| 1 |
♠T984
♥J953
♦Q62
♣94
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 4♠ E ♦3 12-Xu-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
450 3.00 2.00 5♠ E ♦3 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♥7 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
450 3.00 2.00 4♠ E +1 ♦3 5-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Yokel-Powers
460 1.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♥3 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
480 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +2 ♦5 9-Ray-Dau vs 7-Martin-Walker
|
| 2 |
♠K
♥QT65
♦J872
♣T653
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 3♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.00 0.00 2♠ E +2 ♣A 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +2 ♣A 5-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Yokel-Powers
200 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +2 ♣A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣A 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
420 1.50 3.50 4♠ E ♣A 9-Ray-Dau vs 7-Martin-Walker
450 0.00 5.00 4♠ E +1 ♣A 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
| 3 |
♠KQ93
♥QT43
♦72
♣AT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 1/2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.50 0.50 1N E ♣4 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
90 4.50 0.50 2♦ E ♣Q 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
110 3.00 2.00 1♥ E +1 ♣4 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
130 2.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 ♣Q 5-Hullman-Pender vs 2-Yokel-Powers
150 1.00 4.00 3♣ N -3 ♥A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
200 0.00 5.00 4♣ N -4 ♥A 9-Ray-Dau vs 7-Martin-Walker
|
| 4 |
♠2
♥Q5
♦T8653
♣AKQT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♣7/6 ♠0 NT5 |
| EW: 5♠ ♣1/4 ♦5 ♥1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.50 0.50 3♠ W +2 ♣A 9-Ray-Dau vs 5-Hullman-Pender
200 4.50 0.50 3♠ W +2 ♣A 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
650 2.00 3.00 5♠ W ♣A 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣A 7-Martin-Walker vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
650 2.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 2-Yokel-Powers
990 0.00 5.00 4♠* W +1 ♣A 1-Kobland-Hill vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
|
| 5 |
♠KQ9
♥QJ3
♦KJ2
♣Q953
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4/3♥ 4/2♠ 2/3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦7 9-Ray-Dau vs 5-Hullman-Pender
600 4.00 1.00 3N N ♦3 1-Kobland-Hill vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
180 3.00 2.00 2N N +2 ♦7 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
150 2.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♦7 7-Martin-Walker vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
110 1.00 4.00 2♥ S ♦6 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
100 0.00 5.00 3♥ S -1 ♥A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 2-Yokel-Powers
|
| 6 |
♠9653
♥K
♦T73
♣AQJ92
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♣A 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
100 4.00 1.00 3N S -2 ♥J 1-Kobland-Hill vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
150 3.00 2.00 3♦ S -3 ♥J 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
170 1.50 3.50 2♠ W +2 ♥K 9-Ray-Dau vs 5-Hullman-Pender
170 1.50 3.50 2♥ E +2 ♦K 7-Martin-Walker vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
300 0.00 5.00 4♣* N -2 ♦8 12-Xu-Henderson vs 2-Yokel-Powers
|
| 7 |
♠9
♥A54
♦AK865
♣KT42
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2/3 ♠6 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♣A 7-Martin-Walker vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
200 4.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♦A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♦2 2-Yokel-Powers vs 9-Ray-Dau
170 2.00 3.00 3♥ S +1 ♣A 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Hullman-Pender
170 2.00 3.00 1♥ S +3 ♣A 1-Kobland-Hill vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
140 0.00 5.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
|
| 8 |
♠QJT63
♥J54
♦AT3
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ -/1♥ -/1♠ 1/2NT ♥6/7 ♠6/7 |
| EW: ♣6/5 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♦7 12-Xu-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
50 4.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♣8 7-Martin-Walker vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
50 2.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♦7 2-Yokel-Powers vs 9-Ray-Dau
50 2.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♣5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
50 2.00 3.00 2♣ S -1 ♦7 1-Kobland-Hill vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
100 0.00 5.00 2♦ S -2 ♥9 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Hullman-Pender
|
| 9 |
♠T873
♥T96
♦43
♣KQ74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 1/2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦5/4 ♥5 ♠3 NT5/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.90 0.10 4♥ N ♠9 2-Yokel-Powers vs 9-Ray-Dau
200 3.70 1.30 3♣ E -2 ♠A 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 5-Hullman-Pender
170 2.50 2.50 3♠ N +1 ♣3 7-Martin-Walker vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
50 1.30 3.70 4♠ N -1 ♠4 12-Xu-Henderson vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
100 0.10 4.90 4♠ N -2 ♠6 1-Kobland-Hill vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
|
| 10 |
♠A85
♥3
♦76532
♣9654
