1 |
♠8
♥742
♦K84
♣JT7653
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 1♥ ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3/2♠ 3/2NT ♣3 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 3♠ E +1 ♦5 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 3.00 1.00 2♠ E +3 ♥A 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +1 ♥A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
2 |
♠Q72
♥A8
♦J532
♣Q532
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♠A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
150 3.00 1.00 1N N +2 ♠4 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ S +1 ♣6 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ S ♦K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
90 0.00 4.00 2♦ W ♥A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
3 |
♠5
♥A97
♦743
♣AKT754
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 2♠ ♣6/7 ♦3 ♥6/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 4.00 0.00 5♦* E -2 ♣6 4-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.00 1.00 4♦ E -1 ♠A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣3 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ S -1 ♣3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♣3 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
4 |
♠QJT2
♥Q832
♦Q95
♣K8
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♠3 4-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♣5 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
600 3.00 1.00 3N E ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
630 0.50 3.50 3N W +1 ♠Q 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
630 0.50 3.50 3N E +1 ♣5 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠AJ97
♥5
♦A62
♣J9732
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 3♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♠ S ♥A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.00 1.00 4♥ W -1 ♦A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ S -1 ♥3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ N -1 ♥Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
300 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -3 ♠7 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
6 |
♠J75
♥KT3
♦AT93
♣863
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3/4 ♠6 NT3/4 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♠5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♠J 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦7 4-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
170 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +2 ♠3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 3-Loops-Walker
710 0.00 4.00 4♦* E ♠3 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
7 |
♠T64
♥Q
♦AT75
♣AKQJ4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♣A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 3.00 1.00 2♥ E ♣2 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♥3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 3-Loops-Walker
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♦9 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +1 ♣6 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
8 |
♠-
♥Q4
♦Q9543
♣AKT876
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4/3♦ 3♥ 2/1NT ♠6/5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣2 ♦3 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -8 ♣2 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♣A 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♣A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♣A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♠A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
9 |
♠Q
♥T52
♦KT74
♣Q9872
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 4.00 0.00 3N W ♦4 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♦2 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 3-Loops-Walker
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣7 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
630 1.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣7 4-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
10 |
♠AK9754
♥T7
♦QT
♣KQ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ ♣1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +2 ♦A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
650 2.63 1.38 4♠ N +1 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.75 3.25 2♠ N +3 ♦A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
200 0.75 3.25 2♠ N +3 ♦K 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
11 |
♠K73
♥J863
♦T7
♣K532
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠J 4-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 1.00 3♥ E -1 ♣7 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ E ♦J 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♣2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
180 0.00 4.00 2N W +2 ♣2 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
12 |
♠Q2
♥2
♦KQJ532
♣Q972
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦7 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ E ♣J 4-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
140 2.50 1.50 3♥ E ♣5 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♦7 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
420 0.50 3.50 4♥ E ♣J 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
13 |
♠Q62
♥J954
♦K2
♣K964
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3♣ W -2 ♥J 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 1.50 2.50 4♠ E -1 ♥A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♥3 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ W -1 ♦K 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
100 1.50 2.50 2♣ W -1 ♦K 4-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
14 |
♠5
♥QJ98
♦JT42
♣K984
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ ♦3 ♥6 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 5♠ ♣4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 5♣ S -2 ♠A 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 3.50 0.50 5♣ S -2 ♦K 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ W ♣4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 4-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣4 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠AJT2
♥K
♦A43
♣KT973
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 6♠ 1NT ♦3 ♥3 |
EW: 3♦ 3♥ ♣0 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +2 ♣5 4-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 3.00 1.00 5♠ S ♥Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Harken-Harken
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ E ♣6 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ W ♣7 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 3-Loops-Walker
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♣7 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
16 |
♠Q742
♥AJ
♦AT32
♣J94
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣6 ♦2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 5♦ S ♠8 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
130 2.50 1.50 4♦ N ♥T 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
130 2.50 1.50 3♦ N +1 ♠8 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 1.00 3.00 4♦ N -1 ♥3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
150 0.00 4.00 3N N -3 ♥5 4-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
17 |
♠843
♥KQT5
♦JT
♣KT87
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/3♦ 2♠ 2/3NT ♥5/6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -4 ♠3 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 3.00 1.00 3♥ W -2 ♠3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♥9 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 1.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♣6 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
50 1.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣6 4-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
18 |
♠AKQ92
♥AT96
♦AJ
♣87
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦6 ♥1 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1440 4.00 0.00 6N N ♦K 4-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Harken-Harken
720 3.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♦6 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
660 2.00 2.00 3N S +2 ♦5 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
650 0.50 3.50 4♥ N +1 ♦K 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
19 |
♠98
♥AK6
♦K982
♣KQ76
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 1/-♥ 2/-NT ♥7/6 ♠6/5 NT8/6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N N ♣T 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.00 1.00 1N N -1 ♠Q 4-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 1.50 2.50 2N N -2 ♠Q 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.50 2.50 1N N -2 ♠Q 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.00 4.00 3♣ N -3 ♠Q 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
20 |
♠AJ875
♥J93
♦954
♣T9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 5♥ 3♠ 2NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Loops-Walker
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦A 4-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Harken-Harken
650 3.00 1.00 4♥ S +1 ♦K 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
600 1.00 3.00 3N S ♦A 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♦A 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
21 |
♠QJ5
♥AJ5
♦AT932
♣76
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 5♥ 5♠ 5/2NT ♣6/5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 4.00 0.00 3N S +3 ♣A 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠4 4-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Loops-Walker
650 2.00 2.00 4♠ S +1 ♣A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.00 3.00 4♥ S ♥2 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +2 ♠8 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
22 |
♠Q974
♥KQ73
♦K62
♣J6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N W +2 ♠4 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
180 3.00 1.00 1N E +3 ♦3 4-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Loops-Walker
210 2.00 2.00 1N W +4 ♣J 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Harken-Harken
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♦3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥4 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
|
23 |
♠T
♥AQT63
♦KJ3
♣JT83
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ ♣3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 3/4♣ 5♠ 2/4NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ W +2 ♣J 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
200 3.50 0.50 3♠ E +2 ♥2 4-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Loops-Walker
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥2 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
650 1.50 2.50 4♠ E +1 ♥2 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Harken-Harken
680 0.00 4.00 4♠ E +2 ♥2 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
|
24 |
♠AK96
♥A87
♦43
♣AK82
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 6♦ 4♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦1 ♥3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
490 4.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ S +2 ♦A 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
480 2.50 1.50 4♠ N +2 ♥T 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +1 ♠7 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Harken-Harken
450 0.50 3.50 4♠ S +1 ♥2 4-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Loops-Walker
|
25 |
♠J96
♥J84
♦Q832
♣973
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠3 1-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Pearce-Pearce
100 3.50 0.50 3N E -1 ♠3 3-Ruggeri-Kobland vs 1-Tidmore-Traback
600 1.50 2.50 3N E ♠3 5-Graves-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
600 1.50 2.50 3N E ♦5 2-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Harken-Harken
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠3 4-Davidson-Downing vs 3-Loops-Walker
|