1 |
♠QJ93
♥T643
♦A8
♣653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ ♣6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ N ♥Q 5-Pearce-Downing vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ N ♦T 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
80 3.58 2.42 1♠ N ♥5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Frank
50 1.83 4.17 2♠ N -1 ♥Q 7-Barr-Barr vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
50 1.83 4.17 1♠ N -1 ♥Q 8-Jean-Johnson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.08 5.92 2♠ N -2 ♥5 6-Harken-Winham vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
2 |
♠Q2
♥T974
♦A6532
♣AT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 5/6♥ 1♠ 3/5NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.92 0.08 3N S +2 ♥3 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
650 4.17 1.83 4♥ S +1 ♠9 8-Jean-Johnson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
650 4.17 1.83 4♥ S +1 ♦4 6-Harken-Winham vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
170 1.83 4.17 3♥ S +1 ♠4 5-Pearce-Downing vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
170 1.83 4.17 3♥ N +1 ♠6 7-Barr-Barr vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
100 0.08 5.92 4♥ N -1 ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Frank
|
3 |
♠J872
♥Q5
♦QT98732
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♠ ♣0 ♥0 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 6/7♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 1♠ S +2 ♣4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Ducey-Frank
130 4.75 1.25 4♦ N ♥A 7-Barr-Barr vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
640 3.58 2.42 5♣ E +2 ♠J 5-Pearce-Downing vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
680 2.42 3.58 4♥ E +2 ♦K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
710 0.67 5.33 4♥ E +3 ♦A 6-Harken-Winham vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
710 0.67 5.33 4♥ E +3 ♦A 8-Jean-Johnson vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
4 |
♠86
♥T96
♦9654
♣AJ53
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 6♠ W -1 ♣A 5-Pearce-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♠6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
650 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♥T 2-Osborn-Harken vs 2-Foy-Foy
650 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♥6 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Frank
650 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♦9 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
650 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♦4 4-Modest-Loops vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
|
5 |
♠Q86
♥J8632
♦8752
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 6/5♣ 5/4♦ 3♥ 6/5♠ 6/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 5.92 0.08 6N E -3 ♣2 2-Osborn-Harken vs 2-Foy-Foy
50 4.75 1.25 6N W -1 ♣T 5-Pearce-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
150 3.58 2.42 3♣ W +2 ♥3 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Frank
450 2.42 3.58 4♠ W +1 ♥3 4-Modest-Loops vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
460 1.25 4.75 4N E +1 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
490 0.08 5.92 3N E +3 ♥5 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
|
6 |
♠A9
♥K974
♦8654
♣986
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♥ N ♠K 7-Barr-Barr vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
130 4.75 1.25 2♦ S +2 ♦T 6-Harken-Winham vs 1-Ducey-Frank
110 3.00 3.00 2♥ N ♣J 4-Modest-Loops vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
110 3.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♠J 5-Pearce-Downing vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.25 4.75 1N S ♣4 2-Osborn-Harken vs 2-Foy-Foy
110 0.08 5.92 3♣ W ♦8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
|
7 |
♠AQ6
♥K73
♦Q83
♣AT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 7♦ 3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 5.33 0.67 6N S +1 ♠4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
1470 5.33 0.67 6N N +1 ♦6 6-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
720 1.83 4.17 5N N +2 ♥Q 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
720 1.83 4.17 4N S +3 ♠4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
720 1.83 4.17 4N S +3 ♠4 7-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Foy
720 1.83 4.17 4N N +3 ♥Q 2-Osborn-Harken vs 1-Ducey-Frank
|
8 |
♠KQ842
♥QJT7
♦K6
♣J8
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 5.92 0.08 3♣ W -1 ♥7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 4.17 1.83 4♥ N -2 ♣7 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
100 4.17 1.83 3♥ N -2 ♣7 7-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Foy
150 1.25 4.75 4♥ N -3 ♣7 2-Osborn-Harken vs 1-Ducey-Frank
150 1.25 4.75 3♥ N -3 ♥2 6-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
150 1.25 4.75 2♦ S -3 ♣A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
9 |
♠AT3
♥AK5
♦KQT65
♣K3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ -/1NT ♣3 NT4/7 |
