1 |
♠QJ985
♥A2
♦KT9
♣AJ9
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 2♦ 2♥ 3♠ 5NT |
EW: ♣2 ♦5 ♥5 ♠3 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
460 3.50 0.50 3N S +2 ♦4 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 2-Harken-Tainty
460 3.50 0.50 3N N +2 ♦7 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♥7 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
430 1.50 2.50 3N N +1 ♦4 9-Stone-Miller vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
420 0.00 4.00 5♣ S +1 ♥9 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Kremers-Downing
|
2 |
♠T83
♥T53
♦6
♣AT9764
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4/3♣ 1♥ 3NT ♦3 ♠4 |
EW: 3♦ 2♠ ♣2 ♥6 NT3/2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
50 4.00 0.00 4♠ W -1 ♣A 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 10-Kremers-Downing
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W ♦A 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ W ♣A 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
130 1.00 3.00 3♦ W +1 ♣A 9-Stone-Miller vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
200 0.00 4.00 5♣* N -1 ♠A 8-Loops-Loops vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
|
3 |
♠Q2
♥A9865
♦AJT7
♣J6
|
Dlr: South Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♦ 4/3♥ 3/1NT ♣6 ♠6 |
EW: 1♣ 1♠ ♦3 ♥3 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♠ W -2 ♥5 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ S +1 ♠9 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 8-Loops-Loops
100 2.00 2.00 2♠ W -1 ♥A 9-Stone-Miller vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
50 1.00 3.00 4♥ N -1 ♠3 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Kremers-Downing
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ N -2 ♠T 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
4 |
♠74
♥A9
♦654
♣QJ9743
|
Dlr: West Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2/1♦ 1♠ ♣6 ♥6 NT5/6 |
EW: 1/-♥ 1NT ♣6 ♦5 ♥7/6 ♠6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 2♥ W -2 ♣7 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣8 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 10-Kremers-Downing
100 2.50 1.50 2♠ S -1 ♣6 9-Stone-Miller vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
200 1.00 3.00 3N N -2 ♣5 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 2-Harken-Tainty
400 0.00 4.00 3N S -4 ♥2 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 8-Loops-Loops
|
5 |
♠75
♥QT4
♦AQJ4
♣AJ84
|
Dlr: North Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 NT5 |
EW: 2♣ 3♦ 2♠ ♥3 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
620 4.00 0.00 4♥ S ♠8 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
170 3.00 1.00 3♥ S +1 ♠6 2-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Stone-Miller
140 2.00 2.00 3♥ S ♠6 10-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Loops-Loops
140 1.00 3.00 3♠ W ♥4 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
170 0.00 4.00 2♠ E +2 ♦2 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
|
6 |
♠Q
♥Q753
♦83
♣T65432
|
Dlr: East Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣4 ♦2 ♥2 ♠6 NT2 |
EW: 2♣ 4♦ 4♥ 1♠ 5NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
100 4.00 0.00 5♦ E -1 ♠A 2-Harken-Tainty vs 9-Stone-Miller
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ E ♠A 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
110 2.50 1.50 3♦ E ♠A 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
600 1.00 3.00 3N W ♠Q 10-Kremers-Downing vs 8-Loops-Loops
620 0.00 4.00 4♥ E ♠A 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
|
7 |
♠AK7
♥83
♦AQ973
♣QJ8
|
Dlr: South Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣5 ♦6 ♥6 ♠5 NT6 |
EW: 2♣ 1/2♠ 1NT ♦6 ♥6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
120 4.00 0.00 1N N +1 ♦3 2-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
100 3.00 1.00 3N W -1 ♦7 8-Loops-Loops vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
100 2.00 2.00 2♥ N -1 ♦4 10-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Stone-Miller
110 1.00 3.00 2♠ E ♥5 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
120 0.00 4.00 2N E ♥4 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
8 |
♠QJT973
♥A95
♦874
♣3
|
Dlr: West Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: -/1♣ 4♦ 4/5♥ 5♠ 3NT ♣6/7 |
EW: ♣6 ♦3 ♥1 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 4.00 0.00 4♠ N +1 ♣4 8-Loops-Loops vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
420 3.00 1.00 4♥ S ♣8 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
400 2.00 2.00 3N S ♥8 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
50 0.50 3.50 4N S -1 ♣5 2-Harken-Tainty vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
50 0.50 3.50 3N S -1 ♣5 10-Kremers-Downing vs 9-Stone-Miller
|
9 |
♠QJ
♥A9
♦AKQJT432
♣4
|
Dlr: North Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♦ 3♥ 1NT ♣4 ♠4 |
EW: 3♣ 3♠ ♦0/1 ♥3 NT1 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
190 4.00 0.00 4♦ N +3 ♥8 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Harken-Tainty
150 2.50 1.50 4♦ N +1 ♥7 9-Stone-Miller vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
150 2.50 1.50 3♦ N +2 ♥7 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
50 0.50 3.50 6♦ N -1 ♠7 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
