1 |
♠K7
♥KT65
♦AT
♣QT853
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 1/2♠ ♣5 ♦4 ♥4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3♠ E -2 ♣7 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Davidson-Ray
50 2.00 2.00 2♠ E -1 ♣7 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
110 0.33 3.67 2♠ E ♣7 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
2 |
♠A98
♥Q6432
♦QJ4
♣82
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♥ ♣1 ♦2 ♠5/6 NT4 |
EW: 5♣ 4♦ 1♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♥ N ♦A 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♦A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Davidson-Ray
130 0.33 3.67 4♦ E ♦2 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
3 |
♠KQJ
♥AK5
♦A54
♣9765
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♠ ♦4 ♥4 NT5 |
EW: 2♦ 2♥ 1NT ♣5 ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 3♠ N ♥T 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 5-Davidson-Ray
100 2.00 2.00 2♦ E -1 ♣Q 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
90 0.33 3.67 2♦ E ♣Q 7-Walker-Kobland vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
4 |
♠4
♥AKT2
♦AQ
♣KJT976
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 1♥ 2NT ♦6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♦ -/1♠ ♣3 ♥6 ♠6/7 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.67 0.33 3♠ E -2 ♣8 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 2.00 2.00 5♣ N -1 ♦4 5-Davidson-Ray vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
200 0.33 3.67 3N S -2 ♦5 1-Loops-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
5 |
♠T865
♥J82
♦Q95
♣J53
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦5 ♥4 ♠3 NT4 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3N E -2 ♦4 5-Davidson-Ray vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
50 2.00 2.00 3N E -1 ♥9 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 4-Harken-Harken
120 0.33 3.67 1N E +1 ♣6 1-Loops-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
6 |
♠Q3
♥AKJT984
♦5
♣QJ6
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♥ ♣2 ♦1 ♠2 NT6 |
EW: 5♣ 6♦ 4/5♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.67 0.33 4♥ N ♦K 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 4-Harken-Harken
300 2.00 2.00 5♥* N -2 ♣A 1-Loops-Miller vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
990 0.33 3.67 4♠* W +1 ♦5 5-Davidson-Ray vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
7 |
♠JT
♥AK842
♦AJ
♣KJT4
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ ♣6 ♦5 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: -/1♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♣6/7 ♥5 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.67 0.33 3♠ E -1 ♥J 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.00 2.00 3♥ N -1 ♠3 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 5-Davidson-Ray
110 0.33 3.67 2♠ W ♥A 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Loops-Miller
|
8 |
♠K
♥K9842
♦-
♣AKQ9632
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 6♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ ♣2 ♥0 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.83 1.17 5♥ N +1 ♠A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
480 2.83 1.17 4♥ S +2 ♣T 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 5-Davidson-Ray
450 0.33 3.67 5♥ N ♣T 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Loops-Miller
|
9 |
♠KJ7
♥KJT2
♦JT84
♣K3
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♥ ♦5 ♠5/6 NT6 |
EW: 2♦ 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.67 0.33 2♥ S +1 ♥5 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 1-Loops-Miller
50 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♥7 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 5-Davidson-Ray
600 0.33 3.67 3N E ♦A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
10 |
♠JT32
♥K
♦A9654
♣J87
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦6 ♥0 ♠2 NT1 |
EW: 1♣ 1♦ 6♥ 5♠ 6NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.88 0.13 5♠ W -1 ♣8 1-Loops-Miller vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣6 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ E +1 ♣3 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
680 0.13 3.88 4♥ E +2 ♠7 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
11 |
♠K73
♥QJ652
♦A943
♣A
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 5♥ 3♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.25 0.75 5♥ S ♠T 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
450 3.25 0.75 4♥ S +1 ♠T 1-Loops-Miller vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
430 0.75 3.25 3N S +1 ♣7 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
430 0.75 3.25 3N S +1 ♣4 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
12 |
♠J6532
♥A8
♦J95
♣Q53
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 ♥4 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 4♦ 3♥ 1NT ♠5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.88 0.13 3N W -4 ♠3 7-Walker-Kobland vs 4-Harken-Harken
100 2.63 1.38 3N W -2 ♠3 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
200 0.75 3.25 3♠* S -1 ♣A 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
200 0.75 3.25 3♠* N -1 ♦3 1-Loops-Miller vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
|
13 |
♠AJT8642
♥965
♦Q4
♣J
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1/2♦ 1♥ 4/5♠ 4NT ♣5 |
EW: 1/-♣ ♣7/6 ♦5 ♥6 ♠2 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣2 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♥A 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Walker-Kobland
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣6 1-Loops-Miller vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
620 2.00 2.00 4♠ N ♣6 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
300 0.00 4.00 3N S -3 ♦A 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 5-Davidson-Ray
|
14 |
♠QT532
♥J4
♦J76
♣963
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦3 ♥0 ♠5 NT1 |
EW: 3♣ 4♦ 5♥ 1♠ 2NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 4.00 0.00 4♥ E ♠A 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Walker-Kobland
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 1-Loops-Miller vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 5-Davidson-Ray
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ E +1 ♠A 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
15 |
♠AQJT
♥K985
♦42
♣J98
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 6/5♠ 3NT ♣6/5 ♥5 |
EW: 1♣ 2/1♥ ♦3/2 ♠1 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♥4 1-Loops-Miller vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣4 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
