1 |
♠A8
♥AJ3
♦AQJ632
♣J6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 1♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.80 1.80 4♠ W -2 ♦A 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Dau
100 1.80 1.80 3♥ E -2 ♦K 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠K4
♥J53
♦QJT72
♣A74
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 1.80 1.80 1N W +1 ♦Q 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Dau
120 1.80 1.80 1N W +1 ♦2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
3 |
♠JT
♥AKJ53
♦J872
♣K6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 3/2NT ♣5 ♦6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.80 1.80 4♥ N -1 ♣T 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.80 1.80 3♥ N -1 ♣J 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Ray-Dau
|
4 |
♠T43
♥JT72
♦74
♣6432
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ ♣3 ♦5 ♥3 NT6 |
EW: 4/3♣ 3♥ ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ S -1 ♥A 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 2-Ray-Dau
100 2.17 0.83 4♠ S -1 ♥A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
800 0.17 2.83 4♠* S -3 ♥A 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
5 |
♠AQT9
♥A7
♦K54
♣J753
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 3♦ E -2 ♠5 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 2-Ray-Dau
50 1.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♣A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ W ♥A 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
6 |
♠K8
♥AQT
♦AJ973
♣Q63
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3NT ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 2N E -1 ♦T 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
110 0.83 2.17 3♣ W ♦A 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
110 0.83 2.17 2♣ W +1 ♦A 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 2-Ray-Dau
|
7 |
♠JT9876
♥52
♦Q43
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥2 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.95 1.65 3♣ W +3 ♠J 10-Walker-Loops vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
630 1.65 1.95 3N W +1 ♠J 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
|
8 |
♠6
♥AQ62
♦T86432
♣84
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 4♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 1.95 1.65 5♣ E ♦K 10-Walker-Loops vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
450 1.65 1.95 4♠ E +1 ♦K 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
|
9 |
♠QT
♥AKT92
♦T654
♣Q2
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♣5/6 ♦6/7 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.95 1.65 2♦ W -2 ♥A 10-Walker-Loops vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.65 1.95 2♥ N -2 ♦9 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
|
10 |
♠A953
♥654
♦632
♣T84
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦5 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 2♦ 6♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♥4 10-Walker-Loops vs 2-Ray-Dau
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♦6 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
690 1.50 1.50 3N W +3 ♦6 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
11 |
♠K2
♥J953
♦J
♣QJ8654
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1/-♥ 3♠ ♦7/6 ♥7/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 3♣ W -3 ♦J 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 1.50 3♦ S -1 ♠A 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
170 0.17 2.83 2♠ E +2 ♥K 10-Walker-Loops vs 2-Ray-Dau
|
12 |
♠863
♥Q92
♦AT65
♣Q43
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2/3♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 5/4♣ 4/3♦ 2/1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 2.83 0.17 3♣ W +1 ♥2 10-Walker-Loops vs 2-Ray-Dau
400 0.83 2.17 3N W ♠8 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
400 0.83 2.17 3♥ N -4 ♣6 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠T5
♥543
♦K432
♣9863
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 5♥ 1♠ 4/5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 0.50 4♥ E ♠K 2-Ray-Dau vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
620 2.50 0.50 5♣ E +1 ♣5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
660 0.50 2.50 3N W +2 ♥5 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 9-Harken-Harken
660 0.50 2.50 3N E +2 ♠T 10-Walker-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
14 |
♠62
♥AJ732
♦T6
♣J976
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4/3 ♥2 ♠3/2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 3.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♦8 10-Walker-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
430 2.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♦4 2-Ray-Dau vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
400 1.00 2.00 3N S ♦7 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 3.00 6N S -4 ♦7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
|
15 |
♠KQ962
♥A52
♦A86
♣K2
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
