1 |
♠K75
♥Q
♦QT83
♣A9873
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5/6♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6/5 ♦1 ♠3/2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.88 0.13 3N S +2 ♣J 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Loops-Loops
150 2.63 1.38 4♦ S +1 ♥3 5-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
130 1.38 2.63 4♦ S ♣K 8-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♣K 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
|
2 |
♠A862
♥6
♦KQ742
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣2 ♦2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N S ♥7 5-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
130 2.63 1.38 2♦ N +2 ♠Q 8-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.38 2.63 3N S -1 ♥5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
200 0.13 3.88 3N S -2 ♥7 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Loops-Loops
|
3 |
♠K62
♥QJ9
♦J82
♣Q742
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.25 0.75 2♥ S ♠8 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
110 3.25 0.75 2♥ S ♦A 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Loops-Loops
90 1.38 2.63 1N E ♥4 8-Barr-Barr vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.13 3.88 2♠ W +1 ♥Q 5-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
|
4 |
♠A62
♥QT5
♦Q8742
♣72
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 1N W -1 ♦4 11-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♦2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
100 0.33 3.67 2♦ N -1 ♣5 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 8-Barr-Barr
|
5 |
♠K832
♥986
♦A43
♣T64
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.67 0.33 4♠ N +1 ♥2 11-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♦2 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 8-Barr-Barr
100 0.33 3.67 4♠ N -1 ♦2 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
|
6 |
♠KQ2
♥Q843
♦J7
♣K743
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♠ S ♥A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
100 2.00 2.00 1N E -1 ♠4 11-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
140 0.33 3.67 2♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 8-Barr-Barr
|
7 |
♠3
♥AJ762
♦T5
♣AQ762
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♥ ♦6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 1.17 2♥ N +1 ♠4 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 8-Barr-Barr
140 2.83 1.17 2♥ N +1 ♣3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
120 0.33 3.67 1N W +1 ♣6 11-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Allen-Formoso
|
8 |
♠J987
♥T7
♦J94
♣K987
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT4/5 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 4♠ W -3 ♥T 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 8-Barr-Barr
50 2.00 2.00 4♠ W -1 ♥T 11-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Allen-Formoso
140 0.33 3.67 3♠ W ♥T 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
|
9 |
♠KQ8
♥3
♦Q86432
♣J42
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 5NT ♥4 ♠6/5 |
EW: 3♥ 1♠ ♣4 ♦2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.67 0.33 6♥ W -3 ♦2 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 8-Barr-Barr
100 1.17 2.83 4♥ W -1 ♠K 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
100 1.17 2.83 4♥ W -1 ♦Q 11-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Allen-Formoso
|
10 |
♠A853
♥74
♦A987
♣AJ3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/5♣ 4/5♥ 1/2♠ 2/1NT ♦5/6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 2♦ E -1 ♣5 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Loops-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ S -1 ♦Q 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦Q 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
300 0.13 3.88 3N N -3 ♥9 11-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
|
11 |
♠Q5
♥86
♦KQ64
♣QJ872
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 3♥ S ♠A 11-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
140 3.25 0.75 3♥ S ♦2 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Loops-Loops
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ S ♦9 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
100 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -2 ♣A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
12 |
♠AT62
♥T82
♦A93
♣T97
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ 1/-♥ ♣5 ♥7/6 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♣ S +1 ♥4 11-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
100 2.00 2.00 2♣ S -1 ♥4 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 7-Loops-Loops
110 0.33 3.67 2♥ E ♦7 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
13 |
♠65
♥J62
♦Q72
♣KQ532
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ 2NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 4♠ E -2 ♦A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Allen-Formoso
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦A 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦A 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
620 0.13 3.88 4♠ E ♦A 7-Loops-Loops vs 11-Harken-Tainty
|
14 |
♠J
♥JT3
♦A2
♣Q876543
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠3 |
EW: 1♦ 4♠ ♣6 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 5♥ S -1 ♠5 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Allen-Formoso
100 2.63 1.38 5♥ S -2 ♦Q 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
300 1.38 2.63 5♥* S -2 ♦J 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
420 0.13 3.88 4♠ W ♣6 7-Loops-Loops vs 11-Harken-Tainty
|
15 |
♠K732
♥53
♦K