680 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣3 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 7-Walker-Kobland
650 1.00 3.00 5♠ S ♠9 4-Harken-Harken vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
100 0.00 4.00 5♠ S -1 ♥7 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 5-Davidson-Ray
|
16 |
♠6
♥AKJ72
♦AQ962
♣42
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT ♣5 |
EW: 1♣ ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 NT4/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
300 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -3 ♥T 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
300 3.50 0.50 4♣ E -3 ♦7 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
170 2.00 2.00 3♥ N +1 ♦8 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
140 1.00 3.00 3♥ N ♣A 5-Davidson-Ray vs 7-Walker-Kobland
100 0.00 4.00 3♠ S -2 ♣5 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Miller
|
17 |
♠KT
♥T8743
♦AQT8
♣KQ
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ 4♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦5 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠3 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
460 3.00 1.00 4N N +1 ♦3 5-Davidson-Ray vs 7-Walker-Kobland
450 1.50 2.50 4♠ S +1 ♥J 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Miller
450 1.50 2.50 4♥ N +1 ♠4 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
420 0.00 4.00 4♥ N ♠4 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
|
18 |
♠83
♥62
♦T7652
♣J764
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 3♥ 4♠ 4NT ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 4.00 0.00 2♠ E +2 ♣T 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 4-Harken-Harken
210 3.00 1.00 2N E +3 ♥6 5-Davidson-Ray vs 7-Walker-Kobland
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
420 1.50 2.50 4♠ E ♥A 9-Mohan-Mohan vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
690 0.00 4.00 4♠* E +1 ♥A 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 1-Loops-Miller
|
19 |
♠K986
♥KT
♦KQJ942
♣5
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 5♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♠5 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Ray
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♠2 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
420 2.50 1.50 4♥ S ♣K 1-Loops-Miller vs 7-Walker-Kobland
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♣K 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ S -2 ♣K 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
20 |
♠K4
♥QT643
♦T643
♣96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣2 ♦5 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
EW: 4♣ 1♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 3N W -2 ♥5 1-Loops-Miller vs 7-Walker-Kobland
100 3.00 1.00 3♣ E -1 ♠6 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
130 2.00 2.00 3♣ E +1 ♦K 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Ray
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♥K 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
150 0.50 3.50 3♣ E +2 ♣A 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
|
21 |
♠AQ54
♥KT96
♦6
♣AKQ3
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 5♥ 5♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
680 4.00 0.00 4♥ N +2 ♠6 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 5-Davidson-Ray
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♦3 4-Harken-Harken vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♦3 6-Tidmore-Traback vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
650 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♣2 1-Loops-Miller vs 7-Walker-Kobland
200 0.00 4.00 3♥ S +2 ♦3 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues
|
22 |
♠T76
♥KT2
♦Q54
♣QJ93
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ ♣6 ♥4 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 1/-♣ 2♥ 5♠ 4NT ♣7/6 ♦3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ W ♦5 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ W ♦4 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
620 2.63 1.38 4♠ W ♦4 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
650 0.13 3.88 4♠ E +1 ♦Q 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
23 |
♠AQ
♥AK2
♦K62
♣AQ876
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 5♦ 3♥ 7♠ 7NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦2 ♥3 ♠0 NT0 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
1470 3.88 0.13 6N S +1 ♠T 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
1440 2.63 1.38 6N N ♠5 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
180 1.38 2.63 1N N +3 ♣2 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
200 0.13 3.88 7N N -2 ♠5 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
24 |
♠J2
♥AT7432
♦6
♣A842
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♥ 3/2♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: ♣4 ♦6 ♥2 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♠K 2-Brennecke-Rodrigues vs 8-Nathanson-Cottel
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ S +1 ♦9 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 6-Tidmore-Traback
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 4-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
450 2.00 2.00 4♥ N +1 ♦2 7-Walker-Kobland vs 9-Mohan-Mohan
|
25 |
♠A82
♥Q9
♦JT8
♣KJT93
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦2 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 1♠ 1NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 3.67 0.33 3♣ N -1 ♦3 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 1-Loops-Miller
110 2.00 2.00 3♦ W ♣J 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Kobland
150 0.33 3.67 3♦ W +2 ♥Q 5-Davidson-Ray vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
26 |
♠9
♥KT93
♦7532
♣9874
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 2NT ♣5 ♥5 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ 4♠ ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
130 3.67 0.33 2♦ S +2 ♥Q 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Kobland
110 1.17 2.83 3♦ S ♥Q 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 1-Loops-Miller
110 1.17 2.83 2♦ S +1 ♥Q 5-Davidson-Ray vs 4-Harken-Harken
|
27 |
♠54
♥J9
♦QT632
♣K972
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♦ ♣6 ♥0 ♠1 NT1 |
EW: 5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣5 ♦5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♥J 8-Nathanson-Cottel vs 1-Loops-Miller
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♦3 5-Davidson-Ray vs 4-Harken-Harken
480 2.00 2.00 4♠ W +2 ♦3 10-Calciano-Calciano vs 7-Walker-Kobland
|