Jan 28, 2026 Game Result

? Explanation of report features
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

★ ★ ★ Masterpoint Winners ★ ★ ★
Partnership	Pct	Rank	MP
Lani Ray - Peter Gelfand	64.38	1st OA	2.33
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano	61.06	2nd OA	1.75
Nancy Pringle - Nandor Vadas	58.98	3rd OA	1.31
Cathy Foy - Sandra Erickson	52.92	4th OA	0.98
Lesley Xu - Matthew Nathanson	48.72	2nd SC	0.22

EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 28, 2026   |CLUB NO.>137059    | 01/28/2026 21:21
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Championship (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   48.0 |TOP>   4 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=11/B=7/C=4                      ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Gregory Brennecke      Barbara Rodrigues        C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     27.31  28.45          
 2 Cathy Foy              Sandra Erickson          B   4     3     .   |   4     3     .     50.80  52.92  0.98(OA)
 4 Lani Ray               Peter Gelfand            A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     61.80  64.38  2.33(OA)
 5 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     45.33  47.22          
 6 Janet Loops            Francesco Ruggeri        C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     42.17  43.93          
 7 Matthew Nathanson      Lesley Xu                C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     46.77  48.72  0.22(SC)
 8 Lester Loops           John Walker              A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     41.31  43.03          
 9 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B   2     1     .   |   2     1     .     58.62  61.06  1.75(OA)
10 Bette Harken           David Harken             B   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     48.47  50.49          
11 Kathy O'Neil Traback   Barbara Tidmore          A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     47.05  49.01          
12 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            C   3     2     .   |   3     2     1     56.62  58.98  1.31(OA)
                                          Totals                                            526.25

♠876
♥KJT5
♦J97
♣T93

Dlr: North
Vul: None

♠KT3
♥83
♦KQ542
♣K64

♠AJ542
♥94
♦AT
♣AQ75

♠Q9
♥AQ762
♦863
♣J82

	5
11		15
	9

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠0 NT0

EW: 5♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT

LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -450 5♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    4.00   0.00  3♥ S -4   ♦A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Foy-Erickson
        420    3.00   1.00  4♠ E      ♥A  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
        450    2.00   2.00  4♠ E +1   ♥A  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 10-Harken-Harken
        480    1.00   3.00  4♠ E +2   ♦8  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        510    0.00   4.00  4♠ E +3   ♣2  8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠AJ76
♥9762
♦K643
♣K

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

♠K
♥QJT853
♦Q972
♣A2

♠98
♥A4
♦A85
♣QJT653

♠QT5432
♥K
♦JT
♣9874

	11
12		11
	6

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♠ ♣0 ♦3 ♥0 NT0

EW: 6♣ 4♦ 6♥ 1NT ♠4

LoTT: 21 - 18 = +3
Par: -800 6♠*-NS-3

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    4.00   0.00  2♥ W      ♦3  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        140    3.00   1.00  3♥ W      ♠A  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
        200    1.50   2.50  3♠ S -2   ♣A  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 10-Harken-Harken
        200    1.50   2.50  2♥ W +3   ♦3  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Foy-Erickson
        480    0.00   4.00  4♥ E +3   ♣5  8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠A8
♥432
♦QT873
♣T86

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

♠KT
♥KQ9765
♦A52
♣QJ

♠643
♥AJT
♦J9
♣AK432

♠QJ9752
♥8
♦K64
♣975

	6
15		13
	6

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣0 ♦6 ♥1 ♠6 NT1

EW: 5/6♣ 5/6♥ 5/6NT
♦6 ♠5/6

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-E

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    4.00   0.00  4♥ W      ♠A  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
        680    1.50   2.50  5♥ W +1   ♠A  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 10-Harken-Harken
        680    1.50   2.50  4♥ W +2   ♠A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Foy-Erickson
        680    1.50   2.50  4♥ W +2   ♠A  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        680    1.50   2.50  4♥ W +2   ♣5  8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠KJ86
♥9632
♦Q983
♣2

