1 |
♠KQJ6
♥7432
♦K72
♣63
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣0 ♦4 ♥1 ♠4 NT2 |
EW: 7♣ 3♦ 5♥ 2♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 3.88 0.13 3♣ E +4 ♠T 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
420 2.63 1.38 5♣ E +1 ♠5 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 8-Miller-Slinger
460 0.75 3.25 3N W +2 ♠K 6-Loops-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
460 0.75 3.25 3N W +2 ♠K 9-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
2 |
♠QJT965
♥KJ3
♦KQ97
♣-
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 3.88 0.13 3N N +3 ♣2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
650 2.63 1.38 4♠ N +1 ♥9 6-Loops-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
230 1.38 2.63 3♠ N +3 ♥9 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 8-Miller-Slinger
200 0.13 3.88 2♠ N +3 ♥9 9-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
3 |
♠AQ732
♥73
♦J84
♣AQ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 5♠ 1NT ♥5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.88 0.13 4♠ N +1 ♥A 9-Slinger-Loops vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
400 2.63 1.38 5♣ N ♥2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
130 1.38 2.63 4♣ S ♥T 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 8-Miller-Slinger
50 0.13 3.88 4♠ N -1 ♥A 6-Loops-Walker vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
|
4 |
♠AKT2
♥Q752
♦632
♣K7
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 4♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 3.88 0.13 4♠ S +1 ♥J 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Walker
630 2.63 1.38 3N S +1 ♥J 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
600 1.38 2.63 3N N ♣5 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
100 0.13 3.88 3N N -1 ♣T 8-Miller-Slinger vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
5 |
♠K92
♥942
♦T98
♣AT94
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.25 0.75 3N W -1 ♦T 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Walker
50 3.25 0.75 3N W -1 ♣4 8-Miller-Slinger vs 4-Johnson-Modest
140 1.38 2.63 2♥ E +1 ♣3 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
170 0.13 3.88 2♠ W +2 ♦T 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
6 |
♠J3
♥JT82
♦AJT72
♣T8
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 3/2♥ 1NT ♣6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 2♥ N ♣2 1-Black-Sterling vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 2.63 1.38 4♥ S -1 ♠2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 6-Loops-Walker
110 1.38 2.63 2♠ E ♦8 8-Miller-Slinger vs 4-Johnson-Modest
300 0.13 3.88 4♥* N -2 ♣2 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
7 |
♠KT82
♥Q3
♦Q86
♣J975
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/-♠ 2/-NT ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 ♠7/6 NT8/6 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 1♥ ♠6 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ E -1 ♠Q 6-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ E -1 ♣Q 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Modest
100 2.63 1.38 3♦ E -1 ♣Q 9-Slinger-Loops vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
110 0.13 3.88 3♦ E ♠6 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
8 |
♠AT9
♥QJ85
♦Q42
♣J74
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣4/3 ♦5/4 ♠4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 2♠ ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 3.88 0.13 3N S +1 ♦6 9-Slinger-Loops vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
50 2.63 1.38 4♠ E -1 ♥A 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Modest
170 1.38 2.63 3♠ E +1 ♥K 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 1-Black-Sterling
450 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +1 ♥A 6-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
9 |
♠85
♥K85
♦AT8632
♣86
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥3 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 3.88 0.13 3♦ N ♥2 9-Slinger-Loops vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
100 2.63 1.38 3N E -1 ♠K 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 1-Black-Sterling
150 0.75 3.25 4♣ W +1 ♠8 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 4-Johnson-Modest
150 0.75 3.25 4♣ E +1 ♦4 6-Loops-Walker vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
10 |
♠AQ974
♥KQ742
♦2
♣A8
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 6♥ 4♠ 4/2NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥1 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +2 ♥5 9-Slinger-Loops vs 8-Miller-Slinger
680 3.25 0.75 4♥ N +2 ♦A 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
650 1.38 2.63 5♥ N ♣J 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Johnson-Modest
630 0.13 3.88 3N S +1 ♦7 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
11 |
♠KT642
♥9542
♦75
♣A3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥4 ♠6 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 3♠ N -2 ♦A 9-Slinger-Loops vs 8-Miller-Slinger
460 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠4 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Loops-Walker
460 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠3 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
490 0.13 3.88 3N W +3 ♠2 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
12 |
♠KQJ4
♥54
♦K9
♣T9853
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 3.88 0.13 3N N ♦5 1-Black-Sterling vs 6-Loops-Walker
150 2.00 2.00 2N N +1 ♦8 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 4-Johnson-Modest
150 2.00 2.00 1N S +2 ♣7 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
110 0.13 3.88 2♥ S ♥6 9-Slinger-Loops vs 8-Miller-Slinger
|
13 |
♠765
♥JT43
♦K63
♣J92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣1 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♠7 4-Johnson-Modest vs 6-Loops-Walker
660 2.00 2.00 3N W +2 ♦3 1-Black-Sterling vs 9-Slinger-Loops
660 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠7 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
660 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠3 8-Miller-Slinger vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
660 2.00 2.00 3N E +2 ♠3 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
14 |
♠K84
♥AKJ7
♦Q532
♣AJ
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: -/1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ N ♠Q 8-Miller-Slinger vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
50 2.50 1.50 3♠ E -1 ♣3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
50 2.50 1.50 2♠ E -1 ♦T 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
140 1.00 3.00 2♠ E +1 ♦T 4-Johnson-Modest vs 6-Loops-Walker
470 0.00 4.00 2♠* E ♦4 1-Black-Sterling vs 9-Slinger-Loops
|
15 |
♠Q532
♥A7
♦T65
♣T953
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣1 ♦1 ♥1 NT3 |
