1 |
♠97
♥AQJ92
♦QT3
♣KT6
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1♠ ♣5 ♦5 NT6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ ♥5 ♠5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♥ N +1 ♥7 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 7-Miller-Graves
50 4.50 1.50 3♠ S -1 ♦4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 4.50 1.50 3♥ N -1 ♥5 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ S -2 ♦4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Tainty
100 2.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♦4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
100 2.00 4.00 2♠ N -2 ♦4 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
150 0.00 6.00 3N N -3 ♠Q 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
2 |
♠J32
♥KQ8
♦AQJ3
♣Q93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 4♥ 3♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 6.00 0.00 2N E -2 ♣4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
140 4.50 1.50 3♥ E ♠5 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 7-Miller-Graves
140 4.50 1.50 2♥ E +1 ♣4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
200 3.00 3.00 1N N -2 ♥5 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
400 2.00 4.00 2N N -4 ♥5 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
420 1.00 5.00 4♥ E ♦2 6-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
480 0.00 6.00 4♥ E +2 ♥J 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Tainty
|
3 |
♠KQ4
♥KQJ32
♦94
♣QT2
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ 6♥ 5♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
980 6.00 0.00 6♥ N ♣4 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
480 2.50 3.50 5♥ S +1 ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ S +2 ♠J 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 7-Miller-Graves
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♠8 6-Allen-Formoso vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♥6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 3-Harken-Tainty
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♦Q 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
480 2.50 3.50 4♥ N +2 ♦2 5-Barr-Barr vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
4 |
♠J
♥AQ53
♦A7632
♣QJT
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 2♥ E -3 ♦4 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
200 5.00 1.00 1N E -2 ♠6 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
140 4.00 2.00 2♥ N +1 ♣A 5-Barr-Barr vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
120 3.00 3.00 1N N +1 ♥4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
90 1.00 5.00 1N E ♠6 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Miller-Graves
90 1.00 5.00 1N E ♦4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
90 1.00 5.00 1N E ♦4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Tainty
|
5 |
♠K73
♥AT95
♦T9875
♣2
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ ♣4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 3♣ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 6.00 0.00 2♥ S +2 ♠8 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
110 5.00 1.00 3♦ S ♣A 6-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Tainty
50 4.00 2.00 3♠ E -1 ♥6 5-Barr-Barr vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
90 2.50 3.50 2♣ W ♦5 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
90 2.50 3.50 1♣ W +1 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Miller-Graves
100 1.00 5.00 3♦ S -1 ♣A 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
110 0.00 6.00 3♣ W ♦T 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
|
6 |
♠KT
♥AQ86
♦KQJ2
♣QJ7
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 6.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♠6 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♥2 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 7-Miller-Graves
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♣4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 3-Harken-Tainty
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♣3 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
400 3.50 2.50 3N N ♣3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
50 0.50 5.50 2N N -1 ♣3 5-Barr-Barr vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.50 5.50 4♥ N -1 ♠A 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
|
7 |
♠T63
♥AJT
♦T986
♣A82
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1/2♣ 1♦ 1♠ ♥5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 6.00 0.00 2♥ S ♣9 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Harken-Tainty
PASS 5.00 1.00 Pass Out 6-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
80 4.00 2.00 1♠ W ♦T 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Miller-Graves
90 2.50 3.50 1N E ♥5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
90 2.50 3.50 1N E ♥5 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
100 1.00 5.00 3♥ S -1 ♣9 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
110 0.00 6.00 2♠ W ♥A 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
8 |
♠AJ974
♥-
♦642
♣AQJ85
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♥ 7♠ ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ ♣2/1 ♥4 ♠0 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
