| Partnership | Pct | Rank | MP |
| Janet Loops - Vi Gassman | 63.84 | 1st A | 0.72 |
| Chris Tainty - David Harken | 63.70 | 2nd A | 0.50 |
| Larry Frank - Peter Emanuel | 61.54 | 3rd A | 0.36 |
| Richard Pearce - Susan Pearce | 51.70 | 4th A | 0.25 |
EVENT>Monday Evening 499er Pair|SESSION>Monday Eve |SECTION> A ------------------------,------ ------------,-------- -------------------------- DATE>January 5, 2026 |CLUB NO.>137059 | 01/05/2026 21:32 ---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,--------------------- DIR> Jan Winham |RATING>Club Masterpoint (80%, 80%, 60% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER ------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- --------------------- AVE> 31.5 |TOP> 3 |MP LIMITS>None/300/100 |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club ------------ --------- ------------------------- ------------------------------- PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=6/C=4 ,---,-------------------------,------,---------, -------------------------------------------------| | Section | |Section | No Name Name |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct |Awards | ------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 1 Larry Frank Peter Emanuel C 3 2 1 38.77 61.54 0.36(A) 2 Richard Pearce Susan Pearce C 4 . 2 32.57 51.70 0.25(A) 3 Barbara Tidmore Judy Osborn A . . . 31.15 49.44 4 Bette Harken Jan Winham A NE . . 36.16 57.40 5 David Harken Chris Tainty A 2 . . 40.13 63.70 0.50(A) 7 Jane Barr Peter Barr C . . . 23.76 37.71 8 Marilyn Jean Lindsay Johnson C . . . 20.43 32.43 9 Carol Cowen Amos Hahn B . . . 30.29 48.08 10 Vi Gassman Janet Loops B 1 1 . 40.22 63.84 0.72(A) Totals 293.48
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.95 1.65 2♠ S +1 ♦A 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.65 1.95 4♠ S -1 ♣Q 7-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.80 1.80 4♥ E ♣K 7-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
420 1.80 1.80 4♥ E ♣K 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.95 1.65 3N S -1 ♦3 7-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
100 1.65 1.95 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♣A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Pearce-Pearce 100 2.17 0.83 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 140 0.17 2.83 3♥ E ♠7 8-Jean-Johnson vs 4-Harken-Winham |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 620 2.83 0.17 4♠ S ♦6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Pearce-Pearce 140 1.50 1.50 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 400 0.17 2.83 4♠ S -4 ♥Q 8-Jean-Johnson vs 4-Harken-Winham |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2N N -2 ♥T 8-Jean-Johnson vs 4-Harken-Winham
150 1.50 1.50 3N N -3 ♥7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
1270 0.17 2.83 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 140 1.80 1.80 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Harken-Tainty 140 1.80 1.80 2♠ N +1 ♥Q 10-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Frank-Emanuel |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 110 1.95 1.65 2♥ N ♣K 10-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Frank-Emanuel 100 1.65 1.95 4♥ N -1 ♣K 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Harken-Tainty |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.95 1.65 3N E -1 ♠5 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Harken-Tainty
150 1.65 1.95 2N E +1 ♠9 10-Gassman-Loops vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 200 2.83 0.17 5♦ E -2 ♥7 10-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce 170 1.50 1.50 3♥ S +1 ♦2 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Jean-Johnson 170 0.17 2.83 2♠ W +2 ♥A 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Harken-Winham |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ S ♣8 10-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ S -1 ♦T 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Jean-Johnson
70 0.17 2.83 1♦ W ♣5 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.17 0.83 4♣ S +1 ♠A 10-Gassman-Loops vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.17 0.83 3♣ S +2 ♠A 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Harken-Winham
50 0.17 2.83 3♠ W -1 ♦4 9-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Jean-Johnson
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 300 3.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♣T 10-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 200 2.00 1.00 3N W -2 ♦5 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Cowen-Hahn 100 1.00 2.00 2♣ N -1 ♦3 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Barr-Barr 140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦7 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Harken-Tainty |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 50 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦4 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Cowen-Hahn 110 2.00 1.00 2♣ W +1 ♠6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Barr-Barr 420 1.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦8 10-Gassman-Loops vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 450 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦4 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Harken-Tainty |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 680 2.83 0.17 4♥ S +2 ♣6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Barr-Barr 650 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣9 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 9-Cowen-Hahn 620 0.17 2.83 5♦ S +1 ♣6 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Harken-Tainty |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 300 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -3 ♥A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Barr-Barr 200 2.00 1.00 5♦* W -1 ♥9 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Frank-Emanuel 50 1.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♠4 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Jean-Johnson 100 0.00 3.00 4♥ S -2 ♠Q 10-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Harken-Winham |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♣5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♣5 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Jean-Johnson
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♣5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Barr-Barr
70 0.00 3.00 1♦ N ♠7 10-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Harken-Winham
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 50 2.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥K 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Frank-Emanuel 50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♣K 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Jean-Johnson 50 2.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♣K 10-Gassman-Loops vs 4-Harken-Winham 420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♣K 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Barr-Barr |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 1.50 3N S -1 ♦3 4-Harken-Winham vs 9-Cowen-Hahn
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 ♠3 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Barr-Barr
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 ♠3 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 ♠3 10-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Harken-Tainty
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 170 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦7 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Barr-Barr 140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠6 10-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Harken-Tainty 140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦A 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce 140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦A 4-Harken-Winham vs 9-Cowen-Hahn |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
440 3.00 0.00 5♦ E +2 ♣5 10-Gassman-Loops vs 5-Harken-Tainty
520 1.50 1.50 4N E +3 ♣2 1-Frank-Emanuel vs 7-Barr-Barr
520 1.50 1.50 3N E +4 ♣3 4-Harken-Winham vs 9-Cowen-Hahn
1020 0.00 3.00 6N E +1 ♣3 3-Tidmore-Osborn vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♦7 7-Barr-Barr vs 9-Cowen-Hahn 100 2.17 0.83 4♥ E -1 ♣5 4-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 170 0.17 2.83 2♥ E +2 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Jean-Johnson |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.17 0.83 3♥ W +1 ♦A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Jean-Johnson
170 2.17 0.83 1♥ W +3 ♠2 7-Barr-Barr vs 9-Cowen-Hahn
620 0.17 2.83 4♥ W ♦A 4-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 110 2.83 0.17 3♦ N ♠4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Jean-Johnson 50 1.50 1.50 3♦ N -1 ♣9 4-Harken-Winham vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn 110 0.17 2.83 2♠ W ♥8 7-Barr-Barr vs 9-Cowen-Hahn |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 120 2.17 0.83 1N N +1 ♦5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Harken-Winham 120 2.17 0.83 1N N +1 ♦5 10-Gassman-Loops vs 7-Barr-Barr 300 0.17 2.83 5♣* N -2 ♦5 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 140 2.83 0.17 3♠ N ♥4 10-Gassman-Loops vs 7-Barr-Barr 110 1.50 1.50 2♥ W ♦A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Harken-Winham 140 0.17 2.83 3♥ W ♦5 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld 140 2.83 0.17 3♠ N ♥2 10-Gassman-Loops vs 7-Barr-Barr 150 1.50 1.50 3♥ S -3 ♦Q 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Harken-Winham 470 0.17 2.83 3♣* W ♠9 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel |