| 1 |
♠T2
♥KQ982
♦76
♣A952
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 NT4 |
| EW: 2/3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3♠ S -1 ♦Q 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Harken
400 1.50 1.50 3N W ♠T 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
430 0.17 2.83 3N W +1 ♦3 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Kobland-Ray
|
| 2 |
♠Q74
♥J8
♦K9853
♣863
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ S ♥6 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Harken
620 2.17 0.83 4♠ S ♥6 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.17 2.83 3♠ S +1 ♦3 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Kobland-Ray
|
| 3 |
♠KT7
♥J72
♦QJ65
♣T95
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 1.95 1.65 3N W +1 ♦5 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Harken
650 1.65 1.95 4♠ W +1 ♥2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 4 |
♠J54
♥8652
♦9653
♣52
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5/4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 3N W ♦3 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
630 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♠3 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Ray
660 0.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♦8 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 5 |
♠T
♥K87
♦AKQJ74
♣743
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4♣ 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -1 ♦A 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.83 2.17 3♥ E +1 ♦J 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
170 0.83 2.17 2♥ E +2 ♦9 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Ray
|
| 6 |
♠AJ9843
♥65
♦J652
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 1/-♥ 6♠ 3NT ♥7/6 |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.83 0.17 4♠ S +2 ♥2 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♠5 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Harken-Harken
420 0.17 2.83 4♠ N ♦3 5-Davidson-Winham vs 2-Kobland-Ray
|
| 7 |
♠9743
♥Q
♦J987
♣J654
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♥ W -1 ♦7 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ W +1 ♦7 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Walker
660 0.17 2.83 3N E +2 ♥2 2-Kobland-Ray vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠543
♥93
♦KQ83
♣J962
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦5/6 ♥4 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♥ E ♣7 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
130 1.50 1.50 3♣ E +1 ♥5 2-Kobland-Ray vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.17 2.83 3♠ W ♦K 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 9 |
♠AQJ2
♥2
♦753
♣KJT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.83 0.17 2♦ E -4 ♠6 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Walker
100 1.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♠8 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Winham
150 0.17 2.83 2♠ N -3 ♣A 2-Kobland-Ray vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 10 |
♠T85
♥42
♦8632
♣AQ97
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 |
| EW: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ S +2 ♦7 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 1.50 1♥ S +2 ♦7 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Kobland-Ray
200 0.17 2.83 4♥* S -1 ♦7 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 11 |
♠J9754
♥A986
♦Q3
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 2♠ N -1 ♥5 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.17 0.83 3♦ S -1 ♥J 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.17 2.83 2♥ N -2 ♠A 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Kobland-Ray
|
| 12 |
♠A2
♥54
♦JT9762
♣K62
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥4 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 5♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 4/5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.17 0.83 4♠ W ♦J 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Kobland-Ray
420 2.17 0.83 4♠ W ♦6 9-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
450 0.17 2.83 4♠ W +1 ♦J 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 13 |
♠K87
♥AQJ4
♦T75
♣A62
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT ♣5 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥4/5 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♥5 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
120 1.50 1.50 2N N ♣J 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
120 1.50 1.50 1N N +1 ♣J 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Harken-Harken
90 0.00 3.00 1N N ♦4 2-Kobland-Ray vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 14 |
♠3
♥K62
♦9763
♣98643
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6N E -2 ♠Q 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
450 2.00 1.00 4♥ E +1 ♠Q 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Harken-Harken
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♠3 2-Kobland-Ray vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
460 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠Q 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 15 |
♠KJ972
♥AJ3
♦QJ4
♣85
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 2♠ N ♥T 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Davidson-Winham
50 2.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♦2 2-Kobland-Ray vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♦A 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
| 16 |
♠AT
♥AJT2
♦AQ96
♣J97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 3♠ -/2NT ♦6 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥7 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
90 2.00 1.00 1N N ♣Q 2-Kobland-Ray vs 1-Loops-Walker
50 1.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♣Q 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
790 0.00 3.00 4♠* E ♦3 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠97
♥T93
♦J94
♣QT743
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT5/4 |
| EW: -/1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N W +2 ♥T 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ E +2 ♥A 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
180 0.50 2.50 1N W +3 ♥T 2-Kobland-Ray vs 1-Loops-Walker
180 0.50 2.50 1N W +3 ♥T 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 18 |
♠QJ52
♥KQ84
♦J94
♣94
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣9 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
400 2.00 1.00 3N W ♥4 3-Harken-Harken vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣9 5-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
490 0.00 3.00 3N W +3 ♦4 2-Kobland-Ray vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 19 |
♠K64
♥Q72
♦A84
♣J854
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT5/4 |
| EW: 1/2♣ 3♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2N W -1 ♣3 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
100 2.50 0.50 3♦ W -1 ♣4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
120 1.00 2.00 2N W ♣4 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Ray
140 0.00 3.00 3♠ E ♣2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 20 |
♠KQT6
♥A742
♦A82
♣K5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠2 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Ray
620 1.50 1.50 4♥ N ♦4 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Davidson-Winham
100 0.00 3.00 6♥ N -1 ♠A 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 21 |
♠AT96
♥A652
♦8
♣KT64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ 1/2♠ ♣6 ♦4 NT4 |
| EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ S ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 3-Harken-Harken vs 2-Kobland-Ray
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Davidson-Winham
|
| 22 |
♠9
♥AKQ74
♦QJ8
♣KQ86
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 1NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥1 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 3.00 0.00 2♠* W -2 ♥A 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
200 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -2 ♥A 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
200 1.50 1.50 3♥ N +2 ♠A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken
150 0.00 3.00 4♦ S +1 ♠K 2-Kobland-Ray vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 23 |
♠864
♥83
♦KJ3
♣KQT65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ E ♦9 2-Kobland-Ray vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ E ♦9 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
110 2.00 1.00 2♥ E ♣J 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
300 0.00 3.00 3♣ N -3 ♣7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
| 24 |
♠KQJ8
♥QT5
♦QJ
♣KQT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 4♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1010 1.50 1.50 6♥ S +1 ♦9 2-Kobland-Ray vs 8-Pearce-Pearce
1010 1.50 1.50 6♥ S +1 ♦7 5-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
1010 1.50 1.50 6♥ S +1 ♣9 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
1010 1.50 1.50 6♥ N +1 ♠4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Harken-Harken
|
| 25 |
♠KJT42
♥-
♦QT92
♣Q962
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ -/1♦ 5♥ 2/5NT ♦6/7 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 0.00 4♥ W +1 ♠T 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♠6 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +2 ♦3 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
710 0.00 3.00 4♥ E +3 ♠9 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 26 |
♠J52
♥KT852
♦A97
♣A4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♦ S -1 ♠T 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♥3 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
200 1.00 2.00 2♠ E +3 ♥3 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 2.00 4♦ S -2 ♠T 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 27 |
♠8
♥T8542
♦A87
♣K976
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♣K 8-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Walker
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣6 5-Davidson-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣6 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♠8 3-Harken-Harken vs 9-Vadas-Pringle
|