| 1 |
♠A8
♥KT42
♦A86
♣A854
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: -/1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/7 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥2 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♥5 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♥5 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 2 |
♠KQT
♥KQ9
♦KQ7
♣JT43
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 |
| EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♠ E -1 ♣A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ E ♣A 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
110 0.50 1.50 2♠ E ♣A 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 3 |
♠QJ4
♥4
♦KQJ952
♣875
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♦3 8-Harken-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 0.50 3♣ W -1 ♦K 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -3 ♥Q 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 4 |
♠A75
♥975
♦AKQ7
♣T62
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♥ 5NT ♣6 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦1/0 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣A 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
200 1.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦4 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
140 0.00 2.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 5 |
♠A84
♥8
♦J9743
♣T642
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♦A 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 1.00 2♥ E +1 ♣3 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
450 0.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♠7 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
| 6 |
♠AQT7
♥T75
♦KJ84
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♥2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
460 0.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥4 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
460 0.50 1.50 3N S +2 ♥2 8-Harken-Winham vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
| 7 |
♠KQ63
♥95
♦K8
♣AK965
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ -/1NT ♦2 ♥4 ♠4/5 NT4/7 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 2.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 ♣Q 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Kremers-Downing
200 1.00 1.00 4♦* E -1 ♠7 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
110 0.00 2.00 3♦ E ♣Q 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 8 |
♠85
♥A6
♦KQJ95
♣KT65
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 5♦ 3NT ♥4 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♠2 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Kremers-Downing
50 0.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦K 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
50 0.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦A 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠94
♥K976543
♦AK3
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♥ N +1 ♣2 8-Harken-Winham vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ N +2 ♣A 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.00 2.00 3♥ N ♠2 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
| 10 |
♠KQ654
♥Q
♦7532
♣T97
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ ♦7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ E ♠9 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♠9 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
140 0.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♠7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
| 11 |
♠Q8642
♥J6
♦Q765
♣53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 5/4♦ 4♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 4♣ S +1 ♥A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
50 1.00 1.00 5♣ S -1 ♠3 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
130 0.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
|
| 12 |
♠J72
♥J954
♦AJ75
♣74
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 2.00 0.00 1N S ♣T 6-Kremers-Downing vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
70 1.00 1.00 1♦ N ♥T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
50 0.00 2.00 1N W -1 ♦5 8-Harken-Winham vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 13 |
♠T865
♥AT843
♦A8
♣J3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 2N E -2 ♣5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
200 1.50 0.50 3♦ E -2 ♥J 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
100 0.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♣J 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
|
| 14 |
♠A864
♥J964
♦K3
♣JT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 1.50 0.50 4♠ W +2 ♥4 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
480 1.50 0.50 4♠ E +2 ♣9 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
490 0.00 2.00 3N E +3 ♦5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 15 |
♠Q832
♥Q76
♦5
♣QJ872
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣3 ♦6/5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ S +1 ♥9 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
200 1.00 1.00 5♣ S -2 ♥9 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
1100 0.00 2.00 4♠* N -4 ♥A 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
|
| 16 |
♠8653
♥A
♦QJ63
♣KT83
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣7 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
50 1.00 1.00 2♥ S -1 ♣2 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
150 0.00 2.00 2N N -3 ♠6 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
| 17 |
♠AQ8
♥KQ
♦KQ932
♣JT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♦J 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
100 1.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♦J 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
100 1.00 1.00 2♥ E -2 ♠6 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
| 18 |
♠763
♥T752
♦9632
♣87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 1.50 0.50 1N W +2 ♥2 7-Frank-Emanuel vs 2-Tidmore-Osborn
150 1.50 0.50 1N W +2 ♦2 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Davidson-Kobland
430 0.00 2.00 3N W +1 ♥2 8-Harken-Winham vs 6-Kremers-Downing
|
| 19 |
♠AT84
♥KT652
♦-
♣9753
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦5 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 6-Kremers-Downing
120 1.00 1.00 2N S ♦5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ N -1 ♣J 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 20 |
♠87432
♥K985
♦KT
♣AJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 3N E -2 ♦5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
200 1.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 ♥5 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 6-Kremers-Downing
100 0.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♦5 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 21 |
♠AT5
♥AK9
♦J97
♣J652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ E ♣K 2-Tidmore-Osborn vs 6-Kremers-Downing
140 1.50 0.50 1♠ E +2 ♣K 8-Harken-Winham vs 7-Frank-Emanuel
200 0.00 2.00 2N S -2 ♥4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
|