1 |
♠-
♥T8
♦KJ742
♣AQJT65
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ W ♣Q 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pender-Kobland
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♦4 3-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Harken-Harken
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +1 ♣A 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
480 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +2 ♦4 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠K965
♥AT952
♦JT2
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 1/2♥ 2/3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 3♣ E +2 ♦3 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.50 0.50 2♣ E +3 ♦3 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥5 3-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Harken-Harken
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pender-Kobland
|
3 |
♠KQT3
♥Q842
♦8
♣AT64
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ -/2NT ♦6 NT6/8 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 0.00 4♠ S +1 ♠6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pender-Kobland
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥9 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♥5 3-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Harken-Harken
420 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦9 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
4 |
♠AT85
♥A765
♦9752
♣2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣Q 3-Downing-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣Q 6-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Harken
630 2.00 1.00 3N E +1 ♣Q 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
660 0.00 3.00 3N E +2 ♣4 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠984
♥AKQ653
♦84
♣AJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♠A 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♦T 3-Downing-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♣3 6-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Harken
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ N ♦T 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
|
6 |
♠A9874
♥KT86
♦QT2
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2/1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣8 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 0.50 3♠ W -1 ♣8 6-Pender-Kobland vs 7-Harken-Harken
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ W ♣8 3-Downing-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
500 0.00 3.00 5♣* S -3 ♥A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
|
7 |
♠32
♥KQT76
♦864
♣KT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦0 ♥6/5 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 1♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♦ E +4 ♥5 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
710 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +3 ♥K 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
710 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +3 ♥K 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Downing-Davidson
710 1.00 2.00 4♠ W +3 ♦8 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Pender-Kobland
|
8 |
♠K82
♥932
♦QJ65
♣762
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3N E ♠3 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Downing-Davidson
430 2.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♦5 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Pender-Kobland
460 1.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦5 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
490 0.00 3.00 5N E +1 ♦2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
|
9 |
♠K82
♥JT32
♦Q76
♣T82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N W +3 ♣8 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Pender-Kobland
620 2.00 1.00 4♠ E ♥A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Downing-Davidson
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♠3 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♦J 7-Harken-Harken vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
10 |
♠A2
♥AQ865
♦J84
♣A82
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
650 2.00 1.00 4♥ N +1 ♠J 6-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Downing-Davidson
600 1.00 2.00 3N S ♠5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
150 0.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♠3 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
|
11 |
♠T65
♥52
♦AQ32
♣KT86
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 6♥ 5♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W ♠5 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W ♥5 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
420 2.00 1.00 4♠ W ♣8 6-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Downing-Davidson
450 0.00 3.00 5♠ W ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
|
12 |
♠832
♥AJ3
♦KT75
♣T87
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1/2♥ 2♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
630 2.50 0.50 3N S +1 ♥4 6-Pender-Kobland vs 3-Downing-Davidson
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♥4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Harken-Harken
600 0.50 2.50 3N S ♥2 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
|
13 |
♠J8
♥6
♦KQ64
♣AKQJT3
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 2/1♦ 4♥ 2/1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 3.00 0.00 6N N ♦A 6-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
1370 2.00 1.00 6♣ N ♦A 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Downing-Davidson
620 0.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♦A 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
620 0.50 2.50 5♣ N +1 ♦A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠AT4
♥K84
♦KT93
♣K95
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3/2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5/6 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥7 6-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
460 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♥5 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
430 1.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥6 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Downing-Davidson
400 0.00 3.00 3N S ♣8 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
15 |
♠AQJ6
♥AJ94
♦Q63
♣54
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣3 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♠9 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ W ♦3 6-Pender-Kobland vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
120 1.00 2.00 2N W ♥4 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 3-Downing-Davidson
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♠9 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠T754
♥KQJ643
♦K
♣KT
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 3♥ N ♣9 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
100 2.00 1.00 4♥ N -2 ♣9 3-Downing-Davidson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
130 0.50 2.50 4♣ W ♥K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 0.50 2.50 4♣ W ♦K 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pender-Kobland
|
17 |
♠JT642
♥976
♦AJT52
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 1♦ 4NT ♥5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♣ E -2 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.00 1.00 5♣ E -1 ♥A 3-Downing-Davidson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥9 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
460 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥5 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pender-Kobland
|
18 |
♠KJ632
♥A7542
♦2
♣84
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 5♦ W -1 ♠7 3-Downing-Davidson vs 4-Vadas-Pringle
130 2.00 1.00 2♦ E +2 ♠9 7-Harken-Harken vs 2-Xu-Nathanson
150 1.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♠6 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.00 3.00 3N W ♠3 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pender-Kobland
|
19 |
♠Q94
♥AQT97
♦54
♣JT6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 5♥ 4/3NT ♣6/5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠J 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Downing-Davidson
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠J 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♥2 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pender-Kobland
450 1.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♥2 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
20 |
♠QT
♥T9762
♦A532
♣87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4/5 ♦5 ♥5 ♠4/5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♠2 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pender-Kobland
80 2.00 1.00 1♠ W ♥6 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Harken-Harken
120 1.00 2.00 1N E +1 ♠2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Downing-Davidson
150 0.00 3.00 2N W +1 ♦2 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠7
♥K4
♦AQT43
♣A7632
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣4 ♦6/7 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♥A 8-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ S -1 ♣T 4-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 1.00 2.00 3N N -2 ♣K 2-Xu-Nathanson vs 6-Pender-Kobland
400 0.00 3.00 3N N -4 ♣K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Downing-Davidson
|