| 1 |
♠A2
♥A97
♦AT9853
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♦ 7♥ 1♠ 7NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣5/6 ♦0 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.92 0.08 4♠* E -3 ♣A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
420 3.58 2.42 4♥ S ♠4 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
420 3.58 2.42 4♥ N ♠4 7-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Johnson-Jean
420 3.58 2.42 5♦ N +1 ♠3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
170 1.25 4.75 2♦ N +4 ♠7 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.08 5.92 4♦ N -1 ♥3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 2 |
♠9543
♥T
♦AK96
♣AT83
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/3♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♥ ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.92 0.08 1N E -1 ♠2 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
90 4.75 1.25 1N E ♦4 7-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Johnson-Jean
100 3.58 2.42 3♦ S -1 ♣K 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
130 2.42 3.58 2♣ W +2 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
200 1.25 4.75 3♦ N -2 ♥J 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.08 5.92 2N N -3 ♦3 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
|
| 3 |
♠A8
♥K86
♦QT9
♣K8532
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.33 0.67 4♣ S ♠6 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
130 5.33 0.67 2♣ S +2 ♠7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
50 3.58 2.42 3♥ S -1 ♠7 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
100 1.83 4.17 3N N -2 ♠5 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
100 1.83 4.17 3N N -2 ♠2 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.08 5.92 2♠ W +1 ♥6 7-Osborn-Winham vs 5-Johnson-Jean
|
| 4 |
♠J932
♥A864
♦432
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 2N W -2 ♥4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 4.75 1.25 3N E -1 ♥2 7-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
100 3.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦7 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Johnson-Jean
100 3.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♣4 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
110 1.25 4.75 2♣ W +1 ♥4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.08 5.92 1N S -3 ♦Q 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
|
| 5 |
♠763
♥KT7
♦T962
♣Q96
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 2/1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 2N E -2 ♦K 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Johnson-Jean
50 4.75 1.25 3N E -1 ♦4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 3.58 2.42 2♥ E ♠8 7-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
120 1.83 4.17 2N E ♦4 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
120 1.83 4.17 1N E +1 ♦4 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
150 0.08 5.92 2N E +1 ♦4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 6 |
♠AT82
♥AQT87
♦6
♣AJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2/3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 5.92 0.08 6♠ S ♦7 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
480 4.75 1.25 5♠ S +1 ♥4 7-Osborn-Winham vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
450 3.58 2.42 5♠ S ♥4 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Johnson-Jean
420 2.42 3.58 4♠ S ♥5 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
50 0.67 5.33 6♠ S -1 ♦2 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.67 5.33 5♠ S -1 ♣T 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 7 |
♠T87
♥AQT2
♦KJ42
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.92 0.08 4♥ N ♣3 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Johnson-Jean
170 4.75 1.25 2♥ S +2 ♣Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
120 3.58 2.42 1N S +1 ♣Q 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
100 2.42 3.58 2♠ E -1 ♦Q 7-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
80 1.25 4.75 1♠ E ♦7 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
100 0.08 5.92 3♥ N -1 ♦5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
|
| 8 |
♠8
♥7632
♦JT94
♣AKJ9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3/2♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.92 0.08 3♦ S +1 ♠K 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Johnson-Jean
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ W ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ W ♣A 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ W ♣A 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ W ♣A 7-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ E ♣A 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
|
| 9 |
♠984
♥86
♦K843
♣KQ94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.92 0.08 3♣ S -1 ♦6 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 5-Johnson-Jean
100 4.17 1.83 2N N -2 ♦J 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
100 4.17 1.83 2♠ S -2 ♣J 3-Barr-Barr vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
230 2.42 3.58 2♥ W +4 ♠4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
650 1.25 4.75 4♥ E +1 ♦2 7-Osborn-Winham vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
680 0.08 5.92 4♥ E +2 ♠3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠Q73
♥Q97
♦QJ83
♣Q64
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1/-NT ♥5 ♠6 NT7/6 |
| EW: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.33 0.67 2N S ♠5 7-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
120 5.33 0.67 1N S +1 ♠5 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
90 3.58 2.42 2♦ S ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
100 2.42 3.58 2N S -1 ♠9 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
200 1.25 4.75 3N S -2 ♠5 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.08 5.92 2N S -3 ♠6 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 11 |
♠-
♥KJ986
♦QJ9842
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 4♠ W -3 ♦Q 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 4.17 1.83 3♠ W -1 ♦Q 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.17 1.83 3♠ W -1 ♦Q 7-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
50 2.42 3.58 3♥ N -1 ♠3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
110 1.25 4.75 2♠ W ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
140 0.08 5.92 3♠ W ♥8 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 12 |
♠T72
♥AQ965
♦Q83
♣32
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.33 0.67 2♥ N ♦2 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
110 5.33 0.67 2♥ N ♦2 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
100 3.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♠8 3-Barr-Barr vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.00 3.00 2♥ N -1 ♦2 7-Osborn-Winham vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
200 0.67 5.33 4♥ N -2 ♦4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
200 0.67 5.33 4♥ N -2 ♦2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 13 |
♠AJ75
♥J92
♦KT75
