1 |
♠J752
♥Q3
♦T876
♣K54
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ ♣2 ♦6/7 ♥0 ♠6 NT0 |
EW: 5/4♣ 6♥ 1/-♠ 6NT ♦6 ♠7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.83 1.17 4♥ W +1 ♠J 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
450 2.83 1.17 4♥ W +1 ♠2 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
480 0.33 3.67 4♥ W +2 ♠2 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
2 |
♠AJT2
♥A84
♦K75
♣J97
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6/5 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 2♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2♠ W -2 ♣J 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
110 2.00 2.00 1♠ W +1 ♠2 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
120 0.33 3.67 2N E ♥3 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
3 |
♠97432
♥8
♦A872
♣652
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 1/-♦ 4♥ 1♠ 3/2NT ♦7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 4♥ W -2 ♠9 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.00 2.00 4♥ W -1 ♠3 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
140 0.33 3.67 3♥ W ♠9 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
4 |
♠J5
♥QJ84
♦A875
♣A54
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣4 ♦5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 1♦ 1NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 3.67 0.33 1N W ♥4 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
130 2.00 2.00 2♣ W +2 ♥Q 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.33 3.67 4♥ S -2 ♠A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
5 |
♠KQT8
♥865
♦AJT964
♣-
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 3♠ ♣5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦1 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♠ N ♥7 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
300 1.17 2.83 3N S -3 ♥A 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
300 1.17 2.83 3N S -3 ♥A 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠AK73
♥9
♦Q5
♣K98652
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ -/1♠ 3NT ♥5/6 ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♥ S ♦A 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ N -2 ♦4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
130 0.33 3.67 3♦ E +1 ♣J 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠KT6
♥JT54
♦AQ5
♣Q53
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥6 ♠5 NT3/4 |
EW: 1/2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 1/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3♥ S -1 ♦T 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
200 1.17 2.83 2♥ S -2 ♠Q 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 1-Loops-Modest
200 1.17 2.83 2♥ S -2 ♦T 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
|
8 |
♠4
♥98
♦AKQT954
♣K76
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 1♠ ♣5 ♦2 ♥5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.67 0.33 3N S +2 ♣T 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
150 2.00 2.00 3♦ N +2 ♥7 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
130 0.33 3.67 2♦ N +2 ♠A 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 1-Loops-Modest
|
9 |
♠T54
♥KT
♦T85
♣QJ752
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦4 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 3♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2N W -1 ♥T 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
90 2.00 2.00 1N W ♣Q 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 1-Loops-Modest
120 0.33 3.67 1N W +1 ♥K 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
10 |
♠AT32
♥J8
♦K9
♣K8543
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♣ 2♦ 4♠ 3NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +1 ♦8 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Ray-Dau
650 3.25 0.75 4♠ S +1 ♣A 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
100 1.38 2.63 3♥ E -1 ♣T 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.13 3.88 4♠ S -2 ♦8 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
11 |
♠K
♥K654
♦QT63
♣AT53
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3/4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT3/4 |
EW: 2/3♣ 1/2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♠7 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Ray-Dau
50 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♠5 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 2.63 1.38 2♥ E -1 ♠5 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
400 0.13 3.88 3N E ♦K 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
12 |
♠5
♥KQ6
♦AK7642
♣Q93
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 2/1NT ♣5 ♥6 ♠6 |
EW: 2♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.25 0.75 3♦ N +2 ♥4 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Ray-Dau
150 3.25 0.75 3♦ N +2 ♦8 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
130 1.38 2.63 3♦ N +1 ♠2 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
300 0.13 3.88 3N N -3 ♣4 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠K8653
♥2
♦J832
♣J86
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♦ ♣5 ♦7/6 ♥2 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 2♣ 4♥ 5♠ 5NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 4.00 0.00 5♠ W -3 ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
100 2.50 1.50 4♠ E -1 ♥3 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Kobland
100 2.50 1.50 4♥ E -1 ♣K 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Davidson-Downing
180 1.00 3.00 2N E +2 ♣Q 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
790 0.00 4.00 4♥* W ♦2 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
14 |
♠A54
♥T862
♦T62
♣965
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦2 ♥4 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ W ♥8 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
140 3.00 1.00 3♠ E ♥A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♥6 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Kobland
400 1.50 2.50 3N W ♥2 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Davidson-Downing
430 0.00 4.00 3N W +1 ♥2 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
15 |
♠KQJ9653
♥92
♦AQ
♣Q7
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠8 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Davidson-Downing
50 3.50 0.50 4♥ E -1 ♠8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
