? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
Lesley Xu - Matthew Nathanson 57.65 1st A 0.80
Andrew Calciano - Marilyn Calciano 53.94 2nd A 0.56
Bette Harken - David Harken 52.97 3rd A 0.40
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>January 21, 2026   |CLUB NO.>137059    | 01/21/2026 21:20
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/500/100   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=3/C=2                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Richard Pearce         Susan Pearce             C    .     .     .     31.15  43.26          
 2 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B    2     .     .     38.84  53.94  0.56(A) 
 3 Jacci Sterling         Farol Henderson          A    .     .     .     32.12  44.61          
 4 Charles Pender         Christina Kobland        A    .     .     .     37.55  52.15          
 5 Lesley Xu              Matthew Nathanson        C    1     1     .     41.51  57.65  0.80(A) 
 6 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               A    .     .     .     35.13  48.79          
 7 Sandra Erickson        Cathy Foy                A    .     .     .     34.78  48.31          
 8 Bette Harken           David Harken             A    3     .     .     38.14  52.97  0.40(A) 
                                          Totals                         289.22       

1 ♠T852
QJ
T93
♣6543
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠63
AKT2
J2
♣KQT82
♠AJ74
98543
AQ
♣A7
♠KQ9
76
K87654
♣J9
3
1315
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣0 ♦5 ♥0 ♠2 NT0
EW: 7/6♣ 1 6 4/3♠ 6NT
LoTT: 17 - 18 = -1
Par: -1440 7♣-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        450    3.00   0.00  4 E +1   ♠K  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        480    1.00   2.00  4 E +2   ♠K  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
        480    1.00   2.00  4 E +2   ♠K  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
        480    1.00   2.00  4 E +2   7  8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
2 ♠KT972
KT3
42
♣K98
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠A4
Q642
AK65
♣532
♠8653
J9
T873
♣A76
♠QJ
A875
QJ9
♣QJT4
9
135
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 2♠ 2NT  ♦6
EW: 1  ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  180          3.00   0.00  2N S +2   6  8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
  140          2.00   1.00  2♠ N +1   J  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
  100          1.00   2.00  3 W -2   ♣9  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
   90          0.00   3.00  1N S      2  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
3 ♠96542
A9
J4
♣K754
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠T3
QT42
AK97
♣AQ6
♠KQJ7
KJ65
QT62
♣3
♠A8
873
853
♣JT982
8
1512
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2
EW: 5 5 1/2♠ 1/3NT  ♣6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -650 5-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  6 W -1   J  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
        600    2.00   1.00  3N W      ♣4  8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
        650    0.50   2.50  4 W +1   ♠5  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
        650    0.50   2.50  4 W +1   J  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
4 ♠QJ932
-
T765
♣J543
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠64
T8
Q84
♣AKQT96
♠T7
QJ6532
AJ
♣872
♠AK85
AK974
K932
♣-
4
118
17
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5 1/- 5♠ 2NT  ♣6 ♥7/6
EW: 1♣  ♦2 ♥6/5 ♠1/2 NT5
LoTT: 18 - 18 = 0
Par: +650 5♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1000          3.00   0.00  4** E -2 A  8-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
  650          2.00   1.00  4♠ N +1   ♣8  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
  200          1.00   2.00  3♠ N +2   Q  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Davidson-Winham
  130          0.00   3.00  4 S      ♣A  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
5 ♠854
QT87
T64
♣J93
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠T7
964
KJ32
♣Q764
♠AQ9
3
AQ987
♣KT52
♠KJ632
AKJ52
5
♣A8
3
615
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 3♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT6
EW: 3♣ 4  ♥2 ♠4/3 NT6
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +100 5*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  5* E -1  A  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
        100    2.00   1.00  3 S -1   K  8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
        130    1.00   2.00  4 E      A  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
        200    0.00   3.00  3 S -2   K  4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
6 ♠A97542
T94
K86
♣4