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

♠QT
♥54
♦KJ752
♣T653

♠A742
♥Q7
♦A4
♣KQJ87

♠953
♥AKJT8
♦T6
♣A94

	6
6		16
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT6

EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4

LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +500 5♣*-EW-2

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.88   0.13  3♦ W -3   ♠6  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Erickson
  200          2.00   2.00  2♥ S +3   ♠Q  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  200          2.00   2.00  2♥ S +3   ♦5  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Loops-Walker
        100    0.13   3.88  2♥ S -1   ♠Q  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠QT2
♥T9
♦KT876
♣A52

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

♠7
♥AJ654
♦AJ42
♣T63

♠AKJ65
♥Q732
♦5
♣K87

♠9843
♥K8
♦Q93
♣QJ94

	9
10		13
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT3

EW: 3♣ 2♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4NT

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -980 6♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    3.88   0.13  4♥ E      ♣Q  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        480    1.38   2.63  4♥ E +2   ♦5  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Loops-Walker
        480    1.38   2.63  4♥ E +2   ♣4  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
        480    1.38   2.63  4♥ E +2   ♣4  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Erickson

♠Q972
♥854
♦A963
♣K5

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

♠KJ84
♥K6
♦8
♣QJT963

♠T6
♥AT32
♦QJ42
♣874

♠A53
♥QJ97
♦KT75
♣A2

	9
10		7
	14

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5

EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT5

LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/2♥-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          3.88   0.13  2♦ S      ♣Q  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Winham
         50    1.38   2.63  2♠ N -1   ♣8  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Erickson
         50    1.38   2.63  2♥ S -1   ♣Q  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Loops-Walker
         50    1.38   2.63  2♦ S -1   ♣Q  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠K9754
♥642
♦AT763
♣-

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

♠J8
♥AK9875
♦K82
♣85

♠AQT6
♥QJT
♦Q54
♣A76

♠32
♥3
♦J9
♣KQJT9432

	7
11		15
	7

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥1/2 ♠3 NT1

EW: 2♦ 5♥ 3♠ 6NT ♣5

LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -1400 7♣*-NS-5

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        200    3.88   0.13  4♣ S -2   ♥A  10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Walker
        650    2.00   2.00  4♥ W +1   ♠7  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        650    2.00   2.00  4♥ W +1   ♠5  2-Foy-Erickson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
        680    0.13   3.88  5♥ W +1   ♦A  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠T984
♥KT7632
♦T2
♣3

Dlr: West
Vul: None

♠A2
♥954
♦KQ73
♣KJT8

♠J
♥QJ
♦AJ9865
♣Q652

♠KQ7653
♥A8
♦4
♣A974

	3
13		11
	13

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♥ 5♠ ♣4/3 ♦3 NT6

EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT6

LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +450 5♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.88   0.13  5♦ E -1   ♠4  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
        130    2.00   2.00  4♦ W      ♠T  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        130    2.00   2.00  3♦ W +1   ♠T  10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Walker
        400    0.13   3.88  3N W      ♠8  2-Foy-Erickson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano

♠92
♥653
♦AKJT4
♣J42

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

♠76
♥KJ
♦8765
♣KQT97

♠AKQJ8
♥A972
♦92
♣A6

♠T543
♥QT84
♦Q3
♣853

	9
9		18
	4

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣0 ♦5 ♥1 ♠0 NT0

EW: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT

LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: -620 4♠-EW/4♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.63   1.38  3N W -1   ♦A  10-Harken-Harken vs 8-Loops-Walker
  100          2.63   1.38  3N W -1   ♦J  2-Foy-Erickson vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
  100          2.63   1.38  3N W -1   ♦J  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
        620    0.13   3.88  4♠ E      ♦Q  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Davidson-Winham

♠T94
♥QJ974
♦AQ97
♣Q

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

♠Q75
♥AK832
♦2
♣A974

♠J863
♥6
♦654
♣KT652

♠AK2
♥T5
♦KJT83
♣J83

	11
13		4
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♦ 1/-♥
♣3 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 NT6

