| 1 |
♠Q973
♥J52
♦AT86
♣K6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
| EW: 3♣ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Pender-Kobland
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Winham-Murdock
110 0.00 3.00 2♣ W +1 ♠7 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 2 |
♠3
♥KQT652
♦94
♣K987
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♣3 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Pender-Kobland
200 1.00 2.00 5♥* N -1 ♣2 2-Loops-Walker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
200 1.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♠9 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Winham-Murdock
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♦5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
|
| 3 |
♠QJ52
♥QT84
♦K3
♣863
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 3N W ♠2 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Winham-Murdock
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Harken-Harken
660 0.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♥8 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|
| 4 |
♠Q76
♥T4
♦AT
♣K98642
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1/2 NT3 |
| EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥K 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ E +1 ♥K 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Winham-Murdock
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ E ♥K 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pender-Kobland
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ E +1 ♥K 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 5 |
♠832
♥T85
♦QT532
♣J4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
| EW: 4♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N E ♠4 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pender-Kobland
430 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♠Q 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
460 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠4 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Winham-Murdock
460 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠4 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 6 |
♠QT986
♥AQT5
♦92
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1/-♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♦7/6 ♥6 NT6 |
| EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.50 0.50 1N W -3 ♠8 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Loops-Walker
300 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -3 ♠5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 2.00 2♠ N +1 ♣J 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Winham-Murdock
110 0.00 3.00 2♠ N ♥2 6-Harken-Harken vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|
| 7 |
♠852
♥QJ953
♦QT9
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT |
| EW: ♣5/4 ♦6 ♥4/3 ♠2 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♥T 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ N +1 ♣4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Walker
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦8 7-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Winham-Murdock
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ S +2 ♥T 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 8 |
♠654
♥QJ97
♦AT84
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥A 7-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Winham-Murdock
170 0.50 2.50 3♠ E +1 ♥A 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
170 0.50 2.50 2♠ E +2 ♥K 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 9 |
♠6
♥32
♦J865
♣KJ7643
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ ♠4 NT5 |
| EW: 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 6♠ E -2 ♦A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♥A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Walker
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Harken-Harken
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 7-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Winham-Murdock
|
| 10 |
♠KQJ
♥J
♦AK963
♣QJT8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♣ 5♦ 1♥ 7♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥6 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 2.50 0.50 6♠ S +1 ♠3 1-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Loops-Walker
1460 2.50 0.50 6♠ S +1 ♠3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Pender-Kobland
710 1.00 2.00 4♠ S +3 ♥6 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
680 0.00 3.00 5♠ S +1 ♥2 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
|
| 11 |
♠842
♥AQ753
♦J93
♣A9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
| EW: 1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣3 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♥A 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦A 1-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Loops-Walker
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ S ♦A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -2 ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|
| 12 |
♠82
♥KJ863
♦9654
♣Q9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT3 |
| EW: 4/5♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ W +2 ♥6 6-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥6 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
450 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♦6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Pender-Kobland
480 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +2 ♥6 1-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Loops-Walker
|
| 13 |
♠AQ
♥-
♦KJT8743
♣AT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 7♦ 3♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦0 ♥3/4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠T 7-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
640 2.00 1.00 5♦ N +2 ♣Q 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.00 2.00 5♦ N +1 ♠6 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
600 0.00 3.00 5♦ N ♠T 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Winham-Murdock
|
| 14 |
♠AJ8
♥62
♦9654
♣K432
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 4/3♣ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♦7 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Winham-Murdock
50 1.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦K 7-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
50 1.50 1.50 3N E -1 ♦8 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
400 0.00 3.00 3N E ♦K 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 15 |
♠A64
♥76
♦A853
♣AJT7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT |
| EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.50 0.50 3♠ S ♥A 7-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
140 2.50 0.50 1♠ S +2 ♠8 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S ♦4 6-Harken-Harken vs 1-Winham-Murdock
100 0.00 3.00 1N W -2 ♥6 2-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
| 16 |
♠KQ73
♥KT7
♦A72
♣632
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2/3♦ 2♠ ♥4/5 NT5/6 |
| EW: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 2N N -2 ♥J 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.50 0.50 4♣ N -2 ♥A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Harken-Harken
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦J 7-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Loops-Walker
140 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣A 1-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 17 |
♠72
♥A6
♦6432
♣98532
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3/2 ♠5 NT2 |
| EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -4 ♠7 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
400 1.50 1.50 3N W ♠7 7-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Loops-Walker
400 1.50 1.50 3N W ♠7 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Harken-Harken
430 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♠6 1-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 18 |
♠AQJ
♥8762
♦K8
♣7643
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♠ S ♥5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♦5 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Harken-Harken
140 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +1 ♥3 1-Winham-Murdock vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
| 19 |
♠72
♥QJ854
♦AKQ52
♣J
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
| EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 5♥ N ♣2 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠3 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 2.00 3♥ N +2 ♦8 1-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 0.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♣T 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|
| 20 |
♠KT73
♥AT98
♦95
♣543
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
| EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣A 1-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣A 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
110 2.00 1.00 3♦ E ♣A 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.00 3.00 4♦ E ♥5 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|
| 21 |
♠AQ962
♥7
♦A65
♣KT95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 3♣ 6♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣3 ♦0 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦9 1-Winham-Murdock vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 2-Loops-Walker vs 6-Harken-Harken
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 1.00 2.00 4♠ N +1 ♥Q 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Pender-Kobland
|