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K8
7
AQT97
♣AKJ32
♠JT
AKQJ832
J
♣T96
♠Q63
65
5432
♣Q875
7
1712
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣1/0 ♦3 ♥0 ♠5 NT0
EW: 6♣ 4 6 6NT  ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -1440 6NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  300          3.00   0.00  5♣ W -3   ♠A  4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
        620    2.00   1.00  4 E      5  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
        660    1.00   2.00  3N W +2   ♠A  8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
        680    0.00   3.00  4 E +2   ♠3  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
7 ♠AT9642
K
J5
♣T863
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠J7
AQ5
98763
♣K74
♠83
J986
AT
♣AQJ52
♠KQ5
T7432
KQ42
♣9
8
1012
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♠  ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT3
EW: 4♣ 2 2 1NT  ♠3
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -130 4♣-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          2.50   0.50  3♠ N +1   9  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
  170          2.50   0.50  3♠ N +1   A  4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
  100          1.00   2.00  4♣ E -1   ♠K  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
         90    0.00   3.00  1N W      ♠6  8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
8 ♠J
AKQJ83
A975
♣QJ
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠Q975
2
KQJ64
♣A73
♠T862
T6
T32
♣KT86
♠AK43
9754
8
♣9542
18
123
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 5 3NT  ♦5 ♠5
EW: 2 1♠  ♣5 ♥2 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +450 5-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  450          1.50   1.50  5 N      T  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Erickson-Foy
  450          1.50   1.50  4 N +1   T  4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
  450          1.50   1.50  4 N +1   5  8-Harken-Harken vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
  450          1.50   1.50  4 N +1   2  3-Sterling-Henderson vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
9 ♠Q53
53
QJ7532
♣43
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠KJ82
A
KT96
♣Q972
♠AT974
9862
A8
♣86
♠6
KQJT74
4
♣AKJT5
5
138
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣ 2  ♣6/7 ♦5 ♠2 NT4
EW: 2 5♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥4
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -650 5♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
         50    2.83   0.17  4 S -1   ♠K  7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
        170    0.83   2.17  3♠ E +1   K  4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        170    0.83   2.17  3♠ E +1   ♣A  8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
10 ♠AJ84
J75
QJ2
♣J64
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠Q7
Q986
963
♣Q972
♠T9532
42
AK4
♣K83
♠K6
AKT3
T875
♣AT5
10
610
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 2 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          1.50   1.50  1N S +2   8  7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
  150          1.50   1.50  1N S +2   6  8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
  150          1.50   1.50  1N S +2   4  4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
11 ♠AKJT2
K
T965
♣643
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠9764
T752
A
♣QJ85
♠85
QJ83
J8432
♣A9
♠Q3
A964
KQ7
♣KT72
11
78
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 3 3♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW:  ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          2.83   0.17  3N S +1   ♣Q  8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
  140          1.50   1.50  3♠ N      5  4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        100    0.17   2.83  4♠ N -2   ♣A  7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
12 ♠95
K873
92
♣AKQ84
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠J642
T
K8764
♣953
♠AKQ873
J654
53
♣J
♠T
AQ92
AQJT
♣T762
12
411
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 1 4 1NT  ♠3
EW: 4♠  ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 NT3
LoTT: 21 - 19 = +2
Par: -200 5*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    1.95   1.65  2♠ E +1   ♣2  7-Erickson-Foy vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
        420    1.65   1.95  4♠ E      ♣2  8-Harken-Harken vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
13 ♠AK3
Q75
QJT5
♣743
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠Q74
432
96432
♣AK
♠8652
AJT9
8
♣J865
♠JT9
K86
AK7
♣QT92
12
96
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1 1♠ 3NT
