1 |
♠A6
♥AK632
♦AQJ9
♣KJ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 3♦ N +1 ♣A 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
50 0.83 2.17 3N S -1 ♣2 6-Graves-Formoso vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
50 0.83 2.17 3N S -1 ♣2 9-Xu-Loops vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
2 |
♠752
♥AJ85
♦AT
♣K973
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ N ♣A 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
170 1.50 1.50 3♥ N +1 ♦K 6-Graves-Formoso vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
200 0.17 2.83 4♥ N -2 ♦K 9-Xu-Loops vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
3 |
♠53
♥QJ2
♦A754
♣QT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♦Q 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
200 1.50 1.50 5♠ W -2 ♦A 9-Xu-Loops vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
50 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -1 ♦Q 6-Graves-Formoso vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
4 |
♠Q9
♥AKQ42
♦A752
♣92
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♠ W +1 ♥A 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
200 0.83 2.17 4♥ N -2 ♠3 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Graves-Formoso
200 0.83 2.17 3♥ N -2 ♠6 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
5 |
♠AJ3
♥KT863
♦K64
♣K8
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2/3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♣ W -3 ♥6 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -2 ♥4 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Graves-Formoso
130 0.17 2.83 2♦ W +2 ♦4 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
6 |
♠AJ9
♥J8632
♦854
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 3♦ S ♥T 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
100 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♣5 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 0.17 2.83 1N N -2 ♠K 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
7 |
♠J843
♥QJ82
♦AJ43
♣2
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♣ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 2♠ E -3 ♦8 6-Graves-Formoso vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 2.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 ♥A 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
130 0.50 2.50 4♣ E ♥4 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-Kremers-Duey
130 0.50 2.50 4♣ E ♦K 9-Xu-Loops vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
8 |
♠AQJ
♥952
♦AK6
♣Q752
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 4♥ W -3 ♦A 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
150 1.50 1.50 3♣ W +2 ♦A 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-Kremers-Duey
150 1.50 1.50 3♣ W +2 ♦A 6-Graves-Formoso vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
550 0.00 3.00 5♣* W ♦A 9-Xu-Loops vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
9 |
♠J653
♥AT754
♦QJ5
♣T
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.00 0.00 1♥ N +1 ♣4 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♣9 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 4-Kremers-Duey
50 1.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♣2 6-Graves-Formoso vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
150 0.00 3.00 3♥ N -3 ♦9 9-Xu-Loops vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
10 |
♠AQT5
♥65
♦QT765
♣A6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 2.83 0.17 4♠ S +2 ♣7 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
650 1.50 1.50 4♠ N +1 ♣T 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Graves-Formoso
200 0.17 2.83 2♠ N +3 ♣T 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Kremers-Duey
|
11 |
♠A873
♥KT7
♦QT64
♣Q4
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♦ W -2 ♣Q 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
50 1.50 1.50 1♦ W -1 ♣Q 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Kremers-Duey
90 0.17 2.83 2♦ W ♣4 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
12 |
♠A2
♥QJ83
♦AQ5
♣QJT5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 3N N -1 ♦9 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Kremers-Duey
100 2.17 0.83 3N N -1 ♦7 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 6-Graves-Formoso
200 0.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♦9 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
|
13 |
♠KQ76532
♥72
♦T74
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1/-♠ 4NT ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠2 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
150 2.00 1.00 2N W +1 ♠6 4-Kremers-Duey vs 6-Graves-Formoso
620 1.00 2.00 4♥ W ♣9 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 9-Xu-Loops
650 0.00 3.00 4♥ W +1 ♣9 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
14 |
♠72
♥AKT73
♦K
♣QT752
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠4 |
EW: 3♠ ♣2 ♦4 ♥1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠K 4-Kremers-Duey vs 6-Graves-Formoso
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ N +1 ♠K 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
420 1.00 2.00 4♥ N ♠6 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ W -1 ♥A 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 9-Xu-Loops
|
15 |
♠KT4
♥AT7
♦AJ62
♣AKT
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 4♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4/5 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♥ S ♣3 4-Kremers-Duey vs 6-Graves-Formoso