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 3♠ S -1 ♥J 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Ray-Dau
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠A 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 5-Hullman-Pender
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
140 3.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠5 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
200 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -2 ♥J 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
200 0.50 4.50 2♠ S -2 ♥2 2-Yokel-Powers vs 7-Martin-Walker
|
| 11 |
♠KQ3
♥AQ52
♦Q63
♣932
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥5 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4/5♦ -/1♥ 2/3♠ 3/5NT ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.50 0.50 3N W ♥2 2-Yokel-Powers vs 7-Martin-Walker
400 4.50 0.50 3N W ♥2 12-Xu-Henderson vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
460 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♥2 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Ray-Dau
460 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♥2 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
460 1.50 3.50 3N W +2 ♦3 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
460 1.50 3.50 3N E +2 ♣9 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 5-Hullman-Pender
|
| 12 |
♠AK72
♥T9
♦Q932
♣J53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 3/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♠2 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 1-Kobland-Hill
120 4.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♠2 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
120 4.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♠2 12-Xu-Henderson vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
180 1.50 3.50 1N W +3 ♠A 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 5-Hullman-Pender
180 1.50 3.50 1N W +3 ♠2 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 9-Ray-Dau
400 0.00 5.00 2♥ N -4 ♠T 2-Yokel-Powers vs 7-Martin-Walker
|
| 13 |
♠92
♥A32
♦AK74
♣Q932
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠2 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.00 0.00 2♥ S ♠4 12-Xu-Henderson vs 5-Hullman-Pender
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♦6 1-Kobland-Hill vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
170 3.50 1.50 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Martin-Walker
200 1.00 4.00 2♠ E +3 ♦6 9-Ray-Dau vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
200 1.00 4.00 5♥ S -2 ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
200 1.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠A 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Yokel-Powers
|
| 14 |
♠T972
♥A
♦65
♣AK9754
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Martin-Walker
50 4.00 1.00 3♣ N -1 ♠A 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 ♠A 1-Kobland-Hill vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 ♠A 9-Ray-Dau vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 ♠Q 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Yokel-Powers
100 1.50 3.50 3♣ N -2 ♣J 12-Xu-Henderson vs 5-Hullman-Pender
|
| 15 |
♠8
♥J654
♦AQ72
♣J984
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♦T 12-Xu-Henderson vs 5-Hullman-Pender
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣K 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
170 3.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♣K 9-Ray-Dau vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
170 3.50 1.50 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 7-Martin-Walker
140 1.00 4.00 3♠ S ♥A 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 2-Yokel-Powers
1700 0.00 5.00 6♣* S -6 ♦T 1-Kobland-Hill vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
| 16 |
♠QJ65
♥J85
♦T
♣KQ854
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2/3NT ♣5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.00 0.00 2♦ W +2 ♣K 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
180 4.00 1.00 1N W +3 ♣5 1-Kobland-Hill vs 7-Martin-Walker
600 2.00 3.00 3N W ♠5 2-Yokel-Powers vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
600 2.00 3.00 3N W ♣5 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Ray-Dau
600 2.00 3.00 3N W ♣5 5-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
630 0.00 5.00 3N W +1 ♣5 12-Xu-Henderson vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
|
| 17 |
♠K32
♥KT93
♦J73
♣632
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.00 0.00 2N E +1 ♠Q 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
400 3.50 1.50 3N E ♠Q 1-Kobland-Hill vs 7-Martin-Walker
400 3.50 1.50 3N E ♠Q 2-Yokel-Powers vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♠Q 12-Xu-Henderson vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
430 1.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♦2 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Ray-Dau
490 0.00 5.00 3N E +3 ♦2 5-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
|
| 18 |
♠KQ54
♥KT93
♦T82
♣A3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥2 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♠T 5-Hullman-Pender vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
660 3.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♠2 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
660 3.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠T 2-Yokel-Powers vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
660 3.00 2.00 3N N +2 ♠T 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 9-Ray-Dau
