1 |
♠QJ85
♥AJ9
♦J4
♣J432
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦5 ♥5 |
EW: 2♦ 1♥ ♣4 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3♦ E -2 ♠A 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
90 4.75 1.25 2♦ E ♠A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
110 2.42 3.58 3♦ E ♠A 4-Miller-Graves vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
110 2.42 3.58 2♦ E +1 ♠A 1-Barr-Barr vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
110 2.42 3.58 2♦ E +1 ♠A 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
470 0.08 5.92 3♦* E ♠A 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
2 |
♠QT84
♥K864
♦QT94
♣3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2/1♠ ♣5/4 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 2NT ♥4 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
870 5.92 0.08 2♥* S +1 ♠9 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
200 4.75 1.25 3♠ W -4 ♥4 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♠9 4-Miller-Graves vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♦2 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
100 1.25 4.75 3♥ S -1 ♠6 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
120 0.08 5.92 1N E +1 ♣2 1-Barr-Barr vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
|
3 |
♠A
♥964
♦AKT763
♣A86
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 7♦ 7♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦0 ♥0 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 5.92 0.08 6N N +1 ♠3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
520 4.17 1.83 3N N +4 ♠6 7-Loops-Loops vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
520 4.17 1.83 3N N +4 ♣T 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
460 2.42 3.58 3N N +2 ♣4 4-Miller-Graves vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
440 0.67 5.33 5♦ N +2 ♠7 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
440 0.67 5.33 5♦ N +2 ♣T 1-Barr-Barr vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
|
4 |
♠T973
♥K654
♦KQ43
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 5.92 0.08 3N S +2 ♠2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
630 4.75 1.25 4N S ♣2 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
620 3.58 2.42 4♠ S ♥8 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
600 1.25 4.75 3N S ♥3 4-Miller-Graves vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
600 1.25 4.75 3N S ♣3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
600 1.25 4.75 3N S ♣3 7-Loops-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
|
5 |
♠QJT64
♥K9
♦A7
♣AQT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 3/2♥ 4♠ 4/5NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 5.92 0.08 4♠* N +1 ♥Q 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
660 4.75 1.25 3N N +2 ♠7 7-Loops-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
650 3.58 2.42 4♠ N +1 ♣3 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
620 2.42 3.58 4♠ N ♣3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
140 1.25 4.75 3♠ N ♣3 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
200 0.08 5.92 4♠* N -1 ♣3 4-Miller-Graves vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
|
6 |
♠KQ
♥AJ4
♦AK432
♣Q87
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 3♦ 6♥ 1♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦4 ♥0 ♠6 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1020 5.92 0.08 6N N +1 ♠8 4-Miller-Graves vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
920 4.75 1.25 6♣ S ♦J 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
490 3.00 3.00 3N N +3 ♠7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
490 3.00 3.00 3N N +3 ♣3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
420 1.25 4.75 5♣ N +1 ♠5 7-Loops-Loops vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
270 0.08 5.92 2N N +5 ♠8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
|
7 |
♠AJ987
♥T2
♦AQJ8
♣86
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/2♦ 3♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ 2NT ♣6 ♦4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 4♣ E -2 ♠2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
140 4.17 1.83 2♠ N +1 ♥8 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
140 4.17 1.83 2♠ N +1 ♣7 7-Loops-Loops vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 2.42 3.58 1N W -1 ♠6 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
90 1.25 4.75 1♣ W +1 ♠3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
200 0.08 5.92 3♠ N -2 ♣2 1-Barr-Barr vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
|
8 |
♠K6532
♥J972
♦AT7
♣Q
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ ♣6 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥4 ♠4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
500 5.92 0.08 5♥* W -3 ♠A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
100 4.75 1.25 3♥ W -2 ♦A 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
50 3.58 2.42 3♥ W -1 ♥A 7-Loops-Loops vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 2.42 3.58 4♠ N -2 ♥9 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
140 1.25 4.75 3♥ E ♣8 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
150 0.08 5.92 4♠ N -3 ♥3 1-Barr-Barr vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
|
9 |
♠Q52
♥A9874
♦3
♣AT74