50 0.50 3.50 5♦ N -1 ♣T 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 10-Kremers-Downing
|
10 |
♠AJ
♥T642
♦753
♣AK63
|
Dlr: East Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♥ 2NT ♣5 ♦4 ♠3 |
EW: 2♣ 2♦ 3♠ ♥4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣J 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 10-Kremers-Downing
140 3.50 0.50 3♥ S ♣J 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
90 2.00 2.00 2♦ W ♣A 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
100 1.00 3.00 4♥ S -1 ♠3 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 2-Harken-Tainty
110 0.00 4.00 2♦ W +1 ♣A 9-Stone-Miller vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
11 |
♠KT863
♥KJ9
♦Q98
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1NT ♣2 ♦4 ♥3 ♠6 |
EW: 5/4♣ 3♦ 3/4♥ 1♠ NT6 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.50 0.50 3N W -3 ♠8 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
150 3.50 0.50 3N W -3 ♠6 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
100 2.00 2.00 3♠ E -2 ♠3 8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
50 1.00 3.00 3♠ N -1 ♣A 2-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Kremers-Downing
110 0.00 4.00 3♦ E ♥7 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Stone-Miller
|
12 |
♠AJ974
♥T3
♦J632
♣K5
|
Dlr: West Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 1♥ 3♠ ♣4 ♦4 NT6 |
EW: 3♣ 2♦ 1NT ♥6 ♠3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ N +2 ♦4 8-Loops-Loops vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
140 3.50 0.50 1♠ N +2 ♣6 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 9-Stone-Miller
50 2.00 2.00 4♦ W -1 ♠7 1-Foy-Morrissey vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
90 1.00 3.00 1N W ♠7 2-Harken-Tainty vs 10-Kremers-Downing
100 0.00 4.00 2♥ S -1 ♣2 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
|
13 |
♠K8542
♥74
♦J3
♣AK92
|
Dlr: North Vul: Both
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: ♣6 ♦3 ♥2/3 ♠5 NT3 |
EW: 1♣ 4♦ 4♥ 2♠ 3NT |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥ E -2 ♠6 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 9-Stone-Miller
100 3.00 1.00 4N E -1 ♦5 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
140 2.00 2.00 2♥ W +1 ♣A 2-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Loops-Loops
200 1.00 3.00 2♥ E +3 ♠J 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
230 0.00 4.00 2♥ E +4 ♠J 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
|
14 |
♠KT
♥J965
♦KQ985
♣AK
|
Dlr: East Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 4♣ 4♦ ♥5 ♠3/5 NT4/6 |
EW: 2♥ 2♠ ♣3 ♦3 NT3 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 4.00 0.00 3♦ N +2 ♣5 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 9-Stone-Miller
100 3.00 1.00 4♠ E -2 ♦T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♣8 2-Harken-Tainty vs 8-Loops-Loops
50 1.50 2.50 3♠ E -1 ♣6 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
100 0.00 4.00 5♣* S -1 ♠6 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 7-Nelson-Hartmann
|
15 |
♠A87652
♥A
♦KQ52
♣96
|
Dlr: South Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 3♣ 5♦ 1♥ 5♠ 2NT |
EW: ♣4 ♦2 ♥5 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
630 4.00 0.00 3N S +1 ♥4 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
200 3.00 1.00 3♠ N +2 ♥T 10-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ N +2 ♥6 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Loops-Loops
170 1.50 2.50 2♠ N +2 ♦3 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
100 0.00 4.00 3N S -1 ♥4 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
16 |
♠KQJ
♥K6
♦KT953
♣T98
|
Dlr: West Vul: E-W
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 2♦ ♥3 ♠4 NT6 |
EW: 4♥ 3♠ ♣5 ♦4 NT5 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
200 4.00 0.00 4♥* W -1 ♠K 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 8-Loops-Loops
50 3.00 1.00 4♦ N -1 ♥T 7-Nelson-Hartmann vs 5-Xu-Emanuel
100 2.00 2.00 4♣ S -2 ♥4 10-Kremers-Downing vs 4-Pringle-Vadas
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♠J 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
140 0.50 3.50 3♥ W ♣T 6-Pearce-Pearce vs 2-Harken-Tainty
|
17 |
♠AK52
♥J
♦KQ83
♣KQT4
|
Dlr: North Vul: None
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 5♣ 3♦ 5♠ ♥5 NT5 |
EW: 2♥ ♣2 ♦4 ♠2 NT4 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 2-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ S +1 ♥A 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
450 3.00 1.00 4♠ N +1 ♥K 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Stone-Miller
200 1.00 3.00 3♠ S +2 ♥A 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
100 0.00 4.00 4♥ W -2 ♠A 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 10-Kremers-Downing
|
18 |
♠AJ543
♥74
♦J653
♣A7
|
Dlr: East Vul: N-S
|
|
|
|
|
Double Dummy Makes |
NS: 2♣ 5♦ 4♠ 2NT ♥6 |
EW: ♣4/5 ♦2 ♥6 ♠2 NT2 |
|
|
N-S E-W N-S E-W Contract Ld
150 3.00 1.00 4♦ S +1 ♥5 5-Xu-Emanuel vs 10-Kremers-Downing
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♠7 8-Loops-Loops vs 6-Pearce-Pearce
150 3.00 1.00 3♦ S +2 ♥2 4-Pringle-Vadas vs 1-Foy-Morrissey
120 1.00 3.00 2N S ♥2 2-Harken-Tainty vs 11-Rodrigues-GUMZ
100 0.00 4.00 3N N -1 ♥2 12-Cowen-Hahn vs 9-Stone-Miller
|