50 2.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♣A 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♠5 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
200 0.50 2.50 4♥ S -2 ♣3 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 9-Xu-Loops
|
16 |
♠943
♥753
♦K93
♣QJ96
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.00 0.00 3N E -3 ♣3 9-Xu-Loops vs 6-Graves-Formoso
200 1.50 1.50 3N E -2 ♥T 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
200 1.50 1.50 4♠ E -2 ♣2 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
120 0.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♣3 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kremers-Duey
|
17 |
♠J6
♥64
♦AQJ43
♣KJT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣5 ♥2 ♠3 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 3♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.00 0.00 2♦ N ♠2 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♥6 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
50 1.50 1.50 3♠ W -1 ♦3 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kremers-Duey
100 0.00 3.00 4♦ N -2 ♠2 9-Xu-Loops vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
18 |
♠A65
♥J5
♦T753
♣J743
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦3 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣8 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
140 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +1 ♦A 2-Sedey-McAdams vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
110 1.00 2.00 2♠ S ♣8 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Kremers-Duey
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E ♠K 9-Xu-Loops vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
19 |
♠A
♥KQ9652
♦T852
♣AK
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ S +1 ♠Q 4-Kremers-Duey vs 9-Xu-Loops
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♠Q 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
170 1.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦A 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
|
20 |
♠KJ82
♥82
♦9653
♣T82
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥2/1 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 5♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ E +1 ♦A 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
620 2.00 1.00 4♥ E ♦A 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
990 0.50 2.50 4♥* E +1 ♦A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
990 0.50 2.50 4♥* E +1 ♦K 4-Kremers-Duey vs 9-Xu-Loops
|
21 |
♠A82
♥832
♦T42
♣KQ54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.00 0.00 2♥ S +1 ♠4 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Osborn-Tidmore
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ S ♦8 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Sedey-McAdams
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣J 1-Lynnes-Beiers vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
110 1.00 2.00 2♥ S ♣J 4-Kremers-Duey vs 9-Xu-Loops
|
22 |
♠JT432
♥J87
♦2
♣T762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 3/2♣ 4/3♦ 2/1♠ 2NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3N E -2 ♥K 4-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ W -1 ♥7 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Graves-Formoso
90 1.00 2.00 2♦ E ♣K 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 9-Xu-Loops
100 0.00 3.00 2♥ S -2 ♠A 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
|
23 |
♠AQJT654
♥A73
♦T6
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♠ 4NT ♣5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ ♦6 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥Q 4-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
620 2.50 0.50 4♠ N ♥Q 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ N +2 ♥Q 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 9-Xu-Loops
170 0.00 3.00 2♠ N +2 ♥Q 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
24 |
♠QJ9
♥A42
♦97542
♣AK
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥6 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 3.00 0.00 1N N +3 ♥7 4-Kremers-Duey vs 3-Ruggeri-Kobland
170 2.00 1.00 2♠ S +2 ♥5 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 1-Lynnes-Beiers
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥T 7-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 9-Xu-Loops
50 0.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥5 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 6-Graves-Formoso
|
25 |
♠AQ3
♥A973
♦KJT9
♣82
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 2.83 0.17 2N N ♠5 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kremers-Duey
50 1.50 1.50 3N N -1 ♠5 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 9-Xu-Loops
100 0.17 2.83 3N S -2 ♣6 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
|
26 |
♠Q
♥AT943
♦T965
♣A75
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +2 ♦K 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
140 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♣4 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kremers-Duey
100 0.17 2.83 4♥ N -1 ♣8 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 9-Xu-Loops
|
27 |
♠J974
♥KJ2
♦A4
♣T643
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 1♠ ♦5/6 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 1N E -2 ♣8 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 9-Xu-Loops
50 1.50 1.50 1N E -1 ♣7 5-Osborn-Tidmore vs 4-Kremers-Duey
110 0.17 2.83 1♥ E +1 ♣Q 10-O'Neill-Smart vs 7-Gassman-Shoemaker
|