EW: 4♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥6 NT6

LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -130 4♣-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          3.88   0.13  3♦ S +1   ♥A  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
  110          2.63   1.38  3♦ S      ♥K  2-Foy-Erickson vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        200    0.75   3.25  5♦ S -2   ♥A  10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
        200    0.75   3.25  5♦ S -2   ♥A  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri

♠9762
♥52
♦53
♣QJT75

Dlr: South
Vul: None

♠54
♥AQT9873
♦92
♣64

♠KJ
♥-
♦AQT64
♣AK9832

♠AQT83
♥KJ64
♦KJ87
♣-

	3
6		17
	14

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♠ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6 ♥4

EW: 2/1♣ 1♦ 3/2♥
♠4/3 NT6/5

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +100 4♥*-W-1

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.88   0.13  4♥* W -2  ♠9  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
  200          2.63   1.38  4♥ W -4   ♠2  2-Foy-Erickson vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
  150          1.38   2.63  4♥ W -3   ♠9  10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
         50    0.13   3.88  4♠ S -1   ♥A  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri

♠T7652
♥T
♦T973
♣KJ5

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

♠K98
♥Q97
♦Q62
♣A432

♠AQJ
♥K864
♦AK54
♣Q7

♠43
♥AJ532
♦J8
♣T986

	4
11		19
	6

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3

EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT

LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: -430 4NT-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        400    3.88   0.13  3N W      ♠5  2-Foy-Erickson vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        430    2.00   2.00  3N W +1   ♠7  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
        430    2.00   2.00  3N W +1   ♠5  10-Harken-Harken vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
        460    0.13   3.88  3N W +2   ♣5  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠J3
♥A42
♦T6
♣AKJT87

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

♠A9
♥JT9
♦QJ8743
♣Q2

♠KQ84
♥765
♦K52
♣954

♠T7652
♥KQ83
♦A9
♣63

	13
10		8
	9

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 5♣ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♦6

EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +650 5♥-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.63   1.38  3♣ S +2   ♥7  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
  150          2.63   1.38  3♣ N +2   ♦K  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  150          2.63   1.38  2♣ N +3   ♠K  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
  130          0.13   3.88  3♣ N +1   ♦K  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 10-Harken-Harken

♠AKJT
♥KT732
♦Q83
♣K

Dlr: East
Vul: None

♠Q95
♥Q964
♦KJT9
♣J8

♠432
♥AJ5
♦A642
♣A92

♠876
♥8
♦75
♣QT76543

	16
9		13
	2

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5

EW: 2/3♦ 1/2♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠6

LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: +100 3NT*-EW/3♥*-E-1

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.88   0.13  4♦* E -3  ♥8  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
  110          2.63   1.38  3♣ S      ♦J  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  100          1.38   2.63  3♦ E -2   ♥8  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 10-Harken-Harken
   50          0.13   3.88  3♦ E -1   ♥8  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 11-Traback-Tidmore

♠T64
♥T984
♦QJ85
♣T7

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

♠AK95
♥AKJ76
♦74
♣J3

♠QJ73
♥Q32
♦T6
♣KQ54

♠82
♥5
♦AK932
♣A9862

	3
16		10
	11

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠1 NT4

EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4

LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -420 4♠-EW/4♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        170    3.25   0.75  3♥ W +1   ♦5  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 10-Harken-Harken
        170    3.25   0.75  2♥ W +2   ♣T  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        420    1.38   2.63  4♠ E      ♦A  9-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
        450    0.13   3.88  4♠ W +1   ♦Q  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 11-Traback-Tidmore

♠QJ
♥872
♦AQT9
♣T762

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

♠AK9752
♥T63
♦73
♣84

♠864
♥AK9
♦K654
♣K93

♠T3
♥QJ54
♦J82
♣AQJ5

	9
7		13
	11

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT5

EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥6

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    3.00   1.00  3♠ W      ♣6  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        140    3.00   1.00  3♠ E      ♠Q  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
        140    3.00   1.00  2♠ W +1   ♥2  8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
        170    1.00   3.00  2♠ W +2   ♣7  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
        180    0.00   4.00  2N E +2   ♣5  2-Foy-Erickson vs 10-Harken-Harken

