1 |
♠Q974
♥AK9
♦KQ3
♣T52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5/6 ♦3 ♥5 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1/3NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 2N W -2 ♣T 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -2 ♣A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
130 0.33 3.67 2♦ E +2 ♣9 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Downing-Davidson
|
2 |
♠Q97
♥K54
♦AQT
♣JT85
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♠ ♦4 ♥3 NT4/5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 2NT ♣6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 2♥ E +1 ♠J 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
170 2.00 2.00 2♥ E +2 ♣4 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Downing-Davidson
420 0.33 3.67 4♥ E ♣4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
3 |
♠KT7
♥KQJT7
♦KQ9
♣52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♠ S ♥A 9-Harken-Harken vs 2-Downing-Davidson
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ S +1 ♣3 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.33 3.67 4♠ S -1 ♣T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
4 |
♠A987
♥8
♦7543
♣AJ94
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♠ ♦6 ♥5/4 NT4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.67 0.33 3N S ♠3 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 2.00 2.00 2N S +1 ♥J 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Downing-Davidson
90 0.33 3.67 2♣ S ♦9 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
5 |
♠J9
♥Q82
♦854
♣KQJ86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥3/4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.67 0.33 2♥ E ♦A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Downing-Davidson
140 1.17 2.83 2♥ E +1 ♦A 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
140 1.17 2.83 2♥ E +1 ♦A 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠A753
♥AT643
♦K9
♣K8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦6 ♥6 ♠5/6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 2♦ E -2 ♠Q 1-Loops-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
110 2.00 2.00 2♠ S ♥5 8-Ray-Dau vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
50 0.33 3.67 2♠ S -1 ♣6 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Downing-Davidson
|
7 |
♠3
♥96
♦T93
♣AKJT974
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦5 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 3♠ ♣2 ♥5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.67 0.33 4♣ N ♦5 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 1.17 2.83 5♣ N -1 ♠A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.17 2.83 5♣ N -1 ♠2 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
8 |
♠4
♥KQ985
♦A62
♣AK96
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣5 ♦3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ 3♠ 3NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.83 1.17 4♠ E -1 ♥T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 2.83 1.17 4♠ E -1 ♥2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Modest
170 0.33 3.67 2♠ E +2 ♥T 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
9 |
♠T76
♥Q932
♦8652
♣95
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♦ ♣0 ♥2 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♣ 5♥ 6♠ 1NT ♦6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 3.67 0.33 4♠ W ♦8 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
680 1.17 2.83 4♠ W +2 ♦8 9-Harken-Harken vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
680 1.17 2.83 4♠ W +2 ♦2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 1-Loops-Modest
|
10 |
♠AQJ643
♥83
♦Q87
♣K9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 6♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1460 3.88 0.13 6♥ S +1 ♦T 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
1430 2.00 2.00 6♠ N ♦2 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
1430 2.00 2.00 6♥ S ♣A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
680 0.13 3.88 4♠ N +2 ♣4 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Downing-Davidson
|
11 |
♠K
♥AJ3
♦AQJ6
♣AKQ97
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦0 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
940 3.88 0.13 6♦ S +1 ♠Q 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
450 2.63 1.38 4♥ S +1 ♠A 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
420 1.38 2.63 4♥ S ♠A 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
50 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 ♥2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Downing-Davidson
|
12 |
♠JT4
♥T9842
♦2
♣9752
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣5 ♦5 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♦ 1♠ 2NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 3♣ E -1 ♥A 1-Loops-Modest vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
120 2.00 2.00 2N E ♠J 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
120 2.00 2.00 1N W +1 ♦2 9-Harken-Harken vs 8-Ray-Dau
200 0.13 3.88 2N S -2 ♠6 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 2-Downing-Davidson
|
13 |
♠AJ863
♥J96
♦KQ5
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1/2♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3/4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥K 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.00 2.00 3N S -1 ♥5 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ N -1 ♥K 2-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -2 ♥5 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
14 |
♠KQJ5
♥A8
♦AQ98
♣852
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣4/3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♦6 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
430 3.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠6 2-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
420 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥3 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥3 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 0.50 3.50 4♠ N -2 ♥3 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
15 |
♠865
♥JT
♦JT86
♣KT82
