| 1 |
♠KJ62
♥T52
♦A7
♣J653
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
| EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥3 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Xu-Loops
70 1.00 1.00 1♦ E ♥3 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
90 0.00 2.00 1♦ E +1 ♥3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-White-Downing
|
| 2 |
♠JT97
♥983
♦JT5
♣KQT
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 |
| EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♠ S ♥A 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
100 1.00 1.00 4♦ W -2 ♠J 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-White-Downing
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ W ♠J 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 3 |
♠765
♥AJT85
♦K732
♣4
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♦ 2/1♥ 1♠ ♣4 NT6 |
| EW: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.00 0.00 2♥ N ♠8 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
50 1.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 ♠8 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-White-Downing
150 0.00 2.00 1N W +2 ♥8 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 4 |
♠K85
♥73
♦KT753
♣653
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥2 NT2 |
| EW: 2/1♣ 5♥ 3NT ♦6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♠3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-White-Downing
650 1.50 0.50 4♥ E +1 ♦9 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
680 0.00 2.00 5♥ E +1 ♦2 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 5 |
♠J74
♥T43
♦T74
♣AJ32
|
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6/5 |
| EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2/1 ♥2 NT2/1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♣6 5-White-Downing vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
150 1.00 1.00 3♠ E -3 ♦A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Xu-Loops
130 0.00 2.00 4♦ S ♠K 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
| 6 |
♠T73
♥QJ8
♦875
♣T754
|
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
| EW: 4♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.00 0.00 3N W ♣4 5-White-Downing vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
630 1.00 1.00 3N W +1 ♣4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Xu-Loops
650 0.00 2.00 4♥ W +1 ♦5 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
| 7 |
♠T52
♥852
♦632
♣KQT6
|
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ 5♥ 6♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 2.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♣K 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
680 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♥3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Xu-Loops
680 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +2 ♦5 5-White-Downing vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
| 8 |
♠AQ97652
♥K42
♦K4
♣7
|
Dlr: West
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥Q 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Xu-Loops
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♥Q 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
420 1.00 1.00 4♠ N ♦T 5-White-Downing vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
| 9 |
♠AKQ6
♥32
♦Q87
♣AKT8
|
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 6♣ 6♦ 5♥ 5♠ 6NT |
| EW: ♣1 ♦1 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 1.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥T 4-Xu-Loops vs 5-White-Downing
460 1.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♦2 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
400 0.00 2.00 3N N ♠5 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
| 10 |
♠86
♥53
♦KJT8
♣Q9764
|
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
| EW: 4♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.00 0.00 4♠ E ♠4 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥K 4-Xu-Loops vs 5-White-Downing
650 0.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣K 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
| 11 |
♠T853
♥AK95
♦92
♣JT3
|
Dlr: South
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2/1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦5 |
| EW: 3♣ 2♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣A 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
140 1.00 1.00 3♠ S ♦J 4-Xu-Loops vs 5-White-Downing
50 0.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♦J 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
|
| 12 |
♠83
♥KQ532
♦AQ3
♣JT4
|
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
| EW: 1♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♠4 4-Xu-Loops vs 5-White-Downing
100 1.00 1.00 3♥ N -1 ♠2 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
200 0.00 2.00 4♥ N -2 ♦6 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
|
| 13 |
♠JT54
♥K97
♦Q73
♣Q75
|
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
| EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT5/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣3 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
90 0.50 1.50 1N S ♥6 5-White-Downing vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
90 0.50 1.50 1N S ♣3 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 14 |
♠762
♥J3
♦JT6
♣KT965
|
Dlr: East
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥3 ♠0 NT1 |
| EW: 3♣ 7♦ 4/3♥ 7♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.00 0.00 5♦ E +1 ♠T 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 4-Xu-Loops
490 0.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♣6 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
490 0.50 1.50 3N E +3 ♥7 5-White-Downing vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
|
| 15 |
♠T32
♥T65
♦AKQJ8
♣86
|
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥6 |
EW: 1/-♣ 1/-♥
♣7/6 ♦6 ♥7/6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 ♦7 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣5 5-White-Downing vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 0.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣5 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 16 |
♠82
♥AT64
♦76
♣KJ972
|
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
| EW: 2♦ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 1.50 0.50 3♠ W ♦6 1-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
140 1.50 0.50 2♠ W +1 ♥A 5-White-Downing vs 2-Ruggeri-Kobland
170 0.00 2.00 3♠ W +1 ♦7 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 4-Xu-Loops
|
| 17 |
♠KQ2
♥J6
♦KQ5
♣T9643
|
Dlr: North
Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2♠ 5NT |
| EW: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 1.50 0.50 3N S +3 ♠5 4-Xu-Loops vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
490 1.50 0.50 3N N +3 ♠J 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
150 0.00 2.00 3♦ E -3 ♣T 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 5-White-Downing
|
| 18 |
♠AK
♥Q842
♦J83
♣JT32
|
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 4♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT4 |
| EW: 3♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.00 0.00 2♠ S +1 ♦K 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
90 1.00 1.00 2♦ E ♣6 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 5-White-Downing
100 0.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♦5 4-Xu-Loops vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
| 19 |
♠J74
♥8
♦KQJ62
♣K542
|
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3 ♠3/4 NT3/4 |
| EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♣ E -1 ♦9 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 5-White-Downing
150 1.00 1.00 2N E +1 ♠2 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
170 0.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♦K 4-Xu-Loops vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
|
| 20 |
♠AT86
♥984
♦KQ
♣T952
|
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Double Dummy Makes |
| NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1/-♣ 4♦ 1/-♠ 1/-NT
♣7/6 ♥5 ♠7/6 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 0.00 2♥ S -1 ♣A 6-Cowen-Formoso vs 5-White-Downing
200 1.00 1.00 3♥ S -2 ♣A 4-Xu-Loops vs 1-Sedey-McAdams
300 0.00 2.00 3♥ S -3 ♠9 2-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Nathanson-Stone
|