1 |
♠QT2
♥T64
♦T654
♣AJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♠ 1NT ♣5 ♦4/5 ♥3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3/4♥ ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
590 5.92 0.08 4♠* S ♥5 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 12-Barr-Barr
420 4.75 1.25 4♠ S ♥5 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 8-Harken-Tainty
100 3.58 2.42 5♠ E -2 ♠A 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
50 2.42 3.58 4♥ E -1 ♠A 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
50 0.67 5.33 4♠ S -1 ♥5 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.67 5.33 4♠ S -1 ♥2 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
|
2 |
♠AKQT93
♥Q92
♦Q
♣J98
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦4 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♥A 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♣A 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 8-Harken-Tainty
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♣A 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 12-Barr-Barr
110 4.17 1.83 2♠ N ♣A 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
200 0.67 5.33 4♠ N -2 ♦A 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
200 0.67 5.33 3♠ N -2 ♣A 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
|
3 |
♠83
♥Q97542
♦982
♣J7
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♥ ♣4 ♦6/5 ♠6 NT6/5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.92 0.08 3♦ W -3 ♠3 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
200 4.17 1.83 4♣ E -2 ♠A 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
200 4.17 1.83 3♣ W -2 ♠8 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
100 2.42 3.58 1N W -1 ♠8 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.67 5.33 3♠ S -2 ♣A 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
100 0.67 5.33 3♥ N -2 ♦T 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 12-Barr-Barr
|
4 |
♠Q4
♥AKT982
♦J3
♣AK6
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/4♥ 3NT ♣5/6 ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 1♠ ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 5.33 0.67 4♥ N ♠A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
620 5.33 0.67 4♥ N ♦A 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
200 3.58 2.42 3♣ E -2 ♥5 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
140 2.42 3.58 3♥ N ♠A 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
100 1.25 4.75 4♥ N -1 ♠A 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 12-Barr-Barr
300 0.08 5.92 3♣ N -3 ♥Q 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
|
5 |
♠AJ7
♥63
♦AK64
♣QJ54
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 5.92 0.08 4♠ S +1 ♥2 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
500 4.75 1.25 4♥* E -3 ♠2 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
150 3.58 2.42 4♥ E -3 ♠2 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
130 2.42 3.58 3♦ N +1 ♣A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 12-Barr-Barr
50 1.25 4.75 4♥ E -1 ♠3 8-Harken-Tainty vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
100 0.08 5.92 2N N -1 ♥T 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
|
6 |
♠AKQ97
♥96
♦63
♣Q854
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1/-NT ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT7/6 |
EW: 2♦ 3♥ ♣5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 5.92 0.08 1N S +1 ♣6 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
100 4.17 1.83 3♥ W -1 ♠A 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
100 4.17 1.83 3♥ W -1 ♠A 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
100 2.42 3.58 4♣ N -2 ♥7 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
110 0.67 5.33 2♥ W ♠A 8-Harken-Tainty vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
110 0.67 5.33 2♥ W ♠A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 12-Barr-Barr
|
7 |
♠432
♥Q93
♦9654
♣J82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3N W -1 ♥3 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Harken-Tainty
180 4.75 1.25 2N E +2 ♠6 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
600 3.58 2.42 3N W ♦4 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
630 2.42 3.58 3N W +1 ♦9 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.67 5.33 3N E +2 ♠6 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
660 0.67 5.33 3N E +2 ♠6 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
|
8 |
♠K8762
♥A3
♦Q954
♣K9
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1/2♠ ♣2 ♦3 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3NT ♥6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 3♠ N +1 ♥K 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
150 4.75 1.25 2N E -3 ♠Q 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
140 3.58 2.42 2♠ N +1 ♥K 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.42 3.58 3♣ E +1 ♠4 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
180 0.67 5.33 2N E +2 ♥5 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 8-Harken-Tainty
180 0.67 5.33 1N E +3 ♥4 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
|
9 |
♠98
♥KJT74
♦AKT4
♣64
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2NT ♠4 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 2♥ N +1 ♣A 12-Barr-Barr vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
100 4.75 1.25 3♠ E -1 ♥2 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 3.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠T 8-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
50 3.00 3.00 3♥ N -1 ♣A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
100 1.25 4.75 4♥ N -2 ♣A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 0.08 5.92 3♠ E ♥A 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
|
10 |
♠A732
♥92
♦AQ95
♣KT2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 5.92 0.08 3N S +3 ♠5 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
150 4.75 1.25 1N S +2 ♥3 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
120 3.58 2.42 1N S +1 ♣9 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.25 4.75 3N S -1 ♥3 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.25 4.75 3N N -1 ♥5 8-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
100 1.25 4.75 2N N -1 ♥5 12-Barr-Barr vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
|
11 |
♠962
♥K98742
♦KT82
♣-
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ 1♠ ♣2 ♦4 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ ♥3 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 3♥ N ♣A 12-Barr-Barr vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
100 4.75 1.25 5♣* E -1 ♥3 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
50 3.58 2.42 5♣ W -1 ♥7 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
100 2.42 3.58 4♥ N -2 ♣A 8-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
130 1.25 4.75 4♣ E ♦5 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
550 0.08 5.92 5♣* E ♥3 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
|
12 |
♠T8
♥AT96
♦A7654
♣65
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦6 ♠5/4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♠ ♣4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3♠ W -2 ♣6 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
50 4.17 1.83 3♠ W -1 ♦A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
50 4.17 1.83 3♠ W -1 ♣6 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