EW:  ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +600 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  600          3.00   0.00  3N N      J  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
  150          2.00   1.00  1N N +2   J  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
  120          1.00   2.00  2N N      8  8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
        100    0.00   3.00  3N S -1   9  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
14 ♠43
QJ753
J86
♣732
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠K8752
-
954
♣QJ954
♠JT96
K84
T32
♣KT6
♠AQ
AT962
AKQ7
♣A8
4
67
23
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5/4 6 5NT  ♣5 ♠6/5
EW: 1♣ 1♠  ♦2 ♥1 NT2
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: +980 6-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  480          2.50   0.50  4 S +2   ♠Q  8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
  480          2.50   0.50  4 S +2   ♠8  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
  450          1.00   2.00  4 S +1   ♣Q  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
         50    0.00   3.00  3N S -1   ♣5  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
15 ♠875
Q974
K
♣KT852
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠AQ9
AK52
7643
♣97
♠JT432
J6
JT92
♣J3
♠K6
T83
AQ85
♣AQ64
8
134
15
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 3/-NT
       ♦6 ♠6/5 NT9/6
EW: 1♠  ♣3 ♦6 ♥5 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 17 = -2
Par: +500 4♠*-EW-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N S +1   2  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
  120          2.00   1.00  1N S +1   ♣9  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
        100    1.00   2.00  2N S -1   2  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
        300    0.00   3.00  1N N -3   ♠3  8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
16 ♠743
AQJT
2
♣A8632
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠AJT52
K95
T74
♣QT
♠KQ
8732
Q98
♣K975
♠986
64
AKJ653
♣J4
11
1010
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 3 1 2NT  ♠6
EW:  ♣4 ♦2/3 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT2/4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          3.00   0.00  3N N +2   ♠K  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
  150          2.00   1.00  2 S +3   5  5-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Erickson-Foy
  100          1.00   2.00  2♠ W -1   2  8-Harken-Harken vs 4-Pender-Kobland
         50    0.00   3.00  2♣ N -1   ♠K  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
17 ♠K98
KJ964
A3
♣T86
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠QJ4
3
QJ942
♣A975
♠AT762
AT852
T
♣43
♠53
Q7
K8765
♣KQJ2
11
108
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: -/1♣  ♣6/7 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT6
EW: 1 3♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥6
LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  3♠* E -1  Q  8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
   50          1.50   1.50  3♠ E -1   Q  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
        110    0.17   2.83  2♠ E      Q  7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
18 ♠Q2
T954
AQ94
♣943
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠T9875
J62
JT5
♣J6
♠AJ4
AKQ873
K2
♣K5
♠K63
-
8763
♣AQT872
8
320
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 5  ♥4 ♠4/5 NT6
EW: 3/2 2♠  ♣2 ♦2 NT6/5
LoTT: 20 - 18 = +2
Par: +300 5*-W-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.83   0.17  4 E -2   ♠3  7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
   50          1.50   1.50  4 E -1   7  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
        420    0.17   2.83  4 E      8  8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
19 ♠KJ982
54
QJ932
♣7
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠643
Q62
T765
♣AJ6
♠AQ5
-
A84
♣KQ98432
♠T7
AKJT9873
K
♣T5
7
715
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣2 ♦5 ♠6 NT3
EW: 4♣ 1 4NT  ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 20 = -2
Par: -500 5*-NS-3
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.83   0.17  4 S      ♣A  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
         50    0.83   2.17  4 S -1   T  7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
         50    0.83   2.17  4 S -1   5  8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
20 ♠T975
A82
KQ7
♣J62
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠J842
T9
53
♣Q9854
♠A3
KQJ64
T84
♣KT3
♠KQ6
753
AJ962
♣A7
10
313
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥6
EW: 2♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +120 2NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.17   0.83  3 S      T  7-Erickson-Foy vs 4-Pender-Kobland
  110          2.17   0.83  3 S      T  8-Harken-Harken vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
