? Explanation of report features  
Download hands in PBN or PDF format (Right click and choose “Save Link As...” in Firefox or “Save Target As...” in IE)
Jump directly to board 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
★ ★ ★  Masterpoint Winners  ★ ★ ★
Partnership Pct Rank MP
John Walker - Susan Dietz 69.84 1st A 0.80
Charles Pender - Christina Kobland 58.73 2nd A 0.56
Francesco Ruggeri - Lesley Xu 53.97 3rd A 0.40
Barbara Rodrigues - Susan Pearce 45.24 2nd B 0.28
EVENT>Wednesday PM Open        |SESSION>Wednesday Eve|SECTION> A
------------------------,------ ------------,-------- --------------------------
DATE>July 16, 2025      |CLUB NO.>137059    | 07/16/2025 21:19
---------------------,-- ------------------- -------------,---------------------
DIR> Jan Winham      |RATING>Club Masterpoint (100%, 80%, 80% Open)|MOVEMENT>ONE WINNER
------------,-------- ,-------------------------,--------- ---------------------
AVE>   31.5 |TOP>   3 |MP LIMITS>None/750/300   |CLUB>Santa Cruz Bridge Club
------------ --------- ------------------------- -------------------------------
PAIRS IN STRAT A=8/B=5/C=3                       ,---,-------------------------,------,---------,
-------------------------------------------------|   |           Section       |      |Section  |
No Name                   Name                   |Flt|Rnk-A|Rnk-B|Rnk-C| Score | Pct  |Awards   |
------------------------------------------------- --- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------ --------- 
 1 Christina Kobland      Charles Pender           A    2     .     .     37.00  58.73  0.56(A) 
 2 Lester Loops           Janet Loops              B    .     .     .     27.50  43.65          
 3 Barbara Rodrigues      Susan Pearce             C    .     2     .     28.50  45.24  0.28(B) 
 4 Vi Gassman             Nikki Shoemaker          C    .     .     .     24.50  38.89          
 5 Francesco Ruggeri      Lesley Xu                C    3     1     1     34.00  53.97  0.40(A) 
 6 Leslie Davidson        Jan Winham               A    .     .     .     32.00  50.79          
 7 Marilyn Calciano       Andrew Calciano          B    .     .     .     24.50  38.89          
 8 John Walker            Susan Dietz              A    1     .     .     44.00  69.84  0.80(A) 
                                          Totals                         252.00       

1 ♠A852
K865
T54
♣KJ
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠Q
QJT4
AQJ83
♣AT5
♠K64
A92
72
♣Q9764
♠JT973
73
K96
♣832
11
169
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2
EW: 5♣ 5 4 1♠ 5NT
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -460 5NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  3N E -2   ♠J  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
   50          2.00   1.00  2N E -1   ♠J  8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
        110    1.00   2.00  2 W +1   5  2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
        430    0.00   3.00  3N E +1   ♠7  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
2 ♠AT5
AKQ2
AK
♣JT74
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠98
T9875
982
♣AQ2
♠743
J4
QT754
♣863
♠KQJ62
63
J63
♣K95
21
63
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5♣ 2 4/3 5♠ 5NT
EW:  ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT2
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +660 5NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  660          2.50   0.50  3N S +2   T  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
  660          2.50   0.50  3N N +2   5  8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
  650          0.50   2.50  4♠ N +1   J  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
  650          0.50   2.50  4♠ N +1   5  2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
3 ♠AJ863
2
K
♣QJT842
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠KT54
QJ9
A73
♣A76
♠92
K86
QJ652
♣K53
♠Q7
AT7543
T984
♣9
11
149
6
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦5 ♥6 NT5
EW: 1 1 2NT  ♣5 ♠5
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: -100 3♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  400          3.00   0.00  2N W -4   ♣Q  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
  100          2.00   1.00  3N E -1   ♠Q  8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
         50    1.00   2.00  2 S -1   ♠4  2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
        120    0.00   3.00  2N E      A  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
4 ♠AK5
A853
AKJ8
♣83
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠74
T6
Q42
♣KJ7542
♠JT96
KJ2
T75
♣AQ6
♠Q832
Q974
963
♣T9
19
611
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4 4 3♠ 1NT  ♣6
EW: 1♣  ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +620 4-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  3 S +1   ♠7  8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
  110          2.00   1.00  1 N +2   ♠J  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
  100          1.00   2.00  3♣ W -1   A  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
   70          0.00   3.00  1 N      ♠J  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
5 ♠KT73
A985
KJ7
♣32
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠2
QT7
Q965
♣JT964
♠QJ965
K43
A42
♣K7
♠A84
J62
T83
♣AQ85
11
513
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣ 1 3 2♠ 2NT
EW:  ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 15 - 14 = +1
Par: +140 3-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N N +1   ♠5  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
