| 1 |
♠KJT65
♥83
♦532
♣J43
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦1 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 6♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.63 1.38 3N W ♥8 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
400 2.63 1.38 3N E ♥4 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Harken-Tainty
400 2.63 1.38 3N E ♥2 8-Johnson-Jean vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
430 0.13 3.88 3N W +1 ♠6 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 2 |
♠AJ32
♥T
♦KJ52
♣A853
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +1 ♥4 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Harken-Tainty
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +1 ♥4 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♦A 8-Johnson-Jean vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.13 3.88 3♠ S +1 ♥4 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 3 |
♠T3
♥T542
♦J876
♣J82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -1 ♥6 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
650 2.00 2.00 5♠ W ♦6 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Harken-Tainty
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦6 5-Harken-Winham vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
660 0.13 3.88 3N E +2 ♥3 8-Johnson-Jean vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 4 |
♠A872
♥J953
♦96
♣543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 5♣ 2♦ 4/3NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 1♣ W +4 ♦9 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♦5 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 8-Johnson-Jean
600 0.33 3.67 3N W ♥3 11-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 5 |
♠Q32
♥AT876
♦9
♣Q754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.67 0.33 4♥ N +2 ♦5 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 8-Johnson-Jean
500 2.00 2.00 5♦* E -3 ♣A 11-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.33 3.67 5♦ E -2 ♣A 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 6 |
♠9
♥KJT7
♦KJ6
♣KQ843
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2/1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.67 0.33 3N N ♦Q 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
50 1.17 2.83 3N N -1 ♣5 11-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.17 2.83 4♥ N -1 ♦5 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 8-Johnson-Jean
|
| 7 |
♠973
♥JT92
♦J87
♣QT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3N W -2 ♠9 11-Barr-Barr vs 5-Harken-Winham
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♠A 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 8-Johnson-Jean
300 0.33 3.67 3♠ S -3 ♦4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 8 |
♠AK972
♥T76
♦86
♣Q82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 2N W -3 ♠2 11-Barr-Barr vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♥A 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 8-Johnson-Jean
170 0.33 3.67 3♥ E +1 ♣7 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 9 |
♠62
♥Q62
♦KQ7653
♣A4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 3♦ N ♣5 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 8-Johnson-Jean
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -2 ♣T 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
110 0.33 3.67 2♠ E ♥3 11-Barr-Barr vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
| 10 |
♠874
♥K76
♦AK
♣KJT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +1 ♦6 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♦6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Tainty
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♦4 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
620 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♦4 11-Barr-Barr vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 11 |
♠QJ
♥A95
♦JT9832
♣Q2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ W -2 ♥A 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♣7 11-Barr-Barr vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
50 2.00 2.00 2♦ N -1 ♠A 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Tainty
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ W ♥A 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 12 |
♠T9
♥T87
♦AQT52
♣K86
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.88 0.13 3N S +2 ♠6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Tainty
630 2.63 1.38 3N S +1 ♠6 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
150 0.75 3.25 1N S +2 ♥3 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.75 3.25 1N S +2 ♥3 11-Barr-Barr vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 13 |
♠962
♥AQJ85
♦9862
♣7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 6♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.63 1.38 3N S +3 ♠4 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
690 2.63 1.38 3N S +3 ♠4 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
690 2.63 1.38 3N N +3 ♣6 7-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Barr-Barr
650 0.13 3.88 4♥ S +1 ♠7 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
| 14 |
♠KQ64
♥Q86
♦-
♣QT6532
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1NT ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
920 3.88 0.13 6♣ S ♠J 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
150 2.63 1.38 3♣ S +2 ♠9 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 1.38 2.63 5♦* E -1 ♣A 7-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Barr-Barr
50 0.13 3.88 5♦ W -1 ♣2 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 15 |
♠874
♥QJT85
♦KJ87
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5/4 NT6/5 |
EW: 2♣ 2/-♦ 2♠ ♦8/6 ♥5/4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2N E -2 ♣K 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
50 2.63 1.38 1N E -1 ♣K 7-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Barr-Barr