EW: 6♣ 6♦ 6♥ 3/-NT ♠6/5 NT9/6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.50 1.50 5♥ W +1 ♣3 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠2 1-Black-Sterling vs 9-Slinger-Loops
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠2 4-Johnson-Modest vs 6-Loops-Walker
480 2.50 1.50 4♥ W +2 ♠2 8-Miller-Slinger vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
980 0.00 4.00 6♥ W ♣T 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
16 |
♠AK
♥Q986
♦KQ5
♣Q765
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 5♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 1N N +2 ♣5 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
120 3.00 1.00 1N N +1 ♣2 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
110 2.00 2.00 2♥ N ♥3 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Miller-Slinger
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♣2 9-Slinger-Loops vs 6-Loops-Walker
50 0.50 3.50 3N N -1 ♣2 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
17 |
♠T754
♥AJT6
♦QT2
♣K2
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
80 4.00 0.00 1♥ N ♣3 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Miller-Slinger
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
PASS 2.00 2.00 Pass Out 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Modest
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ N -2 ♣3 9-Slinger-Loops vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
18 |
♠AQT7542
♥Q97
♦Q7
♣8
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣2 ♦6 ♥2 NT5 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ ♦6 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 4.00 0.00 3♠ N ♥8 9-Slinger-Loops vs 6-Loops-Walker
200 3.00 1.00 4♠ N -2 ♥5 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠3 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 1-Black-Sterling
420 1.50 2.50 4♥ E ♠3 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Miller-Slinger
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♠K 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
19 |
♠A83
♥AKQ96
♦A3
♣Q63
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 5♦ 6♥ 1♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦2 ♥1 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +1 ♠6 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
400 3.00 1.00 3N S ♠4 6-Loops-Walker vs 8-Miller-Slinger
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠4 4-Johnson-Modest vs 9-Slinger-Loops
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠4 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
50 1.00 3.00 3N S -1 ♠2 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
|
20 |
♠AJ853
♥T7653
♦8
♣93
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3♥ ♦2 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 5♦ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3N W -1 ♠5 4-Johnson-Modest vs 9-Slinger-Loops
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ W +2 ♥T 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ W +2 ♥3 6-Loops-Walker vs 8-Miller-Slinger
150 1.50 2.50 3♦ W +2 ♣9 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
150 1.50 2.50 2♦ W +3 ♣9 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
|
21 |
♠J97
♥852
♦AKQ3
♣A95
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4/3♦ 4/3♥ 3♠ 4/3NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠4/3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 4.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♠K 6-Loops-Walker vs 8-Miller-Slinger
630 3.00 1.00 3N N +1 ♥6 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 5-Gamble-Henderson
600 2.00 2.00 3N N ♠K 1-Black-Sterling vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
100 1.00 3.00 3N N -1 ♣2 4-Johnson-Modest vs 9-Slinger-Loops
200 0.00 4.00 3♦ N -2 ♣8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Llacera-Llacera
|
22 |
♠3
♥QJ5
♦QJT65
♣AKJT
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ 3♦ 2NT ♥6 ♠5 |
EW: 1♥ 2♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +1 ♥A 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Slinger-Loops
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ N ♠6 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Miller-Slinger
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ N ♠4 4-Johnson-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 3.00 3♠ W -1 ♥K 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
200 0.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♥2 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 6-Loops-Walker
|
23 |
♠K7
♥KQ2
♦A752
♣T865
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣4 ♥5 ♠5 NT4 |
EW: 3♣ 2♥ 1♠ 2NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 3♠ W -1 ♥K 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ N ♥5 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Slinger-Loops
90 2.50 1.50 2♦ N ♥5 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 6-Loops-Walker
100 0.50 3.50 1N N -1 ♣3 4-Johnson-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.50 3.50 4♦ N -1 ♣7 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Miller-Slinger
|
24 |
♠62
♥KQ4
♦QJ9865
♣K4
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣2 ♥2 ♠2 NT3 |
EW: 5♣ 5♥ 5♠ 1NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♥ W -1 ♠6 2-Llacera-Llacera vs 8-Miller-Slinger
50 3.00 1.00 3♦ N -1 ♠A 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 6-Loops-Walker
140 2.00 2.00 3♠ E ♦K 7-Traback-Tidmore vs 9-Slinger-Loops
200 1.00 3.00 3♥ E +2 ♦3 4-Johnson-Modest vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
450 0.00 4.00 4♥ E +1 ♦3 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 1-Black-Sterling
|
25 |
♠97
♥3
♦JT98543
♣KQ5
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
EW: 6♥ 6♠ 2NT ♣3 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♦* N -1 ♥Q 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
710 2.63 1.38 4♥ W +3 ♦J 8-Miller-Slinger vs 1-Black-Sterling
1430 0.75 3.25 6♠ E ♣A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Slinger-Loops
1430 0.75 3.25 6♠ E ♣A 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
26 |
♠8643
♥A5432
♦AT4
♣4
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥6 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.25 0.75 2N W ♠8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Slinger-Loops
120 3.25 0.75 2N E ♥K 8-Miller-Slinger vs 1-Black-Sterling
150 1.38 2.63 1N E +2 ♥K 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
200 0.13 3.88 2♥ N -2 ♦3 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Modest
|
27 |
♠862
♥J876
♦Q986
♣42
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5/4 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 2♥ 2♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.88 0.13 3♦ W +1 ♠2 10-Wesolowski-Ruggeri vs 7-Traback-Tidmore
430 1.38 2.63 3N W +1 ♠8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Slinger-Loops
430 1.38 2.63 3N W +1 ♠2 5-Gamble-Henderson vs 4-Johnson-Modest
430 1.38 2.63 3N W +1 ♥6 8-Miller-Slinger vs 1-Black-Sterling
|