1 |
♠KT94
♥T3
♦K63
♣T853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3/2 ♥2 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠4 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
100 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -2 ♦2 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Pender-Kobland
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +2 ♠K 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ W ♠4 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Downing-Davidson
|
2 |
♠AQ82
♥A65
♦T52
♣KT6
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ S +1 ♦2 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ S -1 ♣J 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♠A 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Downing-Davidson
170 1.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♥5 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +2 ♦5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
3 |
♠J7432
♥542
♦4
♣Q842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦4 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♦4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 10-Pender-Kobland
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♦4 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
650 1.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♦4 8-Loops-Walker vs 4-Downing-Davidson
680 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +2 ♣2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
4 |
♠7
♥AJ43
♦9
♣AJT8732
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♥T 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ S ♠2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
200 1.38 2.63 4♠ S ♦3 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Loops-Walker
400 0.13 3.88 5♠ N -4 ♥8 11-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Downing-Davidson
|
5 |
♠Q963
♥J83
♦K762
♣J7
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 3♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3N E ♠2 11-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Downing-Davidson
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♠2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
460 1.38 2.63 3N E +2 ♥5 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
460 1.38 2.63 4♥ N ♦2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
6 |
♠K32
♥AT542
♦J73
♣Q8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♥ W -2 ♠2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
140 2.63 1.38 3♠ S ♣T 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
100 0.75 3.25 3♠ S +1 ♦2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 0.75 3.25 3♠ S -2 ♣T 11-Traback-Osborn vs 4-Downing-Davidson
|
7 |
♠K982
♥AKQ63
♦K8
♣T4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/5♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 4/5♠ 2/3NT ♦6/7 |
EW: ♣1 ♦6 ♥5 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +2 ♥7 11-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦3 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦9 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 4-Downing-Davidson
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♦2 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
8 |
♠752
♥94
♦K965
♣K754
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.88 0.13 3♥ N +1 ♦A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Loops-Walker
100 2.63 1.38 4♣ N -2 ♠3 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
170 0.75 3.25 3♠ W +1 ♠7 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 4-Downing-Davidson
170 0.75 3.25 3♠ W +1 ♥9 11-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
|
9 |
♠J83
♥96542
♦J
♣KJ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ ♦5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.63 1.38 4♥ S ♠A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
420 2.63 1.38 4♥ N ♦A 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 4-Downing-Davidson
420 2.63 1.38 4♥ N ♦A 11-Traback-Osborn vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
100 0.13 3.88 2♠ E -1 ♥A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
10 |
♠4
♥J53
♦AQ9
♣T98652
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6/5 |
EW: 2/1♠ ♣5 ♦4/3 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.88 0.13 3♠ E -4 ♥A 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 4-Downing-Davidson
200 2.63 1.38 3♠ E -2 ♥A 11-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.75 3.25 3♠ W -1 ♥A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
100 0.75 3.25 2♠ E -1 ♦5 10-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
|
11 |
♠AT76
♥AQJ9
♦87
♣974
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N W -2 ♥J 11-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.38 2.63 3N E -1 ♦6 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 4-Downing-Davidson
50 1.38 2.63 2♥ W -1 ♦8 10-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
50 1.38 2.63 4♣ W -1 ♦8 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
|
12 |
♠642
♥Q8
♦K54
♣JT863
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4♥ E -1 ♠A 11-Traback-Osborn vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
90 2.63 1.38 2♦ W ♠6 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ W +1 ♣J 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 4-Downing-Davidson
140 0.13 3.88 3♥ E ♠A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
|
13 |
♠A975
♥K
♦6
♣AKT8752
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4/5♥ -/3NT ♣3 ♠3 NT4/9 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 4♥ W -1 ♦6 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
130 2.63 1.38 4♦ E ♣6 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 11-Traback-Osborn
140 1.38 2.63 3♥ W ♣A 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
500 0.13 3.88 5♣* N -2 ♦A 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
|
14 |
♠AQ3
♥AJ5
♦KQ976
♣A5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦1 ♥3 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +1 ♥3 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 11-Traback-Osborn
430 2.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♠5 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
430 2.00 2.00 3N N +1 ♥8 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
400 0.13 3.88 3N N ♠2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
15 |
♠83
♥Q64
♦AJ7652
