1 |
♠Q87
♥J4
♦AJT4
♣K874
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 1♦ 5♥ 4♠ ♣2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♣ S ♥Q 4-Barr-Barr vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
100 3.00 1.00 5♣ S -2 ♠A 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦K 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣A 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♣A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Foy-Foy
|
2 |
♠2
♥9842
♦KT52
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +2 ♦4 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♦4 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
170 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +2 ♦4 4-Barr-Barr vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
170 2.00 2.00 1♠ N +3 ♦4 3-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Foy-Foy
150 0.00 4.00 4♦ W -3 ♠2 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
|
3 |
♠86543
♥J62
♦Q52
♣AK
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣6 ♥1 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♦ S -1 ♥7 3-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Foy-Foy
620 3.00 1.00 4♥ W ♣A 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♣A 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
650 1.50 2.50 4♥ W +1 ♣K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♣A 4-Barr-Barr vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
|
4 |
♠KJ76
♥Q98
♦K52
♣853
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 2♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♠3 2-Harken-Winham vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -2 ♠2 4-Barr-Barr vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
100 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Foy-Foy
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ W -1 ♦K 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ W ♦2 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
|
5 |
♠KJT
♥K854
♦K3
♣J853
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♦T 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♥7 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Foy-Foy
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ E +1 ♥7 4-Barr-Barr vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♥3 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
|
6 |
♠QJ4
♥KQ74
♦T
♣Q9742
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥3/4 ♠3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4/3 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♣* E -2 ♦A 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
130 3.00 1.00 4♦ N ♣T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♣T 4-Barr-Barr vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
100 1.00 3.00 4♦ S -2 ♣T 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Foy-Foy
600 0.00 4.00 3N E ♦A 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
|
7 |
♠AK
♥964
♦KQ5
♣AKT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♠7 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Foy-Foy
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦J 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦8 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
630 1.00 3.00 3N N +1 ♠Q 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +2 ♣Q 4-Barr-Barr vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
|
8 |
♠K3
♥K8532
♦73
♣QJ86
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ N -2 ♦5 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
120 3.00 1.00 2N W ♥3 3-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
200 2.00 2.00 3♠ W +2 ♦7 4-Barr-Barr vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
300 1.00 3.00 4♥* N -2 ♦5 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 5-Foy-Foy
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥K 2-Harken-Winham vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
|
9 |
♠A2
♥AKJ932
♦KJT9
♣6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♦ 5♥ 6♠ 6/-NT ♣6/5 NT12/5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥1/2 ♠0 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1100 3.50 0.50 5♣ W -4 ♠A 4-Barr-Barr vs 5-Foy-Foy
1100 3.50 0.50 5♣* W -4 ♥A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣2 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ N ♣2 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -1 ♣3 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
|
10 |
♠A95
♥A7
♦T87532
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥2 ♠2 |
EW: 4♥ 4♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♠ W +2 ♦T 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣8 4-Barr-Barr vs 5-Foy-Foy
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♦4 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♣A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ W +1 ♥A 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
|
11 |
♠J65
♥AQT9
♦KJ7
♣982
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 1♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♥ ♣2 ♦3 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠7 4-Barr-Barr vs 5-Foy-Foy
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♣Q 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
130 1.50 2.50 3♦ S +1 ♥4 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
130 1.50 2.50 2♣ S +2 ♠T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♠T 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
|
12 |
♠K2
♥A843
♦AQ
♣KQ875
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 6NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♥ S +1 ♦9 3-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
620 3.00 1.00 5♣ N +1 ♥J 4-Barr-Barr vs 5-Foy-Foy
100 2.00 2.00 6♥ S -1 ♠5 2-Harken-Winham vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
200 1.00 3.00 6♥* S -1 ♦9 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
300 0.00 4.00 6♥ S -3 ♠5 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
|
13 |
♠A752
♥QT8
♦92
♣A642
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♦* W -1 ♠A 4-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦K 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♥A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠A 2-Harken-Winham vs 5-Foy-Foy
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♣9 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
|
14 |
♠5
♥9532
♦A932
♣QT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠2/1 NT2/1 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 5/6♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♠ W ♣2 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♥2 4-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣2 2-Harken-Winham vs 5-Foy-Foy
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♥9 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +2 ♥2 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
|
15 |
♠AKT4
♥KQ96
♦J9
♣A86
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♥ 5♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥2 2-Harken-Winham vs 5-Foy-Foy
600 3.00 1.00 5♣ S ♦7 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
170 2.00 2.00 3♣ S +3 ♥A 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
150 1.00 3.00 4♣ S +1 ♦7 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ N ♣T 4-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
|
16 |
♠A64
♥T85
♦AJ943
♣J5
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥4/5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3♥ W -1 ♣J 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
100 3.50 0.50 2♥ W -1 ♣J 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
80 2.00 2.00 1♥ W ♣5 4-Barr-Barr vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ W ♣J 3-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
150 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♥K 2-Harken-Winham vs 5-Foy-Foy
|
17 |
♠8742
♥KQT95
♦-
♣A954
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♦J 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
50 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -1 ♦5 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ E +1 ♦J 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♦5 4-Barr-Barr vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
430 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♦5 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Foy-Foy
|
18 |
♠T732
♥T94
♦9765
♣T7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 6N W -1 ♠2 4-Barr-Barr vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
430 3.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♠2 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
460 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦5 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
490 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♠2 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Foy-Foy
490 0.50 3.50 3N W +3 ♦5 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
|
19 |
♠K4
♥A8
♦A9876
♣T742
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣Q 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
430 3.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♣6 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♣6 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
150 1.00 3.00 3♦ S +2 ♣Q 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Foy-Foy
140 0.00 4.00 3♥ S ♣6 4-Barr-Barr vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
|
20 |
♠985
♥KT964
♦64
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1/2NT ♣4 ♦4 ♥6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠4 2-Harken-Winham vs 4-Rankin-Kobland
100 3.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠4 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Foy-Foy
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♠T 3-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Rodrigues-Graves
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ E ♠4 1-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Frank-Emanuel
120 0.00 4.00 2N W ♠4 4-Barr-Barr vs 3-Ruggeri-Loops
|