| 1 |
♠AQ8
♥AT7652
♦J75
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦3 12-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -2 ♥K 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 10-Smith-Morreale
50 2.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 ♥K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
50 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦K 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
50 0.50 3.50 3♥ N -1 ♠6 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
|
| 2 |
♠QJ65
♥QT76
♦K2
♣T94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠6/5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥6 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
90 2.50 1.50 2♣ W ♦K 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 10-Smith-Morreale
90 2.50 1.50 1♣ W +1 ♥6 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ E +1 ♥A 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
130 0.00 4.00 2♣ W +2 ♠5 12-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
|
| 3 |
♠J763
♥873
♦J985
♣82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 3♦ 4/3♥ 4/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♣3 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
120 3.00 1.00 1N S +1 ♦4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♥5 12-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥5 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E +1 ♥5 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|
| 4 |
♠T75
♥AJ85
♦J83
♣K83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6/5 NT5/4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 3.25 0.75 1♦ W ♣3 12-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
70 3.25 0.75 1♦ W ♣2 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
90 1.38 2.63 2♣ W ♠T 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
600 0.13 3.88 3N W ♥5 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 5 |
♠J4
♥K98
♦KT86
♣K542
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♥ S +3 ♠8 12-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
170 1.38 2.63 2♥ S +2 ♠3 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 1.38 2.63 2♥ S +2 ♠3 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
170 1.38 2.63 2♥ S +2 ♣4 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 6 |
♠Q83
♥AT96
♦AJ72
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5/6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 2N W -3 ♥6 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
200 2.63 1.38 3♠ E -2 ♣2 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ E ♦6 12-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
800 0.13 3.88 3N* N -4 ♠A 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 7 |
♠QT864
♥532
♦9652
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦6/5 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 2♠ S +3 ♦J 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.63 1.38 1N S +2 ♦J 10-Smith-Morreale vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ N ♣3 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♣A 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
|
| 8 |
♠643
♥A43
♦J42
♣K985
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ S +1 ♦3 10-Smith-Morreale vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
50 2.63 1.38 4♠ S -1 ♦3 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E ♠A 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 0.13 3.88 3♥ W ♠6 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠3
♥J42
♦T98
♣A97653
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠1 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ W ♦T 10-Smith-Morreale vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
170 2.63 1.38 3♥ W +1 ♠3 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
300 1.38 2.63 5♦* S -2 ♠A 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ W ♠3 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
|
| 10 |
♠Q32
♥J9843
♦A6
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5/6 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♥ 1♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.88 0.13 2♦ S ♥A 10-Smith-Morreale vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
200 2.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♥A 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
200 2.00 2.00 3♦ S -2 ♥A 12-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
620 0.13 3.88 4♥ E ♦K 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 11 |
♠K82
♥QT7
♦KQJ932
♣7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 5♦ 4♥ -/1♠ 2/3NT ♠6/7 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N N ♠2 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +2 ♠A 10-Smith-Morreale vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +2 ♥9 12-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 0.13 3.88 3♠ E -2 ♠T 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 12 |
♠AKQ96
♥QJ876
♦Q
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N N ♥9 10-Smith-Morreale vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.63 1.38 3N S -1 ♦2 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
200 1.38 2.63 3N N -2 ♦2 12-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
300 0.13 3.88 3N S -3 ♦2 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 13 |
♠JT8742
♥4
♦3
♣T7632
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2/1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ S ♦2 12-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
140 3.25 0.75 3♠ N ♥3 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ N ♣K 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -2 ♥J 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|
| 14 |
♠A642
♥AJT976
♦-
♣KJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 4♠ ♣4 ♦3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ N +1 ♦A 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 2.63 1.38 5♦ E -2 ♥K 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
50 1.38 2.63 4♥ N -1 ♦A 12-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
130 0.13 3.88 4♦ E ♥K 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|
| 15 |
♠986
♥KT4
♦854
♣A873
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 3♥ S ♠3 12-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
50 2.63 1.38 4♠ W -1 ♥4 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 10-Smith-Morreale
100 1.38 2.63 4♥ S -1 ♦3 9-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
140 0.13 3.88 3♠ W ♥4 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
|
| 16 |
♠K73
♥T42
♦QT8
♣KT95
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1/2♠ ♣6 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♦6 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S ♥Q 12-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♦6 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 10-Smith-Morreale
100 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -2 ♥6 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♦3 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 17 |
♠T862
♥AKQ7
♦632
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♥ 5♠ ♣5 ♦2 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ ♥2 ♠1 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♥8 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
230 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +4 ♥8 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
230 2.50 1.50 2♠ S +4 ♥8 12-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♣K 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ W ♥A 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|
| 18 |
♠852
♥KQ52
♦AKT8
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♠6 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♦6 1-Graves-Shoemaker vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
90 2.00 2.00 1N N ♦3 12-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.00 3.00 3♣ N -1 ♥A 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 10-Smith-Morreale
110 0.00 4.00 1♠ E +1 ♦J 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 19 |
♠43
♥T7654
♦A6
♣AT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣1/0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠K 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
170 2.50 1.50 3♦ S +3 ♣J 12-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
170 2.50 1.50 2♣ S +4 ♠K 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +1 ♠Q 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 0.00 4.00 3♥ W -1 ♦A 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 20 |
♠QT2
♥Q74
♦654
♣T832
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 5/6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ E ♣7 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥4 12-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♣7 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♣7 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♣7 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 21 |
♠A75
♥KJ2
♦K75
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +2 ♣T 12-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Girouard-Ruggeri
660 2.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♥6 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ N +1 ♣T 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 0.00 4.00 6N N -1 ♥A 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 22 |
♠K642
♥AJT7
♦83
♣542
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 5♦ 3♠ 3NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ E +2 ♣K 12-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♥5 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
620 2.00 2.00 5♦ E +1 ♣K 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
630 1.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♣K 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
660 0.00 4.00 3N E +2 ♣7 10-Smith-Morreale vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
|
| 23 |
♠JT2
♥T98632
♦-
♣Q963
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 3/4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ N -3 ♠A 10-Smith-Morreale vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♣4 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
630 2.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♦6 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
660 1.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♦6 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
800 0.00 4.00 1♦* S -3 ♣2 12-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 24 |
♠AQJ63
♥A8
♦J98
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
EW: -/1♣ 3/4♦ 3/4♥ -/1NT ♣6/7 ♠4 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦J 11-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ N -1 ♥K 6-Emanuel-Frank vs 2-Hahn-Cowen
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♠5 7-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Stolzberg-Riley
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠A 10-Smith-Morreale vs 4-Pringle-Rodrigues
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠A 12-Osborn-Winham vs 8-Kobland-Davidson
|
| 25 |
♠QJ73
♥863
♦65
♣Q752
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6/5 ♦4/3 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♠ E -2 ♣A 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ E -1 ♣A 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ E -1 ♣A 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ E -1 ♣A 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|
| 26 |
♠972
♥542
♦QJ952
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -1 ♦4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Smith-Morreale
120 2.00 2.00 2N E ♦4 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
120 2.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♦4 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
150 0.13 3.88 1N E +2 ♦5 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
|
| 27 |
♠2
♥AT8732
♦K54
♣T85
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.88 0.13 4♠* W -3 ♥A 4-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Graves-Shoemaker
110 2.63 1.38 2♥ N ♣Q 8-Kobland-Davidson vs 6-Emanuel-Frank
50 1.38 2.63 3♠ E -1 ♥Q 2-Hahn-Cowen vs 11-Nathanson-Stone
50 0.13 3.88 3♥ N -1 ♣Q 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 10-Smith-Morreale
|