♣J76542
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ 2♥ 1♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.88 0.13 2♥ S +1 ♠4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Allen-Formoso
100 2.63 1.38 2♦ S -1 ♠4 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
200 1.38 2.63 4♥ S -2 ♠4 7-Loops-Loops vs 11-Harken-Tainty
300 0.13 3.88 4♥ S -3 ♥4 9-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
|
16 |
♠Q8
♥KT9754
♦A983
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2/1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -3 ♥8 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
300 3.50 0.50 2♠ E -3 ♥8 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
200 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -2 ♥2 8-Barr-Barr vs 11-Harken-Tainty
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ N +1 ♣K 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
110 0.00 4.00 2♥ N ♣A 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 7-Loops-Loops
|
17 |
♠K73
♥KJ95
♦K5432
♣9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
470 4.00 0.00 2♠* S ♥8 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
50 3.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♥8 8-Barr-Barr vs 11-Harken-Tainty
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♥8 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
150 0.50 3.50 3♠ S -3 ♥3 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
150 0.50 3.50 2♦ N -3 ♣T 1-Shoemaker-Beiers vs 7-Loops-Loops
|
18 |
♠874
♥64
♦JT4
♣AKQ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦1 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 4♦ S ♠A 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♠A 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ S ♠A 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
100 0.13 3.88 3♥ S -1 ♠A 8-Barr-Barr vs 11-Harken-Tainty
|
19 |
♠Q7
♥754
♦AKQT
♣QT96
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠6 5-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
400 2.50 1.50 3N S ♥6 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
400 2.50 1.50 3N S ♥6 11-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
110 1.00 3.00 3♣ S ♠5 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Barr-Barr
150 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -3 ♥Q 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Loops-Loops
|
20 |
♠Q853
♥Q8
♦J7
♣AQT76
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N S ♥3 5-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
90 3.00 1.00 1N S ♥3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Barr-Barr
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♥4 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Loops-Loops
140 0.00 4.00 2♥ W +1 ♦J 11-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
|
21 |
♠JT7653
♥K
♦AQ42
♣62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♥3 2-Osborn-Tidmore vs 8-Barr-Barr
110 3.50 0.50 2♠ N ♣A 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.00 2.00 3♥ E -1 ♠Q 12-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Loops-Loops
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♥2 11-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Davidson-Kobland
200 0.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♣A 5-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
|
22 |
♠KQT9
♥9
♦KQJ2
♣AJ82
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2N N +1 ♣5 11-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
110 2.63 1.38 3♦ N ♥A 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
100 1.38 2.63 2N E -1 ♠7 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Allen-Formoso
150 0.13 3.88 2N W +1 ♠7 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
|
23 |
♠T
♥AK
♦AKQJ92
♣JT72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 3NT ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♠4 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Allen-Formoso
120 2.63 1.38 1N N +1 ♣A 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ N ♣A 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.75 3.25 3♦ N ♣Q 11-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
|
24 |
♠-
♥KQ762
♦942
♣AKQ74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 5♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 3♠ ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 5♥ N ♠A 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Allen-Formoso
100 1.38 2.63 4♠ W -2 ♠A 11-Harken-Tainty vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
100 1.38 2.63 4♠ W -2 ♣A 10-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.38 2.63 3♣* W -1 ♣A 6-Gumz-Emanuel vs 2-Osborn-Tidmore
|
25 |
♠AQ43
♥T54
♦K2
♣KJ62
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦0 NT1 |
EW: 2/1♣ 6♦ 6NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.67 0.33 3♦ W +2 ♥5 5-Allen-Formoso vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
600 1.17 2.83 3N E ♠J 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
600 1.17 2.83 5♦ W ♥T 8-Barr-Barr vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
|
26 |
♠A962
♥Q864
♦AJ43
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2N W -1 ♥4 8-Barr-Barr vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
90 2.00 2.00 2♣ E ♥7 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
100 0.33 3.67 2♦ S -1 ♥A 5-Allen-Formoso vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
|
27 |
♠Q43
♥AK83
♦63
♣K963
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3♥ S +2 ♦Q 4-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Shoemaker-Beiers
140 1.17 2.83 3♥ S ♠7 5-Allen-Formoso vs 10-Nathanson-Stone
140 1.17 2.83 2♥ S +1 ♦Q 8-Barr-Barr vs 6-Gumz-Emanuel
|