1 |
♠A852
♥K865
♦T54
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♠J 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
50 2.00 1.00 2N E -1 ♠J 8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
110 1.00 2.00 2♦ W +1 ♥5 2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
430 0.00 3.00 3N E +1 ♠7 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
2 |
♠AT5
♥AKQ2
♦AK
♣JT74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♦ 4/3♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥3 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♥T 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
660 2.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♦5 8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♥J 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.50 2.50 4♠ N +1 ♦5 2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
3 |
♠AJ863
♥2
♦K
♣QJT842
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥6 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 2N W -4 ♣Q 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 2.00 1.00 3N E -1 ♠Q 8-Walker-Dietz vs 1-Kobland-Pender
50 1.00 2.00 2♥ S -1 ♠4 2-Loops-Loops vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
120 0.00 3.00 2N E ♥A 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
4 |
♠AK5
♥A853
♦AKJ8
♣83
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 3♥ S +1 ♠7 8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
110 2.00 1.00 1♦ N +2 ♠J 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.00 2.00 3♣ W -1 ♦A 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
70 0.00 3.00 1♦ N ♠J 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
5 |
♠KT73
♥A985
♦KJ7
♣32
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N N +1 ♠5 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
100 2.00 1.00 1♠ E -2 ♥2 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 2.00 2♣ E -1 ♦T 8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
200 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -2 ♠9 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
6 |
♠732
♥K852
♦JT5
♣J54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3/2♦ 1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 1N W -2 ♣4 8-Walker-Dietz vs 2-Loops-Loops
100 2.00 1.00 1N W -1 ♥2 6-Davidson-Winham vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.50 2.50 1N W ♥5 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
90 0.50 2.50 1N W ♣4 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
7 |
♠J94
♥K9752
♦-
♣96542
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.50 0.50 4♦ W -1 ♠9 8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 2.50 0.50 4♦ W -1 ♠4 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 1.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♦3 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
110 0.00 3.00 3♦ W ♣4 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
8 |
♠KQ84
♥952
♦5
♣AKQJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.00 0.00 1♥** S +1 ♣6 8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
110 2.00 1.00 2♣ N +1 ♦A 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
50 0.50 2.50 4♣ N -1 ♦A 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
50 0.50 2.50 3♣ N -1 ♥A 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
9 |
♠82
♥92
♦AQ86
♣KQ965
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣3 ♦5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 2N S +1 ♣2 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 2-Loops-Loops
150 2.50 0.50 3♣ N +2 ♥Q 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Kobland-Pender
120 1.00 2.00 2N S ♠6 8-Walker-Dietz vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
50 0.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♥8 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
10 |
♠KQT43
♥65
♦AQJ7
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 |
EW: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ N ♣J 1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
200 2.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♣J 8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
100 1.00 2.00 3♠ N -1 ♦6 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
620 0.00 3.00 4♥ E ♠J 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠763
♥Q9
♦Q984
♣KQT8
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ N ♣9 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠Q 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠Q 8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
50 0.00 3.00 3♦ N -1 ♥4 1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
12 |
♠Q9862
♥A
♦A532
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3/4♦ 2♥ 3NT ♣4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♦J 8-Walker-Dietz vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
50 2.50 0.50 3♥ E -1 ♦J 5-Ruggeri-Xu vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♠5 6-Davidson-Winham vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ E +1 ♠4 1-Kobland-Pender vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
13 |
♠J942
♥76542
♦J9
♣A2
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 1/-♦ 2/1NT ♦7/6 ♥5/4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♠7 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
130 2.00 1.00 4♣ E ♠3 8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
200 1.00 2.00 4♠* S -1 ♣Q 2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
630 0.00 3.00 3N W +1 ♠2 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
|
14 |
♠A4
♥KQT2
♦AK876
♣T6
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 2♠ ♣4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ N ♣A 2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
110 2.50 0.50 3♦ N ♣A 8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
50 1.00 2.00 4♣ W -1 ♦A 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
50 0.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♣A 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
15 |
♠AQT9
♥J972
♦432
♣A7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2N S +1 ♠3 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ E -2 ♣K 6-Davidson-Winham vs 1-Kobland-Pender
100 1.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♣6 2-Loops-Loops vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
200 0.00 3.00 3♣ S -2 ♥K 8-Walker-Dietz vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
|
16 |
♠J3
♥K97653
♦AJ3
♣Q4
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣1 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 3♠ ♦5 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.00 1.00 5♠ E -2 ♥A 1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
200 2.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♥A 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
200 2.00 1.00 5♣ W -2 ♥6 8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
620 0.00 3.00 4♠ E ♥A 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
17 |
♠QJT93
♥AT9
♦72
♣QT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♠2 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♥4 1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ N -1 ♥3 8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
90 0.00 3.00 1N W ♠Q 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
|
18 |
♠-
♥-
♦A75432
♣KJ97542
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5/6♣ 4♦ 1♥ ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♠ 2NT ♣1 ♦2 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 5♣ N +1 ♠A 1-Kobland-Pender vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
600 2.00 1.00 5♣ N ♥7 8-Walker-Dietz vs 6-Davidson-Winham
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 7-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Loops-Loops
420 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♣6 3-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 4-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
19 |
♠62
♥AT653
♦AQ
♣QT92
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦3 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 3/4♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♣ N -2 ♦6 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
120 2.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♥7 8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 2.00 3♥ W ♠6 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
180 0.00 3.00 2N W +2 ♥5 2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
|
20 |
♠875
♥J
♦JT652
♣KQT3
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠J 8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
PASS 2.00 1.00 Pass Out 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ E ♠6 2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
300 0.00 3.00 3♣ N -3 ♦3 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
21 |
♠AJ
♥K76
♦82
♣QT9765
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2NT ♣5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♠ S +2 ♣A 8-Walker-Dietz vs 7-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣A 2-Loops-Loops vs 6-Davidson-Winham
100 1.50 1.50 3♣ N -1 ♥6 1-Kobland-Pender vs 3-Rodrigues-Pearce
150 0.00 3.00 1N W +2 ♣7 4-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Ruggeri-Xu
|