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
  150          1.50   2.50  4♣ S +1   7  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  150          1.50   2.50  4♣ S +1   7  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
15 ♠AK95
KT2
J75
♣J73
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠JT
J3
964
♣KT8642
♠Q86
98765
AKT2
♣A
♠7432
AQ4
Q83
♣Q95
12
513
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♠ 1NT  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6
EW: 1♣ 1 1  ♠5 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +110 2♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.50   1.50  2♠ S      ♠J  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  110          2.50   1.50  2♠ S      J  4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
  110          2.50   1.50  2♠ N      9  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 9-Pender-Kobland
  110          2.50   1.50  2♠ N      ♣A  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
   90          0.00   4.00  1N S      J  10-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
16 ♠AQ954
T3
KT983
♣J
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠KJ
9642
Q52
♣T984
♠863
AJ7
J4
♣AK652
♠T72
KQ85
A76
♣Q73
10
613
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 4 2 4♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +420 4♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          4.00   0.00  3N S +2   ♣T  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  450          2.50   1.50  4♠ N +1   ♣A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  450          2.50   1.50  4♠ N +1   ♣K  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  420          1.00   3.00  4♠ S      ♣A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
  200          0.00   4.00  2♠ N +3   ♣A  9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
17 ♠873
QT9876
J876
♣-
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QT5
5
A32
♣AT9832
♠KJ
KJ32
KT9
♣QJ76
♠A9642
A4
Q54
♣K54
3
1014
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT2
EW: 5♣ 2 1/- 5NT  ♥7/6 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    3.50   0.50  3♣ W +1   T  9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
        130    3.50   0.50  2♣ E +2   A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
        150    1.00   3.00  2 N -3   ♣Q  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        150    1.00   3.00  4♣ E +1   A  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        150    1.00   3.00  2♣ E +3   4  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
18 ♠A9872
J63
J96
♣K7
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠J643
AKQT
K53
♣95
♠-
9854
T874
♣AT843
♠KQT5
72
AQ2
♣QJ62
9
134
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠ 2/1NT  ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥5
EW: 1♣ 1 2  ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.50   0.50  3♠ N      9  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  140          3.50   0.50  2♠ N +1   ♣A  9-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
        100    1.50   2.50  4♠ N -1   9  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        100    1.50   2.50  4♠ N -1   4  10-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Harken-Harken
        200    0.00   4.00  4♠ N -2   9  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
19 ♠T642
AKJ73
A3
♣42
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK7
Q542
KT762
♣9
♠QJ95
T8
984
♣KQ65
♠83
96
QJ5
♣AJT873
12
128
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 1 1/-♠ 1NT
       ♦6/5 ♠7/6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +130 4♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          4.00   0.00  3 N      9  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          2.50   1.50  1N W -1   A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  100          2.50   1.50  2♠ W -1   A  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
   90          1.00   3.00  1N S      6  4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
        100    0.00   4.00  4♣ S -2   ♠A  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
20 ♠QJT8
-
T9852
♣AQ52
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠K9653
JT96
76
♣73
♠A7
AQ52
QJ4
♣K964
♠42
K8743
AK3
♣JT8
9
416
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 3 1NT  ♥5 ♠6
EW: 2 1♠  ♣5/4 ♦4/3 NT6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   1.00  2N E -2   8  10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
  200          3.00   1.00  2♠ W -2   T  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  200          3.00   1.00  2♠ W -2   5  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
  100          1.00   3.00  2 E -1   A  4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
        200    0.00   4.00  4 N -2   ♣4  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
21 ♠T952
T94
75
♣QT85
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠83
76
AKJT962
♣43
♠AQJ6
A52
83
♣KJ97
♠K74
KQJ83
Q4
♣A62
2
815
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT2
EW: 2♣ 5 1 3♠ 4NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    4.00   0.00  3 W      4  1-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        130    3.00   1.00  3 W +1   T  6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        400    1.00   3.00  3N E      K  4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Pender-Kobland
        400    1.00   3.00  3N E      K  10-Davidson-Winham vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
        400    1.00   3.00  3N E      J  3-Brennecke-Hamlin vs 2-Walker-Gelfand
22 ♠J84
KQ763
KT
♣KQ3
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠AKT65
AJ2
9753
♣T
♠72
T98
J2
♣AJ9652
♠Q93
54
AQ864
♣874
14
126
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1NT  ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6
EW: 1/2♣ 1 -/1♠
       ♦5 ♠6/7 NT5/6
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -90 2♣-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.88   0.13  2 N      ♠7  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  100          2.63   1.38  1N E -1   4  10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
         50    1.38   2.63  2 N -1   ♠7  4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        150    0.13   3.88  2 N -3   ♠7  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
23 ♠KT97
AK852
T4
♣JT
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠AJ82
J764
K9
♣754
♠Q54
-
Q853
♣KQ8632
♠63
QT93
AJ762
♣A9
11
99
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4 1♠ 1NT  ♣4
EW: 3♣  ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT5
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +500 5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.25   0.75  4 N      ♠4  4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
  620          3.25   0.75  4 N      ♣K  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
  170          1.38   2.63  3 N +1   ♣K  10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
  110          0.13   3.88  2 N      ♣K  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
24 ♠QT76
T4
7654
♣T84
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AJ9
AQ983
93
♣Q96
♠-
K765
AKQ82
♣K753
♠K85432
J2
JT
♣AJ2
2
1315
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦1 ♥0 ♠6 NT1
EW: 5♣ 6 6 1♠ 5NT
LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -980 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        480    2.63   1.38  5 E +1   ♠6  10-Davidson-Winham vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
        480    2.63   1.38  4 W +2   ♠Q  4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Brennecke-Hamlin
        480    2.63   1.38  4 W +2   5  2-Walker-Gelfand vs 8-Tidmore-Traback
        510    0.13   3.88  5 W +2   7  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Pender-Kobland
25 ♠8
4
AKJT862
♣K643
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QT64
765
4
♣QT852
♠AKJ3
JT983
73
♣AJ
♠9752
AKQ2
Q95
♣97
11
414
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 1NT  ♣6 ♥5 ♠4
EW: 1♣ 2 2♠  ♦2 NT3
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.67   0.33  3 N +2   ♠A  10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  130          1.17   2.83  3 N +1   ♠A  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
  130          1.17   2.83  2 N +2   ♠A  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
26 ♠QJ97
84
J983
♣Q82
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠6
AJT976
A52
♣AT5
♠A32
32
KT76
♣KJ94
♠KT854
KQ5
Q4
♣763
6
1311
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1
EW: 6♣ 5 6 1♠ 2NT
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -1430 6-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.67   0.33  3 W +1   ♠Q  10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        620    2.00   2.00  4 W      ♠Q  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson
        680    0.33   3.67  4 W +2   4  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
27 ♠4
KJT64
J42
♣J973
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠KQJ532
98
KQ983
♣-
♠987
Q72
T5
♣AK864
♠AT6
A53
A76
♣QT52
6
119
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3/2♣ 3/2 1NT
       ♦6/5 ♠4/2
EW: 1 2♠  ♣4 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    3.67   0.33  4♠ W      ♣3  10-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        450    2.00   2.00  4♠ W +1   ♣3  5-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
        690    0.33   3.67  4♠* W +1  ♠2  8-Tidmore-Traback vs 1-Xu-Nathanson