170 2.00 1.00 3♣ S +3 ♦2 2-Ray-Dau vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.00 2.00 3N N -1 ♥4 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 0.00 3.00 5♦* S -1 ♠A 10-Walker-Loops vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠Q
♥JT43
♦6532
♣A985
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5/4 ♠3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦2 2-Ray-Dau vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
300 2.00 1.00 5♦* S -2 ♠A 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
620 0.50 2.50 4♠ E ♦A 10-Walker-Loops vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
|
17 |
♠53
♥T975
♦JT5
♣9742
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥6 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.00 0.00 3♣ W -1 ♠5 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ W ♠5 10-Walker-Loops vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
130 1.00 2.00 2♣ W +2 ♠5 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 3.00 3♦ S -3 ♥8 2-Ray-Dau vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
18 |
♠T964
♥AK
♦A985
♣AQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3/4 ♥5 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 2♣ W -3 ♥K 2-Ray-Dau vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
120 2.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♥2 10-Walker-Loops vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
100 0.50 2.50 1♥ E -2 ♣9 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 2.50 2♣ W -2 ♥K 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
19 |
♠2
♥QJ7
♦A98763
♣T86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 5♠ 4NT ♦6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ S -2 ♥4 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Ray-Dau
150 2.00 1.00 4♥ S -3 ♠4 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 9-Harken-Harken
200 1.00 2.00 3♠ E +2 ♦K 10-Walker-Loops vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
650 0.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
20 |
♠9
♥953
♦Q8654
♣QJ87
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦1 ♥0 ♠4 NT0 |
EW: 5♦ 7/6♥ 2♠ 6NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 6♥ E -1 ♠J 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
680 1.50 1.50 5♥ W +1 ♠9 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 9-Harken-Harken
680 1.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠9 10-Walker-Loops vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
1460 0.00 3.00 6♥ W +1 ♠7 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Ray-Dau
|
21 |
♠AKT85
♥Q52
♦KJ96
♣K
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 3/4♥ 2♠ ♣5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
250 3.00 0.00 2♥ E -5 ♦A 3-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Ray-Dau
200 2.00 1.00 2♠ N +3 ♦4 10-Walker-Loops vs 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky
140 1.00 2.00 3♠ N ♣A 1-Tidmore-Traback vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♣A 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
22 |
♠AJ642
♥42
♦Q86
♣AK4
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 2.83 0.17 3N N +3 ♦J 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
430 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♠8 2-Ray-Dau vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
400 0.17 2.83 3N N ♦J 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
23 |
♠KQ72
♥5
♦72
♣AT7632
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦0 ♥3 NT3/5 |
EW: 6♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3N E -3 ♠Q 2-Ray-Dau vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♦9 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
600 0.17 2.83 5♦ W ♠2 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
24 |
♠QT8
♥AJT96
♦AKT
♣J7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣6/5 ♦6 ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 2.83 0.17 2♥ N +1 ♦5 2-Ray-Dau vs 8-Calciano-Calciano
90 1.50 1.50 1N N ♦Q 7-Vadas-Pringle vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 0.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♣9 4-Faircrest-Graves vs 3-Pearce-Pearce
|
25 |
♠A3
♥42
♦QT7632
♣T84
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 2♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3N W -3 ♦6 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.50 1.50 2♠ W -1 ♦7 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
50 0.17 2.83 3♦ N -1 ♥K 10-Walker-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
|
26 |
♠AKQJ
♥7542
♦Q
♣8732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4/5 ♦3 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 2.83 0.17 3N E -3 ♦6 10-Walker-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
200 1.50 1.50 3♣* W -1 ♠J 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
100 0.17 2.83 3♦ W -1 ♠A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
27 |
♠Q65
♥K52
♦A963
♣Q32
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 |
EW: 1♦ 3♥ ♣6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 1♠ W -2 ♠5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
80 1.50 1.50 1♠ W ♥2 10-Walker-Loops vs 7-Vadas-Pringle
110 0.17 2.83 1♠ W +1 ♥2 5-Ginsberg-Vishnevsky vs 4-Faircrest-Graves
|