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 4/3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦6/5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3/2 ♠3 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 5.92 0.08 4♠ S ♣3 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
200 4.75 1.25 3♠ S +2 ♠7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
170 3.58 2.42 3♠ N +1 ♣3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
140 1.83 4.17 3♠ S ♦4 7-Loops-Loops vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
140 1.83 4.17 2♠ S +1 ♥6 1-Barr-Barr vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
110 0.08 5.92 2♠ S ♣2 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
10 |
♠Q8
♥QT87
♦A852
♣KQ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 3♥ 2♠ 1NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 3♥ W -2 ♣K 7-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
100 4.17 1.83 4♥ W -1 ♣K 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
100 4.17 1.83 3♥ W -1 ♣K 4-Miller-Graves vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
110 2.42 3.58 2♥ W ♣6 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
140 0.67 5.33 3♥ W ♣K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
140 0.67 5.33 2♥ W +1 ♣K 1-Barr-Barr vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|
11 |
♠AK965
♥T2
♦T
♣AQ432
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 1NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3/2 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.92 0.08 3♠ N +2 ♦K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
170 4.75 1.25 2♠ N +2 ♥5 4-Miller-Graves vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
140 3.00 3.00 2♠ N +1 ♦K 7-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
140 3.00 3.00 2♥ S +1 ♦A 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
110 1.25 4.75 2♥ S ♦A 1-Barr-Barr vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
50 0.08 5.92 4♠ N -1 ♦4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
|
12 |
♠85
♥JT2
♦AJ95
♣K762
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦4 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2/3♣ 3♦ 4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 3N E -2 ♠4 4-Miller-Graves vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
180 4.75 1.25 2N E +2 ♠4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
200 3.58 2.42 3♥ W +2 ♣2 7-Loops-Loops vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
400 1.83 4.17 3N E ♠4 1-Barr-Barr vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
400 1.83 4.17 3N E ♠4 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
450 0.08 5.92 4♠ W +1 ♣2 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
|
13 |
♠JT2
♥K
♦J873
♣KQT63
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 1♦ 2♥ 2NT ♠5 |
EW: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 5.92 0.08 2♥ S +2 ♠A 4-Miller-Graves vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
140 4.75 1.25 3♥ S ♠A 1-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
110 3.58 2.42 2♥ S ♣4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
90 2.42 3.58 1N N ♣2 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
100 1.25 4.75 3♥ S -1 ♦2 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
140 0.08 5.92 2♠ E +1 ♥A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
|
14 |
♠AK743
♥9
♦T543
♣AT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 3/4♦ 3/4♥ 4♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥3 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 5.92 0.08 4N N ♥3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
420 4.75 1.25 4♠ N ♣7 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
200 3.58 2.42 3♦ W -4 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
140 1.83 4.17 3♥ S ♦Q 1-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
140 1.83 4.17 2♥ S +1 ♣8 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
50 0.08 5.92 4♠ N -1 ♣7 4-Miller-Graves vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
|
15 |
♠9762
♥K76
♦KT96
♣AT
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦3 ♥5 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 5.92 0.08 1N W -2 ♦6 4-Miller-Graves vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
50 4.17 1.83 3N W -1 ♦T 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
50 4.17 1.83 2N W -1 ♣T 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
90 1.83 4.17 1N W ♦6 5-Harken-Tainty vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
90 1.83 4.17 1N E ♥Q 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
430 0.08 5.92 3N W +1 ♦6 1-Barr-Barr vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
|
16 |
♠AQ932
♥9
♦8732
♣985
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣4 ♦6 ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♦ 2♥ 1NT ♦6/7 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.92 0.08 3N W -3 ♠3 1-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
90 4.75 1.25 2♣ E ♦5 4-Miller-Graves vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
100 3.58 2.42 3♠ N -2 ♦A 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
110 2.42 3.58 3♣ E ♠5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
150 1.25 4.75 2N W +1 ♠3 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
600 0.08 5.92 3N W ♠3 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
|
17 |
♠T74
♥J6
♦J3
♣987542
