Dec 17, 2025 Game Result

? Explanation of report features
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

★ ★ ★ Masterpoint Winners ★ ★ ★
Partnership	Pct	Rank	MP
John Walker - Lester Loops	64.00	1st OA	2.19
Jan Winham - Judy Osborn	58.21	2nd OA	1.64
Lesley Xu - Matthew Nathanson	52.78	3rd OA	1.23
Barbara Tidmore - Kathy O'Neil Traback	48.13	4th OA	0.92
Bette Harken - David Harken	47.36	2nd OB	0.75
Nancy Pringle - Nandor Vadas	44.15	2nd SC	0.22

EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>December 17, 2025  |CLUB NO.>137059    | 12/17/2025 21:42
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Championship (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   36.0 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=9/B=5/C=4                       ,---,-----------------,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |      Overall    |           Section       |      |Final    |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Lester Loops           John Walker              A   1     .     .   |   1     .     .     46.08  64.00  2.19(OA)
 2 Lesley Xu              Matthew Nathanson        C   3     1     .   |   3     1     1     38.00  52.78  1.23(OA)
 3 Bette Harken           David Harken             B   .     2     .   |   .     2     .     34.10  47.36  0.75(OB)
 4 Andrew Calciano        William Calciano         C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     31.65  43.96          
 5 Judy Osborn            Jan Winham               A   2     .     .   |   2     .     .     41.91  58.21  1.64(OA)
 7 Nandor Vadas           Nancy Pringle            C   .     .     .   |   .     .     2     31.79  44.15  0.22(SC)
 8 Kenneth Girouard       Francesco Ruggeri        C   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     31.62  43.92          
 9 Kathy O'Neil Traback   Barbara Tidmore          A   4     .     .   |   4     .     .     34.65  48.13  0.92(OA)
10 Charles Pender         Christina Kobland        A   .     .     .   |   .     .     .     33.91  47.10          
                                          Totals                                            323.71

♠K
♥72
♦AK76
♣AQ6543

Dlr: North
Vul: None

♠AJ8764
♥5
♦T852
♣92

♠QT953
♥AT8643
♦3
♣K

♠2
♥KQJ9
♦QJ94
♣JT87

	16
5		9
	10

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠2 NT6

EW: 2♥ 5♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3

LoTT: 21 - 21 = 0
Par: -300 6♦*-NS/6♣*-NS-2

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          2.83   0.17  3N N +2   ♥3  10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
         50    1.50   1.50  5♣ N -1   ♦3  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Harken-Harken
        150    0.17   2.83  3N N -3   ♠7  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Xu-Nathanson

♠76
♥AK842
♦J53
♣AT4

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

♠AQJ98
♥J63
♦A
♣9862

♠K54
♥Q5
♦Q98642
♣J5

♠T32
♥T97
♦KT7
♣KQ73

	12
12		8
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5

EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 NT6

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +140 3♥-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    2.83   0.17  2♠ W      ♦5  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Harken-Harken
        140    0.83   2.17  3♠ W      ♥A  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
        140    0.83   2.17  3♠ W      ♥A  10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri

♠753
♥A97
♦AQ83
♣963

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

♠JT84
♥Q5
♦KT
♣QJT52

♠962
♥KJT83
♦J765
♣8

♠AKQ
♥642
♦942
♣AK74

	10
9		5
	16

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT

EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4

LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.83   0.17  3N S      ♣Q  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
   80          1.50   1.50  1♠ S      ♥Q  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Harken-Harken
         50    0.17   2.83  3N S -1   ♣Q  10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri

♠T
♥A6532
♦953
♣JT75

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

♠Q73
♥Q7
♦762
♣K9643

♠KJ652
♥KJT8
♦J
♣A82

♠A984
♥94
♦AKQT84
♣Q

	5
7		13
	15

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5

EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥5 NT5

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +130 4♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.83   0.17  4♦ S +1   ♠3  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        110    1.50   1.50  2♠ E      ♦A  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
        140    0.17   2.83  3♠ E      ♦A  5-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Xu-Nathanson

♠AQJ2
♥T842
♦AK9
♣K2

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

♠9
♥A9
♦J87
♣AJ86543

♠T5
♥J763
♦QT6543
♣T

♠K87643
♥KQ5
♦2
♣Q97

	17
10		3
	10

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 ♦5

EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠2 NT2

LoTT: 17 - 19 = -2
Par: +630 4NT-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          1.50   1.50  4♠ N      ♣T  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
  620          1.50   1.50  4♠ N      ♣T  5-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
  620          1.50   1.50  4♠ N      ♣T  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano

♠3
♥A62
♦AKJ94
♣AKT8

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

♠K72
♥JT3
♦T762
♣752

♠QJ854
♥K94
♦3
♣QJ96

♠AT96
♥Q875
♦Q85
♣43

	19
4		9
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 3♣ 6♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT

EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT2

LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +920 6♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          2.83   0.17  3N S      ♠K  1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
  140          0.83   2.17  3♥ S      ♠2  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  140          0.83   2.17  2♥ N +1   ♦3  5-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Xu-Nathanson

♠AK984
♥T753
♦T6
♣A3

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

♠JT6
♥K
♦QJ742
♣QJ54

♠Q52
♥AJ82
♦98
♣9762

♠73
♥Q964
♦AK53
♣KT8

	11
10		7
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 2NT

EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +620 4♠-NS/4♥-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          2.83   0.17  4♠ N      ♦9  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  140          1.50   1.50  3♥ N      ♣Q  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Osborn-Winham
        100    0.17   2.83  3N S -1   ♦4  10-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker

♠T9865
♥T
♦J863
♣J82

Dlr: West
Vul: None

♠AQ42
♥QJ
♦QT754
♣A4

♠J7
♥AK9543
♦92
♣K53

♠K3
♥8762
♦AK
♣QT976

	2
15		11
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2

EW: 2♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -450 5♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        420    2.83   0.17  4♥ E      ♦K  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Osborn-Winham
        430    1.50   1.50  3N W +1   ♣2  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        450    0.17   2.83  4♥ W +1   ♠T  10-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker

♠AK962
♥J98
♦K3
♣AK8

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

♠T743
♥KQ763
♦Q854
♣-

♠Q5
♥T54
♦AJT2
♣T974

♠J8
♥A2
♦976
♣QJ6532

	18
7		7
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♣ 1♠ 3NT ♦4 ♥4

EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT2

LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +200 4♥*-EW/4♦*-EW-1

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  460          2.83   0.17  3N S +2   ♥6  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  150          1.50   1.50  2N S +1   ♥6  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 5-Osborn-Winham
         50    0.17   2.83  5♣ N -1   ♥4  10-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker

♠KQT82
♥Q98
♦KQ742
♣-

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

♠7
♥J7642
♦T6
♣JT964

♠95
♥T5
♦98
♣AKQ8753

♠AJ643
♥AK3
♦AJ53
♣2

	12
2		9
	17

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 7♦ 2♥ 7♠ ♣5 NT6

EW: 2♣ ♦0 ♥4 ♠0 NT0

LoTT: 21 - 22 = -1
Par: +2210 7♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
 1460          2.83   0.17  6♠ S +1   ♣J  10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
  710          0.83   2.17  5♠ S +2   ♦T  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  710          0.83   2.17  4♠ N +3   ♣A  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri

♠A9
♥9652
♦QJ74
♣J64

Dlr: South
Vul: None

♠KT4
♥KQJ84
♦K8
♣A83

♠Q8753
♥T7
♦T96
♣K52

♠J62
♥A3
♦A532
♣QT97

	8
16		5
	11

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5

EW: 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦5

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW/3♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        120    2.83   0.17  2N W      ♦4  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        150    1.50   1.50  3♦ N -3   ♥T  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
        170    0.17   2.83  3♠ W +1   ♥2  10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Xu-Nathanson

♠QJ7432
♥K9
♦QT9
♣K7

Dlr: West
Vul: N-S

♠T8
♥QT
♦K432
♣AJT43

♠K
♥765
♦AJ865
♣Q985

♠A965
♥AJ8432
♦7
♣62

	11
10		10
	9

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦4

EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠1 NT1

LoTT: 20 - 19 = +1
Par: +500 6♣*-EW-3

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  680          2.83   0.17  4♠ N +2   ♥7  10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
  650          0.83   2.17  4♠ N +1   ♦A  9-Traback-Tidmore vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
  650          0.83   2.17  4♠ N +1   ♣5  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano

♠J2
♥KJT73
♦T873
♣J2

Dlr: North
Vul: Both

♠K
♥AQ9652
♦A42
♣AK5

♠Q98763
♥-
♦65
♣T7643

♠AT54
♥84
♦KQJ9
♣Q98

	6
20		2
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣3 ♠4

EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5

LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  800          3.00   0.00  4♥* W -3  ♠J  10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Harken
  300          2.00   1.00  2♥ W -3   ♦3  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  100          1.00   2.00  4♠ E -1   ♥8  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        200    0.00   3.00  3♦ S -2   ♣A  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Osborn-Winham

