1 |
♠J72
♥J952
♦83
♣AQT2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.00 1.00 1N W -2 ♥2 5-Swanson-White vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
100 2.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♥7 3-Frank-Kelly vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
100 2.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♥5 2-Foy-Foy vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
50 0.00 3.00 2♣ E -1 ♥7 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 1-Gassman-Garland
|
2 |
♠52
♥QJ92
♦9543
♣742
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT6 |
EW: 2/1♥ 1/-NT ♣5/4 ♦6 ♠6/5 NT7/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -2 ♦4 2-Foy-Foy vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
100 2.00 1.00 3♠ S -1 ♥3 3-Frank-Kelly vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
200 0.50 2.50 2♠ S -2 ♥4 5-Swanson-White vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
200 0.50 2.50 3♣ S -2 ♥4 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 1-Gassman-Garland
|
3 |
♠93
♥42
♦983
♣A75432
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥4 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♣K 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 1-Gassman-Garland
170 2.00 1.00 1♠ W +3 ♥7 2-Foy-Foy vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
630 0.50 2.50 3N W +1 ♣4 5-Swanson-White vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
630 0.50 2.50 3N E +1 ♣2 3-Frank-Kelly vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
|
4 |
♠T9
♥A964
♦JT8
♣K843
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 1♥ 4♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥6 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♠ S +2 ♣5 3-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Swanson-White
140 0.83 2.17 3♠ S ♣5 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
140 0.83 2.17 2♠ S +1 ♣2 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
|
5 |
♠Q652
♥5
♦AQJ72
♣K87
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 6♠ 4NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣4 ♦2 ♠1 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♥Q 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ S +1 ♥Q 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
170 1.50 1.50 2♠ S +2 ♥Q 3-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Swanson-White
|
6 |
♠K765
♥95
♦Q9752
♣K6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 1♦ 4♥ 2/3♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 4♠ E -2 ♠9 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 7-O'Neill-Smart
600 1.50 1.50 3N E ♥4 3-Frank-Kelly vs 5-Swanson-White
660 0.17 2.83 3N E +2 ♥4 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 2-Foy-Foy
|
7 |
♠KQ76
♥K
♦JT8762
♣62
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♦ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦4 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♥ S ♣J 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 3-Frank-Kelly
100 1.50 1.50 4♥ S -1 ♦5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Gassman-Garland
300 0.17 2.83 5♦ N -3 ♣2 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
|
8 |
♠K72
♥J763
♦AQ4
♣KT6
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5/6♥ 2♠ 5/6NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥1 ♠5 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.17 0.83 3N S +2 ♥9 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
460 2.17 0.83 3N N +2 ♣5 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Gassman-Garland
50 0.17 2.83 3N S -1 ♠4 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 3-Frank-Kelly
|
9 |
♠AJ974
♥T
♦J53
♣8753
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/3♣ 3♠ 2NT ♦4 ♥4 |
EW: 1♦ 2♥ ♣3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 1N S +2 ♣Q 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ E ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 1-Gassman-Garland
150 0.17 2.83 3N S -3 ♥7 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 3-Frank-Kelly
|
10 |
♠95
♥J853
♦K542
♣AK5
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦5 ♥5 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1/2♦ 2♥ -/1♠ 1NT ♠6/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.17 0.83 1N W -1 ♦2 1-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Foy-Foy
100 2.17 0.83 2♥ E -1 ♣2 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
110 0.17 2.83 2♦ W +1 ♣A 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Frank-Kelly
|
11 |
♠Q8
♥T65
♦J4
♣JT9632
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 3♠ W +2 ♣J 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Frank-Kelly
450 1.50 1.50 4♠ W +1 ♣2 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
460 0.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♣6 1-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Foy-Foy
|
12 |
♠2
♥J9876
♦AQ4
♣Q875
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦5 ♥6 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2/1♦ 1♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 2♠ E ♣3 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
170 1.50 1.50 3♠ E +1 ♠7 1-Gassman-Garland vs 2-Foy-Foy
450 0.17 2.83 4♠ E +1 ♥K 6-Sedey-McAdams vs 3-Frank-Kelly
|
13 |
♠K3
♥AK985
♦K52
♣AK7
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 2♦ 3♥ ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♠ -/1NT ♣4 ♦5 ♥3/4 NT4/7 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.95 1.65 4♠ E -1 ♥2 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 5-Swanson-White
300 1.65 1.95 3N N -3 ♠7 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
|
14 |
♠T83
♥AQ973
♦2
♣Q765
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦1 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 6♦ 6♠ 5NT ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.95 1.65 2♠ E +3 ♣2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
450 1.65 1.95 4♠ E +1 ♥4 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 5-Swanson-White
|
15 |
♠J864
♥KJT9
♦JT2
♣72
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 2/3♥ 3/2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 1.95 1.65 3N W -2 ♥3 8-Russak-Shoemaker vs 5-Swanson-White
120 1.65 1.95 2N W ♥J 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 4-Rodrigues-Collins
|
16 |
♠AT9
♥9852
♦KJ8
♣JT8
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2NT ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 |
EW: 3♦ 4/3♥ 5♠ ♣4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 1.95 1.65 5♠* E -1 ♣A 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Foy-Foy
130 1.65 1.95 3♣ S +1 ♥7 1-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Swanson-White
|
17 |
♠A642
♥-
♦T75
♣AKJT73
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 4♥ ♣4 ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 1.80 1.80 5♥ E -1 ♣Q 1-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Swanson-White
50 1.80 1.80 5♥ E -1 ♣4 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Foy-Foy
|
18 |
♠KJ96
♥AK4
♦9732
♣75
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ 3♠ ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
90 1.95 1.65 2♦ W ♥K 1-Gassman-Garland vs 5-Swanson-White
120 1.65 1.95 1N E +1 ♣2 7-O'Neill-Smart vs 2-Foy-Foy
|
19 |
♠A876
♥AQ5
♦K43
♣AK8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.83 0.17 1N N +2 ♠3 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 5-Swanson-White
50 1.50 1.50 2N N -1 ♠2 1-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Frank-Kelly
150 0.17 2.83 3N N -3 ♠3 2-Foy-Foy vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
|
20 |
♠JT9
♥Q9743
♦53
♣Q42
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♥ ♦3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♦ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♠A 1-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Frank-Kelly
200 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -2 ♥4 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 5-Swanson-White
100 0.17 2.83 5♦ E -1 ♣A 2-Foy-Foy vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
|
21 |
♠Q963
♥4
♦98632
♣Q62
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 1♠ ♣5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 1N E -2 ♠3 2-Foy-Foy vs 6-Sedey-McAdams
50 1.50 1.50 2♥ E -1 ♠3 1-Gassman-Garland vs 3-Frank-Kelly
140 0.17 2.83 2♥ E +1 ♦K 4-Rodrigues-Collins vs 5-Swanson-White
|