  100          2.00   1.00  1♠ E -2   2  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
   50          1.00   2.00  2♣ E -1   T  8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
        200    0.00   3.00  3♣ S -2   ♠9  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
6 ♠732
K852
JT5
♣J54
Dlr: East
Vul: E-W
♠K85
A76
KQ83
♣A87
♠Q96
J3
7642
♣K962
♠AJT4
QT94
A9
♣QT3
5
166
13
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2  ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT6
EW: 2♣ 3/2 1NT  ♥5 ♠6
LoTT: 17 - 16 = +1
Par: -100 3*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          3.00   0.00  1N W -2   ♣4  8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
  100          2.00   1.00  1N W -1   2  6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
         90    0.50   2.50  1N W      5  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
         90    0.50   2.50  1N W      ♣4  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
7 ♠J94
K9752
-
♣96542
Dlr: South
Vul: Both
♠KT3
AT6
Q7643
♣Q8
♠AQ
Q84
JT985
♣AT3
♠87652
J3
AK2
♣KJ7
4
1113
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♣  ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3 1 3NT  ♣5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 18 = -2
Par: -600 3NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          2.50   0.50  4 W -1   ♠9  8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
  100          2.50   0.50  4 W -1   ♠4  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        100    1.00   2.00  2♠ S -1   3  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
        110    0.00   3.00  3 W      ♣4  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
8 ♠KQ84
952
5
♣AKQJT
Dlr: West
Vul: None
♠AJT7
K863
QT64
♣6
♠9532
AT
AK73
♣984
♠6
QJ74
J982
♣7532
15
1011
4
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣  ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6
EW: 3 1 3♠ 1NT  ♣5
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -140 3♠-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  720          3.00   0.00  1** S +1 ♣6  8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
  110          2.00   1.00  2♣ N +1   A  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
         50    0.50   2.50  4♣ N -1   A  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
         50    0.50   2.50  3♣ N -1   A  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
9 ♠82
92
AQ86
♣KQ965
Dlr: North
Vul: E-W
♠QT63
84
K32
♣AJ42
♠KJ9
QJT653
J974
♣-
♠A754
AK7
T5
♣T873
11
108
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 4♣ 2 1♠ 3NT  ♥6
EW: 1  ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: +400 3NT-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          2.50   0.50  2N S +1   ♣2  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
  150          2.50   0.50  3♣ N +2   Q  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
  120          1.00   2.00  2N S      ♠6  8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
         50    0.00   3.00  2♠ S -1   8  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
10 ♠KQT43
65
AQJ7
♣K4
Dlr: East
Vul: Both
♠A752
KJ97
K54
♣76
♠9
AQT84
T6
♣JT983
♠J86
32
9832
♣AQ52
15
117
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4♠ 1NT  ♣6 ♥4
EW: 3  ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: +500 5*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  4♠ N      ♣J  1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
  200          2.00   1.00  3♠ N +2   ♣J  8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
        100    1.00   2.00  3♠ N -1   6  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        620    0.00   3.00  4 E      ♠J  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
11 ♠763
Q9
Q984
♣KQT8
Dlr: South
Vul: None
♠A52
K65
T62
♣AJ72
♠K84
AT842
J73
♣94
♠QJT9
J73
AK5
♣653
9
128
11
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 2 1♠  ♥6 NT6
EW: 1  ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6
LoTT: 15 - 15 = 0
Par: +90 2-NS/2♣-NS
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   90          3.00   0.00  2 N      ♣9  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
   50          1.50   1.50  2 E -1   ♠Q  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
   50          1.50   1.50  2 E -1   ♠Q  8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
         50    0.00   3.00  3 N -1   4  1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
12 ♠Q9862
A
A532
♣AJ3
Dlr: West
Vul: N-S
♠T7
Q85
Q8764
♣KT4
♠AKJ3
KJ643
KT9
♣6
♠54
T972
J
♣Q98752
15
715
3
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 3♣  ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4
EW: 3/4 2 3NT  ♣4 ♠5
LoTT: 19 - 17 = +2
Par: -200 4♣*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          2.50   0.50  4 E -1   J  8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
   50          2.50   0.50  3 E -1   J  5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
        110    1.00   2.00  2 E      ♠5  6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        170    0.00   3.00  3 E +1   ♠4  1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
13 ♠J942
76542
J9
♣A2
Dlr: North
Vul: Both
♠AK8
Q8
87632
♣QJT
♠75
AT9
K5
♣K76543
♠QT63
KJ3
AQT4
♣98
6
1210
12
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 2♠  ♣4 ♦6 NT5
EW: 3♣ 1/- 2/1NT
       ♦7/6 ♥5/4 ♠4
LoTT: 17 - 17 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  140          3.00   0.00  2♠ N +1   ♠7  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
        130    2.00   1.00  4♣ E      ♠3  8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
