| 1 |
♠94
♥JT94
♦AQT62
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 1/-♥ 5/4♠ 4NT ♥7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 3N E -1 ♥5 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Murdock-Winham
130 1.50 1.50 3♦ E +1 ♦3 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
200 0.17 2.83 2♠ W +3 ♥J 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
| 2 |
♠KQT7
♥KJ9762
♦8
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦2 ♠6 NT3 |
| EW: 2♣ 5♦ -/1♠ 3NT ♥5 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 0.17 4♦ W -1 ♦3 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
110 1.50 1.50 3♦ W ♠K 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Cowen-Brown
200 0.17 2.83 3♥ N -2 ♦3 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Murdock-Winham
|
| 3 |
♠-
♥K852
♦874
♣KJ9654
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 3/4♦ ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 2♥ 5♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥T 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 3-Cowen-Brown
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣A 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Murdock-Winham
|
| 4 |
♠KQJ85
♥J32
♦J32
♣QT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 3/2♣ 1/-♥ 2NT ♦6/5 ♥7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦6 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Cowen-Brown
100 1.50 1.50 2N E -1 ♦6 8-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 ♠2 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
|
| 5 |
♠KJ
♥AKQT
♦5
♣T87652
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♥3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 4♠ W -4 ♥A 8-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.83 2.17 3♦ E +2 ♣K 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
150 0.83 2.17 2♦ E +3 ♣K 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
| 6 |
♠AJ4
♥92
♦AJ743
♣AQJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♥ 1/2NT ♣5 ♦5/6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3♥ W -2 ♥9 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
140 0.83 2.17 3♥ W ♥9 8-Murdock-Winham vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 0.83 2.17 3♥ W ♥2 1-Loops-Walker vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
| 7 |
♠J4
♥AKQ8
♦JT5
♣AK52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.83 0.17 3N N +3 ♦6 10-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
660 1.50 1.50 3N N +2 ♦4 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
600 0.17 2.83 3N S ♠5 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 8 |
♠Q876
♥AT4
♦AK4
♣KJ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠3 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦5 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦5 10-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 9 |
♠9
♥A83
♦AQ82
♣KJT82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4/5♣ 3♦ 4/5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.95 1.65 3♥ S +1 ♦7 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.65 1.95 2♣ N +3 ♦4 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
|
| 10 |
♠75
♥AKQT6
♦A642
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 2.83 0.17 1N S +3 ♦3 10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♥5 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Murdock-Winham
200 0.17 2.83 4♥ N -2 ♦8 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 11 |
♠873
♥53
♦6542
♣8752
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
| EW: 3♣ 4/3♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.83 0.17 4♠ W +2 ♠4 10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
510 1.50 1.50 4♥ E +3 ♦4 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Murdock-Winham
1010 0.17 2.83 6♠ W +1 ♦2 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 12 |
♠T62
♥54
♦T97654
♣T9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 5♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♠ E ♣A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
430 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♣A 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.17 2.83 4♠ E +1 ♣A 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Murdock-Winham
|
| 13 |
♠A76
♥A964
♦965
♣986
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 2N E +2 ♥8 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
630 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♦2 10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Cowen-Brown
630 1.50 1.50 3N E +1 ♣3 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Harken-Harken
660 0.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣3 8-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
|
| 14 |
♠J7
♥QT6432
♦T54
♣72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣8 8-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
170 2.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♣5 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♥7 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Harken-Harken
110 0.00 3.00 1♠ S +1 ♥9 10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
| 15 |
♠-
♥KJ764
♦AJT94
♣K43
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2/1NT |
| EW: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♦5 8-Murdock-Winham vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ N ♦5 1-Loops-Walker vs 9-Harken-Harken
110 1.00 2.00 3♦ S ♠8 10-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Cowen-Brown
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ N +1 ♦5 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 16 |
♠AK7
♥AQ74
♦9853
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♥ 3NT ♣4 ♦5 ♠6 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 4♦* W -3 ♠A 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
400 2.00 1.00 3N N ♣8 3-Cowen-Brown vs 8-Murdock-Winham
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ S ♦A 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Walker
500 0.00 3.00 6♥* S -3 ♦A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠AKT
♥T875
♦AK
♣AQ52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 1♦ 3♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♣3 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
120 2.00 1.00 2N N ♣J 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ W -1 ♠A 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Walker
150 0.00 3.00 3N N -3 ♠4 3-Cowen-Brown vs 8-Murdock-Winham
|
| 18 |
♠T5
♥AQT43
♦A3
♣K842
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 6♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 2.17 0.83 2♥ N +4 ♦6 3-Cowen-Brown vs 8-Murdock-Winham
230 2.17 0.83 2♥ N +4 ♣3 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
200 0.17 2.83 2♥ N +3 ♠7 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 19 |
♠J7
♥K97532
♦QT53
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♦ 2/3♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT3 |
| EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♣2 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ E ♠A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
130 1.50 1.50 4♣ E ♣7 3-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
600 0.00 3.00 3N E ♠A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
|
| 20 |
♠72
♥T762
♦AJ52
♣Q95
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 5♥ E -3 ♣2 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
600 1.50 1.50 3N W ♠7 10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
600 1.50 1.50 3N W ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥6 3-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
|
| 21 |
♠KT65
♥94
♦92
♣AJ432
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1/-♠ 1NT ♠7/6 |
| EW: ♣5 ♦6/5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 0.00 3N S ♦Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Cowen-Brown vs 2-Pringle-Rodrigues
100 0.50 2.50 2N N -1 ♣5 10-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Wainer-Ruggeri
100 0.50 2.50 2♥ S -1 ♦Q 1-Loops-Walker vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 22 |
♠T875
♥T98
♦3
♣AKT53
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
| EW: 4♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♥ S -1 ♦2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Cowen-Brown
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣7 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Harken-Harken
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ E +1 ♦4 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker
600 0.00 3.00 3N W ♣A 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 8-Murdock-Winham
|
| 23 |
♠QJT2
♥Q54
♦532
♣T73
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5/4 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Cowen-Brown
100 2.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥8 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 8-Murdock-Winham
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ W ♥4 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♠7 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker
|
| 24 |
♠AJT4
♥Q7
♦AT76
♣KJ4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 4/5♦ 4/5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 3.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠7 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 1-Loops-Walker
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠5 2-Pringle-Rodrigues vs 8-Murdock-Winham
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ N +1 ♠2 7-Nathanson-Formoso vs 9-Harken-Harken
420 0.00 3.00 4♥ N ♦J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Cowen-Brown
|
| 25 |
♠75
♥AQT963
♦53
♣QT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -4 ♥8 3-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ E -2 ♦A 8-Murdock-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
130 1.00 2.00 3♦ N +1 ♣5 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♣8 10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
|
| 26 |
♠852
♥QJ9
♦T83
♣Q843
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♦ 1♥ 2/-NT ♣5/4 ♠5 NT8/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 2♦ W -1 ♦2 10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
90 2.00 1.00 2♦ W ♣3 3-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♦A 8-Murdock-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
120 0.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♠K 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 27 |
♠8
♥8543
♦KJ96
♣AK87
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N N ♥Q 10-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Nathanson-Formoso
180 2.00 1.00 2N N +2 ♦3 3-Cowen-Brown vs 9-Harken-Harken
120 1.00 2.00 2N N ♥Q 5-Wainer-Ruggeri vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.00 3.00 2N N -1 ♥8 8-Murdock-Winham vs 1-Loops-Walker
|