♠A85
♥KT82
♦J743
♣AT

Dlr: North
Vul: None

♠QT93
♥QJ9543
♦T
♣83

♠62
♥7
♦AK9852
♣K976

♠KJ74
♥A6
♦Q6
♣QJ542

	12
5		10
	13

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT

EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT4

LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/3♣-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          4.00   0.00  3N N +1   ♦8  2-Foy-Erickson vs 10-Harken-Harken
  150          3.00   1.00  2N N +1   ♥7  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
        150    1.50   2.50  3N S -3   ♥Q  8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
        150    1.50   2.50  5♦ N -3   ♥7  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
        300    0.00   4.00  4♠ S -6   ♦T  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Xu

♠QT8753
♥AQ9
♦J95
♣3

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

♠AK92
♥52
♦8743
♣762

♠6
♥7643
♦AKT
♣AQJ95

♠J4
♥KJT8
♦Q62
♣KT84

	9
7		14
	10

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 NT6

EW: 2♣ 2/1♦ ♥6 ♠5 NT6

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3♦*-W/3♣*-EW-1

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          4.00   0.00  1N E -1   ♥8  2-Foy-Erickson vs 10-Harken-Harken
         90    2.50   1.50  1N E      ♣4  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
         90    2.50   1.50  2♣ E      ♥J  8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
        120    1.00   3.00  1N E +1   ♥8  1-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        470    0.00   4.00  3♣* E     ♥J  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 9-Calciano-Calciano

♠JT843
♥73
♦AK3
♣754

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

♠9652
♥962
♦QT4
♣T82

♠A7
♥AQJ
♦872
♣AQJ96

♠KQ
♥KT854
♦J965
♣K3

	8
2		18
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6

EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT6

LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +110 2♠-NS/2♥-NS/3♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          4.00   0.00  2♣ E -1   ♠K  5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
   90          3.00   1.00  1N S      ♣T  2-Foy-Erickson vs 8-Loops-Walker
         50    1.00   3.00  2♥ S -1   ♣2  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
         50    1.00   3.00  3♦ N -1   ♦2  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
         50    1.00   3.00  2♦ S -1   ♣2  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Xu

♠K765
♥AK2
♦A92
♣AKT

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

♠82
♥QT73
♦KQJT
♣532

♠J9
♥J8654
♦8754
♣J6

♠AQT43
♥9
♦63
♣Q9874

	21
8		3
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 7♣ 2♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT

EW: ♣0 ♦4 ♥6 ♠0 NT0

LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +2220 7NT-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  710          2.00   2.00  4♠ N +3   ♥6  2-Foy-Erickson vs 8-Loops-Walker
  710          2.00   2.00  4♠ N +3   ♥6  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
  710          2.00   2.00  4♠ N +3   ♥5  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
  710          2.00   2.00  4♠ N +3   ♥5  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
  710          2.00   2.00  4♠ N +3   ♣J  5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues

♠KJ842
♥KQT
♦Q97
♣86

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

♠Q976
♥J9865
♦6
♣KT4

♠AT5
♥42
♦432
♣QJ753

♠3
♥A73
♦AKJT85
♣A92

	11
6		7
	16

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 5♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT

EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥5 ♠4 NT2

LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +630 4NT-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  690          4.00   0.00  3N S +3   ♥6  5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
  630          3.00   1.00  3N S +1   ♥6  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Calciano-Calciano
  150          2.00   2.00  3♦ S +2   ♥5  2-Foy-Erickson vs 8-Loops-Walker
        100    0.50   3.50  4♠ N -1   ♣Q  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Xu
        100    0.50   3.50  5♦ S -1   ♥5  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠K76
♥2
♦KJ963
♣J743