♣K7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 5.92 0.08 3N N +1 ♠8 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Johnson-Jean
200 4.75 1.25 2N W -2 ♥2 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
150 3.58 2.42 2N S +1 ♣2 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 1.83 4.17 2♥ S ♦A 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
110 1.83 4.17 3♣ S ♥6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
300 0.08 5.92 4♥ S -3 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
|
| 14 |
♠AK8
♥T76
♦AT
♣A9842
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.33 0.67 2♠ W -2 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
100 5.33 0.67 3♥ E -2 ♠3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
50 3.58 2.42 2♥ E -1 ♣7 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.42 3.58 2♠ N -1 ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Johnson-Jean
100 0.67 5.33 3♠ S -2 ♥3 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
100 0.67 5.33 3♣ N -2 ♠7 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 15 |
♠73
♥A8653
♦QT98
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 3♠ E +1 ♥4 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 5-Johnson-Jean
400 4.75 1.25 3N E ♥3 3-Barr-Barr vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
420 3.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
420 3.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥4 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
450 0.67 5.33 4♠ E +1 ♥4 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.67 5.33 4♠ E +1 ♣T 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 16 |
♠72
♥KJ64
♦J862
♣A85
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3♠ E -1 ♥A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ E ♦T 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Johnson-Jean
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ E ♦T 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
140 1.83 4.17 2♠ E +1 ♥5 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
140 1.83 4.17 2♠ E +1 ♦9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
170 0.08 5.92 2♠ E +2 ♦9 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 17 |
♠92
♥KJ92
♦KT7
♣Q983
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ -/1♦ -/1♥ -/1♠ -/1NT ♦6/7 ♥6/7 ♠6/7 NT6/7 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.92 0.08 1N N +1 ♦5 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
90 4.75 1.25 1N N ♦5 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
PASS 3.58 2.42 Pass Out 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
50 1.83 4.17 1N N -1 ♦5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
50 1.83 4.17 1N N -1 ♦5 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Johnson-Jean
150 0.08 5.92 2♠ S -3 ♣J 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 18 |
♠AKJ84
♥52
♦AQ86
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥5 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♠ N ♥K 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♥K 8-Buhr-Swanson vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
110 4.17 1.83 1♠ N +1 ♥K 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Johnson-Jean
50 2.42 3.58 2♥ E -1 ♣3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
100 0.67 5.33 3♠ N -1 ♥K 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
100 0.67 5.33 3♠ N -1 ♥K 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
|
| 19 |
♠984
♥QT7
♦875
♣QT53
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♥ E -2 ♣A 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Johnson-Jean
100 5.00 1.00 2♦ W -1 ♠4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦K 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
50 3.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦K 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
50 3.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦7 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
90 0.50 5.50 2♦ W ♣3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
90 0.50 5.50 2♦ W ♣3 7-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 20 |
♠6
♥Q952
♦J932
♣Q642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 6.00 0.00 4♠* E -2 ♥3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
150 5.00 1.00 2♣ S +3 ♠2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Johnson-Jean
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ N ♣J 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
100 2.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♣A 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
100 2.50 3.50 4♠ E -1 ♣A 7-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ E +1 ♣A 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
620 0.00 6.00 4♠ E ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 21 |
♠AJ98
♥54
♦Q9763
♣Q5
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.50 0.50 3♣ S ♦2 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Johnson-Jean
110 5.50 0.50 3♣ N ♦2 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Frank-Emanuel
90 4.00 2.00 2♣ N +1 ♦3 7-Osborn-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.50 3.50 3♣ S -1 ♥T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 3.50 3♣ S -1 ♦2 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
200 0.50 5.50 3♠ N -2 ♥A 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
200 0.50 5.50 4♣ S -2 ♦2 3-Barr-Barr vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
|
| 22 |
♠976542
♥KQ5
♦-
♣Q832
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦1 ♥2 ♠5 NT0 |
| EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ 2♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 5.92 0.08 3♦ W +1 ♠9 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
150 4.75 1.25 2N E +1 ♦5 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Johnson-Jean
600 3.58 2.42 3N W ♠7 7-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
660 2.42 3.58 3N E +2 ♠3 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
690 0.67 5.33 3N E +3 ♠3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
690 0.67 5.33 3N E +3 ♥6 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 23 |
♠K932
♥A985
♦J742
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 6N E -2 ♣3 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 4.75 1.25 3N W -1 ♥5 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Johnson-Jean
600 3.58 2.42 3N W ♠2 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
630 1.25 4.75 3N W +1 ♥5 7-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
630 1.25 4.75 3N E +1 ♣3 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
630 1.25 4.75 3N E +1 ♣3 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
|
| 24 |
♠64
♥KJT963
♦A62
♣A2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3♠ E -2 ♥4 3-Barr-Barr vs 5-Johnson-Jean
110 3.58 2.42 2♠ E ♥8 7-Osborn-Winham vs 6-Mohan-Mohan
110 3.58 2.42 2♠ E ♥4 4-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 3.58 2.42 3♣ W ♦2 5-Stolzberg-Riley vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.25 4.75 2♠ E +1 ♥8 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
150 0.08 5.92 4♥ N -3 ♦3 6-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Graves-Rodrigues
|