620 1.00 4.00 4♥ S ♣9 1-Kobland-Hill vs 7-Martin-Walker
170 0.00 5.00 4♣ S +2 ♣9 12-Xu-Henderson vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
|
| 19 |
♠973
♥972
♦94
♣AJ643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ 3NT ♣7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.00 0.00 2♠ W -1 ♦9 2-Yokel-Powers vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
80 4.00 1.00 1♠ W ♣4 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Ray-Dau
100 3.00 2.00 2♣ N -2 ♦5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
120 1.50 3.50 1N E +1 ♥8 12-Xu-Henderson vs 7-Martin-Walker
120 1.50 3.50 1N E +1 ♥4 5-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Kobland-Hill
600 0.00 5.00 3N E ♦5 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
|
| 20 |
♠962
♥J65
♦A43
♣9876
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6/5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 2N W -2 ♠Q 2-Yokel-Powers vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
100 3.00 2.00 2N S -1 ♣2 5-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Kobland-Hill
100 3.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♦6 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
100 3.00 2.00 1N S -1 ♥3 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
400 0.50 4.50 2♦ N -4 ♥T 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Ray-Dau
400 0.50 4.50 2♣ N -4 ♥T 12-Xu-Henderson vs 7-Martin-Walker
|
| 21 |
♠T653
♥A3
♦T62
♣K963
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.50 0.50 2♦ E ♥4 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
90 4.50 0.50 2♦ E ♥2 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
100 3.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Hullman-Pender vs 1-Kobland-Hill
110 1.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 ♠2 2-Yokel-Powers vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
110 1.50 3.50 2♦ E +1 ♥4 12-Xu-Henderson vs 7-Martin-Walker
120 0.00 5.00 1N W +1 ♣2 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 9-Ray-Dau
|
| 22 |
♠AQT
♥KT643
♦AJT8
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♠6 12-Xu-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
150 3.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 ♥2 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 9-Ray-Dau
150 3.50 1.50 3♣ S +2 ♣6 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Kobland-Hill
130 1.50 3.50 4♣ S ♥7 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 2-Yokel-Powers
130 1.50 3.50 4♣ N ♦4 7-Martin-Walker vs 5-Hullman-Pender
50 0.00 5.00 5♣ S -1 ♠5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
|
| 23 |
♠AJ8763
♥K6
♦A
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3♥ 6♠ 5NT ♦5 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣2 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1430 5.00 0.00 6♠ N ♣A 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
680 2.50 2.50 5♠ N +1 ♦6 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 9-Ray-Dau
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 ♥8 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 2-Yokel-Powers
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 ♥8 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Kobland-Hill
680 2.50 2.50 4♠ N +2 ♦6 7-Martin-Walker vs 5-Hullman-Pender
650 0.00 5.00 4♠ N +1 ♦6 12-Xu-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
|
| 24 |
♠A
♥KT32
♦A4
♣QJT642
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 5.00 0.00 3N N ♥4 3-Wesolowski-Johnson vs 9-Ray-Dau
180 4.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♥J 12-Xu-Henderson vs 8-Loops-Ruggeri
130 2.50 2.50 3♣ N +1 ♥J 7-Martin-Walker vs 5-Hullman-Pender
130 2.50 2.50 2♣ N +2 ♥5 10-Gamble-Llacera vs 4-Sedey-Formoso
50 1.00 4.00 3♣ N -1 ♣8 6-Schilling-Bruno vs 2-Yokel-Powers
110 0.00 5.00 2♥ W ♣6 11-Keeley-Ducey vs 1-Kobland-Hill
|
| 25 |
♠9
♥A543
♦AQJ6
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦4/5 ♥2 ♠5/6 NT3/4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 5.00 0.00 4♥ N +3 ♣5 2-Yokel-Powers vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
200 3.50 1.50 2N W -2 ♦Q 7-Martin-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
200 3.50 1.50 3♥ S +2 ♠3 5-Hullman-Pender vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
170 2.00 3.00 2♥ N +2 ♣K 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Hill
140 0.50 4.50 3♥ S ♠3 12-Xu-Henderson vs 9-Ray-Dau
140 0.50 4.50 2♥ S +1 ♣8 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
|
| 26 |
♠6
♥J854
♦AKT543
♣Q4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.00 0.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 2-Yokel-Powers vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦A 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
100 3.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♦A 12-Xu-Henderson vs 9-Ray-Dau
140 2.00 3.00 3♠ W ♦A 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Hill
170 1.00 4.00 3♠ W +1 ♦A 7-Martin-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
620 0.00 5.00 4♠ W ♦A 5-Hullman-Pender vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|
| 27 |
♠AK3
♥J654
♦6432
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣A 4-Sedey-Formoso vs 1-Kobland-Hill
140 4.00 1.00 2♠ W +1 ♥3 2-Yokel-Powers vs 11-Keeley-Ducey
170 2.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♠A 7-Martin-Walker vs 3-Wesolowski-Johnson
170 2.50 2.50 2♠ W +2 ♣A 8-Loops-Ruggeri vs 6-Schilling-Bruno
420 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♠3 12-Xu-Henderson vs 9-Ray-Dau
420 0.50 4.50 4♠ W ♥4 5-Hullman-Pender vs 10-Gamble-Llacera
|