   90          0.17   2.83  2 S      T  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
21 ♠AT762
7
K875
♣QJ9
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠98
AK5
AQ92
♣T742
♠Q543
J642
T63
♣65
♠KJ
QT983
J4
♣AK83
10
133
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣ 2 2 3♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT4
LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  2N S +1   2  7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
  120          1.50   1.50  1N S +1   2  8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
  110          0.17   2.83  2♣ S +1   A  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
22 ♠KQ5
AKQ
A64
♣9765
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠J864
J8
J2
♣AJ842
♠A9
53
KQT975
♣KQT
♠T732
T97642
83
♣3
18
814
0
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1♠  ♣3 ♦3 NT4
EW: 3♣ 3 2NT  ♥4 ♠6
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        130    1.50   1.50  2 E +2   T  7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
        130    1.50   1.50  2 E +2   6  8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        130    1.50   1.50  2 E +2   ♣3  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
23 ♠AT95
762
AT7
♣KJ9
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KQ43
QT
J
♣AT7652
♠J762
AJ85
843
♣Q8
♠8
K943
KQ9652
♣43
12
128
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 2 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
EW: 1♣ 2♠  ♦3 ♥5 NT4
LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +130 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  130          2.83   0.17  3 S +1   ♠K  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
  110          1.50   1.50  3 S      ♣A  8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        110    0.17   2.83  2♠ W      7  7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
24 ♠T432
4
AKJ97
♣A53
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠A98765
AQ9
Q3
♣T8
♠KQJ
T7632
8642
♣2
♠-
KJ85
T5
♣KQJ9764
12
126
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 6♣ 6  ♥6 ♠4 NT4
EW: 1/- 2♠  ♣1 ♦0 ♥7/6 NT1
LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +800 6♠*-EW-4
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.83   0.17  5♣ S +1   ♠A  8-Harken-Harken vs 6-Davidson-Winham
  170          0.83   2.17  4♣ S +2   ♠A  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
  170          0.83   2.17  4♣ S +2   Q  7-Erickson-Foy vs 2-Calciano-Calciano
25 ♠T53
973
AT84
♣KQT
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠K87
J54
9
♣J98754
♠AQ92
Q
KJ6532
♣63
♠J64
AKT862
Q7
♣A2
9
512
14
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3 1NT  ♣6 ♦6 ♠6
EW: 1♣ 1♠  ♦6 ♥4 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  420          2.83   0.17  4 S      9  4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
  170          1.50   1.50  2 S +2   9  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
  140          0.17   2.83  3 S      9  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
26 ♠T7
KQT5
J98
♣K975
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠AJ86
A8743
K6
♣A6
♠Q52
J92
AQT42
♣J3
♠K943
6
753
♣QT842
9
1610
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3
EW: 1♣ 4 4 3♠ 3NT
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -620 4-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        140    2.83   0.17  3 W      ♠T  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        170    0.83   2.17  3 W +1   ♣4  4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
        170    0.83   2.17  2 W +2   ♠T  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
27 ♠QJ2
KQ97
T62
♣J62
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠9764
AJ4
93
♣9853
♠AK8
632
AKQ754
♣4
♠T53
T85
J8
♣AKQT7
9
516
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3 -/1 2♠ 2NT  ♣5 ♥6/7
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.17   0.83  3 E      ♣A  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson
        110    2.17   0.83  3 E      ♣A  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        130    0.17   2.83  3 E +1   ♣A  4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
28 ♠-
QJ54
Q73
♣KJ9632
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠QJ84
AK87
AJ52
♣Q
♠AK7
T632
986
♣T87
♠T96532
9
KT4
♣A54
9
177
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣  ♦6/5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6
EW: 1 2/3 1♠ 1NT  ♣3
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +100 4*-E-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.83   0.17  3♣ N      ♠A  4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Xu-Nathanson
        100    1.50   1.50  4♣ N -1   T  2-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        140    0.17   2.83  3 E      ♣A  1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Sterling-Henderson