♠74
♥K8
♦AKQT75
♣KJ6

Dlr: East
Vul: None

♠Q
♥AJ9764
♦943
♣Q98

♠AKJ863
♥QT5
♦86
♣AT

♠T952
♥32
♦J2
♣75432

	16
9		14
	1

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT4

EW: 4♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -420 4♥-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  500          3.00   0.00  4♠* E -3  ♦J  10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Harken
   50          2.00   1.00  3♠ E -1   ♦J  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        140    1.00   2.00  3♥ W      ♦A  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        170    0.00   3.00  3♠ E +1   ♣5  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Osborn-Winham

♠JT9
♥Q82
♦A643
♣Q87

Dlr: South
Vul: N-S

♠Q632
♥J5
♦QT952
♣T2

♠K4
♥KT63
♦J87
♣AKJ3

♠A875
♥A974
♦K
♣9654

	9
5		15
	11

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4 NT6

EW: 3♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6

LoTT: 16 - 15 = +1
Par: -110 3♦-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  1N E -1   ♥4  1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        110    2.00   1.00  2♥ E      ♦K  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        120    1.00   2.00  1N E +1   ♥4  10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Harken
        150    0.00   3.00  2N E +1   ♦K  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 5-Osborn-Winham

♠KT92
♥982
♦A3
♣T874

Dlr: West
Vul: E-W

♠AJ54
♥J643
♦J9
♣AQ3

♠83
♥KT
♦86542
♣K962

♠Q76
♥AQ75
♦KQT7
♣J5

	7
13		6
	14

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT

EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5

LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  1♥ W -2   ♠2  5-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  170          2.00   1.00  2♠ N +2   ♣2  3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
  140          1.00   2.00  2♠ N +1   ♣2  10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  110          0.00   3.00  2♠ N      ♣2  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Loops-Walker

♠A8543
♥K9
♦AQ84
♣J7

Dlr: North
Vul: None

♠K6
♥85
♦JT763
♣AKT9

♠QJT92
♥AJT2
♦2
♣543

♠7
♥Q7643
♦K95
♣Q862

	14
11		8
	7

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6

EW: -/1♣ 1♠ ♣6/7 ♦5 ♥6 NT6

LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +90 2♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2♥ S      ♣A  5-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
   90          1.50   1.50  1N S      ♦6  3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
   90          1.50   1.50  2♦ N      ♣3  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Loops-Walker
         50    0.00   3.00  3♦ N -1   ♠Q  10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano

♠Q9
♥AJT962
♦Q7
♣Q72

Dlr: East
Vul: N-S

♠JT2
♥73
♦KT42
♣A983

♠A8763
♥K4
♦A953
♣KJ

♠K54
♥Q85
♦J86
♣T654

	11
8		15
	6

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣4/5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3/4

EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6

LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -420 4♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        110    3.00   0.00  2♠ E      ♦6  3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
        140    2.00   1.00  3♠ E      ♥5  5-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        170    1.00   2.00  3♠ E +1   ♥Q  10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        420    0.00   3.00  4♠ E      ♥5  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 1-Loops-Walker

♠KJ6
♥KQ872
♦KT87
♣A

Dlr: South
Vul: E-W

♠Q973
♥J9643
♦9
♣852

♠A5
♥5
♦Q654
♣QJT943

♠T842
♥AT
♦AJ32
♣K76

	16
3		9
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT

EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2/3 NT2

LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: +460 5NT-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  430          3.00   0.00  3N N +1   ♣Q  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
  400          1.50   1.50  3N S      ♣8  3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
  400          1.50   1.50  3N S      ♣5  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        100    0.00   3.00  4♥ N -2   ♣Q  10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Osborn-Winham

♠87
♥AK
♦T84
♣QJT872

Dlr: West
Vul: Both

♠KT432
♥T8432
♦76
♣A

♠QJ95
♥95
♦AQJ953
♣K

♠A6
♥QJ76
♦K2
♣96543

	10
7		13
	10

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 4♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠4

EW: 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣2 NT3

LoTT: 19 - 20 = -1
Par: +130 4♣-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  4♠ E -2   ♣9  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  130          2.00   1.00  4♣ N      ♠Q  10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Osborn-Winham
  100          1.00   2.00  4♠ W -1   ♥A  3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
        100    0.00   3.00  4♣ N -1   ♣4  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Traback-Tidmore