510 4.50 1.50 5♠ S +2 ♦A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Harken-Tainty
510 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥4 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
510 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥4 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
510 4.50 1.50 4♠ N +3 ♥4 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
480 1.50 4.50 5♠ S +1 ♦A 6-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
480 1.50 4.50 5♠ N +1 ♥4 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Miller-Graves
100 0.00 6.00 5♦ E -2 ♠3 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
|
9 |
♠AJ9542
♥T8532
♦-
♣Q4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦6 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 1/-♦ 2/1NT ♦7/6 ♥5 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 4♣ E -2 ♠8 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
200 5.50 0.50 3♣ E -2 ♠Q 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 3-Harken-Tainty
140 3.50 2.50 2♠ N +1 ♣A 6-Allen-Formoso vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
110 2.00 4.00 2♠ N ♥Q 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
100 1.00 5.00 4♠ N -2 ♣A 5-Barr-Barr vs 7-Miller-Graves
300 0.00 6.00 4♠* N -2 ♣A 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
|
10 |
♠AKQJ632
♥4
♦J3
♣962
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♠ 2NT ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 |
EW: 4♣ 3♦ 4♥ ♠4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 6.00 0.00 4♠ N ♦T 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
200 4.50 1.50 6♥ E -2 ♠5 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 3-Harken-Tainty
200 4.50 1.50 5♥* E -1 ♠Q 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Miller-Graves
100 3.00 3.00 5♦ W -1 ♠A 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
100 2.00 4.00 4♠ N -1 ♦T 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
500 1.00 5.00 5♠* N -2 ♣A 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
620 0.00 6.00 5♣ E +1 ♠T 6-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
11 |
♠KT8
♥T984
♦843
♣AT9
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 2♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦4 |
EW: 3♦ ♣4 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 6.00 0.00 3N N ♠3 6-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
110 5.00 1.00 3♣ S ♦9 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
90 4.00 2.00 2♣ S ♦7 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ W ♣K 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 3-Harken-Tainty
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ E ♣K 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Miller-Graves
110 2.00 4.00 3♦ E ♣K 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
150 0.00 6.00 5♣ S -3 ♠Q 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
|
12 |
♠K7
♥Q864
♦852
♣9652
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♥ 1NT ♦4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 3♠ ♣3 ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 5♠* W -2 ♥4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
140 4.50 1.50 3♥ N ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
140 4.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♦3 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
100 3.00 3.00 4♣ S -1 ♦T 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 7-Miller-Graves
110 1.00 5.00 2♠ W ♣A 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 3-Harken-Tainty
110 1.00 5.00 3♦ E ♣A 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
110 1.00 5.00 2♦ E +1 ♣A 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
13 |
♠84
♥KJ764
♦J973
♣Q9
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ ♣1 ♦3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 3♥ N ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
150 4.00 2.00 4♣ E +1 ♥A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
150 4.00 2.00 3♣ E +2 ♣4 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 3-Harken-Tainty
150 4.00 2.00 2♣ E +3 ♣4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
300 2.00 4.00 4♥ N -3 ♠2 6-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Miller-Graves
620 0.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♠A 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
620 0.50 5.50 5♣ E +1 ♠A 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
|
14 |
♠QT964
♥AQ743
♦A8
♣5
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 2♠ ♦6 NT6 |
EW: -/1♦ ♣6 ♦6/7 ♥2/3 ♠3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 6.00 0.00 4♥ N ♣2 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
200 5.00 1.00 3♥ N +2 ♠8 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
170 3.50 2.50 3♥ S +1 ♦4 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
170 3.50 2.50 2♥ N +2 ♦5 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
140 2.00 4.00 3♠ N ♦9 6-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Miller-Graves
100 1.00 5.00 4♦ W -2 ♥A 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 3-Harken-Tainty
50 0.00 6.00 3♥ N -1 ♦5 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
|
15 |
♠A73
♥JT843
♦QJ74
♣3
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 1/-♦ 1♥ 2♠ 1NT ♦7/6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦6 ♥5 ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 6.00 0.00 3♦ W -3 ♣3 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
140 4.50 1.50 2♠ S +1 ♦A 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 3-Harken-Tainty
140 4.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♦2 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
90 3.00 3.00 1N N ♦9 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
50 2.00 4.00 3♦ W -1 ♣3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 1.00 5.00 2♥ S -1 ♦A 5-Barr-Barr vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
200 0.00 6.00 3♥ N -2 ♦9 6-Allen-Formoso vs 7-Miller-Graves
|
16 |
♠Q9643
♥AK2
♦K87
♣J2
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♦ 4♥ 3/4NT ♠6 |
EW: ♣3 ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 6.00 0.00 2♣ E -3 ♠A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
200 5.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♣J 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
170 4.00 2.00 2♥ S +2 ♣T 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
150 3.00 3.00 2N S +1 ♦4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
120 1.50 4.50 2N S ♠7 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
120 1.50 4.50 2N S ♠7 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Miller-Graves
50 0.00 6.00 3♥ S -1 ♣T 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
|
17 |
♠Q962
♥K8
♦AK92
♣T52
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 4♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦3 ♥5 ♠2 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 6.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♠3 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Miller-Graves
430 5.00 1.00 3N S +1 ♠5 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
420 4.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥6 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
50 1.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 ♥2 6-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
50 1.50 4.50 4♠ S -1 ♦8 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
50 1.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♥J 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
50 1.50 4.50 4♠ N -1 ♥4 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
|
18 |
♠Q2
♥K72
♦JT64
♣AQT3
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4/3♦ 2/1♥ 5♠ 5/4NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥5 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 6.00 0.00 3N N +3 ♥Q 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
650 5.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♦K 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 3-Harken-Tainty
620 4.00 2.00 4♠ S ♦7 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
240 3.00 3.00 2N N +4 ♥3 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
230 2.00 4.00 3♠ S +3 ♦K 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 7-Miller-Graves
200 1.00 5.00 2♠ S +3 ♦K 5-Barr-Barr vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
180 0.00 6.00 2N N +2 ♦9 6-Allen-Formoso vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
|
19 |
♠K42
♥AQJ6
♦96
♣JT52
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 1♦ 2/1♠ ♥6 NT6 |
EW: 1♥ 1NT ♣5 ♦6 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 5.50 0.50 3♥* W -1 ♠2 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Harken-Tainty
200 5.50 0.50 2♣ W -2 ♠2 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
140 4.00 2.00 1♠ S +2 ♣9 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
100 3.00 3.00 2♥ W -1 ♠2 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
90 2.00 4.00 1N N ♦K 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
PASS 1.00 5.00 Pass Out 6-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
50 0.00 6.00 2♠ S -1 ♦8 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Miller-Graves
|
20 |
♠J53
♥7632
♦AJ9
♣AT2
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 ♦5 |
EW: 1♣ 2♦ ♥4 ♠5 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 6.00 0.00 3N S ♠8 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
200 5.00 1.00 2♠ W -2 ♥6 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 4.00 2.00 4♥ N -1 ♦T 6-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
200 2.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♦8 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
200 2.50 3.50 4♥ S -2 ♦7 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Harken-Tainty
300 1.00 5.00 4♥ N -3 ♣6 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
380 0.00 6.00 2♦* E +1 ♥K 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Miller-Graves
|
21 |
♠KQT942
♥J
♦J53
♣AT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦6 ♥4 ♠6 NT5/4 |
EW: 3♣ -/1♦ 3♥ -/1♠ -/2NT ♦5/7 ♠6/7 NT6/8 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 6.00 0.00 2♠ N +1 ♥4 6-Allen-Formoso vs 5-Ruggeri-Hemrick
110 5.00 1.00 2♠ N ♥4 4-Smart-O'Neill vs 1-Pringle-Vadas
100 4.00 2.00 4♥* E -1 ♠8 2-Davidson-Kobland vs 4-Tidmore-Osborn
50 3.00 3.00 3♣ W -1 ♥J 3-Nathanson-Stone vs 6-Avenmarg-GUMZ
110 2.00 4.00 2♥ W ♣A 1-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Corgiat-Rodrigues
140 1.00 5.00 3♥ E ♠6 5-Barr-Barr vs 3-Harken-Tainty
200 0.00 6.00 2♠ N -2 ♥4 7-Morrissey-Foy vs 7-Miller-Graves
|