| 1 |
♠65
♥984
♦852
♣AQ864
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ W ♦8 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
140 2.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♦8 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 6-Davidson-Winham
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ W +3 ♦8 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
420 0.00 3.00 4♠ W ♦3 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 2 |
♠Q74
♥KQ76
♦T842
♣QT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N N ♥3 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Pender-Kobland
170 2.00 1.00 3♠ S +1 ♣3 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 6-Davidson-Winham
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♣3 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 3 |
♠KQT6
♥762
♦AQT9
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 6♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦1 ♥6 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♠9 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♠5 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Pender-Kobland
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♥3 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 6-Davidson-Winham
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 4 |
♠K863
♥95
♦765
♣T953
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1♥ W -2 ♠3 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +1 ♣4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
110 1.00 2.00 1♥ S +1 ♠T 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Loops-Walker
100 0.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♥9 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 5 |
♠65
♥AT832
♦K84
♣A74
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ E ♦Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Loops-Walker
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥J 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥J 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +2 ♦Q 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 6 |
♠9543
♥2
♦AJT75
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♠ 1/2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♦8 4-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
200 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +2 ♥A 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
200 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +2 ♣A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 7 |
♠9543
♥KJ4
♦AQJ
♣Q98
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥3 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +3 ♥3 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ S -1 ♦T 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Loops-Walker
200 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦T 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠KT97
♥J
♦T72
♣J9843
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♦Q 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
150 2.00 1.00 4♣ S +1 ♦A 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Loops-Walker
50 1.00 2.00 3♠ W -1 ♥J 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
140 0.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣3 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 9 |
♠AJ962
♥K2
♦9863
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♦A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Davidson-Winham
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥7 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 1.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦A 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥Q 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 10 |
♠KQJ85
♥53
♦J87
♣864
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦K 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
170 1.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣T 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pender-Kobland
170 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♦K 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
170 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +2 ♦Q 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 11 |
♠85
♥JT32
♦AT75
♣AK5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣5/6 ♥5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -2 ♣A 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 1.50 4♦ N -2 ♣4 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 2-Loops-Walker
100 1.50 1.50 3♦ N -2 ♣4 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pender-Kobland
200 0.00 3.00 3♠ E +2 ♦6 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 12 |
♠932
♥KJ432
♦T
♣AQ72
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♦K 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ S +1 ♣9 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pender-Kobland
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠J 5-Ruggeri-Girouard vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
650 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♣J 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 13 |
♠A8
♥J52
♦QJ82
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.50 0.50 2N N +2 ♦3 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
180 2.50 0.50 2N N +2 ♣5 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ S ♦9 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
90 0.00 3.00 1N N ♣5 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 14 |
♠J87
♥AQ72
♦AQJ
♣Q65
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 6♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥4 ♠2/3 NT1/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♣7 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠2 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♣3 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
120 0.00 3.00 2N N ♥5 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
| 15 |
♠AQT2
♥JT3
♦QT
♣JT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/1♣ 4/3♥ 2♠ 4/2NT ♦5/4 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣4 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♦5 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
230 2.00 1.00 3♥ S +3 ♠3 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♠3 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
200 0.00 3.00 3N S -2 ♦5 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 16 |
♠83
♥JT43
♦Q842
♣K84
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠8 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Davidson-Winham
600 2.00 1.00 3N W ♦2 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
630 0.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♠8 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
630 0.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦2 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 17 |
♠QJT7
♥T53
♦AK94
♣T4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥2 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Walker
50 2.00 1.00 3♠ W -1 ♠Q 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
400 0.50 2.50 3N W ♠Q 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Davidson-Winham
400 0.50 2.50 3N W ♦4 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
|
| 18 |
♠AK5
♥985
♦K75
♣KQ96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣8 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
100 2.00 1.00 5♦ E -2 ♠Q 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 2-Loops-Walker
50 1.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠A 3-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Pender-Kobland
100 0.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♣8 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
| 19 |
♠J732
♥QJ854
♦Q72
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ -/1♠ ♣1 ♥4 ♠6/7 NT4 |
| EW: 6♣ 2/3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♦ S -2 ♠T 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
150 1.50 1.50 4♣ E +1 ♥6 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
150 1.50 1.50 4♣ E +1 ♥6 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
500 0.00 3.00 4♦* S -3 ♠6 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 20 |
♠Q52
♥A42
♦T976
♣A86
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2NT ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦T 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦T 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦6 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
110 0.00 3.00 2♥ E ♣T 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
|
| 21 |
♠KT8
♥76
♦A6
♣AKT952
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Girouard
180 2.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♠3 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.00 2.00 2♣ N +3 ♦7 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 0.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♥2 8-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|