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♣ ♦2/0 ♥3/4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 5♦ 3♥ 3♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 5.92 0.08 3N* W -2 ♥J 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
110 4.17 1.83 3♦ W ♥6 1-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
110 4.17 1.83 3♦ W ♣5 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
200 2.42 3.58 5♣ N -4 ♠A 4-Miller-Graves vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
400 0.67 5.33 3N W ♣5 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
400 0.67 5.33 3N W ♣5 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|
18 |
♠AQ85
♥976
♦3
♣AKT52
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 2♠ 2NT ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♦ ♣1 ♥5/6 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
870 5.80 0.20 3♣* S +1 ♥K 8-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
150 3.00 3.00 4♣ N +1 ♠T 5-Harken-Tainty vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
150 3.00 3.00 3♣ N +2 ♦K 1-Barr-Barr vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
150 3.00 3.00 2♣ N +3 ♥5 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
100 0.20 5.80 3♦ W -2 ♥9 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|
19 |
♠A
♥KQ8
♦AK92
♣T9543
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 1♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 6.00 0.00 4N S +1 ♠7 7-Loops-Loops vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
450 4.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♠7 1-Barr-Barr vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
450 4.50 1.50 4♥ S +1 ♣J 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
50 1.50 4.50 6N S -1 ♠7 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
50 1.50 4.50 6N S -1 ♠7 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
50 1.50 4.50 6N S -1 ♠7 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
50 1.50 4.50 6N S -1 ♠2 4-Miller-Graves vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
|
20 |
♠632
♥J7
♦93
♣KJT864
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥2 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 4♦ 5♥ 6♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 4N E -3 ♣2 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
200 5.00 1.00 3♠ W +2 ♥7 1-Barr-Barr vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
650 3.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♦9 7-Loops-Loops vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
650 3.00 3.00 4♠ W +1 ♣J 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
650 3.00 3.00 4♥ E +1 ♦4 4-Miller-Graves vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
680 0.50 5.50 4♠ W +2 ♥J 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
680 0.50 5.50 4♠ E +2 ♦4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|
21 |
♠J6543
♥T87
♦93
♣K86
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 1♥ ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♥2 7-Loops-Loops vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
140 5.50 0.50 2♠ S +1 ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ S ♥2 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ S ♣T 4-Miller-Graves vs 1-Hahn-Cowen
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ S ♣9 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
110 2.50 3.50 2♠ S ♣9 5-Harken-Tainty vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
100 0.00 6.00 2♠ S -1 ♦4 1-Barr-Barr vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
|
22 |
♠Q97
♥852
♦AQJ52
♣54
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 5♥ 3NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥1 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.75 1.25 4♥ S +1 ♠A 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
450 4.75 1.25 4♥ S +1 ♠A 4-Miller-Graves vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
450 4.75 1.25 4♥ S +1 ♠A 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
420 1.83 4.17 4♥ S ♠A 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
420 1.83 4.17 4♥ S ♠A 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
50 0.08 5.92 4♥ S -1 ♠A 7-Loops-Loops vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|
23 |
♠J
♥JT96
♦K86
♣KQ764
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♥ 1♠ ♦4/5 NT4 |
EW: 2♦ 2NT ♣6 ♥6 ♠6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 5.92 0.08 2♠ S +1 ♥4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
90 4.75 1.25 2♦ E ♣3 4-Miller-Graves vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
100 3.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♦5 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
100 3.00 3.00 2♠ S -1 ♣T 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
200 1.25 4.75 2N S -2 ♦A 7-Loops-Loops vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
300 0.08 5.92 4♥ N -3 ♠8 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
|
24 |
♠J3
♥AK6
♦AQT
♣KT873
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣3 ♥4 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
180 5.92 0.08 2N N +2 ♦4 2-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Tidmore-Osborn
140 4.75 1.25 2♠ N +1 ♦4 5-Harken-Tainty vs 2-Rodrigues-Corgiat
110 3.58 2.42 2♠ N ♦3 4-Miller-Graves vs 7-Ruggeri-Brennecke
90 2.42 3.58 1N S ♦4 3-Vadas-Pringle vs 5-Emanuel-Gumz
50 1.25 4.75 3N N -1 ♠6 6-Foy-Morrissey vs 4-Kobland-Davidson
300 0.08 5.92 4♠* N -2 ♣A 7-Loops-Loops vs 6-Hartmann-Nelson
|