1 |
♠AK4
♥A982
♦K5
♣9743
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣3 ♥5 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 4/3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 3♥ E -3 ♦J 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 1.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♦K 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
200 0.00 2.00 2♥ N -4 ♥7 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
|
2 |
♠Q52
♥A92
♦T943
♣Q92
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 ♠3 NT3/2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.00 0.00 3♣ W +1 ♠2 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
400 0.50 1.50 3N W ♦3 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
400 0.50 1.50 3N E ♥8 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
|
3 |
♠A
♥AK74
♦QT92
♣AQ96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♦8 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
450 1.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♦8 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
50 0.00 2.00 4♠ S -1 ♦8 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
4 |
♠Q73
♥KJ2
♦Q43
♣J872
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠4/3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣7 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♣2 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
100 0.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♦3 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
|
5 |
♠QT75
♥K876
♦QT
♣643
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ N +2 ♦A 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
50 0.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♦3 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
50 0.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♦3 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
6 |
♠932
♥KJ9
♦A873
♣KT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣5 ♠1 NT4 |
EW: 1/-♣ 5♠ ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ W ♥9 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
650 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♥K 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
680 0.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♣4 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
7 |
♠76
♥AT75
♦J98
♣AJ54
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ N -1 ♥J 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
110 1.00 1.00 2♠ E ♥3 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♦9 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
8 |
♠54
♥93
♦T97654
♣Q62
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 6♥ 6♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 4♦ S -2 ♠A 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
450 1.00 1.00 4♠ W +1 ♦4 3-Rodrigues-Pringle vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
690 0.00 2.00 4♠* W +1 ♦7 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
9 |
♠J
♥K53
♦AJT5
♣QJ832
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.00 0.00 2♠ W +2 ♣Q 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♦A 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣Q 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
|
10 |
♠763
♥97
♦T942
♣AQ87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2/1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6/5 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2N E -1 ♠4 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
150 1.00 1.00 1N E +2 ♥5 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
300 0.00 2.00 2♥ S -3 ♠5 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
11 |
♠AKQ2
♥K4
♦K86
♣K432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣6/7 ♠5/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.50 0.50 2N N -1 ♣A 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
50 1.50 0.50 1♣ N -1 ♦A 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ N -2 ♥Q 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
|
12 |
♠98
♥KQ9
♦AQ9
♣AT762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 3♦ 6♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 2.00 0.00 6N N ♠3 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
690 0.50 1.50 4N N +2 ♠4 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
690 0.50 1.50 3N N +3 ♠K 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
13 |
♠76
♥42
♦KQJ963
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 0.50 3♠ W +1 ♣K 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
170 1.50 0.50 2♥ E +2 ♦2 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
300 0.00 2.00 3♦ N -3 ♥A 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
|
14 |
♠752
♥KJ73
♦AJ
♣AT86
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 2.00 0.00 3N S ♠T 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -2 ♠8 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦3 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
|
15 |
♠AQ42
♥Q4
♦AQ864
♣K3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2/3♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♥ N ♣A 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
140 1.50 0.50 2♥ N +1 ♥8 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
100 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♣9 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
|
16 |
♠952
♥QJT94
♦Q2
♣Q43
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣4 ♦3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♠ 1NT ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ W -2 ♥Q 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Sedey-McAdams
200 1.50 0.50 4♠ E -2 ♠Q 5-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes
140 0.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦J 1-Llacera-Llacera vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
|
17 |
♠8652
♥76
♦Q843
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 4♣ N -1 ♠A 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ E +2 ♦A 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
730 0.00 2.00 3♥* E +2 ♦A 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
|
18 |
♠J985
♥T
♦AK8
♣KQJ54
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦3/2 ♠2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 5♥ E -2 ♦2 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
50 1.00 1.00 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
200 0.00 2.00 5♠* N -1 ♥A 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
|
19 |
♠K82
♥T
♦AT632
♣K643
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 2.00 0.00 2♠* S ♦7 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
300 1.00 1.00 2N W -3 ♦3 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
90 0.00 2.00 2♦ N ♣Q 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
|
20 |
♠843
♥KJ842
♦T95
♣T5
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ 3/2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 1N W -1 ♠8 2-Shoemaker-Lynnes vs 3-Rodrigues-Pringle
200 1.00 1.00 2♠ S -2 ♦4 4-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Llacera-Llacera
210 0.00 2.00 1N E +4 ♠6 6-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Davidson-Kobland
|