430 2.00 2.00 3N E +1 ♠8 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 7-Walker-Kobland
500 0.50 3.50 4♠* N -2 ♣A 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
500 0.50 3.50 4♠* N -2 ♣A 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
16 |
♠J842
♥J72
♦Q3
♣J963
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.50 0.50 4N W +3 ♠2 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Modest
720 3.50 0.50 4N W +3 ♣3 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 8-Ray-Dau
1430 2.00 2.00 6♠ E ♣4 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
1470 1.00 3.00 6N E +1 ♣4 9-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
2220 0.00 4.00 7N W ♠2 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Walker-Kobland
|
17 |
♠J94
♥A654
♦76
♣AQJ8
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣5 ♥4 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 3♦ E -1 ♥A 9-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
50 2.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♦5 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 8-Ray-Dau
50 2.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♦A 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Walker-Kobland
120 1.00 3.00 1N E +1 ♥3 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Modest
150 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -3 ♦A 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠KJ2
♥A
♦A642
♣AJ873
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠3 9-Davidson-Downing vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♠3 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 8-Ray-Dau
150 2.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♠3 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
130 1.00 3.00 2♣ S +2 ♦K 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Walker-Kobland
110 0.00 4.00 3♣ S ♦5 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 1-Loops-Modest
|
19 |
♠Q964
♥J6
♦Q864
♣QJ2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 4.00 0.00 3N S ♣9 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
200 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +2 ♥5 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Walker-Kobland
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S ♠3 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ray-Dau
140 1.50 2.50 3♥ S ♠3 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
50 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -1 ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
|
20 |
♠8
♥T653
♦75
♣KJT942
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ ♦4 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♦ 5♠ 5NT ♣6 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♠8 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ray-Dau
100 3.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♦7 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
100 3.00 1.00 6♠ W -1 ♣J 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Walker-Kobland
650 1.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣J 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
680 0.00 4.00 5♠ W +1 ♣J 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
|
21 |
♠T652
♥-
♦AQ762
♣QT75
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 6♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣0 ♦1 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
640 4.00 0.00 5♣ S +2 ♥A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Ray-Dau
500 3.00 1.00 4♥* E -3 ♣A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ S +3 ♥5 3-Formoso-Nelson vs 2-Rodrigues-Pearce
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ S +3 ♣3 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 5-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ E -2 ♣A 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Walker-Kobland
|
22 |
♠7
♥T73
♦K7
♣AQJ7532
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 3♣ N +1 ♦3 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Davidson-Downing
110 2.63 1.38 3♣ N ♠K 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
100 1.38 2.63 2N E -1 ♣T 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♥5 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
23 |
♠T85
♥Q92
♦A6
♣QJT32
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 1NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.25 0.75 3N W -3 ♣Q 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
300 3.25 0.75 3N W -3 ♣Q 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
200 1.38 2.63 2N E -2 ♣Q 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Davidson-Downing
100 0.13 3.88 2♣ N -1 ♦3 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
24 |
♠T984
♥K962
♦T4
♣432
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 4♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ W -1 ♣2 2-Rodrigues-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
50 3.25 0.75 4♥ W -1 ♣2 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Davidson-Downing
300 0.75 3.25 5♣* S -2 ♥3 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
300 0.75 3.25 4♣* S -2 ♥A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Formoso-Nelson
|
25 |
♠632
♥63
♦QT54
♣KQJT
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦1 ♥1 NT2 |
EW: 6♦ 6/5♥ 5NT ♣6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.67 0.33 3♥ E +1 ♣7 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
620 2.00 2.00 4♥ W ♠2 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 7-Walker-Kobland
650 0.33 3.67 4♥ W +1 ♦4 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
26 |
♠KT82
♥6432
♦J6
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 1♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♥ S ♥8 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 7-Walker-Kobland
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ N -1 ♦3 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.33 3.67 3♥ S -2 ♦A 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
|
27 |
♠KT932
♥-
♦AKT72
♣Q52
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 4♠ 4NT ♥4 |
EW: 1/3♥ ♣4 ♦5 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 2.83 1.17 4♠ N ♥4 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
420 2.83 1.17 4♠ N ♣9 5-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 0.33 3.67 5♠ N -3 ♣9 10-Shoemaker-Gassman vs 7-Walker-Kobland
|