100 1.38 2.63 3♥ N -1 ♦2 9-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
200 0.13 3.88 1N S -2 ♠A 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 5-Harken-Winham
|
| 16 |
♠A52
♥J7642
♦KQ6
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♦ 3/4♠ 2NT ♦6/7 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♥4 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♣3 8-Johnson-Jean vs 11-Barr-Barr
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ W +1 ♦K 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 7-Harken-Tainty
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♣T 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ W +3 ♥4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
|
| 17 |
♠T
♥J9
♦KQT9842
♣T94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥4/1 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠4 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠4 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠5 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 7-Harken-Tainty
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ W +1 ♦Q 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
790 0.00 4.00 4♠* W +2 ♥J 8-Johnson-Jean vs 11-Barr-Barr
|
| 18 |
♠A4
♥AQJT63
♦AQJ
♣64
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦3 8-Johnson-Jean vs 11-Barr-Barr
600 3.00 1.00 3N S ♣J 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
170 1.50 2.50 3♥ N +1 ♦3 1-Oneill-Oneill vs 7-Harken-Tainty
170 1.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♦3 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
200 0.00 4.00 6♥ N -2 ♦3 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 19 |
♠K
♥QJ53
♦AK85
♣AK32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣4 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 7-Harken-Tainty
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♠A 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
170 2.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♦9 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 8-Johnson-Jean
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ N +1 ♥T 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♦9 11-Barr-Barr vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 20 |
♠852
♥J94
♦J94
♣AK93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♣4 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 7-Harken-Tainty
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♥6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 8-Johnson-Jean
100 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♣J 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 1.00 3.00 1♥ E +1 ♦A 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ S -2 ♣Q 11-Barr-Barr vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 21 |
♠KT82
♥KT4
♦QJ3
♣976
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2/3 |
| EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♣J 12-Ruggeri-Formoso vs 7-Harken-Tainty
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♣8 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 8-Johnson-Jean
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♣J 5-Harken-Winham vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
400 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣T 11-Barr-Barr vs 9-Stolzberg-Riley
400 0.50 3.50 3N E ♣8 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 22 |
♠4
♥KJ974
♦7532
♣T52
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N E -2 ♣3 11-Barr-Barr vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
100 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -1 ♦6 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
600 1.38 2.63 3N E ♠8 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Harken-Winham
620 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♠8 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 23 |
♠AQ93
♥65
♦KT7
♣AKQT
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 1N E -2 ♣7 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Harken-Winham
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♥A 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
120 2.00 2.00 1N N +1 ♥A 11-Barr-Barr vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
100 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 ♦5 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 24 |
♠JT
♥Q972
♦9865
♣983
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♣6 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♥ E -2 ♣4 6-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Davidson-Kobland
50 2.63 1.38 2♠ S -1 ♥3 7-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Harken-Winham
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ S -2 ♥3 10-Shoemaker-Hogg vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ E ♦A 11-Barr-Barr vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
|
| 25 |
♠J8542
♥K5
♦QJ965
♣Q
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 2N S +1 ♦5 5-Harken-Winham vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
120 2.00 2.00 2N S ♥Q 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
110 0.33 3.67 2♦ N +1 ♥2 8-Johnson-Jean vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 26 |
♠QT973
♥K
♦KQ986
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.67 0.33 4♥ E +1 ♣5 5-Harken-Winham vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
680 1.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 ♠8 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
680 1.17 2.83 4♥ E +2 ♠2 8-Johnson-Jean vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 27 |
♠KQT82
♥J74
♦2
♣J965
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1/2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♠ N ♣8 8-Johnson-Jean vs 6-Buhr-Swanson
100 2.00 2.00 1N W -2 ♠8 5-Harken-Winham vs 10-Shoemaker-Hogg
50 0.33 3.67 3♦ S -1 ♣A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Oneill-Oneill
|