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

♠98543
♥J876
♦8
♣Q98

♠QJ
♥543
♦A542
♣AKT2

♠AT2
♥AKQT9
♦QT7
♣65

	8
3		14
	15

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT

EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5

LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: +130 4♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          4.00   0.00  3N S +1   ♦8  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 2-Foy-Erickson
  170          3.00   1.00  2♥ S +2   ♦8  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  140          2.00   2.00  1♠ N +2   ♣A  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
  110          1.00   3.00  2♥ S      ♦8  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
         90    0.00   4.00  2♣ E      ♥A  10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Ray-Gelfand

♠J74
♥A8
♦J87642
♣K9

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

♠863
♥QT74
♦QT93
♣54

♠A2
♥KJ652
♦5
♣Q7632

♠KQT95
♥93
♦AK
♣AJT8

	9
4		10
	17

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5

EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠2 NT3

LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +650 5♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  650          4.00   0.00  4♠ S +1   ♣5  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
  620          2.50   1.50  4♠ S      ♥4  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Davidson-Winham
  620          2.50   1.50  4♠ S      ♥4  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
  600          1.00   3.00  3N S      ♥4  10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
        100    0.00   4.00  4♠ S -1   ♦T  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 2-Foy-Erickson

♠K8
♥A75
♦AQ76
♣AQ94

Dlr: West
Vul: None

♠Q92
♥QJ642
♦K94
♣53

♠AJT
♥KT9
♦8532
♣KJ7

♠76543
♥83
♦JT
♣T862

	19
8		12
	1

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT4

EW: 1♦ 2/3♥ 2NT ♣4/5 ♠6

LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -140 3♥-E

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          4.00   0.00  2N N      ♦2  11-Traback-Tidmore vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
   70          3.00   1.00  1♦ N      ♥9  12-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
         50    2.00   2.00  1N N -1   ♥9  10-Harken-Harken vs 4-Ray-Gelfand
        110    1.00   3.00  2♥ W      ♥5  7-Nathanson-Xu vs 5-Davidson-Winham
        530    0.00   4.00  3♥* W     ♣4  6-Loops-Ruggeri vs 2-Foy-Erickson

♠632
♥Q9542
♦QT4
♣73

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

♠K5
♥87
♦A98652
♣KJ6

♠J74
♥AK3
♦KJ73
♣T82

♠AQT98
♥JT6
♦-
♣AQ954

	4
11		12
	13

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦2 NT2

EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5

LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: -600 5♦-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.88   0.13  4♦ E -2   ♥6  8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
         50    2.63   1.38  3♠ S -1   ♦A  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
        100    1.38   2.63  4♠ S -2   ♦A  2-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
        150    0.13   3.88  4♠ S -3   ♦A  5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Harken-Harken

♠6
♥J9763
♦A94
♣A874

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

♠AKJT98
♥52
♦QJ632
♣-

♠Q752
♥AT8
♦K
♣QT952

♠43
♥KQ4
♦T875
♣KJ63

	9
11		11
	9

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 2/1♥ ♦3 ♠1 NT4

EW: 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5

LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    3.25   0.75  4♠ W      ♥7  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
        620    3.25   0.75  4♠ W      ♥6  5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Harken-Harken
        650    0.75   3.25  5♠ W      ♥6  2-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
        650    0.75   3.25  4♠ W +1   ♥3  8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri

♠AK63
♥KQ3
♦A976
♣98

Dlr: South
Vul: None

♠T7
♥965
♦J8
♣AKJT65

♠92
♥J842
♦QT54
♣432

♠QJ854
♥AT7
♦K32
♣Q7

	16
9		3
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT

EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT3

LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: +420 4♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          3.25   0.75  4♠ S      ♣A  4-Ray-Gelfand vs 1-Brennecke-Rodrigues
  420          3.25   0.75  4♠ S      ♣A  8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Loops-Ruggeri
  170          1.38   2.63  3♠ S +1   ♣A  2-Foy-Erickson vs 11-Traback-Tidmore
         50    0.13   3.88  2N N -1   ♣4  5-Davidson-Winham vs 10-Harken-Harken