110 2.42 3.58 2♠ W ♣6 12-Barr-Barr vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
140 1.25 4.75 3♠ W ♠8 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
420 0.08 5.92 4♠ W ♠8 8-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
|
13 |
♠Q753
♥65
♦K632
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 4♥ ♣5 ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♦9 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Harken-Tainty
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ E ♦8 12-Barr-Barr vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ E ♣A 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
140 4.00 2.00 3♥ E ♣A 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
200 1.00 5.00 3♥ E +2 ♠A 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
200 1.00 5.00 3♥ E +2 ♠2 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
200 1.00 5.00 4♣ S -2 ♥K 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
|
14 |
♠T8
♥6
♦Q9864
♣AQ542
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 6♥ 2♠ 4NT ♣5 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 2♥ E +3 ♦J 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♠4 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♥J 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 8-Harken-Tainty
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦3 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦3 12-Barr-Barr vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
450 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦3 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
480 0.00 6.00 4♥ E +2 ♦3 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠T
♥Q32
♦AJ8632
♣J76
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 2♥ ♣2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♠ ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 3♠ W +1 ♥2 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
450 2.50 3.50 5♠ E ♥A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥Q 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♥2 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ W +1 ♣6 12-Barr-Barr vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♥A 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
450 2.50 3.50 4♠ E +1 ♥A 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Harken-Tainty
|
16 |
♠Q72
♥J9853
♦J3
♣J87
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ ♣4 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 1♠ S +2 ♥A 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
50 4.50 1.50 1N S -1 ♣3 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 8-Harken-Tainty
50 4.50 1.50 2♦ S -1 ♥A 10-Formoso-Rodrigues vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
90 3.00 3.00 1N W ♥5 12-Barr-Barr vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.50 4.50 2♥ S -2 ♦5 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.50 4.50 2♥ N -2 ♦Q 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
120 0.00 6.00 2N W ♦3 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 13-Kobland-Davidson
|
17 |
♠KT6
♥JT8543
♦95
♣AK
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ 3♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♦A 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
150 5.00 1.00 4♠ W -3 ♣A 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♠9 12-Barr-Barr vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
50 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦A 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Harken-Tainty
50 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♦A 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
50 2.50 3.50 4♥ N -1 ♣T 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
100 0.00 6.00 4♥ N -2 ♠7 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
|
18 |
♠Q
♥82
♦J963
♣T96543
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 6.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♣6 7-Gumz-Emanuel vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
170 5.00 1.00 2♠ W +2 ♣T 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Harken-Tainty
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥8 4-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
420 3.50 2.50 4♠ W ♥8 11-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-O'Neill-Smart
430 2.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♥4 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ W +1 ♠Q 12-Barr-Barr vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
450 0.50 5.50 4♠ W +1 ♣T 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
|
19 |
♠9
♥AKQ8532
♦J5
♣J32
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2NT ♣3 ♦3 ♠5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 6.00 0.00 4♠ E -2 ♥4 8-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣9 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
50 4.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♣8 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
50 4.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♣9 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
100 1.50 4.50 4♥* N -1 ♣9 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
100 1.50 4.50 3♥ N -2 ♣9 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
300 0.00 6.00 3♥* N -2 ♣9 12-Barr-Barr vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
|
20 |
♠942
♥T3
♦KQJ73
♣K63
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 1♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 6.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♥4 5-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Osborn
630 3.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♥4 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 9-Nelson-Hartmann
630 3.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♥4 8-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Pearce-Pearce
630 3.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♥4 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
630 3.50 2.50 3N S +1 ♥2 12-Barr-Barr vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
140 1.00 5.00 2♠ S +1 ♦8 14-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
100 0.00 6.00 4♠ N -1 ♣9 1-Pringle-Vadas vs 3-Cowen-Hahn
|
21 |
♠Q965
♥T3
♦KQJT96
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ ♣3 ♥1 ♠3/4 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 5♥ 3♠ ♦4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 4♦ N -1 ♣K 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
200 4.17 1.83 3♥ E +2 ♦A 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
200 4.17 1.83 3♥ E +2 ♦A 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
230 2.42 3.58 3♥ E +3 ♠4 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
420 1.25 4.75 4♥ E ♦A 8-Harken-Tainty vs 12-Barr-Barr
450 0.08 5.92 4♥ E +1 ♦3 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
|
22 |
♠765
♥A85
♦QT87
♣AQT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥2 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 3♣ E -2 ♠2 2-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Foy-Morrissey
100 4.75 1.25 4♥ E -1 ♠2 6-Tidmore-Osborn vs 7-Gumz-Emanuel
140 3.58 2.42 2♥ E +1 ♠6 3-Cowen-Hahn vs 10-Formoso-Rodrigues
150 2.42 3.58 2N W +1 ♦7 8-Harken-Tainty vs 12-Barr-Barr
620 1.25 4.75 4♥ E ♣9 13-Kobland-Davidson vs 5-Calciano-Calciano
650 0.08 5.92 4♥ E +1 ♣9 9-Nelson-Hartmann vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|