| 1 |
♠8
♥7
♦QT872
♣QT9653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
| EW: 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♣ S -2 ♦A 1-Gassman-Barber vs 1-Collins-Ducey
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +2 ♠8 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Johnson-Clark
200 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +2 ♠8 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
450 0.13 3.88 4♥ W +1 ♠8 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 2 |
♠54
♥AJ62
♦A764
♣854
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦6 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ S ♦5 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Johnson-Clark
90 2.63 1.38 2♣ E ♦J 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
100 1.38 2.63 2♥ S -1 ♣7 1-Gassman-Barber vs 1-Collins-Ducey
300 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -3 ♣7 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
|
| 3 |
♠8765
♥T9
♦KQ94
♣Q73
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6/7 ♥6/5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♠ S +1 ♥2 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
110 2.63 1.38 2♠ N ♦6 1-Gassman-Barber vs 1-Collins-Ducey
90 0.75 3.25 1N S ♥5 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Johnson-Clark
90 0.75 3.25 1N S ♥2 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 4 |
♠JT752
♥J975
♦A98
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ N ♦2 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
70 2.63 1.38 1♣ S ♦K 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Collins-Ducey
100 0.75 3.25 1N S -1 ♦5 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
100 0.75 3.25 2♠ N -1 ♠4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
|
| 5 |
♠Q65
♥QJT92
♦K982
♣8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5/4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♣ S ♦5 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Collins-Ducey
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ W -2 ♣8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
50 0.75 3.25 3♦ W -1 ♣8 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
50 0.75 3.25 3♦ W -1 ♣8 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 6 |
♠A98
♥KT7
♦Q8
♣KQT42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♣ N ♠4 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E ♠Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E ♣A 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
110 1.38 2.63 3♦ E ♣3 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Collins-Ducey
|
| 7 |
♠762
♥A972
♦64
♣T874
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
210 3.25 0.75 2N W +3 ♠2 1-Gassman-Barber vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
210 3.25 0.75 1N E +4 ♦T 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
630 1.38 2.63 3N E +1 ♠3 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Johnson-Clark
680 0.13 3.88 4♥ E +2 ♦T 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 1-Collins-Ducey
|
| 8 |
♠T6
♥T65
♦A62
♣K8432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/3♦ 4/3♠ ♣6 ♥6/4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 1♠* S +3 ♦T 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
200 2.63 1.38 2♠ S +3 ♦5 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Johnson-Clark
170 1.38 2.63 2♠ S +2 ♥3 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 1-Collins-Ducey
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ S +1 ♦J 1-Gassman-Barber vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
|
| 9 |
♠T
♥Q97
♦A987
♣76542
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠3 |
| EW: 3♥ 4♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♥6 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 3-Johnson-Clark
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ E -1 ♥6 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 1-Collins-Ducey
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♦T 1-Gassman-Barber vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
140 0.13 3.88 3♥ W ♦A 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
|
| 10 |
♠Q
♥AKQT85
♦J93
♣872
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 4/3♣ 4♦ ♥6 ♠4/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +2 ♥9 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ S ♥2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
140 1.38 2.63 3♠ S ♣K 1-Gassman-Barber vs 3-Johnson-Clark
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -1 ♣K 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 1-Collins-Ducey
|
| 11 |
♠AT
♥A875
♦9753
♣JT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 3.88 0.13 1♠ S ♦K 1-Gassman-Barber vs 3-Johnson-Clark
50 2.63 1.38 1N N -1 ♠2 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ E ♥2 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 1-Collins-Ducey
150 0.13 3.88 1N S -3 ♥Q 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 12 |
♠J732
♥654
♦A54
♣A87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ E -1 ♠6 1-Gassman-Barber vs 3-Johnson-Clark
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ E -1 ♦8 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ E ♦8 6-Wainer-Raphael vs 1-Collins-Ducey
420 0.13 3.88 4♥ W ♠7 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 13 |
♠A764
♥AQ95
♦J8
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 7♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 4.00 0.00 5N N +2 ♦3 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦4 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Collins-Ducey
650 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣2 1-Gassman-Barber vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
630 1.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♥2 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
100 0.00 4.00 6N N -1 ♦4 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Johnson-Clark
|
| 14 |
♠AK984
♥K7
♦J74
♣J75
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3/4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -2 ♠6 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Collins-Ducey
90 3.00 1.00 2♣ S ♥6 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♦8 1-Gassman-Barber vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
110 1.00 3.00 3♦ E ♠Q 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
150 0.00 4.00 2N N -3 ♦2 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Johnson-Clark
|
| 15 |
♠AQT
♥QJ93
♦J96
♣632
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
| EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♠2 1-Gassman-Barber vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
110 3.50 0.50 2♥ N ♦A 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 1-Collins-Ducey
100 1.50 2.50 3♥ N -1 ♦A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Johnson-Clark
100 1.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♣Q 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
300 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♣Q 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
|
| 16 |
♠96
♥AT9
♦QJ83
♣AJ65
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.88 0.13 1N* E -3 ♠8 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
150 2.63 1.38 2♦ N +3 ♠A 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
140 1.38 2.63 2♠ S +1 ♣4 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 3-Johnson-Clark
100 0.13 3.88 3♠ S -2 ♥2 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|
| 17 |
♠4
♥K4
♦AKQ97652
♣A3
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♣ 5/6♦ -/1♥ 5/6♠ 1/6NT ♥6/7 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
940 3.88 0.13 6♦ N +1 ♣Q 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
520 2.63 1.38 3N N +4 ♥7 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
510 0.75 3.25 4♠ S +3 ♠5 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
510 0.75 3.25 4♠ S +3 ♣2 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 3-Johnson-Clark
|
| 18 |
♠AJ8
♥K42
♦64
♣AKJ63
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4/5 ♠3/4 NT6 |
| EW: 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♠ N +1 ♣4 2-Phillips-Bailey vs 3-Johnson-Clark
110 2.63 1.38 2♣ N +1 ♥A 4-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Pulliam-Meck
100 1.38 2.63 2♠ E -2 ♣2 3-Shoemaker-Schwartz vs 5-Powers-Bertani-Kiser
50 0.13 3.88 3♠ E -1 ♣2 5-Buhr-Swanson vs 4-Emanuel-Frank
|