| 1 |
♠AJ6
♥AK9
♦JT64
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: -/1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
50 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -1 ♦4 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥6 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
140 0.50 3.50 3♠ W ♥A 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
140 0.50 3.50 2♥ E +1 ♦5 4-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Johnson-Jean
|
| 2 |
♠-
♥AT872
♦J865
♣AKJ3
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ S +2 ♠2 4-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Johnson-Jean
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠A 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♥6 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ E -2 ♥Q 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
50 0.00 4.00 2♠ E -1 ♥J 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
|
| 3 |
♠K732
♥AQ7
♦AT9
♣J42
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♥ 1/2♠ 3/5NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣8 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
450 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♣3 2-Barr-Barr vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
420 2.00 2.00 4♥ S ♠4 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
400 1.00 3.00 3N N ♠5 4-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Johnson-Jean
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ N +2 ♦2 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 4 |
♠2
♥AQ9864
♦Q8
♣KT95
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♠ ♣4/5 ♥6 NT4/5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♣2 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♣7 4-Gassman-Garland vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♣2 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Johnson-Jean
620 1.50 2.50 4♠ S ♣2 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ S +1 ♣J 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 5 |
♠T
♥AT632
♦AK742
♣94
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠6 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Johnson-Jean
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠4 4-Gassman-Garland vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦3 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ N +2 ♠4 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♠6 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 6 |
♠KQ975
♥A63
♦A7
♣Q96
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♣3 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
100 3.00 1.00 3♦ W -1 ♣9 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 ♠K 2-Barr-Barr vs 2-Johnson-Jean
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ W +1 ♠Q 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ E +1 ♠6 4-Gassman-Garland vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
|
| 7 |
♠A872
♥AT976
♦QT5
♣9
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦ W -2 ♣9 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
100 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♥5 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♥5 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♣9 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 2-Johnson-Jean
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♦3 4-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 8 |
♠AQJ6
♥Q3
♦AJ9
♣KJ94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦4/5 ♥6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣1 ♥6 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦K 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♦K 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
430 2.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♦K 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
170 1.00 3.00 4♣ N +2 ♠4 4-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
100 0.00 4.00 4♦ E -2 ♣A 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 2-Johnson-Jean
|
| 9 |
♠AJT72
♥QJ762
♦6
♣A7
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 1/2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1/-♠ ♣6 ♥1 ♠7/6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.50 0.50 5♥ S +1 ♦A 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
480 3.50 0.50 4♥ S +2 ♦A 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♦A 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 2-Johnson-Jean
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♦A 2-Barr-Barr vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
100 0.00 4.00 5♥ S -2 ♦A 4-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 10 |
♠AKJ9863
♥A92
♦2
♣52
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♥ 6♠ ♦3 NT6 |
| EW: 4♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠0/1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♠ N ♦A 2-Barr-Barr vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
100 2.50 1.50 5♦ E -1 ♠T 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
100 2.50 1.50 5♦ E -1 ♠4 4-Gassman-Garland vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
130 1.00 3.00 4♦ E ♣A 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
200 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦3 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Johnson-Jean
|
| 11 |
♠92
♥-
♦98732
♣KQJ862
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♦ ♣5 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1/-♣ 6/5♥ 2♠ 1NT
♣7/5 ♦0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 5♦* S +1 ♥2 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Johnson-Jean
400 3.00 1.00 5♦ S ♥2 2-Barr-Barr vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
50 2.00 2.00 6♥ E -1 ♦A 4-Gassman-Garland vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♦A 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
480 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +2 ♦A 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
|
| 12 |
♠Q53
♥Q94
♦QJ75
♣Q94
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 3/2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 2N W -1 ♦Q 4-Gassman-Garland vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
120 1.50 2.50 2N W ♥4 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Johnson-Jean
120 1.50 2.50 2N W ♦7 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
120 1.50 2.50 1N W +1 ♦5 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
120 1.50 2.50 1N E +1 ♠4 2-Barr-Barr vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 13 |
♠JT4
♥-
♦J84
♣AJ97652
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 7♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1/0 ♥6 ♠0 NT1/0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 5♠ S +1 ♥K 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥K 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
600 2.00 2.00 5♣ N ♥5 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 2-Johnson-Jean
230 1.00 3.00 3♠ S +3 ♥K 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
150 0.00 4.00 4♣ N +1 ♥T 4-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
|
| 14 |
♠843
♥JT3
♦Q75
♣AK53
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥5 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♦8 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 2-Johnson-Jean
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♥4 4-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
100 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦2 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
|
| 15 |
♠J7654
♥QJ3
♦84
♣T75
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT2 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦8 2-Barr-Barr vs 4-Buhr-Swanson
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦8 4-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Lynnes-Beiers
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ E +1 ♠3 5-Russak-Rodrigues vs 5-Frank-Emanuel
210 1.00 3.00 2N W +3 ♠5 1-Powers-Bertani-Kiser vs 2-Johnson-Jean
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠5 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Sedey-Sedey
|