♠AT3
♥A873
♦A9
♣T765

Dlr: North
Vul: N-S

♠K7642
♥42
♦85
♣A942

♠8
♥KQJT6
♦QT74
♣J83

♠QJ95
♥95
♦KJ632
♣KQ

	12
7		9
	12

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT

EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4

LoTT: 14 - 14 = 0
Par: +140 3♠-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  120          3.00   0.00  2N N      ♥K  10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Osborn-Winham
  110          2.00   1.00  2♠ S      ♥4  3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
        100    0.50   2.50  3N N -1   ♥K  1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        100    0.50   2.50  4♠ S -1   ♥4  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Traback-Tidmore

♠KQ432
♥KJ63
♦A42
♣3

Dlr: East
Vul: E-W

♠87
♥QT954
♦T6
♣T975

♠AT965
♥A87
♦K73
♣AQ

♠J
♥2
♦QJ985
♣KJ8642

	13
2		17
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 3♦ -/1NT
♥4/5 ♠5/6 NT6/7

EW: 2♥ 1/-♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♠7/6 NT6

LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: +110 3♦-NS

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.50   0.50  3♦ N      ♥A  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
  110          2.50   0.50  3♣ S      ♦T  5-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
  100          1.00   2.00  2♥ E -1   ♠J  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken
        250    0.00   3.00  3♥ N -5   ♥A  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Traback-Tidmore

♠84
♥5
♦AQ53
♣Q75432

Dlr: South
Vul: Both

♠AJT95
♥A973
♦J86
♣T

♠Q76
♥KQ82
♦KT4
♣KJ8

♠K32
♥JT64
♦972
♣A96

	8
10		14
	8

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2

EW: 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: -650 5♠-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  6♥ E -2   ♠2  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        170    1.50   1.50  1♠ W +3   ♥5  5-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
        170    1.50   1.50  2♥ W +2   ♣4  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri
        180    0.00   3.00  2N E +2   ♥4  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken

♠Q9876
♥KT
♦K64
♣AK3

Dlr: West
Vul: None

♠532
♥AQ54
♦A8
♣JT62

♠AJ
♥98732
♦Q9753
♣9

♠KT4
♥J6
♦JT2
♣Q8754

	15
11		7
	7

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4

EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠4 NT5

LoTT: 18 - 17 = +1
Par: +100 4♥*-EW/4♦*-EW-1

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          3.00   0.00  2♠ N      ♣9  7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
   90          1.50   1.50  1N N      ♥9  5-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
   90          1.50   1.50  1N N      ♦5  4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken
         50    0.00   3.00  1N N -1   ♥9  2-Xu-Nathanson vs 8-Girouard-Ruggeri

♠T872
♥QT
♦K963
♣J43

Dlr: North
Vul: E-W

♠A63
♥J2
♦T84
♣AKQT9

♠KQJ4
♥AK65
♦AJ
♣865

♠95
♥98743
♦Q752
♣72

	6
14		18
	2

Double Dummy Makes

NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT1

EW: 6♣ 2♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT

LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -1440 6NT-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        620    3.00   0.00  5♣ E +1   ♠9  10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
        690    1.00   2.00  3N W +3   ♦3  5-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        690    1.00   2.00  3N E +3   ♥9  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker
        690    1.00   2.00  3N E +3   ♥4  3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Traback-Tidmore

♠AJ863
♥86
♦J542
♣J5

Dlr: East
Vul: Both

♠Q97
♥KQ7
♦987
♣Q874

♠52
♥J432
♦AQT
♣AK62

♠KT4
♥AT95
♦K63
♣T93

	7
9		14
	10

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT6

EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT6

LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -110 3♣-EW

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  1N W -1   ♦2  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker
         90    2.00   1.00  1N W      ♠T  3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        120    1.00   2.00  1N W +1   ♠6  5-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
        200    0.00   3.00  3♠ N -2   ♣A  10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle

♠AKT962
♥AQ
♦Q8
♣T73

Dlr: South
Vul: None

♠5
♥KJ853
♦J7653
♣K9

♠Q4
♥7642
♦AK42
♣AJ8

♠J873
♥T9
♦T9
♣Q6542

	15
8		14
	3

Double Dummy Makes

NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦2 ♥2 NT5

EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT5

LoTT: 18 - 19 = -1
Par: -300 4♠*-NS/4♣*-NS-2

  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ N      ♥7  10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
  140          2.50   0.50  3♠ N      ♦A  5-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
  110          1.00   2.00  2♠ N      ♦K  3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Traback-Tidmore
        170    0.00   3.00  3♥ W +1   ♠A  8-Girouard-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker