1 |
♠AT843
♥AJ65
♦T75
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 2NT ♣7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +2 ♣Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.50 0.50 2♠ N +2 ♦4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
140 1.50 2.50 3♠ N ♦4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
140 1.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 ♥3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♣Q 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
2 |
♠A643
♥QJ5
♦763
♣K32
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♠T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠8 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠7 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♠5 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 3-Loops-Walker
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♠T 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
3 |
♠964
♥J97
♦K95
♣AK63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2N E -1 ♣4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 3.50 0.50 1N W -1 ♣3 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 2.00 2N N -1 ♦2 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
120 1.00 3.00 1N W +1 ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Cowen-Brown
140 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +1 ♣4 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
4 |
♠2
♥JT87
♦AKJ542
♣A9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♦ 1♥ 4NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣0 ♦1 ♥6 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 5♠* W -3 ♦A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
620 3.00 1.00 5♦ N +1 ♠4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
500 2.00 2.00 4♠* E -2 ♦A 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 3-Loops-Walker
170 0.50 3.50 4♦ N +2 ♠9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Cowen-Brown
170 0.50 3.50 3♦ N +3 ♠4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
5 |
♠532
♥K652
♦AK84
♣T3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♥ S ♦T 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ W -2 ♦A 2-Harken-Harken vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
50 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♦A 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ S -1 ♣A 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 0.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
6 |
♠T7
♥K2
♦J93
♣AQJ973
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦0 ♥3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥7 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
400 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -4 ♣8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ S +1 ♠K 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ N +1 ♠A 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 1-Cowen-Brown
130 0.50 3.50 3♣ N +1 ♠5 2-Harken-Harken vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
|
7 |
♠QT52
♥KJT43
♦54
♣A4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♦A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♦6 2-Harken-Harken vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ S ♦6 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 1-Cowen-Brown
620 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♠J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -2 ♠J 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
8 |
♠AKQ43
♥AJ762
♦2
♣53
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 6♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♦K 4-Pender-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♥K 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 1-Cowen-Brown
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♦K 2-Harken-Harken vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
430 1.00 3.00 3N S +1 ♦8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ N ♦4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
9 |
♠J94
♥K732
♦KJT94
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♦5 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
300 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -3 ♦A 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
150 2.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♥4 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 0.50 3.50 3N N -2 ♥J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ S -2 ♦5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
10 |
♠-
♥AKJ53
♦K94
♣AQ864
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N N ♣J 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
140 3.00 1.00 3♥ N ♠A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ N +2 ♦8 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Cowen-Brown
110 1.00 3.00 2♣ N +1 ♠A 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♠4 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
|
11 |
♠QT87
♥T72
♦KJ5
♣976
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 |
EW: 3/2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠6/5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♦2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
50 2.50 1.50 4♣ E -1 ♠4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 1.50 3♣ E -1 ♠K 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♥6 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ E ♠5 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
12 |
♠42
♥QT
♦J852
♣Q8532
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♠2 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
420 3.00 1.00 4♠ W ♦2 6-Kremers-Downing vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
450 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +1 ♥T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♥Q 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♣3 2-Harken-Harken vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
13 |
♠J65
♥K83
♦K93
♣K953
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥1 ♠0 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 6♥ 7♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
230 4.00 0.00 2♥ E +4 ♠T 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 2-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
600 2.00 2.00 3N W ♣3 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Cowen-Brown
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠5 4-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
14 |
♠Q86
♥6
♦AKT32
♣AT72
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 4.00 0.00 2♥* S ♠A 4-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
150 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -3 ♦J 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Cowen-Brown
50 1.50 2.50 3N W -1 ♥6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
50 1.50 2.50 3N W -1 ♥6 2-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
50 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -1 ♠J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
|
15 |
♠JT6
♥J752
♦654
♣K97
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♦Q 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
100 3.50 0.50 1N S -1 ♦Q 4-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♦6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
200 1.00 3.00 1N S -2 ♦Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Cowen-Brown
300 0.00 4.00 1N S -3 ♦Q 2-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
16 |
♠T754
♥Q432
♦A964
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 1.50 5♥ E -1 ♠2 2-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦Q 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦7 6-Kremers-Downing vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠2 4-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
17 |
♠8754
♥J985
♦9
♣KJ76
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 1♥ 5♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2♣ W +3 ♦9 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ E +2 ♦4 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♦Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
400 1.50 2.50 3N E ♦Q 4-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
420 0.00 4.00 4♠ E ♦J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
18 |
♠AJ
♥865
♦87542
♣A73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 3N W -1 ♦4 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♠A 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ W ♦8 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♦8 4-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
170 0.00 4.00 3♠ W +1 ♦4 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
|
19 |
♠AKT3
♥QT5
♦K64
♣985
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♥ S +2 ♦7 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
110 2.50 1.50 2♥ S ♦7 4-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
110 2.50 1.50 1♥ S +1 ♦7 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
50 1.00 3.00 1N S -1 ♦7 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
100 0.00 4.00 2N N -2 ♦8 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
20 |
♠-
♥AK54
♦KT9632
♣KQ2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ W -2 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
150 2.63 1.38 4♦ N +1 ♠3 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
300 1.38 2.63 3♥ N -3 ♠J 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Cowen-Brown
400 0.13 3.88 4♥ N -4 ♠3 2-Harken-Harken vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
21 |
♠Q53
♥QJ2
♦94
♣Q8742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥6/5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -1 ♦9 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ W +1 ♥Q 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 2-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
22 |
♠86542
♥Q53
♦93
♣732
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠3 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 4-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
650 2.50 1.50 4♥ E +1 ♣K 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +2 ♣K 2-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
23 |
♠A865
♥A65
♦AJ843
♣6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥7 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
630 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♥2 4-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥Q 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.50 2.50 3N S -1 ♥2 2-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
300 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♥2 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
24 |
♠42
♥K653
♦965
♣9764
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ 6♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♣9 6-Kremers-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♠4 4-Pender-Kobland vs 2-Winham-Dykstra
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥3 3-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♥3 2-Harken-Harken vs 3-Loops-Walker
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♣4 5-Friedberg-Brown vs 4-Rodrigues-Pearce
|