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 4.00 0.00 1N S ♥9 2-Downing-Davidson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♥9 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♣J 1-Loops-Modest vs 9-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ S -1 ♣J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♠3 8-Ray-Dau vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
16 |
♠A62
♥Q52
♦9842
♣K75
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 3♦ 4♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠A 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠A 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♠2 2-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Modest
620 2.50 1.50 4♥ W ♦9 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
650 0.00 4.00 4♥ W +1 ♦9 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
17 |
♠AQT42
♥-
♦KJ5
♣Q9842
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/3♥ 2/3♠ ♣4/5 ♦4/6 NT4/6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1NT ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ N -1 ♥A 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
50 3.50 0.50 4♠ N -1 ♣3 2-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 2.00 2.00 4♠ N -2 ♣3 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
150 1.00 3.00 4♠ N -3 ♠3 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
200 0.00 4.00 4♠ N -4 ♣3 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
18 |
♠Q865
♥3
♦J52
♣K8654
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 2♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N N +1 ♦3 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
150 3.00 1.00 2♦ S +3 ♣7 9-Harken-Harken vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
140 2.00 2.00 1♥ S +2 ♣3 2-Downing-Davidson vs 1-Loops-Modest
110 1.00 3.00 2♦ S +1 ♦6 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Ray-Dau
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♣3 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
19 |
♠A976
♥QT5
♦K975
♣T9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.50 0.50 1N W -2 ♣2 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
200 3.50 0.50 1N E -2 ♦4 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
100 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♣7 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Downing-Davidson
100 1.50 2.50 1N E -1 ♣6 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
90 0.00 4.00 1N S ♥J 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
20 |
♠AJ73
♥J93
♦875
♣AQ7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2NT ♦6 ♥6/4 ♠4 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 3♠ ♣4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 3♣ S ♥A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ W -1 ♦8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Downing-Davidson
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ S -1 ♦K 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
110 0.50 3.50 1♠ W +1 ♦8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
110 0.50 3.50 1♠ W +1 ♦5 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
21 |
♠876
♥KQT
♦T9
♣T8742
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦2 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -1 ♠A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 8-Ray-Dau
180 3.00 1.00 2N W +2 ♣4 1-Loops-Modest vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♦T 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Downing-Davidson
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♣4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Harken-Harken
400 1.00 3.00 3N W ♣4 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 5-Nelson-Formoso
|
22 |
♠AK97
♥K2
♦K8654
♣42
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.88 0.13 2♦ N +3 ♣A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Harken-Harken
130 2.00 2.00 3♦ S +1 ♣J 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
130 2.00 2.00 2♦ S +2 ♣5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.13 3.88 3N S -1 ♠2 2-Downing-Davidson vs 8-Ray-Dau
|
23 |
♠JT843
♥J74
♦2
♣T763
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣1 ♦5/6 ♥1 NT1 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3♥ W +2 ♦2 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ W ♠2 2-Downing-Davidson vs 8-Ray-Dau
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ W ♦2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
620 1.38 2.63 4♥ W ♦2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Harken-Harken
|
24 |
♠Q9
♥QJT863
♦J
♣J972
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣0 ♦0 ♠1 NT0 |
EW: 7♣ 7♦ 6♠ 7NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ W +1 ♦J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
940 2.00 2.00 6♦ E +1 ♣5 2-Downing-Davidson vs 8-Ray-Dau
940 2.00 2.00 6♦ E +1 ♣3 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Harken-Harken
1020 0.13 3.88 6N E +1 ♥5 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
25 |
♠KQ32
♥KJ963
♦J
♣AT8
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣6 ♦3 ♠6 NT5 |
EW: -/1♣ 4♦ 1♠ 2NT ♣6/7 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♥ N ♦2 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
100 2.00 2.00 5♦ W -1 ♠Q 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
50 0.33 3.67 3♥ N -1 ♦2 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
26 |
♠A5
♥KJ84
♦KJ6
♣AQJ2
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣6 ♦5 ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ -/1NT ♥6 ♠5 NT6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 2♣ E -2 ♥T 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
200 1.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♣9 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
200 1.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♣5 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
27 |
♠J96
♥Q862
♦AQ72
♣98
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2♠ 3NT ♦5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣2 ♥6 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.67 0.33 3♣ S +1 ♦K 10-Gassman-Shoemaker vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
110 1.17 2.83 3♣ S ♦4 8-Ray-Dau vs 1-Loops-Modest
110 1.17 2.83 2♣ S +1 ♦4 5-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|