1 |
♠875
♥72
♦8753
♣QJT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥3 ♠3 NT3 |
EW: 2♣ 1♦ 3♥ 4♠ 4/3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♠ W -2 ♦8 7-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.50 1.50 4♠ W -1 ♠2 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
170 0.17 2.83 2♠ W +2 ♦8 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
2 |
♠K94
♥AKT
♦AK843
♣93
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 6♣ 4♦ 3♥ 6♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣1 ♦3 ♥4 ♠1 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
690 2.83 0.17 3N N +3 ♥3 7-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
650 0.83 2.17 5♠ S ♣2 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
650 0.83 2.17 4♠ S +1 ♦9 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
3 |
♠T9
♥K
♦AQJT92
♣J863
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4♦ 2♥ 1♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦3 ♥3 ♠6 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 2♠ N -2 ♥2 9-Davidson-Downing vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
130 0.83 2.17 3♦ N +1 ♠A 7-Harken-Harken vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
130 0.83 2.17 3♦ N +1 ♠A 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
4 |
♠Q72
♥AJ95
♦J8732
♣9
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣1 ♦1 ♠1 NT2 |
EW: 6♣ 4/5♦ 5♠ 5NT ♥4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 2.83 0.17 4♠ E -1 ♥7 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
620 1.50 1.50 4♠ W ♣9 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
650 0.17 2.83 5♠ E ♥8 8-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
5 |
♠K
♥AQ65
♦876
♣AJ874
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♥ 1NT ♦5 ♠5 |
EW: 1♦ 2♠ ♣6 ♥1 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 2.83 0.17 4♥ S ♦A 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ S +1 ♥2 8-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.17 2.83 4♥ S -1 ♥2 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
6 |
♠JT83
♥Q3
♦83
♣Q9762
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ ♦3 ♥4 ♠5 NT5 |
EW: 4♦ 3♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
110 2.83 0.17 1♥ E +1 ♠7 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
120 0.83 2.17 2N W ♠8 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
120 0.83 2.17 1N W +1 ♣6 8-Loops-Modest vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
7 |
♠J8653
♥J973
♦AT
♣K9
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/5♥ 3/5♠ -/3NT ♣4/5 ♦4/5 NT6/9 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 2.83 0.17 2♥ S +2 ♠9 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -1 ♥4 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
100 0.83 2.17 4♥ S -1 ♦J 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
|
8 |
♠JT98
♥KJ953
♦3
♣JT7
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥3 ♠5 NT2 |
EW: 3♣ 5♦ 4♥ 2♠ 4NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 2.17 0.83 3N W -1 ♠J 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
50 2.17 0.83 3N W -1 ♥5 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
210 0.17 2.83 1N E +4 ♥2 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
|
9 |
♠AQT8
♥KQ8
♦K76
♣J76
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 3♦ 3♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣3 ♦4 ♥3 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
430 2.83 0.17 3N N +1 ♥4 9-Davidson-Downing vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
400 1.50 1.50 3N N ♥4 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
180 0.17 2.83 2N N +2 ♥4 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
|
10 |
♠Q983
♥A3
♦J63
♣J732
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣3 ♦2 ♥2 ♠2 NT2 |
EW: 4♣ 5♦ 5♥ 4♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
600 2.83 0.17 3N W ♠3 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
660 0.83 2.17 3N W +2 ♠3 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Modest
660 0.83 2.17 3N W +2 ♠3 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
|
11 |
♠AKQ4
♥A6
♦QJ54
♣QJ3
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 1♥ 2♠ 2NT ♣6 |
EW: 1♣ ♦2 ♥6 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 2.83 0.17 3N N +2 ♥8 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
150 1.50 1.50 3♣ W -3 ♦Q 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Modest
100 0.17 2.83 3N N -2 ♣4 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
12 |
♠532
♥KQ5
♦Q7
♣AJT92
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3/2♣ 3♦ 3♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦4 ♥4 ♠4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 2.83 0.17 2♣ E -4 ♥4 7-Harken-Harken vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
150 1.50 1.50 1N N +2 ♠6 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
110 0.17 2.83 2♠ S ♥3 9-Davidson-Downing vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
13 |
♠KQJ65
♥Q2
♦AJ63
♣A5
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 4/5♦ 1♥ 3♠ 3NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥6 ♠3/4 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N N +2 ♥5 8-Loops-Modest vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
150 2.00 1.00 2N S +1 ♥5 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Davidson-Downing
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♣2 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 7-Harken-Harken
200 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♣2 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
|
14 |
♠T9862
♥K8
♦Q
♣AQ864
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 4♦ 5♥ 2♠ 4NT |
EW: ♣5 ♦2 ♥1 ♠4 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠A 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Davidson-Downing
450 2.50 0.50 4♥ S +1 ♠A 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 7-Harken-Harken
200 1.00 2.00 2♥ S +3 ♠K 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
100 0.00 3.00 4♣ N -2 ♦5 8-Loops-Modest vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
|
15 |
♠AKT9
♥876
♦T7653
♣8
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4/3♠ 1NT ♣4 ♥5 |
EW: 2♣ 2♥ ♦4 ♠3 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
800 3.00 0.00 5♥* W -4 ♠A 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 9-Davidson-Downing
