| 1 |
♠AKQ5
♥KT32
♦K4
♣542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
| EW: 2♦ 1♥ 1/2NT ♣5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♦2 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♥7 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
110 2.50 1.50 3♣ N ♥9 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ W -1 ♠A 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
50 0.50 3.50 2♥ W -1 ♠A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 2 |
♠2
♥J92
♦KQT954
♣654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥3 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠2 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 3.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♣3 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ W ♦Q 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
300 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -3 ♦8 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
300 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -3 ♦8 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 3 |
♠6
♥9842
♦AK86532
♣K
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 3/4♥ 4♠ 2/3NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ E -1 ♦J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♠6 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
170 1.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♦7 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
620 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 4 |
♠T9876
♥-
♦QJ92
♣T874
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥5 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -2 ♠T 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Johnson-Jean
200 3.00 1.00 3♥* W -1 ♦Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 3.00 2N S -1 ♥K 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♥K 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♥J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 5 |
♠T76
♥J87
♦954
♣AJT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♣J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
170 3.00 1.00 1♥ W +3 ♣8 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♣J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♠3 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Hahn
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣8 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
|
| 6 |
♠AKQT42
♥982
♦92
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥5 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -3 ♠7 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 1.50 3♥ E -1 ♠7 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Hahn
100 2.50 1.50 4♣ W -1 ♠A 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
50 0.50 3.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 7 |
♠JT
♥J43
♦T52
♣A9843
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
| EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♠2 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♣5 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♣5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♦4 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♠8 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Hahn
|
| 8 |
♠A97
♥7654
♦AK9
♣K87
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♥ E -1 ♠4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♥J 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♥J 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E ♣4 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Harken-Hahn
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ E ♠4 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠A5
♥5
♦Q87654
♣KQ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥4 |
| EW: 3♥ ♣3/2 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ N ♥A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Harken-Hahn
130 3.00 1.00 4♣ S ♥T 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ N ♠2 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♦A 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥5 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
|
| 10 |
♠A
♥Q7652
♦KQ83
♣762
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 4♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 4♠ W -1 ♥5 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.50 0.50 4♥ W -1 ♦K 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ W ♥2 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ W ♦K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Harken-Hahn
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W +1 ♥7 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
| 11 |
♠KJT6
♥AKJ
♦KT3
♣QT5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠2/3 NT2/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦7 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 3.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♥T 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Harken-Hahn
50 1.50 2.50 3N N -1 ♥7 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♦7 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E ♦2 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 12 |
♠T72
♥T75
♦KT763
♣J9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♣ W -2 ♦6 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Harken-Hahn
90 3.00 1.00 1♦ S +1 ♣A 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
50 2.00 2.00 3♣ W -1 ♦3 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 6-Johnson-Jean
110 0.50 3.50 2♥ E ♦2 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.50 3.50 3♣ W ♦3 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 13 |
♠J543
♥76
♦AT83
♣J97
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
| EW: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.50 0.50 1N E +1 ♠T 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Hahn
120 3.50 0.50 1N E +1 ♣2 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠T 2-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♠8 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣2 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 14 |
♠J87654
♥65
♦52
♣AJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 1♥ E +4 ♣3 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Hahn
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ E ♦T 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ E ♣4 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♦T 2-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
450 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♣4 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 15 |
♠J9
♥JT876542
♦AQ8
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♦2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣4 2-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
100 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -2 ♥J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♠4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Hahn
200 0.00 4.00 4♥* N -1 ♠4 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 16 |
♠A6
♥KQT74
♦QT74
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N N ♥9 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
300 3.00 1.00 4♣ W -3 ♥2 2-Harken-Winham vs 6-Johnson-Jean
170 2.00 2.00 1♠ S +3 ♦J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Harken-Hahn
150 1.00 3.00 1N N +2 ♥8 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
120 0.00 4.00 2N N ♥8 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 17 |
♠-
♥T876
♦J765
♣KQT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦5 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: -/1♦ 4♠ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♥6 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣K 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣9 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥4 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Hahn
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♣3 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
|
| 18 |
♠KJ62
♥A83
♦Q752
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.50 1.50 2N S ♥J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
120 2.50 1.50 2N N ♥Q 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Hahn
120 2.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♥J 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
120 2.50 1.50 1N S +1 ♥J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ S ♥J 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 19 |
♠AKJT7
♥A63
♦K
♣JT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♦T 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Hahn
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥2 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣3 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
170 1.00 3.00 3♣ S +3 ♠6 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 4.00 6♠ N -2 ♣3 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 20 |
♠Q94
♥AK42
♦J43
♣732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 3/2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦5 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -2 ♦3 1-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Harken-Hahn
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♣J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Ainsworth
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ E -1 ♥9 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♣J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ E ♠J 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 21 |
♠K6
♥T9
♦AKT96
♣K763
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 4NT ♥6 ♠6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠7 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Hahn
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠7 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Johnson-Jean
620 2.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 ♣J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
150 1.00 3.00 2♦ N +3 ♥Q 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
100 0.00 4.00 4♠ W -2 ♦A 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|
| 22 |
♠QJT762
♥832
♦65
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥5 ♠5 NT1 |
| EW: 7♣ 6♦ 2♥ 1♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 2♥ S -2 ♦4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Johnson-Jean
190 1.50 2.50 4♣ W +3 ♥8 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
190 1.50 2.50 3♣ W +4 ♥8 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Hahn
190 1.50 2.50 3♣ E +4 ♥K 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
190 1.50 2.50 3♣ E +4 ♥K 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
|
| 23 |
♠AQ873
♥974
♦9
♣QT74
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥J 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Hahn
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ S +1 ♣A 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
120 2.00 2.00 2N N ♥6 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ S ♣A 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♥2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Johnson-Jean
|
| 24 |
♠AT763
♥AJT72
♦Q
♣A2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 4♠* W -3 ♣A 5-Rodrigues-Graves vs 4-Frank-Emanuel
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♦K 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Pearce-Pearce
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♦4 4-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Harken-Hahn
480 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +2 ♦4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Johnson-Jean
50 0.00 4.00 5♦ W -1 ♦5 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Girouard-Ruggeri
|