EW: 4♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.92 0.08 5♣* E -2 ♥Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
140 4.75 1.25 3♥ S ♣2 6-Harken-Winham vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
50 3.58 2.42 2N N -1 ♣9 2-Osborn-Harken vs 1-Ducey-Frank
100 2.42 3.58 4♥ S -2 ♦J 7-Barr-Barr vs 2-Foy-Foy
110 1.25 4.75 2♣ E +1 ♦2 8-Jean-Johnson vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
200 0.08 5.92 3N N -4 ♣A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
10 |
♠-
♥T87
♦876532
♣KJT4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 2♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 6♠ E -1 ♥3 6-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
620 4.75 1.25 4♠ W ♣4 4-Modest-Loops vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
650 3.58 2.42 4♥ E +1 ♣6 7-Barr-Barr vs 1-Ducey-Frank
1430 1.25 4.75 6♥ E ♠K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
1430 1.25 4.75 6♥ E ♥3 2-Osborn-Harken vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
1430 1.25 4.75 6♥ E ♣6 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
11 |
♠QJ7
♥A97
♦J8762
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦3 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.75 1.25 3♦ S +1 ♥3 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
130 4.75 1.25 3♦ S +1 ♣A 4-Modest-Loops vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
130 4.75 1.25 2♦ N +2 ♣6 7-Barr-Barr vs 1-Ducey-Frank
110 2.42 3.58 3♦ S ♥3 2-Osborn-Harken vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
420 1.25 4.75 4♥ W ♦J 6-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.08 5.92 4♥ W +2 ♦2 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
12 |
♠A42
♥AJT54
♦932
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♣ 6♥ -/1♠ 2NT ♦5 ♠6/7 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.92 0.08 4♥ N +1 ♠K 4-Modest-Loops vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
620 4.75 1.25 4♥ N ♦4 7-Barr-Barr vs 1-Ducey-Frank
200 3.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♠K 2-Osborn-Harken vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
200 3.00 3.00 3♥ N +2 ♠K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
170 1.25 4.75 2♥ N +2 ♠K 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 0.08 5.92 4♦ W -2 ♦2 6-Harken-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠Q7543
♥AQJ
♦QT75
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♥ 5♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♥6/7 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥6 ♠2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♥3 5-Pearce-Downing vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥3 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Ducey-Frank
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♣T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♣3 4-Modest-Loops vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
650 3.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♣3 8-Jean-Johnson vs 2-Foy-Foy
620 1.00 5.00 4♠ S ♣K 2-Osborn-Harken vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.00 6.00 2♠ N +2 ♥3 7-Barr-Barr vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
|
14 |
♠65
♥T9832
♦32
♣AQ32
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 6.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♠T 5-Pearce-Downing vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
70 5.00 1.00 1♦ S ♣5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
50 4.00 2.00 1♠ E -1 ♥K 4-Modest-Loops vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 2.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♦6 7-Barr-Barr vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
50 2.00 4.00 1N S -1 ♠Q 8-Jean-Johnson vs 2-Foy-Foy
50 2.00 4.00 1N N -1 ♠4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Ducey-Frank
100 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -2 ♣T 2-Osborn-Harken vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AQ6
♥KT9
♦943
♣Q987
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3N W -3 ♦3 4-Modest-Loops vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
50 4.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♦3 7-Barr-Barr vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♣7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ E -1 ♦2 8-Jean-Johnson vs 2-Foy-Foy
170 2.00 4.00 3♥ W +1 ♣7 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Ducey-Frank
200 1.00 5.00 1♠ S -2 ♣A 5-Pearce-Downing vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
420 0.00 6.00 4♥ W ♦9 2-Osborn-Harken vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠9654
♥KJ86
♦K4
♣A97
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 3♥ E -2 ♣J 4-Modest-Loops vs 2-Foy-Foy
100 4.17 1.83 3N W -1 ♥6 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
100 4.17 1.83 2N E -1 ♠3 2-Osborn-Harken vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
110 2.42 3.58 1♥ E +1 ♠3 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Ducey-Frank
120 1.25 4.75 2N E ♠3 5-Pearce-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
210 0.08 5.92 2N E +3 ♦2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
17 |
♠42
