1 |
♠KT
♥QT943
♦T73
♣AT5
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♦ 5♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♠ ♦3 ♥2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.83 1.17 4♥ S +1 ♠A 9-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
450 2.83 1.17 4♥ S +1 ♣Q 6-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 0.33 3.67 4♥ S ♣4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Winham-Murdock
|
2 |
♠T7
♥A6
♦AQ5
♣AKQJ73
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 3♠ 5NT ♥6 |
EW: 1♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠4 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.83 1.17 3N N +3 ♥T 9-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
690 2.83 1.17 3N N +3 ♥8 6-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
170 0.33 3.67 3♣ N +3 ♥K 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Winham-Murdock
|
3 |
♠AQ53
♥K65
♦6
♣87542
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♥ ♦2 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 4/5♦ 4♠ 3/2NT ♣5 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3N E -2 ♥4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Winham-Murdock
140 2.00 2.00 2♠ W +1 ♦6 9-Cowen-Loops vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
630 0.33 3.67 3N E +1 ♥4 6-Wainer-Allen vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
4 |
♠85
♥J964
♦A652
♣932
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣4 ♦4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ 1NT ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 2♥ S +1 ♣A 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ S -1 ♦4 1-Loops-Xu vs 3-Winham-Murdock
120 0.33 3.67 1N W +1 ♥4 8-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠AKQ32
♥Q
♦AT3
♣9654
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ 1NT ♣4 ♦5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 2♦ E -1 ♠J 1-Loops-Xu vs 3-Winham-Murdock
100 1.17 2.83 2♠ N -1 ♥K 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
100 1.17 2.83 2♠ N -1 ♦7 8-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
6 |
♠5
♥J98
♦J972
♣QT963
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♠ ♦5 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 1♦ 1♥ 2/1NT ♣2 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 2N E -2 ♠A 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
100 2.00 2.00 3♦ E -1 ♠A 1-Loops-Xu vs 3-Winham-Murdock
620 0.33 3.67 4♥ E ♦Q 8-Davidson-Downing vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠AT853
♥QJ53
♦7
♣AK5
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3♠ N +2 ♥2 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Loops-Xu
170 2.00 2.00 3♠ N +1 ♣9 6-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Winham-Murdock
140 0.33 3.67 3♠ N ♥2 9-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
8 |
♠73
♥KQJ943
♦94
♣K93
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦0 ♥6 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♦ 6♠ 1NT ♣5 ♥5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 ♥8 9-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 ♥7 6-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Winham-Murdock
510 2.00 2.00 4♠ E +3 ♥5 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Loops-Xu
|
9 |
♠643
♥AKJ4
♦J3
♣KQT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: 1♠ ♣4 ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 1.17 2♥ S +2 ♠K 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 1-Loops-Xu
170 2.83 1.17 2♥ S +2 ♠8 6-Wainer-Allen vs 3-Winham-Murdock
140 0.33 3.67 3♥ S ♠5 9-Cowen-Loops vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
|
10 |
♠9874
♥AQJT
♦AQ3
♣85
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.25 0.75 2♥ S +1 ♠A 1-Loops-Xu vs 6-Wainer-Allen
140 3.25 0.75 2♥ S +1 ♦T 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
110 1.38 2.63 2♥ S ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.13 3.88 1N E ♥6 9-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
11 |
♠62
♥72
♦732
♣QJT985
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Loops-Xu vs 6-Wainer-Allen
480 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
480 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♠A 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
480 1.38 2.63 4♥ E +2 ♠6 9-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
12 |
♠AQ72
♥AKQ5
♦J7643
♣-
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 1♦ 2♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥4/5 ♠2 NT1/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
720 3.88 0.13 3N S +4 ♦9 1-Loops-Xu vs 6-Wainer-Allen
690 2.63 1.38 3N N +3 ♣4 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
120 1.38 2.63 2N N ♥8 9-Cowen-Loops vs 8-Davidson-Downing
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♦8 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
13 |
♠QJ862
♥-
♦T854
♣T763
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦0 ♥4 ♠2 NT0 |
EW: 6/7♣ 6/7♦ 3♥ 5♠ 7NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N W +1 ♠6 1-Loops-Xu vs 9-Cowen-Loops
640 3.00 1.00 5♦ W +2 ♦4 8-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
720 2.00 2.00 4N E +3 ♥K 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Winham-Murdock
1470 0.50 3.50 6N E +1 ♥K 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Wainer-Allen
1470 0.50 3.50 6N E +1 ♥3 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
14 |
♠AKJ9
♥Q83
♦KT84
♣J7
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3♥ 2/3♠ ♣4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ ♦5 ♥3 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♦9 1-Loops-Xu vs 9-Cowen-Loops
170 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +1 ♣A 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Winham-Murdock
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♣5 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 1.00 3.00 5♣ E -2 ♥A 8-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♦9 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Wainer-Allen
|
15 |
♠KJ2
♥K5
♦T87
♣QT642
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥3 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 4.00 0.00 2♦ E +1 ♥9 8-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
120 3.00 1.00 1N W +1 ♣4 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 3-Winham-Murdock
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ W +1 ♣4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Wainer-Allen
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ W +3 ♠J 1-Loops-Xu vs 9-Cowen-Loops
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♣5 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
16 |
♠K82
♥J73
♦654
♣8742
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦3 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 2N E ♠7 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
180 3.00 1.00 2N E +2 ♠7 3-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Davidson-Downing
210 2.00 2.00 1N E +4 ♠7 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Xu
600 1.00 3.00 3N E ♥4 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
630 0.00 4.00 3N E +1 ♠7 9-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Wainer-Allen
|
17 |
♠87
♥T
♦QJ832
♣KJT82
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 4♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣4 ♦4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 2♥ W +1 ♠8 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Xu
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♠6 3-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Davidson-Downing
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♦Q 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ E +1 ♣A 9-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Wainer-Allen
200 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -4 ♣7 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
18 |
♠A65
♥KQT52
♦Q92
♣K4
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1/2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♠J 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
140 3.00 1.00 2♥ N +1 ♠Q 3-Winham-Murdock vs 8-Davidson-Downing
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♠Q 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Loops-Xu
50 1.00 3.00 1N E -1 ♠3 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
90 0.00 4.00 1N E ♠5 9-Cowen-Loops vs 6-Wainer-Allen
|
19 |
♠QT73
♥A9754
♦965
♣9
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2/1NT ♥5 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♦ E -2 ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Cowen-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 2♥ N -1 ♦Q 6-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Davidson-Downing
110 2.00 2.00 2♦ E +1 ♣4 3-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
130 1.00 3.00 2♦ E +2 ♣4 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
600 0.00 4.00 3N W ♥5 1-Loops-Xu vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
20 |
♠A543
♥Q54
♦AQ6
♣Q96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3♥ 1/-♠ 2NT ♠7/6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥4 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♦5 1-Loops-Xu vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
120 2.00 2.00 2N S ♠8 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Cowen-Loops
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♠8 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
120 2.00 2.00 1N S +1 ♦3 3-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♠T 6-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
21 |
♠752
♥942
♦KJ62
♣Q82
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT1 |
EW: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♦2 3-Winham-Murdock vs 2-Vadas-Pringle
400 3.00 1.00 3N E ♠4 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♥2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Cowen-Loops
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♥2 6-Wainer-Allen vs 8-Davidson-Downing
420 1.00 3.00 4♥ W ♦6 1-Loops-Xu vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
22 |
♠K64
♥T53
♦A63
♣K753
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2/3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3N E -1 ♠5 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Cowen-Loops
630 1.38 2.63 3N E +1 ♠J 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Davidson-Downing
630 1.38 2.63 3N E +1 ♠5 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Winham-Murdock
630 1.38 2.63 3N E +1 ♠5 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Wainer-Allen
|
23 |
♠AQ84
♥-
♦KQT64
♣KQJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2/3♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: 1♥ ♣6 ♦2/4 ♠2/3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.88 0.13 1N E -3 ♥J 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Winham-Murdock
180 2.63 1.38 2N N +2 ♦4 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Cowen-Loops
100 1.38 2.63 1N E -1 ♥J 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Wainer-Allen
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ W ♦4 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Davidson-Downing
|
24 |
♠AK843
♥872
♦963
♣Q7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.88 0.13 4♦ W -1 ♠A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Cowen-Loops
130 1.38 2.63 4♦ W ♠A 2-Vadas-Pringle vs 8-Davidson-Downing
130 1.38 2.63 4♦ W ♠A 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 6-Wainer-Allen
130 1.38 2.63 2♦ W +2 ♠A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Winham-Murdock
|
25 |
♠AT9
♥T752
♦943
♣J94
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 4♠ E -1 ♣T 8-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Loops-Xu
180 2.00 2.00 2N E +2 ♣7 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
600 0.33 3.67 3N E ♣8 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
26 |
♠Q865
♥Q84
♦QJ873
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♦ -/1♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦6/7 ♥6/7 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
70 3.67 0.33 1♦ E ♠3 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 1.17 2.83 2♠ N -1 ♦9 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 1.17 2.83 2♠ N -1 ♣5 8-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Loops-Xu
|
27 |
♠J65
♥87
♦QT2
♣K9742
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 4/5♦ 4/5♥ 2/3♠ 2/5NT ♣6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
PASS 3.67 0.33 Pass Out 8-Davidson-Downing vs 1-Loops-Xu
460 1.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♣4 5-Avenmarg-Rodrigues vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
460 1.17 2.83 3N W +2 ♣4 10-Nelson-Formoso vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|