♣J5
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 2/1♦ 4/3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.88 0.13 4♥ S ♥3 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Pender-Kobland
140 2.63 1.38 3♥ S ♣A 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 11-Traback-Osborn
150 1.38 2.63 4♣ E +1 ♥A 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
450 0.13 3.88 4♠ W +1 ♥4 9-Gamble-Friedberg vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
16 |
♠T75
♥T864
♦753
♣Q65
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4/3♣ 4/3♦ 2/1♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N W ♥4 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Osborn
120 3.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♥4 4-Downing-Davidson vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
150 1.50 2.50 1N W +2 ♥6 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 10-Pender-Kobland
150 1.50 2.50 2♠ S -3 ♦A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥3 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
17 |
♠J95
♥Q983
♦8
♣QJ642
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5/6 ♥2 ♠1 NT3 |
EW: 1/-♦ 5♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦7/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 10-Pender-Kobland
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
450 2.50 1.50 4♠ E +1 ♣5 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Osborn
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +2 ♠4 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
480 0.50 3.50 4♠ E +2 ♦T 4-Downing-Davidson vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
|
18 |
♠A4
♥Q9852
♦K
♣86542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ -/1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣5 ♥6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥T 4-Downing-Davidson vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ E -1 ♥T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦2 8-Loops-Walker vs 11-Traback-Osborn
420 1.00 3.00 4♠ E ♣A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 10-Pender-Kobland
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♣3 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠QJ542
♥AJ3
♦Q82
♣J3
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ ♣6/7 NT6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♣J 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♦9 11-Traback-Osborn vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
90 2.00 2.00 1N S ♣2 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ S ♣A 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
50 0.00 4.00 2N N -1 ♣T 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Downing-Davidson
|
20 |
♠74
♥J865432
♦T7
♣T6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣3 ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ W +1 ♠7 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
130 3.50 0.50 3♦ W +1 ♥5 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
150 2.00 2.00 1N E +2 ♠5 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Downing-Davidson
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥K 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥8 11-Traback-Osborn vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
|
21 |
♠QJ6
♥AKJ75
♦42
♣AK8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 1♥ N +2 ♠2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 7-Ray-Rodrigues
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♠4 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♠4 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Downing-Davidson
200 0.50 3.50 2N N -2 ♠5 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Loops-Walker
200 0.50 3.50 1N N -2 ♦7 11-Traback-Osborn vs 9-Gamble-Friedberg
|
22 |
♠AT643
♥K2
♦3
♣KJ764
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♠ N -2 ♦K 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Downing-Davidson
200 3.00 1.00 2♥ E +3 ♣9 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ E ♠2 11-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠2 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ E +1 ♠2 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 8-Loops-Walker
|
23 |
♠9854
♥J972
♦K2
♣J52
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N S ♥8 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 8-Loops-Walker
200 2.50 1.50 2N S -2 ♣7 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Downing-Davidson
200 2.50 1.50 2N S -2 ♣3 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
400 0.50 3.50 3N S -4 ♠3 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
400 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -4 ♥8 11-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|
24 |
♠985
♥A7
♦KT942
♣A52
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 3♦ N +2 ♠A 6-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
150 3.50 0.50 3♦ N +2 ♥3 11-Traback-Osborn vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦A 10-Pender-Kobland vs 4-Downing-Davidson
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♦3 12-Gassman-Swanson vs 8-Loops-Walker
70 0.00 4.00 1♣ W ♠9 7-Ray-Rodrigues vs 5-Faircrest-Winham
|
25 |
♠KJ9876
♥K8
♦84
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♠ N ♣9 4-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥J 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 11-Traback-Osborn
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♥J 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.13 3.88 2♠ N -2 ♥J 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
|
26 |
♠J53
♥AQ94
♦QJT84
♣Q
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♥ 1♠ ♣3 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2N E -1 ♦K 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ E ♠K 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.38 2.63 3♣ E +1 ♠K 4-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.13 3.88 4♦ N -2 ♣A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 11-Traback-Osborn
|
27 |
♠AQ4
♥65
♦KJ983
♣972
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.25 0.75 4♣ E ♦A 5-Faircrest-Winham vs 10-Pender-Kobland
130 3.25 0.75 2♣ E +2 ♦A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 11-Traback-Osborn
170 0.75 3.25 4♣ E +2 ♦2 8-Loops-Walker vs 6-Calciano-Calciano
170 0.75 3.25 2♣ E +4 ♠9 4-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Pearce-Pearce
|