♥KQ532
♦K75
♣Q82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣7/6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ S ♥J 4-Modest-Loops vs 2-Foy-Foy
110 5.33 0.67 2♠ S ♦A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
50 3.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♣3 2-Osborn-Harken vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
50 3.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦A 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Ducey-Frank
110 1.25 4.75 3♦ E ♥6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
150 0.08 5.92 3♥ N -3 ♦8 5-Pearce-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
|
18 |
♠9654
♥AQ76532
♦83
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 3/2♠ 3NT ♣3 |
EW: 4/3♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠3/4 NT4/3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.92 0.08 4♥ N +1 ♠A 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Ducey-Frank
630 4.17 1.83 3N S +1 ♣J 5-Pearce-Downing vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
630 4.17 1.83 3N S +1 ♣6 2-Osborn-Harken vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
620 2.42 3.58 4♥ N ♠A 4-Modest-Loops vs 2-Foy-Foy
300 1.25 4.75 5♣* E -2 ♥K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
140 0.08 5.92 3♥ N ♠A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
|
19 |
♠K
♥Q43
♦9752
♣Q9763
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.33 0.67 3♠ S ♠9 2-Osborn-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
140 5.33 0.67 3♠ S ♦4 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
50 3.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♠5 7-Barr-Barr vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 3.00 3♠ S -1 ♥7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Foy
130 1.25 4.75 3♦ W +1 ♠K 4-Modest-Loops vs 1-Ducey-Frank
620 0.08 5.92 4♥ E ♦6 5-Pearce-Downing vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
|
20 |
♠QJ3
♥76
♦AQT95
♣Q43
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥3/4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ ♦4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.75 1.25 3♠ S ♥K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Foy
140 4.75 1.25 3♠ S ♥K 2-Osborn-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
140 4.75 1.25 3♠ S ♥K 4-Modest-Loops vs 1-Ducey-Frank
100 2.42 3.58 4♥ E -1 ♠A 5-Pearce-Downing vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
100 1.25 4.75 4♠ S -1 ♥K 7-Barr-Barr vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.08 5.92 4♥ E ♠A 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
|
21 |
♠74
♥Q54
♦AQ9
♣AQ854
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣1 ♦1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 5.92 0.08 5♦ S ♥A 5-Pearce-Downing vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
150 4.75 1.25 4♦ S +1 ♥A 6-Harken-Winham vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
100 3.58 2.42 4♠ W -2 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Foy-Foy
50 2.42 3.58 3♠ W -1 ♦A 4-Modest-Loops vs 1-Ducey-Frank
100 1.25 4.75 4♦ S -1 ♥K 7-Barr-Barr vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.08 5.92 5♦* S -1 ♥A 2-Osborn-Harken vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
|
22 |
♠AQT
♥QT8
♦K4
♣AKT75
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ 1♦ 4/5♥ -/1♠ 4NT ♠6/7 |
EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 5.33 0.67 4♠* W -3 ♣A 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
800 5.33 0.67 3♠* W -3 ♣A 4-Modest-Loops vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
450 3.58 2.42 4♥ S +1 ♠8 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
420 2.42 3.58 4♥ S ♦Q 2-Osborn-Harken vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
200 1.25 4.75 3♠* W -1 ♣7 8-Jean-Johnson vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
130 0.08 5.92 3♣ N +1 ♠2 5-Pearce-Downing vs 2-Foy-Foy
|
23 |
♠T872
♥K8
♦83
♣98754
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣0/4 ♦1/3 ♠2/3 NT0/5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.33 0.67 4♣ W -2 ♥K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
200 5.33 0.67 4♣ W -2 ♥K 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
100 3.58 2.42 4♠ E -1 ♣2 2-Osborn-Harken vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
130 2.42 3.58 4♦ E ♥A 5-Pearce-Downing vs 2-Foy-Foy
170 1.25 4.75 4♦ E +2 ♥A 4-Modest-Loops vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
190 0.08 5.92 4♣ W +3 ♥8 8-Jean-Johnson vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
|
24 |
♠A2
♥J6
♦T84
♣AJT862
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6/5♣ 3/2♦ 5/3♥ 5/4♠ 6/4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
520 5.92 0.08 3N S +4 ♦5 6-Harken-Winham vs 4-Cowen-Hahn
490 3.58 2.42 3N S +3 ♦5 4-Modest-Loops vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
490 3.58 2.42 3N S +3 ♦5 5-Pearce-Downing vs 2-Foy-Foy
490 3.58 2.42 3N S +3 ♦5 8-Jean-Johnson vs 8-Ruggeri-Xu
460 1.25 4.75 3N S +2 ♦5 2-Osborn-Harken vs 3-Stolzberg-Riley
420 0.08 5.92 5♣ N +1 ♠J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Graves-Rodrigues
|