1 |
♠AT76
♥AQ72
♦Q52
♣A8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♥4 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
90 3.00 1.00 1N N ♦A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
50 2.00 2.00 1N N -1 ♥4 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Jean-Johnson
100 1.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♦A 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ E ♣3 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
|
2 |
♠875
♥96
♦A76543
♣93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥4/3 ♠6 NT4/3 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
140 3.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ W -2 ♠8 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Jean-Johnson
50 1.00 3.00 1N W -1 ♠8 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
110 0.00 4.00 2♣ W +1 ♠8 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
|
3 |
♠K4
♥AK963
♦T97
♣T82
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♣A 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
210 3.00 1.00 2N N +3 ♠6 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 8-Jean-Johnson
180 2.00 2.00 1N S +3 ♦K 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
150 1.00 3.00 1N S +2 ♠7 3-Barr-Barr vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦K 10-Vadas-Collins vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
|
4 |
♠T8743
♥A52
♦K876
♣8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 2/1♣ 5♦ 4/5♥ 2♠ 5/4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠3 8-Jean-Johnson vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ W +1 ♦6 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠4 3-Barr-Barr vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
600 1.50 2.50 3N W ♠4 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
630 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♠8 10-Vadas-Collins vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
|
5 |
♠52
♥AJ32
♦Q6
♣A9754
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ W -2 ♦Q 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
100 3.50 0.50 2♦ W -2 ♠2 8-Jean-Johnson vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ E -1 ♣2 10-Vadas-Collins vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -2 ♦3 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
200 0.50 3.50 2♥ N -2 ♣8 3-Barr-Barr vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
|
6 |
♠AJT9
♥43
♦Q875
♣954
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠J 8-Jean-Johnson vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
150 3.00 1.00 3♣ E +2 ♦6 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♥4 10-Vadas-Collins vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦5 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
660 0.00 4.00 3N W +2 ♠J 3-Barr-Barr vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
|
7 |
♠Q753
♥K95
♦A9
♣KJ65
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1/2♠ -/2NT ♦6 ♥4 NT5/8 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ N +1 ♠A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 3-Barr-Barr
130 3.50 0.50 3♣ N +1 ♠K 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
110 2.00 2.00 3♣ N ♥A 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♥Q 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +1 ♣7 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
|
8 |
♠Q6
♥AJ72
♦T9
♣J9864
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ E -1 ♥5 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
100 3.00 1.00 2♦ S -2 ♠4 10-Vadas-Collins vs 3-Barr-Barr
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♥5 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♦7 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
170 1.00 3.00 3♠ E +1 ♣A 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
|
9 |
♠A764
♥85
♦K543
♣Q63
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 1♠ ♣3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 5♣ W -2 ♦3 10-Vadas-Collins vs 3-Barr-Barr
110 3.00 1.00 3♦ S ♣A 5-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
100 1.50 2.50 4♣ W -1 ♠A 8-Jean-Johnson vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
100 1.50 2.50 3♣ W -1 ♦3 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
130 0.00 4.00 4♣ W ♦3 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
|
10 |
♠AJ82
♥Q62
♦Q62
♣J76
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♠3 10-Vadas-Collins vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
100 3.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♥5 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
100 3.00 1.00 1N E -1 ♥5 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 8-Jean-Johnson
110 1.00 3.00 2♥ E ♦K 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
120 0.00 4.00 1N E +1 ♠3 3-Barr-Barr vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
|
11 |
♠AT92
♥Q64
♦AJT
♣T32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥5 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 4/5♣ 1♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 4.00 0.00 Pass Out 3-Barr-Barr vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
50 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♠5 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 8-Jean-Johnson
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ E +1 ♦K 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +2 ♥3 10-Vadas-Collins vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
170 0.50 3.50 2♠ E +2 ♦5 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
|
12 |
♠AJ432
♥AJ4
♦T8
♣K43
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 2N E -3 ♠8 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Keeley-Ainsworth
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦K 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 8-Jean-Johnson
110 2.50 1.50 2♠ N ♦K 10-Vadas-Collins vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
100 1.00 3.00 2♦ W -2 ♥4 3-Barr-Barr vs 7-Lynnes-Beiers
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ N -1 ♦K 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
|
13 |
♠K
♥743
♦T964
♣K9865
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 1N E -1 ♠3 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Barr-Barr
100 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -1 ♣A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
90 2.00 2.00 1N E ♥6 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♥6 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
110 0.50 3.50 2♠ E ♦5 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
|
14 |
♠Q654
♥KT4
♦AT76
♣52
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♥ 4NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠9 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Barr-Barr
110 3.00 1.00 3♣ S ♠9 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♣A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
50 1.50 2.50 2♠ E -1 ♣A 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
50 0.00 4.00 3♣ S -1 ♠9 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
|
15 |
♠954
♥QJ832
♦Q2
♣AJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥4 10-Vadas-Collins vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
660 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦7 9-Ruggeri-Barber vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
630 2.00 2.00 3N S +1 ♥4 8-Jean-Johnson vs 3-Barr-Barr
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ N ♠7 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 2-Kobland-Rankin
200 0.00 4.00 2♥ N +3 ♥A 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 4-Schwartz-Ducey
|
16 |
♠A975
♥K972
♦543
♣63
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦6/7 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♥4 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♣A 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ E ♣A 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 3-Barr-Barr
100 1.00 3.00 3♥ S -2 ♠2 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 8-Jean-Johnson
110 0.00 4.00 2♠ E ♣A 10-Vadas-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
|
17 |
♠A52
♥AQ86
♦T9
♣Q932
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 2♥ 4♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ E ♦8 10-Vadas-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♣Q 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 3-Barr-Barr
150 2.00 2.00 4♦ W +1 ♣2 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 8-Jean-Johnson
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ E +2 ♣K 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
400 0.00 4.00 5♦ W ♣2 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
|
18 |
♠K94
♥KQ5
♦3
♣AQT953
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 2♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥4 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥A 2-Kobland-Rankin vs 3-Barr-Barr
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥A 4-Schwartz-Ducey vs 8-Jean-Johnson
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♥9 1-Keeley-Ainsworth vs 9-Ruggeri-Barber
680 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♦Q 10-Vadas-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
650 0.00 4.00 4♠ S +1 ♥J 7-Lynnes-Beiers vs 5-O'Neill-Smart
|