300 2.00 1.00 5♣* E -2 ♠6 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
150 1.00 2.00 5♣ E -3 ♥A 8-Loops-Modest vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
110 0.00 3.00 3♣ E ♥A 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
16 |
♠KQ83
♥AT9
♦K4
♣KQ93
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 7♣ 4♦ 3♥ 5♠ 6NT |
EW: ♣0 ♦3 ♥4 ♠2 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
990 3.00 0.00 6N N ♥4 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
520 2.00 1.00 3N N +4 ♥8 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 7-Harken-Harken
490 1.00 2.00 3N N +3 ♥4 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Modest
50 0.00 3.00 6N N -1 ♥4 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
|
17 |
♠AT82
♥A54
♦AJT64
♣A
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♦ 4♥ 4♠ 3NT ♣6 |
EW: ♣6 ♦2/3 ♥3 ♠3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 3.00 0.00 3♥ S +2 ♠4 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 7-Harken-Harken
90 2.00 1.00 1N N ♣Q 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Modest
100 0.50 2.50 3N N -2 ♣K 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
100 0.50 2.50 2N S -2 ♣2 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
|
18 |
♠875
♥AKT43
♦QT52
♣9
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 3♥ 1♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦5 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
170 3.00 0.00 2♥ N +2 ♦A 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
140 1.50 1.50 3♥ N ♠J 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
140 1.50 1.50 2♥ N +1 ♦A 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 8-Loops-Modest
500 0.00 3.00 3N S -5 ♠4 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
19 |
♠964
♥-
♦Q9542
♣AQJ75
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ ♦6 ♥3 ♠6 NT4 |
EW: -/1♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣3 ♦6/7 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 3.00 0.00 3♥ W -1 ♦5 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
100 2.00 1.00 5♣* N -1 ♥9 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
140 1.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♦2 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
170 0.00 3.00 3♥ W +1 ♦4 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
20 |
♠AQ4
♥QJT
♦A752
♣A96
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 4♦ 5♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦3 ♥2 ♠4 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
660 3.00 0.00 3N S +2 ♠2 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
630 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦6 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 7-Harken-Harken
630 1.50 1.50 3N N +1 ♦6 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
200 0.00 3.00 6N N -2 ♠2 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
|
21 |
♠J98
♥64
♦J643
♣AK84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 5♠ 2NT ♥5 |
EW: ♣4 ♦1 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♦9 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 9-Davidson-Downing
650 2.50 0.50 4♠ S +1 ♣Q 1-Mohan-Mohan vs 7-Harken-Harken
620 1.00 2.00 4♠ S ♣Q 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke
170 0.00 3.00 3♠ S +1 ♣Q 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 5-Pearce-Avenmarg
|
22 |
♠AK98
♥Q963
♦T95
♣Q3
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ 1NT ♣6 ♦6 ♥6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣6 ♥6 ♠6 NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 3.00 0.00 1N S +1 ♥4 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
90 2.00 1.00 1N S ♥4 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
PASS 1.00 2.00 Pass Out 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 8-Loops-Modest
100 0.00 3.00 2N N -2 ♣9 7-Harken-Harken vs 9-Davidson-Downing
|
23 |
♠Q5
♥Q96432
♦Q84
♣QJ
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♠ ♣3 ♦4 ♥5 NT2/3 |
EW: 3♣ 3♦ 2♥ 4NT ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
400 3.00 0.00 3♠ W -4 ♥6 7-Harken-Harken vs 9-Davidson-Downing
110 2.00 1.00 3♣ E ♦A 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
130 1.00 2.00 2♣ E +2 ♠2 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
660 0.00 3.00 3N W +2 ♥4 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
24 |
♠KQ65
♥K75
♦Q642
♣QJ
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♠ 1NT ♣2 ♦2 ♥3 |
EW: 5♣ 3♦ 3♥ ♠5 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
420 3.00 0.00 4♠ S ♣9 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
140 2.00 1.00 3♠ N ♣T 7-Harken-Harken vs 9-Davidson-Downing
100 1.00 2.00 5♣* W -1 ♠K 4-Calciano-Calciano vs 3-Pringle-Vadas
200 0.00 3.00 2♥ E +3 ♣A 2-Rodrigues-Brennecke vs 8-Loops-Modest
|
25 |
♠A765
♥5
♦KQJ7
♣A654
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♥ 6♠ 3NT ♦6 |
EW: 1♦ ♣5 ♥3 ♠1 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♠4 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 7-Harken-Harken
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣K 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Davidson-Downing
480 2.00 1.00 4♠ S +2 ♣K 8-Loops-Modest vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
50 0.00 3.00 4♠ S -1 ♠4 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
|
26 |
♠AT32
♥K984
♦3
♣K872
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2♠ ♣2 ♦2 NT2 |
EW: 5♣ 5♦ 5NT ♥4 ♠4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 0.00 1N S +2 ♥4 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
130 2.00 1.00 3♦ E +1 ♥Q 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Davidson-Downing
600 0.50 2.50 3N W ♠2 8-Loops-Modest vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
600 0.50 2.50 5♦ E ♥Q 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 7-Harken-Harken
|
27 |
♠A984
♥K82
♦T986
♣75
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♣ 2♦ 1♥ 3/2♠ 2/1NT |
EW: ♣6/5 ♦5/4 ♥6/5 ♠5/4 NT6/5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 2.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♥4 8-Loops-Modest vs 1-Mohan-Mohan
150 2.50 0.50 1N S +2 ♥3 5-Pearce-Avenmarg vs 4-Calciano-Calciano
110 1.00 2.00 1♠ N +1 ♦Q 3-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Davidson-Downing
50 0.00 3.00 2♠ N -1 ♥3 10-Gleason-Gleason vs 7-Harken-Harken
|