        200    1.00   2.00  4♠* S -1  ♣Q  2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        630    0.00   3.00  3N W +1   ♠2  6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
14 ♠A4
KQT2
AK876
♣T6
Dlr: East
Vul: None
♠762
7
Q
♣KJ987532
♠985
A654
JT95
♣A4
♠KQJT3
J983
432
♣Q
16
69
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 4 2♠  ♣4 NT4
EW: 3♣  ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT6
LoTT: 19 - 18 = +1
Par: +300 5♣*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  110          2.50   0.50  3 N      ♣A  2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
  110          2.50   0.50  3 N      ♣A  8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
   50          1.00   2.00  4♣ W -1   A  6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
         50    0.00   3.00  4 N -1   ♣A  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
15 ♠AQT9
J972
432
♣A7
Dlr: South
Vul: N-S
♠J3
KQ
QT976
♣T952
♠K87652
A864
A8
♣6
♠4
T53
KJ5
♣KQJ843
11
811
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1 2NT  ♦5 ♠5
EW: 1 2♠  ♣5 ♥6 NT5
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: +100 3♠*-EW-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  150          3.00   0.00  2N S +1   ♠3  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
  100          2.00   1.00  2♠ E -2   ♣K  6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
        100    1.00   2.00  2 N -1   ♣6  2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        200    0.00   3.00  3♣ S -2   K  8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
16 ♠J3
K97653
AJ3
♣Q4
Dlr: West
Vul: E-W
♠4
4
QT876
♣AKJ862
♠AQT9762
QJ
5
♣975
♠K85
AT82
K942
♣T3
11
109
10
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2 3  ♣1 ♠4 NT6
EW: 4♣ 3♠  ♦5 ♥3 NT4
LoTT: 19 - 19 = 0
Par: -100 4*-NS-1
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  200          2.00   1.00  5♠ E -2   A  1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
  200          2.00   1.00  4♠ E -2   A  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
  200          2.00   1.00  5♣ W -2   6  8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        620    0.00   3.00  4♠ E      A  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
17 ♠QJT93
AT9
72
♣QT6
Dlr: North
Vul: None
♠K7
QJ3
986
♣KJ842
♠A8
K874
AQJ5
♣973
♠6542
652
KT43
♣A5
9
1014
7
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 1♠  ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT6
EW: 3♣ 2 3/2 1NT  ♠5
LoTT: 16 - 17 = -1
Par: -140 3-W
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
   50          3.00   0.00  3 E -1   ♠2  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
         50    1.50   1.50  2♠ N -1   4  1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
         50    1.50   1.50  2♠ N -1   3  8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
         90    0.00   3.00  1N W      ♠Q  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
18 ♠-
-
A75432
♣KJ97542
Dlr: East
Vul: N-S
♠75432
Q6432
98
♣8
♠AQJT986
T9
K6
♣A3
♠K
AKJ875
QJT
♣QT6
8
214
16
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 5/6♣ 4 1  ♠3 NT4
EW: 4♠ 2NT  ♣1 ♦2 ♥6
LoTT: 22 - 22 = 0
Par: +300 6♠*-EW-2
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  620          3.00   0.00  5♣ N +1   ♠A  1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
  600          2.00   1.00  5♣ N      7  8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        420    0.50   2.50  4♠ E      A  7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
        420    0.50   2.50  4♠ E      ♣6  3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
19 ♠62
AT653
AQ
♣QT92
Dlr: South
Vul: E-W
♠AK4
KQ98
KJ962
♣A
♠Q975
72
T85
♣J864
♠JT83
J4
743
♣K753
12
203
5
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1  ♦3 ♠6 NT6
EW: 3/4 1♠  ♣5 ♥5/6 NT6
LoTT: 18 - 16 = +2
Par: -130 4-E
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
        100    3.00   0.00  3♣ N -2   6  1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        120    2.00   1.00  1N W +1   7  8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
        140    1.00   2.00  3 W      ♠6  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
        180    0.00   3.00  2N W +2   5  2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
20 ♠875
J
JT652
♣KQT3
Dlr: West
Vul: Both
♠AQ94
9763
AQ8
♣J5
♠K32
A854
93
♣A982
♠JT6
KQT2
K74
♣764
7
1311
9
Double Dummy Makes
NS:  ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4
EW: 3♣ 2 3 3♠ 2NT
LoTT: 14 - 16 = -2
Par: -140 3♠-EW/3-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  100          3.00   0.00  4 E -1   ♠J  8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
    PASS       2.00   1.00  Pass Out      4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
        110    1.00   2.00  2 E      ♠6  2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        300    0.00   3.00  3♣ N -3   3  1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
21 ♠AJ
K76
82
♣QT9765
Dlr: North
Vul: N-S
♠KQ8
J43
A754
♣AK2
♠T9
T952
KQT9
♣843
♠765432
AQ8
J63
♣J
10
175
8
Double Dummy Makes
NS: 2♣ 1♠  ♦4 ♥5 NT5
EW: 3 2 2NT  ♣5 ♠6
LoTT: 16 - 16 = 0
Par: -120 2NT-EW
  N-S   E-W    N-S    E-W   Contract  Ld
  170          3.00   0.00  2♠ S +2   ♣A  8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
        100    1.50   1.50  2♠ S -1   ♣A  2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
        100    1.50   1.50  3♣ N -1   6  1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
        150    0.00   3.00  1N W +2   ♣7  4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu